Shania Twain apologizes after receiving backlash for saying she would have voted for Donald Trump

Image result for Shania Twain apologizes after receiving backlash for saying she would have voted for Donald Trump

Shania Twain has apologized for saying that she would have voted for Donald Trump.

The 52-year-old Canadian singer released a statement on Sunday in which she clarified her comments made about the current president of the United States.

She said: ‘I would like to apologize to anybody I have offended in a recent interview with the Guardian relating to the American President. The question caught me off guard.

Clarification: Shania Twain has apologized for saying that she would have voted for Donald Trump, as she is pictured in LA back in September 

Clarification: Shania Twain has apologized for saying that she would have voted for Donald Trump, as she is pictured in LA back in September

POTUS: President Trump pictured with members of the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office in Florida on Sunday

POTUS: President Trump pictured with members of the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s office in Florida on Sunday

‘As a Canadian, I regret answering this unexpected question without giving my response more context.’

The That Don’t Impress Me Much hitmaker continued by explaining that she recognizes the sociopolitical climate and that her core values have been centered around being inclusive.

Twain said: I am passionately against discrimination of any kind and hope it’s clear from the choices I have made, and the people I stand with, that I do not hold any common moral beliefs with the current President.

Opening up: The 52-year-old Canadian singer released a statement on Sunday in which she clarified her comments made about the current president of the United States, as she is pictured back in September

Opening up: The 52-year-old Canadian singer released a statement on Sunday in which she clarified her comments made about the current president of the United States, as she is pictured back in September

‘I was trying to explain, in response to a question about the election, that my limited understanding was that the President talked to a portion of America like an accessible person they could relate to, as he was NOT a politician.

‘My answer was awkward, but certainly should not be taken as representative of my values nor does it mean I endorse him. I make music to bring people together. My path will always be one of inclusivity, as my history shows.’

Twain raised eyebrows in an interview with The Guardian published on Sunday.

The You’re Still The One hitmaker revealed that she appreciated Trump’s honesty and transparency.

Ouch: Twain raised eyebrows in an interview with The Guardian published on Sunday, as she is pictured performing in New York last August 

Ouch: Twain raised eyebrows in an interview with The Guardian published on Sunday, as she is pictured performing in New York last August

She explained: ‘I would have voted for [Trump] because, even though he was offensive, he seemed honest. Do you want straight or polite? Not that you shouldn’t be able to have both.

‘If I were voting, I just don’t want bulls***. I would have voted for a feeling that it was transparent. And politics has a reputation of not being that, right?’

Meanwhile Shania showed that she is still hip as she partied it up at Coachella last week with Nicki Minaj, French Montana, Timothee Chalamet, and members of Migos.

Source:www.dailymail.co.uk

EXONERATED: House Intel Committee Officially Votes to Shut Down Russia Probe After Finding NO Collusion

The Left-Right paradigm has never served Americans well.  Its failure stems from the fact that it offers only binary choices to complex issues. 

It does, however, serve the interests of international corporations and mega-banks whose nefarious plan for domination of the world’s commerce is relegated to the business section of news reporting while Americans are left arguing over whether Republicans or Democrats come closest to solving our problems.

The Deep State exists to serve these global commercial interests.

Donald Trump’s presidency has taken a wrecking ball to the Left-Right paradigm and now the Deep State’s political operatives have launched a major counter-offensive.

Over the past two days those political operatives have begun emptying their entire arsenal against President Trump in an effort to turn the midterms into Trump’s Waterloo.

Three major developments have taken place this week that find Democrats and, in some cases, establishment Republicans aligning to marginalize the president’s support and to restore the divisive paradigm that allows corporations and the international banking community to grow fat with proper scrutiny.

HPSCI Exonerates Trump

First, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence voted to release its 250-page report ending its months long investigation.  The vote went along party lines.

According to those with knowledge of its contents the investigation found no evidence that the Trump campaign, or any of his senior associates colluded with any foreign during the 2016 presidential campaign.

But, the Democrats on the committee, led by their ranking member, Adam Schiff couldn’t blast the Republicans fast enough and claimed the report was a partisan effort and ignored available evidence.

Mr. Schiff offered no evidence to support his claims.  Nor has Eric Swalwell or any of the other Dems on the committee.  Nor has special counsel Robert Mueller who was granted broad prosecutorial powers and who has also found no evidence to support those claim after 10 months of his investigation.

Combined with the megaphone of the globalist controlled propaganda arm, the mainstream media matrix, this is now a Democrat versus Republican (Left-Right) issue and no longer a search for the truth.  Truth be told, it never was a search for the truth.

Outcry Over Tariffs

This is a relatively simple issue but it has become convoluted under the parade of corporate and banking mouthpieces that tell us that we can’t win a trade war.  What they are really saying is that they can’t win a trade war.

Here’s the simple truth:  It doesn’t matter how many vehicles General Motors builds.  It matter how many vehicles Americans build.

The stock price of GM may matter to them but jobs should matter to you.

$1.3 Trillion Omnibus Spending Bill

Whenever Deep State defenders – and self-declared opponents of President Trump’s agenda – Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer get together to make policy you can be sure your interests are not being considered.

That became abundantly clear with yesterday’s vote on the bloated omnibus spending bill that exceeded 2000 pages and $1.3 Trillion. 

Those expected to vote on it had less than 24 hours to read it before being expected to make a decision on it. 

How do we call it bloated if we haven’t read it?  What else would you call a bill 14% more expensive than the previous, already bloated, spending bill that was expiring?  If you need more proof of the bloat check out Chuck Schumer’s gleeful declaration that it marks “the end of austerity.”

Austerity?  How can the “richest” country in the world have spent itself $20+ trillion into debt and have politicians claim that we need to spend even more?

Republican leadership intentionally scheduled the vote on the spending bill to occur virtually simultaneously to the president’s announcement that he was imposing tariffs on certain Chinese imports.  This allowed the mainstream media to blame the tariffs as the reason the markets were sent spiraling downwards. 

The intent was clear; diminish the market gains that Trump has been credited with since his election, something that many believe is his singular accomplishment.

All of these events are meant to convince you that you were wrong about Trump and they were right and to restore the Left-Right paradigm.

Trump can destroy the establishment’s charade by vetoing the spending bill and forcing every member of Congress to return to Washington and defend their actions before the people they purport to serve.

As we wrote yesterday:

President Trump knows that if this is the best Congress can do then he should call their bluff and veto the omnibus.  At the end of the day a shutdown will be much more painful to those politicians and their constituents who rely on the money than to his supporters who will be called on to foot the bill.

Mr. President punish the Deep State before they punish you.

End the Left-Right paradigm now!

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Breaking: Voting Machine Miscalibrated

Image result for breaking news

Republicans have discovered that the voting machines used during Pennsylvania election were miscalibrated.

From (Link: freebeacon.com)

Republicans are citing numerous problems at polling sites in Tuesday’s special election in Pennsylvania, which remains too close to officially call but appears to be trending toward an extremely narrow victory for Democrat Conor Lamb.

Lamb currently leads Republican Rick Saccone by just 627 votes and there are still absentee and provisional ballots that have not been tabulated, but Republicans are already preparing for the likely recount and even a possible lawsuit regarding issues at polling sites, according to a Republican source familiar with the deliberations.

“We’re actively investigating three instances and likely to file court action on them,” the source said.

Among the listed concerns are “miscalibrated” voting machines in Allegheny County, the only county of four in the district that went for Lamb, according to the source, who said there have been many reports of voters who intended to vote for Saccone ending up casting a ballot for Lamb.

Furthermore, Republicans say their attorneys were ejected from polling sites as the absentee ballots were still being counted and that due to confusion caused by the Pennsylvania secretary of state website people were directed to the wrong polling locations.

Source:conservativepost.com

HILLARY CLINTON GOES NUCLEAR: Says ‘WHITE WOMEN’ Were Forced to Vote for Trump by Their Husbands

Hillary Rodham Clinton has been griping and moaning since her epic loss to President Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. The former First Lady and failed presidential candidate took her excuse tour to a whole new level of low over the weekend. She told a full audience during a conference in India that “white women” cast their votes overwhelmingly in Trump’s favor just because their husbands forced them to. As a white woman, I can say that this is entirely untrue.

The former Secretary of State spoke at the India Today Conclave event this past Saturday. She used another excuse for her loss in the 2016 presidential election. She blamed “white women” belonging to both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party who she claims would have voted for her if not for their husbands.

Clinton claimed at the event, “[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

“What happened in my election, I was on the way to winning white women until former Director of the FBI Jim Comey dropped that ill-advised letter; then my numbers went down,” she went on. “All of a sudden white women who were going to vote for me and standing up to the men in their lives were told she’s going to jail.”

Watch the video here.

In the past, Clinton blamed young women for her voting loss:

It’s looking more and more like Hillary Clinton’s political career is just about over. Now she’s stooping to blaming women for her voting loss? She’s supposed to be an ally to women. Not a smart move by the queen of mean.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Muslim Board Votes To Ban POTUS From District, Trump Gets Last Laugh With 2 Simple Words

Lat week, a Muslim council voted to officially ban President Donald Trump from stepping into their district.

They accused him of “bigotry.”

But, he easily got the last laugh and slapped the smiles off of their faces with just two words.

As the Muslim minority grows, their defiance of democracy in favor of Sharia Law grows too. Anyone who seeks to preserve our exceptional Western freedoms and rights is seen as an enemy,as the Quran commands the Muslims to physically and politically fight unbelievers until Islam is the only religion and governance.

According to our source, Mad World News, following London Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan’s footsteps, a Muslim-majority council in East London’s Tower Hamlets borough, which boasts the highest percentage of Muslims in the UK, has voted to ban President Donald Trump from the district, claiming that he is a bigot.

 

Unfortunately, the ban is not enforceable, because they are not endowed with the power to legislate such actions. Even more damning to their cause, the council has been exposed at the center of several corruption scandals, including the quiet removal of a Muslim mayor who was convicted of bribing Muslim organizations.

Sharia enforcers Councillor Ohid Ahmed and Councillor Oliur Rahman led the ban, which passed on January 17, to ensure that President Donald Trump would not be allowed to step foot in their London district. It calls for President Trump’s planned state visit to the United Kingdom to be cancelled, adding, “Should the Government still choose to go ahead with State Visit, this Council makes clear that President Trump would not be welcome in our Borough.”

In response to the unofficial ban, Peter Golds, the leader of the Conservatives on Tower Hamlets Council, called out the Muslim council’s corruption, hypocrisy and attack on democracy.

“In 2015 one of the Tower Hamlets First election candidates tweeted “let us support Hitler the Great.” These people, corruptly elected, have no shame. For the record our group refused to vote in this farce.”

President Donald Trump would perhaps wish to avoid the Muslim borough anyway, since it boasts a major Muslim minority and equally disastrous crime rate.

“Tower Hamlets is home to one of the country’s most diverse communities,” the motion begins, adding that it “has the highest percentage of Muslim residents in England – 35 per cent compared with the national average of 5 per cent.”

Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.

Source: www.usafortrumponline.com

In the Dead of Night, Senate Votes To Steal HUGE Constitutional Right

In a morally controversial decision, the Washington state Senate passed a bill that is sure to anger many Americans and force numerous debates to take place. The bill that passed is called Senate Bill 6219, and it forces insurance companies to cover the cost of abortions and contraceptive drugs and procedures that are part of maternity care plans. This effectively will require companies to pay for women to have an abortion and the company no longer will have a choice other than to comply with the ruling or stop providing medical coverage for their employees.

Most Americans find it acceptable that birth control will be part of an insurance plan’s coverage, but many people do not wish for the abortion procedures to be covered. Many people, in particular pro-lifers, want for the abortion procedures not to be covered by insurance companies. This places businesses in a bind as they battle with the laws and conflict of being forced to pay for people’s abortions, even if they are morally or religiously against abortion.

Many people consider abortion to be a form of murder, compared to a form of birth control which prevents pregnancies – not ends them. Many others are touting this as a violation of people’s constitutional rights that mixes with the religious aspects, such as religious freedoms of which some might find abortion explicitly wrong to commit.

Businesses who provide medical coverage for their employees often do a fantastic thing for their workers, who then receive better outcomes and products from said workers. The businesses who are privately owned now risk losing one of their Constitutional rights that should have been left up to the business to decide. Not everyone is accepting of abortion, and no company should be forced to participate in the murder of an unborn child. This debatable topic will leave business owners with a tough line of decisions if the bill is successfully signed into law by Governor Jay Inslee. The bill will be sent to him where he must sign it officially into law.

The Daily Caller reported more on the controversial bill from Washington state:

“The Washington state Senate passed a bill Saturday mandating that insurance companies pay for abortions and contraceptive drugs and procedures for maternity care plans.

The state legislature passed Senate Bill 6219 in a 27 to 22 vote Saturday, according to KIRO7. The measure insists that any company who provides maternity care must also provide coverage for women who seek to abort. It also requires insurance companies to cover all contraceptive methods including drugs, implants, consultations and sterilization procedures. The bill does not allow exceptions for religious or moral objections.

“It’s vital that women have access to whatever contraceptive drugs, devices, products and services we need to manage our reproductive needs and overall health,” state Sen. Annette Cleveland, said in support of the bill, according to the Peninsula Daily News. “This legislation has been a long time in coming and will make a big difference in many women’s lives.” (RELATED: Washington State Considers Bill Requiring Health Plans To Pay For Abortions)”

It should also be noted that current Federal law does not allow taxpayer money to be used to pay for abortions. There are only two exceptions to that rule: 1) a woman is raped and wishes to abort the rapist’s spawn, and 2) a woman’s life is in danger during the pregnancy, and abortion must be completed to save the woman’s life. In the first case, the abortion should be done because women should not be forced to carry the child of a rapist, nor is there a need to bring more evil blood into the world. The second exception will save the woman’s life and allow her to continue trying for another child. Sometimes there are complications with pregnancies, and we should always seek to save the lives of the women who wish to bear children.

Abortion has been a hot topic in politics, and Planned Parenthood has been the face of child murder for a very long time. Planned Parenthood does provide some outstanding services for women, such as breast cancer screenings and affordable contraception, but they face a plethora of controversy in their line of work for things related to abortion and Margaret Sanger’s alleged disdain for African Americans.

Do you believe that businesses should be forced to pay for medical insurance that pays for abortions? What is your opinion on this bill?

House Votes 52-9 To Expel Sleazy Democrat For Sex Scandal In Liberal State

It is almost becoming laughable the number of Democrats that are being caught in scandals and crimes after years of pretending to take the moral high road. For years, we have heard the left claim how they are the paradigm of morality and that it is the Democrat party that stands for women right’s and so forth. Well, that is going to be a hard sell in the future for these faux do-gooder’s since most of their party now stands accused of sexual misconduct and corruption that can land many of them behind bars.

Over the last several months, the Democratic Party has faced one sex scandal after another, and it does not appear to be stopping anytime soon as these liberal politicians are being discovered for the perverts they are. Just in the last several months, two top Democrats Senator Al Franken and John Conyers were caught embroiled in disgusting sexual behavior that prompted them to resign from their political positions in power.

And, now just before the dust has settled another explosive sex scandal has emerged involving another Democrat that has the left reeling and another seat up for grabs after being expelled from office.

After Donald Trump won the election last November, the Democrat party has been in shambles as Democrat leaders desperately trying to pull itself back together again. With the 2018 midterm elections looming in not so far off distance, sexual misconduct scandals have rocked the Beltway resulting in numerous resignations, and now a stunning expulsion from office.
Rep. Steve Lebsock

Rep. Steve Lebsock from the ultra-liberal state of Colorado was just voted overwhelmingly to be expelled from office after numerous women have come forward with claims that this sleazy representative sexually assaulted them. The allegations are so horrible that it is entirely possible that Lebsock may serve jail time, and that is not all.

Here is more from Conservative Tribune:

“The Colorado State House voted overwhelmingly Friday to expel a Democrat member accused of sexually assaulting at least five women.

Fellow Democrats led the charge in a 52-9 vote in favor of the expulsion of Rep. Steve Lebsock, marking the first expulsion to occur in over 100 years, KDVR reported.

“We, as a general assembly, have responsibility to police our own, to hold our own to high level of accountability,” Democratic Majority Leader KC Becker, who introduced the legislation to expel Lebsock, said previously.

Five women accused Lebsock of sexual harassment and making repeated unwanted sexual advances.

State Rep. Faith Winter alleged that Lebsock grabbed her arm while she tried to leave a bar two years ago, described various sexual acts and grew angry with her when she refused to go home with him.

Lebsock has denied all the allegations.

“The last months have been awful. I have taken public attack, after attack, after attack while I have patiently stood by waiting for due process to take its course,” Winter told her colleagues during the hearing.

“Today is not about sex. It is about power.”

Some Republicans voiced concerns about whether due process had been afforded to Lebsock during the allegations and hearings.

However, many believed Lebsock abused his power in an effort to prove his innocence and retaliated against the victims by handing out a document that detailed the sex life of one of his accusers and other personal information.

Right before he was expelled, he quickly changed parties, according to his tweet.”

And, of course, the reactions on Twitter were priceless!

It is about time that these Democrat creeps hiding in power are exposed for their dirty deeds against women. For too long the left has claimed that they are the champions of women’s right, but that will be a hard sell for the upcoming midterm elections.

Now, this stunning revelation could prove to be good news for the Republicans who are running for office in the state of Colorado who may now just have a shot they need to slow the progressive liberal policies ruining the country on a daily basis.

It is about time that these sexual deviants in the Democrat party are exposed for their nasty behavior, but there is still one that needs to be held accountable for his actions, and that is Bill Clinton. The Democrats can continue to say they are sorry for their behavior and resign from office, but until Bill Clinton does it, the Democrat party will only stay mired in their own filth.

Source:Conservative Tribune,daily-vine.com

Schumer slammed for citing skin color in vote against white judicial nominee

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced a stern rebuke from congressional colleagues for citing skin color in voting against a white federal judge nominee earlier this week.

Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum, a white lawyer who is a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough in Greenville, S.C., “speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary.”

Sen. Chuck Schumer on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration’s nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum because he’s white. Schumer argued the nomination “speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary.”

He complained that many of Trump’s nominees have been white males. He also complained that Republicans previously held up two black judges nominated under the Obama administration for the position— which The Post and Courier notes has long been vacant.

“It is long past time that the judiciary starts looking a lot more like the America it represents,” Schumer said. “Having a diversity of views and experience on the federal bench is necessary for the equal administration of justice.”

The senator said that with Quattlebaum’s nomination, the Trump administration was “taking a giant step backwards” in terms of diversity.

Quattlebaum was ultimately confirmed to the district judgeship on Thursday, 69-29.

Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, slammed Schumer for his statements.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Thursday it was actually Schumer’s vote against Quattlebaum that was “a massive step backward.”

While Schumer “is not a racist,” Graham tweeted, “this was an absolutely shameful reason to vote against a very qualified nominee like Marvin Quattlebaum.” He added, “Voting against a highly qualified nominee because of the color of his skin does nothing to bring our country and nation together.”

Sen. Tim Scott, also a Republican serving South Carolina and the GOP’s sole black senator, tweeted, “Perhaps Senate Democrats should be more worried about the lack of diversity on their own staffs than attacking an extremely well-qualified judicial nominee from the great state of South Carolina.”

Democrat Voter Fraud: Pennsylvania Court Discovers 100,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote

Image result for Democrat Voter Fraud: Pennsylvania Court Discovers 100,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote

According to testimony submitted Monday in a lawsuit by the Public Interest Legal Foundation, Pennsylvania officials have admitted over 100,000 non-citizens have been registering to vote in the state.

The PILF argued that non-citizens have been voting in Pennsylvania for decades. That problem has been evident in other states the organization has worked with. Those states include New Jersey and Virginia.

State officials have previously stonewalled PILF requests for access to the data that could expose the problem.

Democrat Voter Fraud: Pennsylvania Court Discovers 100,000 Non-Citizens Registered to Vote

PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams stated:

“For months, Pennsylvania bureaucrats have concealed facts about non-citizens registering and voting. That ends today.”

Adams said the state already admitted that it allowed non-citizens renewing their driver’s licenses to have the opportunity to register to vote.

The American Thinker explains:

J. Christian Adams, a former federal prosecutor, through his work with the Public Interest Legal Foundation, is leading an effort to expose the extent of aliens voting in federal elections. For unexplained reasons, the officials are stonewalling release of official data. It appears that they have evidence already that should alarm everyone concerned with election integrity. This had far more influence than any Russian ads on Facebook.

February 26, 2018: The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a lawsuit today against the Pennsylvania Department of State for failing to disclose a reported 100,000 noncitizen registered voter records under federal law (PILF v. Torres et. al. 1:18-cv-00463).

In summary:

The Pennsylvania Department of State (DOS) refused the PILF’s rights to inspect or be furnished documents related to non-citizen registered voters either reporting their own unlawful activities or discovered thanks to a joint study with the Department of Transportation (PennDOT). The latter effort has reportedly revealed 100,000 cases of non-citizens currently registered to vote in the Commonwealth. The DOS’ actions constitute an apparent violation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

A core concern for the lawsuit stems from a report by City of Philadelphia Commissioner Al Schmidt to the Pennsylvania Assembly in 2017, which detailed how a DOS/PennDOT study of noncitizen driver’s license holders matched records belonging to roughly 100,000 current voters in the statewide registration database.

The DOS/PennDOT study was triggered in September 2017 after Pennsylvania officials admitted to a “glitch” that offered voter registration opportunities to all PennDOT customers regardless of citizenship status since the 1990s. Prior to the study, election officials only took actions to remove ineligible noncitizens from the rolls after they self-reported their statuses. A full accounting of how many registered and voted remains unclear due to the DOS’ intentionally limited transparency.

“For months, Pennsylvania bureaucrats have concealed facts about non-citizens registering and voting—that ends today,” PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said. “Before this lawsuit, the State admitted to a ‘glitch’ that exposed thousands of driver’s license customers to voter registration offers despite their non-citizen status since the 1990s. The Secretary of State abruptly resigned. DOS officials blocked federal public inspection rights. The PILF hopes to finally get answers about the true scale of non-citizen voting in Pennsylvania and assist lawmakers in crafting reforms that fix it.”

While Pennsylvania refused PILF record requests, the group did manage to obtain data from some counties, and found several curious cases.

One man, Felipe Rojas-Orta, cancelled his registration last year, filing a handwritten note saying he was not a citizen. He had, however, registered as a Democrat and voted in three separate elections, including most recently 2016, the year of the presidential race.

In addition, one woman had her registration cancelled in 2006 as a non-citizen. She then re-registered to vote twice and cast ballots in some elections. That woman, a registered Democrat, is still active in the system, the lawsuit says.

Another woman voted in 2008 and 2012. She had her registration cancelled in 2014 because she wasn’t a citizen. She then re-registered and voted in 2016, according to documents filed in court. She was registered as a Democrat.

“Time has run out on the Pennsylvania’s effort to hide embarrassing data about how the State failed citizens and immigrants alike,” said PILF’s spokesman Logan Churchwell. “The electorate deserves an informed debate on how we address unlawful noncitizen participation in our elections. Seeking this information is step one.”

Voter fraud has been rampant.

Trump disbanded the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity on Jan. 3 and asked the Department of Homeland Security to review its initial findings.

It will determine the next courses of action. The Commission was plagued by infighting, multiple lawsuits and push-back from many states. Slowly but surely, the information is coming through.

Source:joeforamerica.com

Jerry Brown Has Done It. Illegal Immigrants Will Vote In California

Outgoing Governor Jerry Brown, has signed into law a bill that will automatically register to vote people who obtain driver’s licenses from the DMV. California currently allows non-citizens to obtain Driver’s licenses.

LegalInsurrection.com reported: A California law, which goes into effect on April 1, automatically registers people to vote when they apply for a new driver’s license or new state identification card.

The Golden State permits anyone who claims to be in the country legally, even without proof, to obtain a license the law. So, logically, I anticipate that California will be getting a whole, new crop of illegal immigrant voters.

A new law in California that goes into effect this spring will automatically register people to vote – including immigrants who are in the country illegally.In 2015, the state passed a law called the California New Motor Voter Act to increase voter rolls by simplifying the process to register to vote.The legislation, which goes into effect April 1, will automatically register people who apply for a new driver’s license or new state ID at the Department of Motor Vehicles.

The new rules were created in response to a lawsuit claiming it was too challenging to fill out both a driver’s license application and voter registration form (despite the fact millions of Californians have done so for many, many years).

The settlement reached Jan. 10 ends eight months of litigation over California’s alleged violations of the National Voting Rights Act of 1993.The League of Women Voters and three other groups sued the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles and Secretary of State’s Office in May 2017, claiming the state burdens would-be voters by making them fill out the same information on two separate forms to register to vote.“We are very pleased that Californians will have easier access to voter registration,” said Jeremiah Levine, an attorney with Morrison Foerster who represented the voting rights groups. “We are especially satisfied that changes will be made before California’s statewide and federal primary elections.”The state agreed to roll out a new program that will automatically register driver’s license applicants to vote unless they opt out. The program is part of AB 1461, dubbed the California New Motor Voter Act. Signed into law in October 2015, the new statute requires the DMV to forward records for all eligible applicants to the Secretary of State’s Office for registration unless those applicants elect not to register to vote.
Paired with the proposal to hike the corporate tax rate for the state, this new measure should incentivize Californians who are legal residents…to obtain new licenses in other states after they relocate.

Over 800,000 illegal immigrants had applied for driver’s licenses in California as of last April. Those who acquired these priceless gems of identification included a Mexican man living in the U.S. illegally who allegedly used his job as an Uber driver to rape and rob 4 young women in this state.

Alfonso Alarcon-Nunez drove women to their homes, assaulted them, and stole property including cellphones, computers and jewelry, officials said. He collected his fare payments through the smartphone app Venmo to disguise his identity and his Uber records.DNA evidence helped lead detectives to Alarcon-Nunez, who was arrested at his Santa Maria home last week, San Luis Obispo County District Attorney Dan Dow said at a news conference.The alleged crimes occurred over four weeks starting in mid-December in San Luis Obispo, a city of about 45,000 that is home to California Polytechnic State University. Alarcon-Nunez’s victims are between 19 and 22 and three were drunk at the time of the crimes, Dow said.
Linda Paine, a co-founder of the nonpartisan Election Integrity Project of California who has been monitoring the situation, is deeply troubled by the development.

H]er organization has visited DMV offices to observe how workers handle undocumented immigrants. She said the visits, and meetings with state officials, left her with little confidence about any safeguards to prevent illegal voter registration.“There are thousands and thousands of DMV workers across our huge state,” Paine told Fox News. “They’re not all trained. There’s no actual protection to prevent noncitizens from being added to voter rolls. It’s not even that people who are ineligible want to be registered. They may not know that they have to select ‘Opt out.’”

Read story @ (Link: legalinsurrection.com)

 Source:conservativepost.com