After Jerry Brown Disobeys Trump’s Direct Border Order, Donald Announces Swift Consequences

Image result for After Jerry Brown Disobeys Trump’s Direct Border Order, Donald Announces Swift Consequences

Know what happens when you disobey a direct order from the President of the United States?

Well, it sort of depends on the President. But in the case of Donald Trump, he’s going to tell you exactly what sort of punishment to expect.

And he’s going to be very bold, and very public about announcing that punishment, too.

So, when California Governor Jerry Brown made it clear that National Guard troops in the state essentially have no power to protect our southern border, Trump fired back fast.

After Trump ordered states to send Guard troops to bolster our porous border, Brown issued the following order:

California National Guard will not enforce immigration laws or participate in the construction of any new border barrier.

He added that the federal government is paying for this deployment. Wait…so we pay for the action, and youhave the gall to tell them what to do?

Unsurprisingly, Trump wasn’t too pleased with this limitation of authority. He knows we need those troops to do their jobs if Americans are to remain safe in their beds at night.

As such, the President took to Twitter and ripped into Brown, saying the federal government won’t pay for troops to go to the border and “do nothing.”

He’s certainly right about needing action because illegal immigration continues to be one of this country’s biggest problems.

He then added another Tweet on Wednesday, mentioning the dire situation in California, and praising the efforts of various local officials in the state who have opposed its sanctuary state status.

The National Guard troops are there to protect us from dangerous illegal activity, such as drug smuggling and other cartel-related antics.

California has been turned into a war zone in certain spots, and it continues to be a safe haven for terrifying illegal criminals. All this has to stop.

And if it’s going to stop, we have to let border officials and our military do their jobs.

We almost hope California doesn’t obey Trump’s order, though, because it’d be great to see Trump take away more federal money!

Source: Western Journalism,

Google Plot Uncovered To Sabotage President Trump—Senior Engineer Confesses Every Detail

Image result for Google Plot Uncovered To Sabotage President Trump—Senior Engineer Confesses Every Detail

Former Google engineer James Damore made international news when he wrote a memo in July of last year blasting the company’s “ideological echo chamber”.

He called on the company to reexamine its diversity policies and its outright attack on those on the right.

He wrote the memo in response to a Google diversity program he was forced to attend, which Damore believed was just an excuse for the company to shame conservative white men like himself.

Damore was fired a month after the memo was released, but not before he filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board over threats he had received.

Damore is now pursuing legal action against Google, and as a result, many of the corporation’s censorship activities are finally being brought to light, and they’re even worse than we could have imagined.

From Breitbart:

Alon Altman, a senior software engineer at Google, pressured the company to sabotage President Trump’s Android phone, according to new evidence released via James Damore’s class-action lawsuit against the company.

Calling on the tech giant to use the ‘full economic force [of] Google for good’, Altman also suggested deleting the gmail accounts of Trump, his administration, and his aides for ‘abuse.’”

Altman is well-known at Google for her far left leanings, and tried last year to get the company to fire every employee that agreed with Damore’s memo.

The fact that she would try to subvert our Constitution by censoring those who don’t agree with her, including our own President, is extremely disturbing and reveals the lengths the left will go to in order to silence opposition.

Google claims to support diversity, but not when it comes to diversity of thought. Everyone at Google must subscribe to the company’s groupthink, or else be fired.

This wouldn’t be so concerning were it not for Google’s power over information. On average, the search engine receives 3.5 billion searches per day.

When the people engineering our search results have such a clear political bias, how can we be sure that the information we’re receiving is truthful?

As Damore’s lawsuit progresses, it will be interesting to see what else Google has been trying to hide from the American public…and whether or not it will show up in a Google search.

Source: Breitbart,

President Trump Kicks Off 2020 Campaign With Heart-Stopping Welfare Announcement

Image result for President Trump Kicks Off 2020 Campaign With Heart-Stopping Welfare Announcement

The War on Poverty has been going on for over fifty years, and often it seems like poverty is winning.

Some people say the definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.

Big government programs haven’t cured poverty; in fact, some argue, they’ve just made the problem worse. Isn’t it time we tried something different?

The ultimate goal of any welfare program should be to get people off of it.

But too often people become ensnared by dependency and lose the motivation to work for themselves when they can mooch off of those that do.

President Trump has always understood this, and has been instrumental in creating thousands of jobs that are allowing people to come off of welfare in astonishing numbers.

Trump isn’t even halfway through his first term and is already preparing for his next, by announcing just how successful his administration has been in curbing those on government dependency.

From Breitbart:

President Trump’s re-election campaign released a statement Monday celebrating the decline of nearly 600,000 people using food stamps in one month.

The campaign credited the data to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the government agency responsible for administering food stamp benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).”

This news is sure to crush the leftists, who want people dependent on welfare so that they’ll keep voting in Democrats who will provide it.

The campaign went on to criticize Trump’s predecessor, stating that, “food stamp enrollment dramatically increased throughout the Obama administration.”

But, “the news from the USDA today demonstrates that President Trump’s economic policies are bringing hard-working Americans back into the workforce…”

This welfare reduction is also due in part to America’s crackdown on those who are able-bodied but are still attempting to get a free ride.

Last month we reported on how West Virginia voted on a measure that would require residents ages 18-49, who are not disabled, pregnant, or military veterans, and do not have dependent children, to work a minimum of 20 hours per week to receive food stamp benefits.

Now all Trump has to do is finish completing the wall, and we will take millions more off the taxpayer dole.

Tired of winning yet, America?

Source: Breitbart,

James Woods Blasts Trump, ‘RINO Wimps’ Over Omnibus Budget Surrender

Two-time Oscar nominee James Woods blasted congressional Republicans as “RINO wimps” over the just-passed $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill.

“I never imagined I could loathe the @GOP more than the I loathe @TheDemocrats, but they got me with this suck-ass budget,” Woods tweeted to his 1.36 million followers, adding that he hopes “they get what they asked for in November. When will these RINO wimps stop sticking their asses in the air for the Democrats to violate?”

This massive omnibus bill, which only funds the government for six months, is widely seen as a total capitulation to Democrats. Although Americans put Republicans in charge of all three branches of government, Planned Parenthood remains fully funded, while there is virtually no funding for President Trump’s wall or border security. The bill is expected to add another trillion dollars to a national debt that is already over $20 trillion.

In other tweets, Woods also hammered Trump over his broken promise to build a border wall:

Although Trump at first signaled that he would sign the massive and massively unpopular bill, the growing fury in his own political base appears to have changed his mind. The president is now threatening a veto.

Woods’ frustration speaks for many — not in far-left Hollywood but in Middle America, who time and again see the GOP rolling over, even though they are completely in charge of the government. Moreover, all the wasteful spending on utter nonsense continues while priorities like border security remain under-funded.

On his nationally-syndicated radio show Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh said that he believes Trump signing this omnibus bill could be the kind of act that at long last creates a rift between the president and his loyal base of support.

“I predict this is going to be the first phase of Trump voters beginning to go wobbly. This is the swamp on steroids. This was not supposed to be happening anymore, this kind of thing,” he said.

“My fear is that this could be the issue, the item that begins to cause Trump voters to go wobbly, ’cause this was not… Let me put it another way.  This is the kind of thing that was going to stop — specifically under that umbrella, definition, ‘draining the swamp.’ My sense is that this is going to cause a massive amount of anger and opposition,” Limbaugh warned.


Trump Plays Compilation of Violent Video Games During Meeting With Entertainment Executives

A rising number of scholars question evidence of a link between gaming and aggression

President Trump reportedly showed a compilation of graphic scenes from modern video games to entertainment industry executives during a meeting about the effects of violent media on teenagers.

The Washington Examiner reports that during a closed-door meeting with a number of executives from video game studios, President Trump began the meeting by playing a compilation of “horrendously violent” scenes from video games to the group. Present at the meeting was Melissa Henson of the Parents Television Council, Dave Grossman, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel who has long argued that video games cause violence in teens, Mike Gallagher, the CEO of the video game trade association Entertainment Software Association (ESA), video game developer ZeniMax Media CEO Robert Altman, Take-Two Interactive CEO Strauss Zelnick, Pat Vance, the President of the Entertainment Software Rating Board, Brent Bozell of the conservative Media Research Center, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo., and Rep. Martha Roby, R-Ala.

The video that Trump played for the group has been posted to the official White House YouTube page. The Verge listed all of the scenes featured in the clip, they include,

  • The death of Call of Duty: Black Ops character Joseph Bowman (2010)
  • A collection of scenes from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2009)
  • Clips of kills in horror multiplayer game Dead by Daylight (2016)
  • More scenes from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, this time the infamous “No Russian” mission
  • Killing Nazis in Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
  • Shootouts in Fallout 4 (2015)
  • The “X-ray kill cam” system in Sniper Elite 4 (2017)
  • A death animation from horror game The Evil Within (2014)

The video can be seen above.

Grossman gave details on the meeting to the Washington Examiner: “President Trump said, ‘Did everyone see that clearly?’” Grossman said. “He played a video of a bunch of horrendously violent slashing games and then he turned to the industry representatives and said, ‘What are you going to say about this?’” The video game executives produced research showing that there was no link between violent video games and violent teens, which Grossman called “bogus.” When he’s not writing about the dangers of fictional video games, Grossman is a self-described “Killologist” who teaches military tactics to police officers and was most recently quoted telling officers “It’s your job to put a piece of steel in your fist and kill those sons of bitches when they come to kill our kids.”

Breitbart Tech has previously debunked the claim that video games cause violence. Recent studies have not shown any link between violent video games and violence in teens. Some studies have claimed that on-screen violence can create a desensitization effect, but so far have failed to show a corresponding drop in personal empathy towards others. A study in Frontiers in Psychology found no link, nor did a similar study in Brain Imaging and Behavior. According to a team of researchers at Oxford, online team-based video games can actually help to improve the sociability of children while in some cases actually reducing aggression.

President Trump reportedly asked each executive, “What do you think needs to be done?” Trump was apparently quite open-minded throughout the interview, “I don’t think he came in with his mind made up…. I think he was gathering information,” said Henson of the Parents Television Council. “He didn’t come in with an opening statement or a closing statement.”

The ESA released a statement on the meeting which states: “We welcomed the opportunity today to meet with the President and other elected officials at the White House. We discussed the numerous scientific studies establishing that there is no connection between video games and violence, First Amendment protection of video games, and how our industry’s rating system effectively helps parents make informed entertainment choices. We appreciate the President’s receptive and comprehensive approach to this discussion.”

Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center told the Verge, “I don’t think there should be any government control over it. But there is some programming that contains just absolute mind-boggling violence. We’ve all seen it. Is it appropriate in a civilized world to have that? Or could the industry listen to the better angels of their nature and say, we just don’t want to do it, on a voluntary basis?”

The White House also issued a statement which reads:  “The President acknowledged some studies have indicated there is a correlation between video game violence and real violence. The conversation centered on whether violent video games, including games that graphically simulate killing, desensitize our community to violence.”

Breitbart News reporters Allum Bokhari and Charlie Nash wrote in their recent piece that there is no direct correlation between violent media and real-life violence:

Across society, there is no correlation between the rise of on-screen violence. There is considerably more violent media available today than there was in the mid-20th century when movies were tightly censored by the Hays Code, which prohibited gratuitous displays of bloodshed. Video games – violent and otherwise – are a new medium, only gaining traction in the late 70s and 1980s. Yet real-world violence in the developed world has declined across the same period.

The American Psychological Association (APA) categorizes violent video games as a risk factor in causing aggression but found no evidence linking them to acts of real-world criminality or delinquency. Aggression, which is also caused by competitive sports, is not sufficient to lead to real-world violence. In 2017, the Media Psychology and Technology division of the APA has advised public officials and journalists against attempts to link violent media to acts of real-world violence.


President Trump Asks Dianne Feinstein to Add ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban to School Safety Bill

Trump and Feinstein (Alex Wong / Getty)

President Trump asked Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) to add her “assault weapons” ban to the overarching school safety bill during a bipartisan meeting with lawmakers on Wednesday.

Feinstein’s bill, which is an enhanced reintroduction of a bill she has put forward again and again, bans over 200 different firearms.

During Wednesday’s White House meeting, Trump showed support for the gun control pushed by Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Pat Toomey (R-PA). The Manchin/Toomey bill is a gun control bill that the Democrat-controlled Senate rejected on April 17, 2013. But Trump chalked that failure up to Barack Obama’s lack of leadership, and talked of using the Manchin/Toomey bill as a base to which other bills could be added.

The goal was to create a body of gun legislation, ubiquitously for the purposes of school safety.

Sen. Feinstein talked about her bill and described the AR-15 as one of “the latest and newest weapons” to hit our streets. However, Eugene Stoner designed the AR-15 in the 1950s and Armalite began producing the gun during the 1960s. Are weapons from 60 years ago now considered “latest and newest”?

Nonetheless, Trump listened to Feinstein, heard from a few more gun control proponents—including Rep. Ted Deutch (D-FL)—then looked back at Feinstein and told her she should add her bill to the Manchin/Toomey bill for consideration.


Report: Trump Jumped Out of Limo to Stop Mugging in 1991

US President Donald Trump looks on from the presidential limo, nicknamed The Beast, following his arrival at Hanoi's Noi Bai airport on November 11, 2017. Trump arrived in the Vietnamese capital after attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit leaders meetings earlier in the day in Danang. / AFP PHOTO / HOANG DINH NAM (Photo credit should read HOANG DINH NAM/AFP/Getty Images)

According to a New York Daily News report dated November 20, 1991, when he spotted a “big guy with a big bat” beating on another guy, Donald Trump told his limousine driver to pull over. Witnesses told the paper,  that “with [then-girlfriend] Marla Maples tugging at his arm to try to stop him, [Trump] leaped from his black stretch limousine Monday evening during the Manhattan assault.”

The Manhattan billionaire, who was 45 at the time, told the story from there. “The guy with the bat looked at me, and I said, “Look, you’ve gotta stop this. Put down the bat. I guess he recognized me because he said, ‘Mr. Trump, I didn’t do anything wrong.’ I said, ‘How could you not do anything wrong when you’re whacking a guy with a bat?’ Then he ran away.”

Trump added that he saw the mugger deliver “five or six good whacks” before he put a stop to it.

Witness accounts varied. One young woman says Trump only got out of his limo only to see what was going on after it had already happened and the mugger was long gone.

Another witness, though, backed The Donald’s account. “All of a sudden, a big long limousine pulls up on an angle, and Donald Trump pops out with the blond, too,” the unnamed witness said. “There was a guy with a bat, hitting a guy over the head, and Trump yelled, ‘Put that bat down. What are you doing?’ The guy dropped the bat, came over and started talking to him.”

Trump, who was on his way to a Paula Abdul concert, said that he only left the scene when he knew an ambulance was on the way and saw that the victim was being treated by a witness who appeared to be a doctor.

At the time, there was no police report filed about the attack.

The reporter, James Rosen, does not disclose how he learned of the incident. Trump said he was surprised anyone heard about it. “I’m not looking to play this thing up,” Trump told Rosen. “I’m surprised you found out about it.”

Rosen also reports that “Trump was at first reluctant to discuss his daredevil deed, but then he warmed to the task.”

Trump’s famous ability to manipulate the New York press should always be kept in mind.

New York in the pre-Giuliani days of 1991 was not the New York of today, the New York that looks like a Hollywood backlot dressed for a romcom. No, in 1991, New York looked like this and the statistics looked like this. Just a few weeks earlier, in fact, Trump’s own mother had been mugged before a bystander named Lawrence Herbert chased the thug away.

A full 27 years later, this story surfaced online after the media roundly mocked President Trump over his claim that, unlike the local deputies at the scene, he would not have stood outside as innocent children were being massacred at a school in Parkland, Florida.

CNN’s anti-Trump pundit, Jake Tapper, who is himself using traumatized children as human shields to hide from the widespread criticism of his mishandling of last week’s anti-gun town hall, angrily lashed out at Trump over the school shooting comments. Tapper has yet to comment on this 1991 report.

In its own snarky attack on Trump, the far-left Washington Post also failed to inform its readers about this report of Trump stopping a mugging.


White House on ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban: ‘We Haven’t Closed Doors on Any Front’

Sarah Sanders, Assault Weapons

During Tuesday’s press briefing, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders was asked about a proposed “assault weapons” ban and said, “We haven’t closed the door on any front.”

NPR’s Mara Liasson asked, “In 2000 [President Trump] did support an ‘assault weapons’ ban. What is his position now?” She followed her own question by asking if President Trump supports “reinstating” the 1994-2004 federal “assault weapons” ban.

CNN reported that Sanders responded by saying, “I don’t have any specific announcements, but we haven’t closed the door on any front.”

Sanders went on to say “the next several days and weeks” will witness conversations on where changes in current laws might be made.

She said Trump is specifically supportive of making background checks “more efficient.”

On February 20, Breitbart News reported that Trump directed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to finalize plans to ban bump stocks. The details of the ban–whether it might include a grandfather clause–are not yet known.


Trump Directs DOJ to Ban Bump Stocks in Response to Gun Control Outcry

A bump stock device that fits on a semi-automatic rifle to increase the firing speed, making it similar to a fully automatic rifle, is shown here at a gun store on October 5, 2017 in Salt Lake City, Utah. Congress is talking about banning this device after it was reported to of been used in the Las Vegas shootings on October 1, 2017. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump directed Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Tuesday to finalize plans to ban bump stocks.

The Hill reports that Trump mentioned that the “process” of banning bump stocks began in December.

It was December 28, 2017, when Breitbart News reported that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was accepting public comment on proposed regulatory gun control that would alter the definition of “machinegun” to cover machineguns and non-machineguns, too. This shift allows the ATF to use the National Firearms Act (1934) to control firearm accessories like bump stocks in the same way it controls actual machine guns and devices that convert semiautomatic firearms into machine guns.

Gun control outlet The Trace reported that the public comment period ended with roughly 36,000 comments, of which more than eight out of ten voiced opposition to bump stock gun control.

Yet Trump is supporting regulatory action against the firearm accessories.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins tweeted:

Trump also said he expects regulations banning bump stocks to “be finalized … very soon.”

Bump stocks were not used in the February 14 attack in Florida. Nor were they used in the Texas church attack (November 5, 2017), the Alexandria attack (June 14, 2017), the Orlando attack (June 12, 2016), the San Bernardino attack (December 2, 2015), the Umpqua Community College attack (October 1, 2015), the Lafayette movie theater attack (July 23, 2015), the Chattanooga attack (July 16, 2015), the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal attack (Jun 17, 2015), the Santa Barbara attack (May 23, 2014), the Fort Hood attack (April 2, 2014), the D.C. Navy Yard attack (September 16, 2013), the Aurora movie theater attack (July 20, 2012), the Gabby Giffords (January 8, 2011) attack, or the Virginia Tech attack (April 16, 2007), among others.

In fact, the October 1, 2017, Las Vegas attack is the only high profile public attack in which a bump stock was used criminally.


After Trump’s Speech, Border Wall Poll Takes A Tremendous Swing

It’s amazing how fake news can split this country. For over a year, we’ve been told President Trump is the one dividing us. But when the people are allowed to see the facts, we discover the opposite is true.

The only people dividing us are the liberals. They lie in media. They lie in Washington. They push false narratives in order to keep many Americans in the dark.

But when they were allowed to hear from Trump himself, it makes all the difference. Since Trump’s State of the Union address, many people are singing a new tune. Turns out, most of us support Trump’s plan for America.

From Breitbart:

The majority of Americans want a wall along the southern border to protect the United States and American workers from illegal aliens pouring into the country.

Following President Trump’s “State of the Union” (SOTU) address wherein he demanded at least $25 billion from the Republican-controlled Congress to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, nearly 60 percent of Americans said they supported the plan.

The post-SOTU CBS News poll revealed that 59 percent of Americans said they supported “building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.”

Only 41 percent of Americans said they opposed the border wall, but were not given other options in the poll for what they would like to see done about securing the country’s southern border.

The support for Trump’s border wall is just the latest development in Americans’ vast support for the president’s plan to transform the current legal immigration — whereby more than 70 percent of legal immigrants arrive in the U.S. for no other reason than to reunify with foreign relatives — into one based on merit, skills, and English proficiency.

It seems like the only people who want to protect illegal immigration are radical leftists. And, of course, the brain-dead celebrities who endorse them. Neither group has to deal with the fallout of increased illegal immigration. The rest of us do.

Most Americans are against illegal immigration. They don’t want millions of undocumented strangers flooding the country. We understand the danger that poses.

Most Americans also want improvements to the immigration system. And now we know, most want a border wall.

So, who’s standing in the way? Radical liberals who need illegals for their support. They aren’t interested in protecting the economy or national security. Democrats only want to exploit illegals for political power. Pathetic.

But more and more Americans are getting behind the President. Democrats will be forced to either support his vision or get voted out of office. Let’s see which happens first!

Source: Breitbart,