Trey Gowdy Is Cleared To Go After Hillary Clinton And Loretta Lynch, You’ll Cheer

Hillary Clinton clearly broke the law. Regardless of whether it was a result of her failure to deal with her email system appropriately, it doesn’t make a difference – she should’ve been charged. In any case, James Comey, our previous FBI chief felt that it would be better given her a chance to get away with it. Additionally, Comey had started composing his letter where he exonerates Hillary Clinton before he even had a meeting with her.

Via Fox News:

THE FBI RELEASED DOCUMENTS MONDAY PROVING FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY BEGAN DRAFTING A LETTER REGARDING HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAIL INVESTIGATION MONTHS BEFORE CONDUCTING SEVERAL KEY INTERVIEWS, INCLUDING SPEAKING TO CLINTON HERSELF.

THE DOCUMENT RELEASE WAS TITLED “DRAFTS OF DIRECTOR COMEYS JULY 5, 2016 STATEMENT REGARDING EMAIL SERVER INVESTIGATION PART 01 OF 01.”

THE CONTENTS OF THE EMAIL WERE LARGELY UNCLEAR AS NEARLY ALL OF IT WAS REDACTED. THE NOW-PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW THE EMAIL TITLED “MIDYEAR EXAM — UNCLASSIFIED” WAS SENT BY COMEY ON MAY 2, 2016, TO DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW MCCABE, GENERAL COUNSEL JAMES BAKER AND CHIEF OF STAFF AND SENIOR COUNSELOR JAMES RYBICKI.

Brilliant.

Furthermore, AG Loretta Lynch trusted that it would be an amazing decision to meet with Hillary Clinton’s husband on an airport tarmac while the examination was still crisp and new.

Clearly, they discussed their grandkids. The examination that jeopardized Hillary Clinton’s political profession didn’t ring a bell, by any stretch of the imagination.

That is to say, clearly.

Be that as it may, Trey Gowdy is here and he dispatches an examination to find the answers we all need.

Via Conservative Tribune:

HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN TREY GOWDY HAS ANNOUNCED, ALONG WITH HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN BOB GOODLATTE, THAT THE TWO WILL BE JOINTLY INVESTIGATING THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’S HANDLING OF THE INVESTIGATION OF FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON’S USE OF A PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER, SAYING THAT THE DEPARTMENT’S ACTIONS HAVE LEFT “A HOST OF OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED.”

“OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS REPRESENTED BY A BLIND-FOLDED WOMAN HOLDING A SET OF SCALES… NO ENTITY OR INDIVIDUAL IS EXEMPT FROM OVERSIGHT,” THE TWO CHAIRMEN SAID IN A STATEMENT TUESDAY.

More incredible news.

This is the thing that they will be searching for.

Each and every one of those issues is fundamentally basic.

THE “HOST OF OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS” PERTAIN TO SUBJECTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

“FBI’S DECISION TO PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THE INVESTIGATION INTO SECRETARY CLINTON’S HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUT NOT TO PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THE INVESTIGATION INTO CAMPAIGN ASSOCIATES OF THEN-CANDIDATE DONALD TRUMP;

“FBI’S DECISION TO NOTIFY CONGRESS BY FORMAL LETTER OF THE STATUS OF THE INVESTIGATION BOTH IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER OF 2016;

“FBI’S DECISION TO APPROPRIATE FULL DECISION MAKING IN RESPECT TO CHARGING OR NOT CHARGING SECRETARY CLINTON TO THE FBI RATHER THAN THE DOJ;

“FBI’S TIMELINE IN RESPECT TO CHARGING DECISIONS.”

Plainly, Gowdy is going pretty however after Comey.

Via Washington Examiner:

REP. TREY GOWDY PLANS TO GRILL FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY ABOUT HIS DECISION-MAKING AS PART OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE’S DECISION TO RE-EXAMINE THE INVESTIGATION INTO HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER.

“HAVE TO, WON’T WE?” THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN TOLD THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER WHEN ASKED ABOUT INTERVIEWING COMEY.

GOWDY CHAIRS THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE, WHICH HAS OPENED A JOINT INVESTIGATION WITH THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN ORDER TO REVIEW THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S HANDLING OF THE POLITICALLY CHARGED INVESTIGATION. GOWDY IS PARTICULARLY CONCERNED THAT “THE DECISION TO CHARGE OR NOT CHARGE [CLINTON] WAS MADE BEFORE ALL THE WITNESSES WERE INTERVIEWED,” BUT HE EMPHASIZED THAT THE INVESTIGATION TOPICS ARE STRUCTURED IN A NONPARTISAN WAY.

We don’t surmise that there could be anybody more reasonable than Gowdy for this.

Via Business Insider:

THE EMBATTLED CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE ANNOUNCED ON TUESDAY THAT HE HAD OPENED AN INVESTIGATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE INTO A DEAL STRUCK BETWEEN THE US AND A PREDOMINANTLY RUSSIA-OWNED URANIUM COMPANY BASED IN CANADA WHILE HILLARY CLINTON WAS SECRETARY OF STATE.

DEVIN NUNES’ ANNOUNCEMENT CAME ONE WEEK AFTER THE HILL PUBLISHED A REPORT ON A “RACKETEERING SCHEME … DESIGNED TO BENEFIT FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON’S CHARITABLE FOUNDATION DURING THE TIME SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON SERVED ON A GOVERNMENT BODY THAT PROVIDED A FAVORABLE DECISION TO MOSCOW.”

Hillary Clinton is in a crisis. Loretta Lynch is in a crisis. James Comey is in a crisis. Barack Obama is in a crisis.

Basically, every leading and renowned liberal from the most recent couple of years of the Obama administration is catching that the games are finished.

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

 Source:conservativepost.com

“I Don’t Give A Damn Whose Careers Are Ruined” – Look Trey Gowdy Go After Lynch and Clinton

Hillary Clinton wasn’t able to properly manage her emails and she should have been in prison for it. She broke the law and got Former FBI Director James Comey to rewrite the law to let her off the hook. Andrew C. McCarthy wrote a great article about it when that controversy was developing.

 

In addition, before he even interviewed Hilary, Director Comey had already started writing his letter exonerating her.

The FBI released documents Monday proving former FBI Director James Comey began drafting a letter regarding Hillary Clinton’s email investigation months before conducting several key interviews, including speaking to Clinton herself.

The document release was titled “Drafts of Director Comeys July 5, 2016 Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation Part 01 of 01.”

The contents of the email were largely unclear as nearly all of it was redacted. The now-public records show the email titled “Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED” was sent by Comey on May 2, 2016, to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, general counsel James Baker and chief of staff and senior counselor James Rybicki.

Beautiful.

When it comes to her shady dealings this is just the beginning for Hillary. She’s still in tons of trouble for her pay to play slush fund she ran while she was at the State Department.

Additionally, while the investigation was in full swing AG Loretta Lynch thought it was a good idea to meet up with Hillary’s husband on an airport tarmac.

Hillary is in trouble. Lynch is in trouble. Comey is in trouble. Obama is in trouble.

There’s a new sheriff in town, and every liberal from the Obama administration is realizing that their games are over.

According to ITSABOUTUSA. ORG

Hillary Clinton couldn’t appropriately deal with her messages and she ought to have been in jail for it. She overstepped the law and got Former FBI Director James Comey to rework the law to let her free. Andrew C. McCarthy composed an awesome article about it when that debate was creating.

Furthermore, before he even talked with Hilary, Director Comey had just begun composing his letter absolving her.

The FBI discharged reports Monday demonstrating previous FBI Director James Comey started drafting a letter with respect to Hillary Clinton’s email examination months before leading a few key meetings, including addressing Clinton herself.

The record discharge was titled “Drafts of Director Comeys July 5, 2016 Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation Part 01 of 01.”

The substance of the email were to a great extent hazy as almost every last bit of it was redacted

The now-open records demonstrate the email titled “Midyear Exam — UNCLASSIFIED” was sent by Comey on May 2, 2016, to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, general insight James Baker and head of staff and senior instructor James Rybicki.

Delightful.

With regards to her shady dealings this is the ideal start for Hillary. She’s still in a bad position for her compensation to play slush subsidize she ran while she was at the State Department.

Moreover, while the examination was going all out AG Loretta Lynch thought it was a smart thought to get together with Hillary’s significant other on an airplane terminal landing area.

Hillary is stuck in an unfortunate situation. Lynch is stuck in an unfortunate situation. Comey is stuck in an unfortunate situation. Obama is in a bad position.

 

There’s another sheriff around the local area, and each liberal from the Obama organization is understanding that their recreations are finished.

Source:sectionviral.net

Trey Gowdy Just Released The Final Benghazi Report – NOT GOOD FOR HILLARY

Washington, D.C. – Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy (SC-04) released the following statement after the committee’s Majority released a mark of its investigative report:

“Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were heroes who gave their lives in service to our country. Their bravery and the courageous actions of so many others on the ground that night should be honored.

“When the Select Committee was formed, I promised to conduct this investigation in a manner worthy of the American people’s respect, and worthy of the memory of those who died. That is exactly what my colleagues and I have done.

Now, I simply ask the American people to read this report for themselves, look at the evidence we have collected, and reach their own conclusions. You can read this report in less time than our fellow citizens were taking fire and fighting for their lives on the rooftops and in the streets of Benghazi.”

The committee’s proposed report is just over 800 pages long and is comprised of five primary sections and 12 appendices. It details relevant events in 2011 and 2012.

2SHARES SHARE TWEET SHARE EMAIL

Washington, D.C. – Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy (SC-04) released the following statement after the committee’s Majority released a mark of its investigative report:

“Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were heroes who gave their lives in service to our country. Their bravery and the courageous actions of so many others on the ground that night should be honored.

“When the Select Committee was formed, I promised to conduct this investigation in a manner worthy of the American people’s respect, and worthy of the memory of those who died. That is exactly what my colleagues and I have done.

“Now, I simply ask the American people to read this report for themselves, look at the evidence we have collected, and reach their own conclusions. You can read this report in less time than our fellow citizens were taking fire and fighting for their lives on the rooftops and in the streets of Benghazi.”

The committee’s proposed report is just over 800 pages long and is comprised of five primary sections and 12 appendices. It details relevant events in 2011 and 2012.

The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part I:

Despite President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s clear orders to deploy military assets, nothing was sent to Benghazi, and nothing was en route to Libya at the time the last two Americans were killed almost 8 hours after the attacks began. [pg. 141]
With Ambassador Stevens missing, the White House convened a roughly two-hour meeting at 7:30 PM, which resulted in action items focused on a YouTube video, and others containing the phrases “[i]f any deployment is made,” and “Libya must agree to any deployment,” and “[w]ill not deploy until order comes to go to either Tripoli or Benghazi.” [pg. 115]
The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff typically would have participated in the White House meeting, but did not attend because he went home to host a dinner party for foreign dignitaries. [pg. 107]
A Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) sat on a plane in Rota, Spain, for three hours, and changed in and out of their uniforms four times. [pg. 154]
None of the relevant military forces met their required deployment timelines. [pg. 150]
The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]
Rep. Mike Pompeo (KS-04) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“We expect our government to make every effort to save the lives of Americans who serve in harm’s way. That did not happen in Benghazi. Politics were put ahead of the lives of Americans, and while the administration had made excuses and blamed the challenges posed by time and distance, the truth is that they did not try.”

Rep. Martha Roby (AL-02) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“Our committee’s insistence on additional information about the military’s response to the Benghazi attacks was met with strong opposition from the Defense Department, and now we know why. Instead of attempting to hide deficiencies in our posture and performance, it’s my hope our report will help ensure we fix what went wrong so that a tragedy like this never happens again.”

The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part II:

Five of the 10 action items from the 7:30 PM White House meeting referenced the video, but no direct link or solid evidence existed connecting the attacks in Benghazi and the video at the time the meeting took place. The State Department senior officials at the meeting had access to eyewitness accounts to the attack in real time. The Diplomatic Security Command Center was in direct contact with the Diplomatic Security Agents on the ground in Benghazi and sent out multiple updates about the situation, including a “Terrorism Event Notification.” The State Department Watch Center had also notified Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills that it had set up a direct telephone line to Tripoli. There was no mention of the video from the agents on the ground. Greg Hicks—one of the last people to talk to Chris Stevens before he died—said there was virtually no discussion about the video in Libya leading up to the attacks. [pg. 28]
The morning after the attacks, the National Security Council’s Deputy Spokesperson sent an email to nearly two dozen people from the White House, Defense Department, State Department, and intelligence community, stating: “Both the President and Secretary Clinton released statements this morning. … Please refer to those for any comments for the time being. To ensure we are all in sync on messaging for the rest of the day, Ben Rhodes will host a conference call for USG communicators on this chain at 9:15 ET today.” [pg. 39]
Minutes before the President delivered his speech in the Rose Garden, Jake Sullivan wrote in an email to Ben Rhodes and others: “There was not really much violence in Egypt. And we are not saying that the violence in Libya erupted ‘over inflammatory videos.’” [pg. 44]
According to Susan Rice, both Ben Rhodes and David Plouffe prepared her for her appearances on the Sunday morning talk shows following the attacks. Nobody from the FBI, Department of Defense, or CIA participated in her prep call. While Rhodes testified Plouffe would “normally” appear on the Sunday show prep calls, Rice testified she did not recall Plouffe being on prior calls and did not understand why he was on the call in this instance. [pg.98]
On the Sunday shows, Susan Rice stated the FBI had “already begun looking at all sorts of evidence” and “FBI has a lead in this investigation.” But on Monday, the Deputy Director, Office of Maghreb Affairs sent an email stating: “McDonough apparently told the SVTS [Secure Video Teleconference] group today that everyone was required to ‘shut their pieholes’ about the Benghazi attack in light of the FBI investigation, due to start tomorrow.” [pg. 135]
After Susan Rice’s Sunday show appearances, Jake Sullivan assured the Secretary of the State that Rice “wasn’t asked about whether we had any intel. But she did make clear our view that this started spontaneously and then evolved.” [pg. 128]
Susan Rice’s comments on the Sunday talk shows were met with shock and disbelief by State Department employees in Washington. The Senior Libya Desk Officer, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, wrote: “I think Rice was off the reservation on this one.” The Deputy Director, Office of Press and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, responded: “Off the reservation on five networks!” The Senior Advisor for Strategic Communications, Bureau of Near East Affairs, State Department, wrote: “WH [White House] very worried about the politics. This was all their doing.” [pg. 132]
The CIA’s September 13, 2012, intelligence assessment was rife with errors. On the first page, there is a single mention of “the early stages of the protest” buried in one of the bullet points. The article cited to support the mention of a protest in this instance was actually from September 4. In other words, the analysts used an article from a full week before the attacks to support the premise that a protest had occurred just prior to the attack on September 11. [pg. 47]
A headline on the following page of the CIA’s September 13 intelligence assessment stated “Extremists Capitalized on Benghazi Protests,” but nothing in the actual text box supports that title. As it turns out, the title of the text box was supposed to be “Extremists Capitalized on Cairo Protests.” That small but vital difference—from Cairo to Benghazi—had major implications in how people in the administration were able to message the attacks. [pg. 52]

Rep. Jim Jordan (OH-04) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“Obama Administration officials, including the Secretary of State, learned almost in real time that the attack in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Rather than tell the American people the truth, the administration told one story privately and a different story publicly.”

Rep. Peter Roskam (IL-06) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“In the days and weeks after the attacks, the White House worked to pin all of the blame for their misleading and incorrect statements on officials within the intelligence community, but in reality, political operatives like Ben Rhodes and David Plouffe were spinning the false narrative and prepping Susan Rice for her interviews.”

The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part III:

During deliberations within the State Department about whether and how to intervene in Libya in March 2011, Jake Sullivan listed the first goal as “avoid[ing] a failed state, particularly one in which al-Qaeda and other extremists might take safe haven.” [pg. 9]
The administration’s policy of no boots on the ground shaped the type of military assistance provided to State Department personnel in Libya. The Executive Secretariats for both the Defense Department and State Department exchanged communications outlining the diplomatic capacity in which the Defense Department SST security team members would serve, which included wearing civilian clothes so as not to offend the Libyans. [pg. 60]
When the State Department’s presence in Benghazi was extended in December 2012, senior officials from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security were excluded from the discussion. [pg. 74]
In February 2012, the lead Diplomatic Security Agent at Embassy Tripoli informed his counterpart in Benghazi that more DS agents would not be provided by decision makers, because “substantive reporting” was not Benghazi’s purpose. [pg. 77]
Emails indicate senior State Department officials, including Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin were preparing for a trip by the Secretary of State to Libya in October 2012. According to testimony, Chris Stevens wanted to have a “deliverable” for the Secretary for her trip to Libya, and that “deliverable” would be making the Mission in Benghazi a permanent Consulate. [pg. 96]
In August 2012—roughly a month before the Benghazi attacks—security on the ground worsened significantly. Ambassador Stevens initially planned to travel to Benghazi in early August, but cancelled the trip “primarily for Ramadan/security reasons.” [pg. 99]
Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta bluntly told the committee “an intelligence failure” occurred with respect to Benghazi. Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell also acknowledged multiple times an intelligence failure did in fact occur prior to the Benghazi attacks. [pg. 129]

Rep. Susan Brooks (IN-05) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“President Obama has said his worst mistake was ‘failing to plan for the day after … intervening in Libya.’ As a result of this ‘lead from behind’ foreign policy, the Libyan people were forced to make the dismal trade of the tyranny of Qadhafi for the terror of ISIS, Al-Qaeda and others. Although the State Department considered Libya a grave risk to American diplomats in 2011 and 2012, our people remained in a largely unprotected, unofficial facility that one diplomatic security agent the committee interviewed characterized as ‘a suicide mission.’”

Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (GA-03) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“One of the most concerning parts of the State Department’s policy in Libya was its reliance upon the militias of an unstable nation to protect our men and women in Benghazi. These were by no means forces that could adequately protect Americans on the ground, and the State Department knew it. But the appearance of no boots on the ground was more important to the administration.”

Part IV of the report reveals new information about the Select Committee’s requests and subpoenas seeking documents and witnesses regarding Benghazi and Libya, and details what the Obama administration provided to Congress, what it is still withholding, and how its serial delays hindered the committee’s efforts to uncover the truth.

Part V proposes 25 recommendations for the Pentagon, State Department, Intelligence Community, and Congress aimed at strengthening security for American personnel serving abroad and doing everything possible to ensure something like Benghazi never happens again, and if it does, that we are better prepared to respond.

The Select Committee intends to convene a bipartisan markup to discuss and vote on the proposed report on July 8, 2016. All members of the committee will have the opportunity to offer changes in a manner consistent with the rules of the House.

Source:sectionviral.net

WHOA! Trey Gowdy Just Wiped The Floor With Goofy Nancy Pelosi – You’ll Cheer [Details]

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has one ultimate goal – to destroy President Trump at any price. Recently, she had an interview in which she bashed our President about the scandal with the resignation of his National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Howsoever, Trey Gowdy did not buy any of this nonsense.

The Daily Caller revealed that Gowdy told to Fox News have Martha MacCallum that Pelosi and her kindred Democrats took “an eight-year long vacation from doing oversight on the executive branch.” He included that in the wake of watching Pelosi’s public interview, he supposes his “colleagues have amnesia.”

Gowdy said, “I will say this, they are very well rested because for eight years. They did not lift a finger to do oversight. “

Gowdy added, “All of that energy you saw today at their press conference, that is because they went on an eight-year-long vacation from doing oversight over the executive branch. I am all for the committees of jurisdiction, looking into it. I am also for looking into how classified information can make its way into the public domain. That is not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue. It’s a legal issue. “

WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS AND PREDICTIONS.

Source:www.nationalinsiderpatriot.com

Trey Gowdy Smells A Dirty, Rotten, Money Laundering Dem Rat In D.C. – Leaves Democrats In Panic Mode

Congressman and chair of the House Oversight Committee, Trey Gowdy has been making the headlines more frequently. Having in mind that only one year ago Hillary was running her failed presidential campaign, his committee is most likely full of work. Hillary is well known for her high level of corruption.

She has made a lot of politically incorrect moves in order to maintain her freedom. The Democrats would have suffered catastrophic consequences from Hillary going in a criminal trial, so they used influence peddling, extreme power politics, and dodgy deals to keep her free.

Fortunately, Mr. Gowdy is here to right the things. He, more than anyone else, would enjoy putting Hillary behind the bars. We have to wait and see if he succeeds. Howsoever, Gowdy is recently looking in the possible Hillary-DNC money-laundering scheme, by using a law firm to get cash to FUSION GPS which made the distrusted Trump dossier.

“Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Gowdy said that the Clinton campaign and the DNC might have committed money laundering through the law firm they hired which paid Fusion GPS to do opposition ‘research’ on then-candidate Donald Trump.

“‘I’m not an election law expert, but the good news is you don’t have to be to understated the absurdity believing you can just launder all of your campaign money by just hiring a law firm,’ Gowdy told Wallace. ‘Imagine if you and I were running for Congress, and we just hired a law firm and said “Hey, you go to all the opposition, you go buy all the television, you go buy all the bumper stickers, you go hire all the experts, and we will launder all of this through a law firm.” I can’t think of anything that defeats the purpose of transparency laws more than that.’”

Democratic Party officials informed they are not able to recall who approved the funds funneling using a law firm to pay Fusion GPS. Trey Gowdy does simply not believe it.

“‘I am interested in that, and I am also interested in sharing some memory tricks with folks at the DNC because no one can remember who paid $10 million dollars to a law firm to do oppo research,’ Gowdy said. ‘I find that stunning. $10 million and no one can remember who authorized it, who approved it.’”

The Democrats are simply attempting to “skate fast over thin ice,” hoping the whole thing just blows over. Sort of like Hillary’s famous comment, “What difference does it make?”

Integrity, or in Hillary’s case, a lack of integrity does make a difference. And Mr. Gowdy does not appear to be a man who gives up easily.

WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS AND PREDICTIONS.

Source:www.nationalinsiderpatriot.com

Nobody Was Expecting To Hear What Trey Gowdy Just Revealed About Obama

TREY GOWDY RECEIVES A LOT OF TRASH TALK FROM THE LEFT.

OF COURSE, THAT IS BECAUSE HE IS NOT SCARED TO GET THE TRUTH FROM WHOEVER HE WANTS IT FROM.

HE HAS DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB IN GETTING RID OF THE CORRUPTION THAT TROUBLES WASHINGTON THESE DAYS. GOWDY IS RESPECTED AND LOVED BY SO MANY CONSERVATIVES AROUND THE COUNTRY FOR HIS ACTIONS.

He went on Fox News lately and spoke about the corruption that was happening under former President Barack Obama. We all know that Obama was a big liar.

He even hired the whole administration solely on the fact that he knew that they wouldn’t be whistle-blowers.

However, even if it worked for a lot of time, it backfired since Gowdy is in the house.

On Fox, Trey Gowdy wanted to speak about Susan Rice and the leaks that have happened since. We have all been informed about the unmasking that went on under Susan Rice and Obama.

THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED WERE HUGE, ILLEGAL AND SHOULDN’T BE COVERED UP BY THE DEMS.

The biased mainstream media won’t publish this because it does not go with their anti-Trump, anti-Conservative agenda that they are trying to push.

Obama was a liar that would do whatever it took to get on top.

He tried to be as powerful as possible and this is one of the ways that he did that.

This unmasking,” Gowdy said on Fox. “That is a privilege to be able to request that a U.S. person’s name be unmasked. I want to know who’s making the request [and] what is the evidentiary basis of that request? And if it’s late in your tenure – like the day before you leave office – that should send off alarms and sirens in your head as to why that person did it.”

Gowdy is a dog that can sniff out crime from miles away. That is why people love him.

We hope that you found this article informative and helpful. Share your thoughts and opinions with us!

Source:www.nationalinsiderpatriot.com

Trey Gowdy’s Stunning Remarks On McCain’s Betrayal Will Leave You Speechless!

REPUBLICAN ATTEMPTED AND FAILED TO REPEAL OBAMACARE.

JOHN MCCAIN STABBED THE CONSERVATIVES IN THE BACK. HE GAVE THE FINAL VOTE THAT DECIDED THE FAITH OF THE SENATE’S REPEAL BILL.

He was an accomplice in defeating it.

The Republican party was enraged because of the way it all happened.

However, Trey Gowdy’s powerful remarks took it a step further.

Gowdy echoed Republicans who were enraged that the best thing the Senate could come up with is a “skinny repeal” choice which could only eliminate the Obamacare individual and employer mandates together with the medical device tax.

Moreover, this was a far cry from what Republicans like John McCain had pledged while they were campaigning for seven years.

The Daily Caller reports:

“HOUSE OVERSIGHT CHAIRMAN TREY GOWDY IS IRRITATED WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR HAVING SEVEN YEARS TO COME UP WITH A HEALTH CARE PLAN BUT ONLY MANAGING TO THINK OF A “SKINNY” REPEAL.

“Our problem is for seven years telling people what we’re against and what we’re opposed to and then we’ve had seven months to govern, and the best we can come up with is a skinny plan on 24 hours notice?” Gowdy said during a Friday morning Fox News interview.

“We’ve had seven years to figure it out and the best we can come up with is something called ‘skinny,’” he continued to mock.

Cohost Brian Kilmeade asked Gowdy what next steps are given the Senate’s “skinny” repeal failed very early Friday.

Gowdy asserted that Republicans have to go back and try again because Obamacare “is failing” and repeal and replace was a “fundamental promise of the Trump campaign.”

“It’s not going to be done with 24 hours notice and a bill that has the word ‘skinny’ in it,” he reiterated.”

The reason why the Republicans had to scale back the repeal bill was the liar John McCain.

In 2015, he voted to repeal the Obamacare bill but this repeal bill was vetoed by Obama.

It was seen as a test vote, for what the GOP could be able to pass if they got the Congressional majorities and won the Presidential election in 2016.

Also, in 2016, John McCain had a campaign ad stating that he was “leading the fight” to repeal Obamacare.

HOWEVER, WHEN THE MOMENT OF TRUTH FINALLY CAME, MCCAIN EXPOSED HIMSELF AS A FRAUD.

He voted against the legislation he once voted for.

This is what made the GOP scrambling for something they can actually make the pass in Senate and they tried to keep the hope of full repeal alive when the Senate and the House would meet for a conference committee to come up with the final legislation.

However, McCain had other plans according to his personal agenda.

His real plans were to keep Obamacare in place.

He was misleading the American nation when he alleged that he wants to repeal Obamacare.

Trey Gowdy was correct and honest when he said that the GOP needs to do better than a “skinny” repeal.

And John McCain backstabbed the President, the party and the American people when he voted “no.”

We hope that you found this article informative and helpful. Share your thoughts and opinions with us!

 Source:www.nationalinsiderpatriot.com