Sanctuary State To Lose ALL Federal Funding – They Said This Would NEVER Happen

Image result for Sanctuary State To Lose ALL Federal Funding – They Said This Would NEVER Happen

One wonders just how far the state of California is willing to continue to push the envelope for illegal immigration? Just how much is pandering to illegal aliens worth?

The Department of Justice just issued a second and final warning to the state California sternly letting its Democrat Governor, Jerry Brown, state leadership, and the citizenry were given an ultimatum – you can be a sanctuary state that flouts federal immigration law or you can keep the federal tax dollars flowing … but you cannot have both.

Fox News reports

“Earlier this month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a so-called “sanctuary state” bill which basically erects a wall between California law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement officers. The bill forbids California cops from providing release and other information that isn’t publicly available in response to a request for notification from federal law enforcement.

The government has been pushing for notification from local authorities about when they have an undocumented immigrant in custody who has committed a crime, saying to withhold that information, and then release that person onto the streets is putting local communities in danger.

Supporters argue that sanctuary policies allow local and state law enforcement officers to build crucial relationships with immigrant communities. Critics say not turning over people living in the country illegally puts the public in danger. Wednesday’s letter urges California to comply federal statute (8 USC 1373) which bars local jurisdictions from limiting communication with federal law enforcement about a person’s immigration status or whereabouts. The letter states that California’s new law (SB54) “May violate,” 1373.

Department of Justice Officials tell Fox News this situation could result with future federal grants being withheld from California, that threat has been a common thread in this ongoing story. However DOJ officials also tell Fox they could “clawback” funds already awarded to the Golden State.

For instance California received more than $18 million in federal grants from the Department of Justice in 2016, funds DOJ officials say could be subject to a “clawback.”

‘In early October, the State of California codified into law a requirement that local police release criminal aliens back onto our streets. This law undermines public safety and national security, was opposed by law enforcement, and potentially violates federal law,’ said DOJ spokesman Devin O’Malley. ‘The abandonment of the rule of law evades all common sense, especially given the multiple high-profile incidents that have occurred in California as a result of similar policies. The Justice Department urges California to reconsider these so-called ‘sanctuary policies.’”

The so-called “sanctuary state” law, California “Sanctuary State” Bill (SB 54) – 

  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from holding illegal aliens on the basis of federal
  • immigration detainers, or transferring them into federal custody, unless they’ve been convicted in
  • the last 15 years for one of a list of 31 crimes, or are a registered s*x offender: if not, they may only
  • be held with a warrant from a federal judge
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from asking anyone about their immigration status
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from sharing any information with federal immigration
  • authorities that is not available to the general public
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from using any of their money or personnel to
  • “investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes”
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from allowing federal immigration authorities to use
  • space in their facilities
  • Limits how and when state and local law enforcement can contract with federal immigration
  • authorities
  • Grants discretion to state and local law enforcement to cooperate even less with federal
  • immigration authorities than the bill authorize them to, but not more
  • Is near-universally recognized and described by both its supporters and opponents as a sanctuary
  • state bill: protects illegal aliens at the expense of citizens, will increase illegal immigration to
  • California, and sends the message that illegal aliens are welcome everywhere in the state

The Federalist Papers took a look at all 261 sanctuary jurisdictions in the United States at risk for defunding back in August. All told, over $30 million in Byrne Justice Assistance Grant money, which account for the lion’s share of federal aid to states and localities for criminal justice, is at stake.

The Federalist Papers has previously covered how this indefensible policy will continue to affect Americans with the increase in crime, continued and increased government insolvency, less assimilation amongst illegal aliens to American culture, and fewer jobs for American citizens.

To many Americans, it is patently absurd that this is still even a topic for discussion, let alone a continued debate.

How is the proposition that higher levels of government have a right to require that lower levels of government actually enforce the law possibly controversial, especially in light of the fact that the law is clearly constitutional and immigration clearly falls under the scope of that office’s enumerated powers?

The answer, while obvious, is not simple, in that in a sane political climate, it wouldn’t be.

In response to simple common sense, the progressive left likes to claim that sanctuary cities are somehow good for law enforcement because illegals feel freer to report crimes if they know talking to police will not get them deported.

Yet in July that talking point took a hit thanks to the release of statistics showing that crime actually decreased in Phoenix, Arizona after the city dropped its sanctuary status –

According to Levi Bolton, the executive director to the Arizona Police Association, when Phoenix suspended its sanctuary city policies, instead of endangering the citizens, the opposite happened.

“We saw a decrease in crime,” said Bolton. “It had a deterrent effect on folks because the risk of discovery went up exponentially when we actually enforced the law.”

Under the new policies, law enforcement could ask suspects if they are in the U.S. legally, and they could inform immigration agencies about violations of federal laws.

Fox News reported that the m****r rate in Phoenix fell by 27 percent, robberies fell by 23 percent, and assault fell by 13 percent. Even more minor crimes fell, with burglaries by 14 percent and theft by 19 percent.

Just In: Explosive New Strzok-Page Text Messages to Destroy Anti-Trump Deep State – To Reveal POTUS Assassination Plot?

Related image

This may sound like a conspiracy theory of sorts but for fifty-plus years so was the second shooter in the JFK assassination.

Investigative journalist Sara Carter has been at the forefront of exposing the corruption that gripped the DOJ-FBI dismissal and destruction of evidence against Hillary Clinton, and what has been exposed as an almost two year long sham investigation that included illegal surveillance of Donald Trump.

Yesterday afternoon she made us aware that her sources had confirmed to her that the DOJ was preparing to release to Congress the missing text messages between the FBI’s Deputy of Counterintelligence and DOJ attorney Lisa Page. 

The first batch of emails between lovebirds Strzok and Page was explosive and resulted in a complete shift of the narrative, but judging by everything we can gather, you ain’t seen nothing yet!

Let’s take the Wayback Machine to January 22, 2018 when QAnon – reputed to be a high level patriot inside the intel community – posted this cryptic message that no longer seems to be nearly as cryptic.

Two days later text messages between the two revealed that a secret society existed within the FBI.

Given the extent of the illegalities that we already know the DOJ and the FBI engaged in, it’s not a stretch to believe that the same FBI agents risking imprisonment to protect the massive Democrat crime syndicate, would consider assassinating President Trump:

Q then asks:

This was three months ago when everyone was (on our side) was calling for Jeff Sessions’ ouster because he wasn’t moving fast enough.  Think about the ramifications had Sessions moved too quickly.  For all the un-Constitutional and destructive orders Obama and his minions gave to these two agencies they remain an important – perhaps the most important – cog in the intelligence network our country relies on to keep us safe and to maintain law and order.

Liberal judges planted by Obama throughout our court system over his eight years would’ve had a field day overturning convictions and flooding our communities with miscreants and terrorists.

Back to the possible assassination plot.  Is this why President-elect Donald Trump continued to employ a private security and intelligence team after he was elected and continues to do so until the present? 

The radical left led by the mainstream media and Congressional Democrats will continue ratcheting up their divisive and destructive rhetoric from now until the 2018 midterms in the attempt to convince their voters that the evidence they are about to be subjected to is a politically motivated smokescreen.

Patriots know better.


Democrats Livid, Melania Rocks 1st White House State Dinner With ‘Special Tribute’

First Lady Melania Trump is facing her biggest challenge yet as she hosts her first official White House state dinner. Like all things done by the Trump White House, Melania is doing things her way and has spent months in preparation for this main event. On hand will be France’s President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, and as details begin to leak out, Democrats are livid as FLOTUS announces a “special tribute.”

Maxine Waters & Nany Pelosi (left & right) are livid, along with their fellow Democrats, as First Lady Melania Trump (middle) hosts her first White House state dinner. (Photo Credits: CBS/Screengrab, Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images, YouTube/Screengrab)

Melania Trump could have hired a huge staff to pull off her first White House state dinner. That’s exactly what Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton did as first ladies, but Melania refused to give in to the pressure of planning such a prestigious event. She took charge of planning the entire evening with no detail too small for her approval.

CNN reports, “So confident was [Melania] Trump about her ability to handle something like a state dinner, with its myriad details, that the first lady would not hire an event planner to help, as previous first ladies have done in the past to manage the grandeur and spectacle.”

They add, “For example, the final state dinner of the Obama administration, its 14th, was a tented affair for former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, held on the South Lawn of the White House for 400 guests. Michelle Obama wore a custom, chainmail Atelier Versace gown; Mario Batali cooked, and Gwen Stefani entertained.”

For the Trump administration’s first state dinner, there will be none of that. There will also be none of the paparazzi element that has come with past state dinners; celebrity supporters of the President are harder to come by than they were for Obama.

“A smaller, more elegant event allows a guest to have a more personal experience, and that is very important to Mrs. Trump,” said Stephanie Grisham, Mrs. Trump’s closet aide, who confirmed the dinner will take place in the State Dining Room, which can hold about 100-150 seated guests.

Mrs. Trump has also been doing some homework, educating herself about the protocol and history of these sorts of White House events. This is to ensure her selections for the Macrons’ visit have meaning behind them, down to the china, flowers, color scheme, and menu, which, while American, will highlight the influence France has had on American cuisine.

“Mrs. Trump selected every item and every detail for the dinner, from the entrée to the chair cushions,” said White House social secretary Rickie Niceta.

But, as details leaked out, the Democrats are livid. First, President Donald Trump decided he didn’t want anyone there who has not been supportive of his administration, which means, yep, you guessed it, no Democrats got an invite. Trump also shunned the mainstream media; they won’t be allowed access.

Then, there’s Mrs. Trump special tribute to the Macrons, which has the Trump-haters doing backflips. Melania loves giving gifts with a special meaning, and she has outdone herself with her original choice for the Macrons and France. Mrs. Trump’s special tribute gift will be a framed section of upholstery from one of the chairs in the White House Blue Room.

Featuring a golden eagle surrounded by laurels, the chair was part of the furniture suite inspired by Pierre-Antoine Bellangé, the famous French designer who was commissioned to create 53 carved and gilded pieces for the Blue Room by President James Monroe in 1817.

Senate panel narrowly approves Pompeo for Secretary of State

Senate panel narrowly approves Pompeo for Secretary of State

CIA Director Mike Pompeo’s nomination to become the next secretary of state was approved in a narrow vote Monday by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

The approval came after Sen. Rand Paul said he would support Pompeo as the next secretary of state — virtually guaranteeing that he would be confirmed by the full Senate.

“I just finished speaking to @realDonaldTrump, after speaking to him several times today. I also met with and spoke to Director Pompeo,” the Kentucky Republican said in a series of tweets explaining his change of heart.

“After calling continuously for weeks for Director Pompeo to support President Trump’s belief that the Iraq war was a mistake, and that it is time to leave Afghanistan, today I received confirmation the Director Pompeo agrees with @realDonaldTrump,” he wrote.

“President Trump believes that Iraq was a mistake, that regime change has destabilized the region, and that we must end our involvement with Afghanistan,” he continued.

“Having received assurances from President Trump and Director Pompeo that he agrees with the President on these important issues, I have decided to support his nomination to be our next Secretary of State.”

His announcement came as the committee was set to vote on Pompeo.

He faced a tough fight there, but with Paul’s support and the backing of several Democrats he will be able to win a vote by the full Senate.

Situation Involving Fresno State Professor Gets Significantly Worse

The situation involving a professor at Fresno State University who rejoiced over the death of former First Lady Barbara Bush got a whole lot worse for the university after new tweets were discovered.

Professor Randa Jarrar ignited controversy with a series of offensive tweetscelebrating the death of Bush and the pain that the family is experiencing as a result of her death. Jarrar even bragged about how much money she made as a tenured professor, saying, “I will never be fired.”

Jarrar has since locked her account after racist and anti-Semitic tweets were discovered.

“I can’t wait for the old white guard of literary writers and ‘critics’ to die. Their time is f**king up, too,” Jararr wrote.

In another tweet, Jararr writes: “Coming up: a bunch of f**king white women.”

In another tweet, Jararr showed her arrogance, telling another account to get the “f**k outta here with your white feminism. I said don’t at me b**ch. I’m a professor…”

Jararr, who is Muslim and is a major supporter of the Palestinian state, also wrote, “we are sooooo much cooler than Israelis, don’t at me b**ch.”

Perhaps the most problematic tweet from Jararr the administration must now address is one from last night in which she posted a phone number she claimed belonged to her but is actually the number to Arizona State’s 24-Hour emergency crisis line.

An official who works on the crisis hotline told The Daily Wire they have been receiving an extremely high number of calls due to her tweet.

Jararr’s tweet containing the number to the crisis hotline was so outrageous that far-left activist and physician Eugene Gu called her out over it.

Corrupt CA Governor Initing Repulsive New Ban On ALL CHRISTIANS In His State – Get Him Out Of Office!

Image result for Corrupt CA Governor

The assembly in California could vote on a bill that would legitimately ban books up to and including the Bible as well as shut down churches, and close psychiatric offices all over the state in what some people may consider an attack or ban on Christianity.

Assembly Bill 2943 would make it an “unlawful business practice” to engage in “a transaction intended to result or that results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer” that advertise, offer to engage in, or do engage in “sexual orientation change efforts with an individual.” The bill then defines “sexual orientations change efforts” as “any practices that seek to change an individual’s sexual orientation. This includes efforts to change behaviors or gender expressions, or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the same sex.”

The pro-LGBTQ bill is rapidly moving through the state assembly after being approved on the floor on Thursday.  The bill will now go before the California state Senate for a vote. If passed, Assembly Bill 2943 could ultimately end free speech and freedom of religion as we know it for Christians.

The bill also suggests that any attempt to change behavior or gender expression amounts is tantamount to a crime. The law uses the state’s consumer fraud statute to restrict religious freedom and free speech when it comes to issues of homosexuality and gender identity. This means the bill would make it illegal to distribute resources, sell books, offer counseling services, or direct someone to a biblically based model for getting help with gender confusion and homosexuality. The state of California would essentially criminalize any and all parenting, religious instruction, or teaching that does not follow a leftist, progressive worldview bullet point by bullet point.

Randy Thomasson with says the bill is very broad and could affect just about anything helping people overcome same-sex desires.

Thomasson states of the bill: “So, this is a pastor speaking, you pay a ticket to hear him speak. He speaks about overcoming same-sex desires. Hey, that could be outlawed. A church sells a book about overcoming same-sex desires. There’s a sale, there’s a transaction, that could be banned. This is very expansive, very tyrannical and absolutely squashing free speech, religious freedom and basic choice of people. This is an anti-freedom, anti-American bill.

“Well, you could see this law going into effect. A church bookstore selling the Bible, of course, selling a book about marriage or sexual purity or overcoming homosexuality or overcoming trans-sexuality. You could see a member of the public or even a member of the state government coming and saying, ‘Hey, that’s illegal.’ Even the Muslim community should be against this, too, because of what is said about sexual perversity in the Koran.”

It is a clear and undisputed fact that many Christians, as well as other religious groups, believe that orientation and behavior are two different things. Meaning that while urges may exist, that does not necessarily mean that one must act upon them – that is in and of itself a choice. Yet the state of California now wants to make that very thought process a jailable offense, or at the very least fineable.

The bill also seeks to ban biblically based counseling for those wanting to get help. Additionally, if one happens to be the parent of a small child that perhaps feels more like a boy today, rather than a girl despite her biological gender, those residing in California are now forbidden from teaching their children that this is a phase they may grow out of despite it being statistically true.  They are also forbidden from seeking counseling for assistance for their child for any treatment other than the “approved treatment” promoting transgenderism as “normal.”

It comes six years after California deemed it illegal for minors to receive counseling for same-sex attraction, even if they and their parents wanted help. Now, this bill would also address adults.

“AB 2943 would start by saying, ok, nobody can get counseling to overcome same-sex desires… ok, so no help for adult children, adults who were molested as kids and now they are adults and they say I want help to overcome these feelings. No help for you,” Thomasson explained.

The bill states that “contemporary science recognizes that being lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender is part of the natural spectrum of human identity and is not a disease, disorder, or illness.”

This law would effectively outlaw the buying and selling of Bibles due to its teachings on homosexuality.  This law could also make it illegal to send your children to a religiously affiliated school, or even homeschooling as the case may be. This affront and antithesis to freedom has already passed two separate committees by a large margin.

It is wildly unthinkable that such a law could or even would be held up by the Supreme Court, yet stranger things have happened and continue as advocates of personal and religious liberty continue to lose traction.

Hannity Drops Bombshell: ‘We Now Have Proof The Deep State Is Real’

Elder Patriot – A Monmouth University poll released on Monday finds:

“a large bipartisan majority who feel that national policy is being manipulated or directed by a “Deep State” of unelected government officials.”

That “large bi-partisan majority” is indeed large – 74% large!

This finding has the Deep State’s propaganda arm, the mainstream media matrix desperately denying its existence

Last night Sean Hannity used his opening monologue to prove the mainstream media’s collusion in protecting the Deep State by exposing the phony narrative that Donald Trump had ordered the firing of disgraced F.B.I. deputy director Andrew McCabe.

Sean enlightens us to the facts that tell a different story.  This is how America’s Pravda media operates.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” – Joseph Goebbels, Master Propagandist of the Nazi regime

The fact is President Trump had no direct role in the firing of the former deputy director of the FBI.

The Obama-appointed Inspector General, Michael Horowitz was nearing the completion of his oversight report when he shared his findings with Robin Ashton who is the head of the Office of Professional Responsibility at the FBI.

The Office of Professional Responsibility is responsible for investigating allegations of professional misconduct involving department attorneys.

After reviewing the facts presented by Horowitz, Ashton decided to recommend the firing of McCabe to Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Ashton had been appointed to her position, as the head of enforcing ethics at the FBI by Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder.

In other words, Trump’s Attorney General Jeff Sessions followed the advice of two Obama-appointed overseers of the F.B.I. 

The reason for the phony narrative blaming President Trump for McCabe’s firing isn’t to simply discredit the president as a rash, unreasonable tyrant.  It’s to start the defense of the rest of the rogue operators at the F.B.I., the DOJ, and the Department of State whose heads will begin rolling very soon.

If the MSM can successfully blame President Trump as the sole person behind the coming firings and prosecutions they can more easily isolate him from the American public.

They are following Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #13:

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

With this knowledge, consider why the MSM wants us silenced and, Facebook and Google are doing their best to do that.


Liz Warren’s Own State Abandons Her… Says She Must Take DNA Test

Liberal Senator Elizabeth Warren has been lying about her heritage for years, and has become the butt of many of President Trump’s jokes because of this. She has been unwilling to provide any evidence to back up her claim that she is Native American. Everyone is dying to see some proof that Senator Warren is truly Native American. One liberal local newspaper from her own state is now calling for some proof.

Warren was challenged by the Berkshire Eagle editorial board to settle the debate with a DNA test.

Berkshire Eagle reported:

The same technology that can match a perpetrator to a crime with virtual 100-percent certainty could settle the question of her heritage for all time. There are now so many commercial DNA heritage-tracking labs in business that they advertise on television. The going rate for one of the most popular tests is $99. All the senator needs to do is spit into a tube, wait a few weeks, and get her answer.

No matter whether the test came up negative or positive, it would constitute a plus for Senator Warren and her political hopes. Were she to test positive for Native American DNA, it would permanently resolve the issue — while possibly shutting down President Trump.

If the test were to show up as negative, it would finally be time for Senator Elizabeth Warren to admit that she has been lying for years. She could come clean with a full admission of her fabrication and offer an apology to all Native American tribes. The newspaper went on to “call upon” their “senior senator to screwup her courage and take the spit test.” 

The Eagle explained that Warren agreeing to take the DNA test would be the simplest solution to solving the issue. It’s highly doubtful that the senator will agree to it, however. In fact, it has been a problem since 2012 when her opponent called for her to take a DNA test. She never took the test.

Many Native Americans are unhappy with Senator Warren to this very day. Rebecca Nagle of the Cherokee Nation is one of those people.

Think Progress Reported:

She was not a hero to me when she failed to foster a haven of support for Native students within Harvard University’s alienating Ivy League culture. She is not a hero for spending years awkwardly avoiding Native leaders. She is not a hero because, despite claiming to be the only Native woman in the U.S. Senate, she has done nothing to advance our rights.

She is not from us. She does not represent us. She is not Cherokee.

It all started in the 1990s when Elizabeth Warren was working as a professor at Harvard Law School. She had been promoted within the university and was celebrating becoming the first minority woman to receive tenure. The Boston Press went on to find reports during Warren’s campaign for Senate back in 2012. It would appear that Warren played the part of Native American and categorized herself as a minority when it would help push her career along. She then dropped the act when she got her tenure.

One thing Elizabeth Warren truly hates is when someone refers to her as “Pocahontas.” President Trump makes the joke all the time, and it gets her every time. I think it’s about time that we all start referring to her as her favorite nickname.


Confiscation Is Here: State Congress Orders Once Legal Owners to Turn in Guns

The left said this would never happen.  Confiscation was not what they were after.  We all knew it was a lie and now it’s going to be a reality for some gun owners.  When they came for the 18-20 year old’s right did you speak up, even though you were not one of them?
Conservative Tribune Reports: It happens every time there’s talk of gun control laws: The left predictably scoffs at gun owners, calling them paranoid for not trusting the state.

“Nobody wants to confiscate your guns,” liberals assure the rest of America. “Stop exaggerating.”

Flash forward to Thursday. Lawmakers in Democrat-controlled Illinois have passed a bill to — you guessed it — confiscate currently legal firearms from gun owners. So much for being paranoid.

BREAKING: Democrat State Busted In Sneaky Scam To Hide 100,000 Illegals

The beauty of American politics is that all we need is a majority to right a wrong. Sure, there are some loopholes and people who believe that the system is broken, but basically, the majority gets to decide things. This was set up for the purpose of keeping the government from scamming people. It’s easy to convince a few people that your idea is right, but it’s hard to convince the majority unless the idea is really good.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Party has had so very many bad ideas that they are starting to run out of voters will buy what they’re selling. That provides them with a problem: how do they get votes, while simultaneously frustrating the voters with their unsustainable policies.

Enter illegals. No really, illegals are entering, and the Democrats are helping them, basically buying their votes. Not only do they advocate for the rights of illegals to remain in the country, but allow those same non-citizens to live off of our welfare and other special programs. Now, as the plan progresses, we’re discovering that hundreds of thousands of illegals (that we know of) are being put on voter registries. American Conservative Heraldreports that these illegals names were found voting in Pennsylvania:

“We know that Democrats will do anything to win elections. Even violate the very ethics of our democratic republic.

In numerous states, people aren’t even required to show proof of identity before voting. They can pretend to be anyone, so long as the name is registered. You can’t tell me people aren’t exploiting that to steal elections.

We often hear of other forms of voting fraud, including using the names of registered deceased voters to sneak in another vote. But one state took it much too far. It has admitted to letting 100,000 non-citizens register to vote. This means that a large group of people have the power to sway elections, who aren’t even American citizens.

The state is not one you’re thinking of.”

From Breitbart:

“More than 100,000 non-U.S. citizens are registered voters in Pennsylvania, according to testimony contained in a lawsuit demanding that the state admit its problems when it comes to non-citizen voting…

“For months, Pennsylvania bureaucrats have concealed facts about non-citizens registering and voting — that ends today,” PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said.

Of the more than 100,000 non-citizen voters in Pennsylvania, one city commissioner found in September that at least 90 of those non-citizens registered to vote cast ballots in Philadelphia. Hundreds more non-citizens who did not vote were also on the voter rolls.’

They are following a scheme used by other liberal states like California. They lowered the bar, allowing non-citizens who renew their driver’s licenses the right to register to vote. There’s just one big problem: being allowed to drive in the U.S. is not the same as legal citizenship.

This is an obvious attempt at voter fraud. No non-citizen, even a legal immigrant, should be allowed to vote in an U.S. election. Would I be able to vote in Canada, simply by getting a driver’s license there? Of course not. Why should it be any different in America?

News of this fraud comes after liberal, Pennsylvania judges re-created the congressional election map, which now gives Democrats a distinct advantage. Clearly, Democrats are doing anything to steal the state from legal, voting citizens. Whether inside the law or outside of it, they will violate our democracy to have their way.

News is spreading that other states are also joining in this ridiculous practice, including New Jersey, Virginia, and Texas.

So, when are we going to say we’ve had enough? The time is now to stop this before illegals take over our country for good.””

America is basically the frog in a pot of water that has been being heated slowly for decades. If we were to hear this story about any other country, where millions of people were migrating in, not integrating, and getting increasingly aggressive with their demands, we would call it for what it was; an invasion. America is slowly but surely agreeing with illegals that we’re totally OK with them taking our country over.

When a debate like this comes up, someone inevitably brings up the fact that America is a country of immigrants, and they’re right. However, we became a country of immigrants because of a desire to allow everyone to experience this amazing way of life. However, it’s not a right, it’s a privilege.

We have the right to say who enters and who doesn’t, and part of the path to citizenship requires that immigrants familiarize themselves with the framework of our government. Anyone who does that will be able to easily recognize that the Democrats’ platform is completely unsustainable, and shouldn’t be supported. That’s one of the reasons that illegals are vital for the continuation of the DNC’s agenda, and why we should fight to keep our right to vote sacred.

Source: American Conservative Herald,