Donald Delivers 30-Day Eviction Notice To Barack’s Most Cherished Legacy

One of the biggest differences between President Obama and President Trump? How they wield their Presidential authority.

Obama abused his executive orders to push through his agenda. He did not want to work with Congress. It was an obvious and flagrant violation of the Constitution’s limits on power.

Trump, on the other hand, isn’t interested in going beyond what the law allows. He understands that to make a permanent change, you need to do it through law. That’s why he rescinded DACA’s, Obama’s worst abuse of executive authority.

Now he’s made it clear, he won’t sign any orders extending the controversial program.

From The Hill:

White House chief of staff John Kelly said Tuesday that President Trump is unlikely to extend the deadline for work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on March 5 if Congress has not reached a deal on immigration by that date.

Kelly told reporters on Capitol Hill that he was “not so sure” that Trump had the authority to extend the deadline because the program was not based on law, The Washington Post reported.

Work permits for DACA recipients will begin to expire on that date due to Trump’s decision to rescind DACA in September with a six-month delay.

Would you have ever heard these words out of Barack “the ends justify the means” Obama? Barack “never waste a good crisis” Obama? No, and here’s what’s at stake:

“There are 690,000 official DACA recipients and the president sent over what amounts to be two and a half times that number, to 1.8 million,” Kelly continued. “The difference between 690 and 1.8 million were the people that some would say were too afraid to sign up, others would say were too lazy to get off their asses, but they didn’t sign up.”

Obama grossly overstepped his bounds when he issued DACA. He refused to work with Congress to provide a lasting solution (legally and within the bounds Constitution). It’s why we are facing the problems we have today. Obama’s impatience and short-sidedness left us with today’s crisis.

Trump is not Obama. He’s not interested in forcing issues to get his own way. He wants lasting fixes for our ailing country. That means getting Congress to draft an immigration solution that will work. And continue to work for many years. Unlike DACA, which was a poor, short-term Band-Aid.

But will Congress be responsible enough to make that fix? President Trump laid out his goals in the SOTU address. It’s up to Republicans in Congress to draft up a bill to fit his vision. But Democrats might not be willing to compromise. Which will lead to more gridlock and possible government shutdowns.

The question is: will Democrats be mature enough to swallow their pride and work with Trump? Hmm, I’ll let you answer that yourselves.

Source: The Hill, patriotjournal.org

BREAKING! Trump Just Ordered Him ARRESTED! Obama And ENTIRE Dem Party FURIOUS!

And once again we are getting reports of another so-called “Dreamer” doing what illegals do best, breaking the law.

An in-depth investigation by a local Houston television reporter has now revealed that the man accused of murdering a local convenience store owner is, in fact, an illegal alien who is only here because of former President Barack Hussein Obama’s DACA amnesty program. The “Dreamer” is currently at-large after allegedly killing the store owner and shooting another man in what is being called a senseless crime.

Apparently, the “Dreamer,” 21-year-old Judas Deluna, after harassing some people waiting in line at a taco truck, got into a fight with a man. So he went to his car, grabbed a gun and shot the man, but things turned deadly when the owner of the store ran out to help the man who was shot and Deluna shot him fatally.

Newly obtained court records from Texas from Harris County District Clerk Chris Daniel’s office confirm that Deluna received a felony conviction for a terroristic threat made in 2015 for which he was sentenced to 60 days in county jail. He had previously been charged with Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon but that charge was dismissed as part of his plea deal. Earlier this year prosecutors charged Deluna with a felony charge of evading arrest with a motor vehicle, and he was put on probation.

Deluna is now at large and considered to be armed and dangerous, Thanks, Obama and the Democrat Party!

All these crimes and this man was still allowed to stay in this country?  And now an innocent father of two young children is dead because a segment of our society hates law-abiding American citizens so much that they want to change the very fabric our nation has had for almost 250 years. The only acceptable outcome to this whole immigration issue is to deport them all, they are welcomed to come back, but they have to wait in line and come through the front door. This is the only way we will be able to stop criminals from coming into our country, don’t you agree?

Via Breitbart:

An investigation by a Houston television reporter revealed that the man accused of murdering a store owner is allegedly an illegal alien who is currently under President Barack Obama’s DACA amnesty program. The “Dreamer” is currently on the run after allegedly killing the store owner and shooting another man.

An investigation by ABC13’s Jessica Willey reports that accused killer Judas Deluna, 21, is an illegal alien who is currently under the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty program. The program allows undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents to receive temporary protected status from deportation. The federal government is supposed to conduct a criminal background investigation prior to adjusting the immigrant’s the DACA status.

Deluna may have obtained the DACA protection despite a prior history of felony arrests and convictions.

Court records obtained by Breitbart Texas from Harris County District Clerk Chris Daniel’s office show that Deluna received a felony conviction for a terroristic threat made in 2015. The judge of the 176th Criminal District Court sentenced the man to 60 days in county jail. He had also been charged with Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon. That charge was dismissed as part of a plea agreement.

Earlier that year, prosecutors charged Deluna with a felony charge of evading arrest with a motor vehicle. The same judge placed the man on four years of probation and deferred adjudication. Following the new murder charge, prosecutors filed a motion to adjudicate this charge.

The current murder charges stem from a shooting that occurred outside DJ’s Food Mart in northwest Harris County in January, Willey reported. It is believed that Deluna got into a fight with another man. He fled to his vehicle where he reportedly pulled a gun and shot the man he was fighting with. When store owner’s son, Rahman Rupani, responded to the shooting, Deluna allegedly shot him as well. Rupani died from his wounds.

Deluna fled the scene in a Black Lincoln Navigator, according to a criminal complaint obtained by Breitbart Texas.

He has been on the run since the January 26 shooting. Willey reported that during the passing three weeks, she learned of Deluna’s status as a DACA “Dreamer.”

Willey also learned that Deluna’s illegal alien father, Manuel Deluna, is also a violent felon who is currently facing deportation proceedings.

Crime appears to be the family business. Judas Deluna’s older brother, Eric Deluna, also has a violent criminal history that includes convictions in state court in 2005 of Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon and a 2011 case of Aggravated Robbery with a Deadly Weapon, according to Harris County court records obtained by Breitbart Texas.

Willey reported that Eric Deluna planned to ambush a Los Zetas cartel drug shipment in Houston. The shipment was actually part of a federal sting operation. The sting turned violent when a gun battle ensued. A federal informant died in the shootout and a Harris County deputy sheriff was wounded. The older Deluna brother received a 30-year prison sentence.

Activists have often attempted to paint the picture of all DACA recipients being upstanding, law-abiding residents of this country. However, Breitbart Texas has previously reported on crimes, including human smuggling and gang membership, committed by DACA recipients.

“This is not a depiction of who Dreamers are, who DACA holders are,” Cesar Espinosa, an immigrant rights activist with FIEL Houston told ABC13. “We, like everyone else, don’t want those people here. Don’t want bad actors in our community.”

Esponisa then fell back on conflated statistics on immigrant crime which does not separate crimes committed by legal and illegal immigrants. “Studies have shown immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than born citizens because even if you make a small mistake it could lead to something as big as a deportation for ourselves,” Espinosa said.

Many states do not statistically separate crimes committed by immigrants based on their status. However, a study conducted in Arizona where immigration status is tracked reported that “Dreamer”-age illegal aliens are twice as likely to commit crimes as young American citizens. Breitbart News’ Neil Munro wrote, “The report punctures claims by pro-amnesty advocates that young ‘dreamer’ illegals are vital to U.S. industry and civic life, and indicate that any amnesty will ensure that many more crimes — including murders and rapes — will be inflicted against Americans and legal immigrants, including Hispanics and blacks.”

The report states:

Unfortunately, if the goal of DACA is to give citizenship to a particularly law-abiding group of undocumented immigrants, it is accomplishing the opposite of what was intended. As Table 8 shows, DACA age eligible undocumented immigrants are 250% more likely to be convicted of crimes than their share of the population. Those too old for DACA status are convicted at a relatively low rates (45.7% more than their share of the Arizona population).

A report summary explains:

Using newly released detailed data on all prisoners who entered the Arizona state prison from January 1985 through June 2017, we are able to separate non-U.S. citizens by whether they are illegal or legal residents. These data do not rely on self-reporting by criminals. Undocumented immigrants are at least 142% more likely to be convicted of a crime than other Arizonans. They also tend to commit more serious crimes and serve 10.5% longer sentences, more likely to be classified as dangerous, and 45% more likely to be gang members than U.S. citizens …

If undocumented immigrants committed crime nationally as they do in Arizona, in 2016 they would have been responsible for over 1,000 more murders, 5,200 rapes, 8,900 robberies, 25,300 aggravated assaults, and 26,900 burglaries.

Judas Deluna remains a fugitive at this time. His victim, Rhaman Rupani, leaves behind a grieving wife and two young children.

A cash reward is being offered by Houston Crime Stoppers for information leading to Deluna’s arrest.

 

Source:freedom-daily.com

Obama Knew Everything: Barack’s House of Cards About to Come Crashing Down

The mainstream media matrix is doing its best to limit the public’s knowledge of the past president’s administration’s weaponization of the FBI and the DOJ for political purposes as they possibly can. 

If this doesn’t matter to you then you don’t deserve to live in this country.  But be aware that you are fomenting a political revolution to strip American patriots of their rights and you deserve their scorn, at least.

In one case the nation’s premier law enforcement agency destroyed evidence and passed out immunity deals like free cigarettes in Times Square in order to exonerate the past president’s preferred successor.  And all the while, the FBI was operating with the full approval, and under orders from, the Attorney General of the United States and with guidance from her highest level associates within the DOJ.

In a second instance both agencies fabricated and publicized a wholly unwarranted probe into the past president’s preferred successor’s challenger.

This is all going to crash down upon that president because Congress has evidence that the President of the United States might have orchestrated both of these violations that desecrated the oaths those at the FBI and DOJ took to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Even if the president didn’t initially give the orders to conduct these crimes, these crimes amounted to a criminal conspiracy that evidence shows were conducted with his full knowledge.  There is no evidence that president did anything to stop this conspiracy – or those involved in it – from continuing to subvert the rule of law, the spirit of the law, or the long-term damage that would result from it.

That president must now answer for his crimes.  If he isn’t then no one’s freedoms will ever again be protected.

The fact that president was Barack Hussein Obama and not Donald Trump only shines a spotlight on the mainstream media’s intense partisanship.  It would be hard to see how any paid lobbyist could present a more polarized viewpoint. 

Their sins are so egregious that they are forced to ignore what are increasingly earth-shaking revelations of wrongdoing while at the same time dedicating all of their print space and airtime to looking for some crime with which to charge his successor.  A successor who has sworn to drain the D.C. swamp.

Thanks to investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson we have a chart outlining the interactions of the criminal co-conspirators that manned the highest levels of both agencies:

While there’s now no denying that they were a rogue group of traitors, the evidence shows they were working with the full knowledge and authority of Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, and President Obama.

Despite the obfuscation from every agency of which documentation had been requested, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs found damning evidence of the President Obama’s direct involvement in what can only be characterized as a criminal conspiracy to alter the outcome of an election:

First, a list of documentation that has been kept from investigators following written requests for which date as far back as July 2015:

  • State Department (10 requests for documents ignored),
  • Justice Department (4 requests for documents ignored),
  • FBI (11 requests for documents ignored),
  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2 requests for documents ignored),

There were also interview requests that have been ignored dating back to September 2015:

  • Interview request with Bryan Pagliano. (September 4, 2015 request).
  • Interview request with Justin Cooper. (December 7, 2015 request).
  • Interview request with John Bentel. (March 4, 2016 request).
  • Interview request with Marcel Lazar (April 27, 2016 request).

Requests for records from other non-governmental groups were also ignored including those of Clinton Executive Services Corporation made in September 2015.

This was a full-scale cover-up and the report released on Wednesday by the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs points to glaring proof that Obama’s fingerprints are all over it:

  • From Page 3 of the report: [FBI Deputy Director of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok and FBI Attorney Lisa Page] discussed then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch knowing that Secretary Clinton would not face charges—before the FBI had interviewed Secretary Clinton and before her announcement that she would accept Director Comey’s prosecution decision. They wrote about drafting talking points for then-Director Comey because President Obama “wants to know everything we’re doing.”
  • From Page 5: On March 7, 2015, in an interview with President Obama, CBS News correspondent Bill Plante asked, “When did you first learn that Hillary Clinton used an email system outside the U.S. government for official business when she was Secretary of State?” President Obama answered: “The same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”

On its face, Obama’s assertion is absurd.  Are we to believe that not a single one of our 17 intelligence agencies alerted President Obama to Hillary’s violation of the Espionage Act?

More from Page 5: On March 9, 2015, responding to press inquiries about the President’s interview with Plante, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest stated: “The President was referring specifically to the arrangement associated with Secretary Clinton’s email. Yes, the President was aware of her email address. He traded emails with her. That shouldn’t be a surprise that the President of the United States is going to trade emails with the Secretary of State. But the President was not aware that this was the email address that she was using exclusively for all her business. The president was not aware of that until that had been more widely reported.”

Nobody in the White House press corps thought to press the question why didn’t the president, sending and receiving emails on a non-approved platform, demand an investigation in to whether his exchanges with Hillary – his Secretary of State – had been compromised or, at least, secure. 

At this point it had become evident that the mainstream media had become cheerleaders for the president.

  • From Page 6: Plante, however, was not asking about Secretary Clinton’s exclusive use of a private email system—only the President’s knowledge that Secretary Clinton had used a private system for official business.

President Obama had effectively been given a pass for himself having violated the Espionage Act through his communications with Hillary Clinton, something we considered in a column from August 13, 2015.

  • From Page 13: On April 10, 2016, Strzok texted Page that he was “increasingly profoundly bothered by JBs [sic – likely refers to James Baker, FBI General Counsel] call and the lack of ANY heads up. Deeply. It was wrong given what I had already been asked to do.” He continued: “I’m not sure if I want to be part of this.” Page responded, “You are part of this and that’s not going to change. But I think you have every right to be angry and frustrated about being left out of the loop on your investigation, especially when you’re going to be left holding the bag. . .  Big big case, big big problems.”68 From context, it appears that Page and Strzok may have been discussing an interview that President Obama gave to Fox News Sunday, taped earlier in the week but aired that day, in which President Obama noted that he “continued to believe that [Secretary Clinton] has not jeopardized America’s national security.”

This suggests that Strzok had been doing the bidding of superiors – sometimes against his better judgment – and he realized that he was being set up as the fall guy if the conspiracy was ever exposed.

Then this smoking gun followed.

  • From Page 14: “Rybicki [Comey’s Chief of Staff] just sent another version.”… “He changed President to ‘another senior government official.’”

“The changes in Director Comey’s statement to delete the reference to President Obama—taken with the President’s April 10 statements about the investigation—raise questions about whether the FBI sought to downplay President Obama’s role or awareness of Secretary Clinton’s conduct.”

Lisa Page then flatly admits Obama’s Attorney General was aware of everything that the FBI was conspiring to do to exonerate Clinton and that she did nothing to stop it. 

  • More from Page 14: “On July 1, 2016, following Attorney General Lynch’s announcement that she would follow the FBI’s recommendation in the Clinton investigation, Page wrote, “it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought” against Secretary Clinton.”

As we already knew, A.G. Lynch had ordered Comey to downplay the most explosive criminal conspiracy in American history by referring to it as a matter. 

Four days later Comey held a press conference to exonerate Clinton.  Then two days after that he swore before the “House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016, Director Comey that he “did not coordinate [his statement] with anyone. The White House, the Department of Justice, nobody outside the FBI family had any idea what I was about to say.”

Who was lying – Page in a private text message to her lover or Comey to a nationwide audience?

Then less than two months later we had proof that Obama was deeply involved in, at least, monitoring the fraudulent FISA application if not having orchestrated it:

  • From Page 15: On September 2, 2016, Page wrote about preparing talking points for Director Comey because “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.”78 This text raises additional questions about the type and extent of President Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email scandal and the FBI investigation of it.

These were the direct references to Obama, or “the president” contained in the 25-page interim report released by the Senate’s Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

The FBI text messages can be found here.

The letters Chairman Johnson has sent to various agencies and source documents can be found here.

There is no way to deny the evidence that the only tyrant in the Clinton-Trump equation was Barack Obama.  He was the only person with knowledge of the conspiracy who also had the ability to end it.

Unlike Robert Mueller who started his investigation from scratch the special counsel appointed to look into this will have much its work already done.  The 32 requests for the production of evidential documents and interviews that we cited above promise to bring Obama’s House of Cards crashing down.

Source:conservativepost.com

BREAKING! Obama Family Flees As Secret Service Agent Just Blows Obamagate WIDE OPEN!

Obamagate is the Watergate of our generation….except far worse. Here is a bit of a refresher for those with that either have short memories, those too young to remember or those that are afraid of accurate history books.

Watergate is termed as one of the biggest scandals in modern political history. Republican President Richard Nixon desperately wanted to know what Democrats were planning for their 1972 presidential campaign against him. He ordered a team of trusted aides to spy on them where they literally broke into the offices of the Democrat National Committee inside the Watergate Building thus leading to Nixon’s downfall.

Yet it seems there is no longer any need for breaking and entering any longer. All you have to do is use the high-tech electronic power of big brother government where a corrupt president intent on wiping out the opposition is willing to listen in on anyone at anytime and the 4th amendment is little more than words on paper. When President Donald Trump tweeted back in March 2017 that Barack Obama spied on him it became a joke of sorts with CNN tweeting about “Trump’s baseless wiretap claim” and, “Trump just flat-out lied about wiretapping.”

Except it was not a joke and President Trump was right…

Apparently, President Trump’s biggest crime is winning a fixed election against all odds against globalist criminal Hillary Clinton. Now President Trump is in charge of the Department of Justice and he can investigate and prosecute as he sees fit based on where the evidence takes him.

This is Obamagate. It makes Watergate look like child’s play. The real question is: What did Obama himself know and when did he know it? Former Secret Service agent and host of “The Dan Bongino Show” Dan Bongino suggests that not only did Obama know? He was an active participant. He  makes the case that the entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a “setup” from the beginning dubbing the Obama surveillance abuse of the Trump team and Americans as a whole is the “most consequential political scandal in the history of the United States.”

Bongino states – “You can see the left-wing media’s own stories about all of this. The spying, the setup, the framing of Donald Trump. The left-wing reported on it because they thought it was real … because they’re suckers for the Democrats! Folks, this was a setup. It was a stingoperation, an entrapment operation the entire time.”

Listen.

An IBD/TIPP poll shows that “Americans overwhelmingly believe the Obama administration ‘improperly surveilled’ Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.” This is all despite the concerted propaganda and media disinformation effort being put forth by the American mainstream media’s best and most cynical efforts to bury the truth or even stop the truth from ever seeing the light of day. This poll shows how many Americans are simply tuning out and refusing to listen to the hysterical rantings of the MSM. Many are looking to alternative media sources for the truth as to what is happening. It makes sense as to why platforms such as the uber leftwing Facebook and Twitter are so desperately trying to shut down anything but the “official” points of view.

The poll without a doubt shows that a majority of the public believe the exact opposite of what an unceasing, coordinated media campaign wants them to believe. America simply is not buying the complete work of fiction that President Trump colluded with the Russians to win the 2016 campaign and that the heroic FBI is being unfairly smeared by Trump’s eeeevil defenders despite their relentless propaganda attempting to convince them otherwise.

A clear majority of 55% of Americans believe it is  “likely” that the Obama administration “improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.” That includes 31% of Democrats, 87% of Republicans, and 55% of Independents. It seems even those among Obama’s own party do not buy his story. 54% of Americans want a special counsel to investigate “whether the FBI and the Department of Justice improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election.” Along party lines – 74% of Republicans and 50% of Independents want a special counsel — as do a full 44% of Democrats.

A Rasmussen poll from this week shows that a mere 42% of Americans believe Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election more than the FBI and a full 34% believe the FBI actually meddled more than the Russians. That means we now currently live in a country where more than half – 58% of Americans – believe own FBI meddled in a presidential election more than a hostile foreign government.

Meanwhile, President Trump’s approval rating is running ahead of former-President Obama’s at this point in his failed presidency.

Bongino has been leading the charge in exposing the Obamagate scandal on his chart-topping podcast, calling it the “biggest political scandal in U.S. history.”

All of this means that while government agents were supposedly listening for so-called “criminal activity” they just happened to come across every single detail and plan of the Trump campaign.  They just happened to know the entire content of Trump’s speeches….before they happened no less.  They just happened to know his line of attack on Hillary Clinton.  They knew what Trump was planning before he did.  Did they consult their Magic 8 ball? Perhaps perform a tarot reading? Use their phone a friend option? NO! They illegally obtained valuable insider information on a much greater scale than Nixon ever did!

Obama thought he committed the perfect crime. With a rigged election for Hillary, she couldn’t lose. after her easy victory, Hillary would be in control of the Department of Justice. So who would ever investigate or prosecute? Except Obama did not count on the American people…and now his chickens are coming home to roost.

Source:freedom-daily.com

JUST IN: BILLIONS Of Obama’s Ransom Payment Just Surfaced In SICKENING Location

American people are learning about another Barack Obama lie and betrayal against our nation and people. We are now starting to get reports which confirm that the money Iran received in sanction relief from the Obama Administration has in fact gone to groups considered terrorists. If you all can recall, back in 2016, the Obama administration came under fierce criticism following reports that in January of that same year the US had illegally transferred $400 million in cash to Iran at Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport. And interestingly enough the payment took place the very same day, January 17, 2016, that the  Americans who were being held by the Iranian regime as hostages were released.

Although defenders of the payment and Obama lackeys claimed the transfer was not a ransom payment to secure the prisoners’ release. They kept repeating it was part of a long-running dispute between the US and Tehran regarding a canceled weapons procurement deal from the 1970s. While the Shah had made a $400 million down payment on the deal before his overthrow in 1979, the US had refused to give the money to the fundamentalist Islamic republic which toppled the Shah’s government after the deal was scrapped. So along came the most anti-American President in history, Barack Hussein Obama to make things right with Iran.

That wasn’t the only payment which took place. The Obama administration later paid an additional $1.3 billion to Iran for what they claimed was interest from the $400 million held by the US from 1979 to 2016. Whatever happened to not negotiating with terrorist regimes?

 

Investors Business Daily Reports:

“Since it was revealed the U.S. gave Iran $1.7 billion as part of its 2015 nuclear deal, everyone has wondered: What did Iran do with all that money, much of it in cash? Now we know — a chunk of it went to fund terrorism.

The U.S. foolishly gave Iran the money because both President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry were so desperate for an Iranian nuke deal that they were willing to bribe the Iranians to go along. And ever since, Iran has treated them with utter contempt for being so weak.

Even so, all along the U.S. government has steadfastly maintained that the money was desperately needed by Iran to prop up its ailing economy. They would spend the money on butter, not guns.

Yes, both Obama and Kerry said that “some” of the money might get used for evil purposes, but downplayed its significance.

And, as recently as last week, State Department official Christopher Backemeyer told a congressional hearing: “It’s our assessment the vast majority (of the $1.7 billion) has gone to the critical needs that Iran has had.”

He went on to concede that he couldn’t vouch for “every dollar that’s gonna go in or out of Iran, as you know.” Still he made clear the government believes the money was used mainly general economic purposes.

Well, it was bad enough that a big part of the $1.7 billion — about $400 million — was paid out as a clear bribe for the return of four American hostages, a violation of U.S. law.

But now we find out from a new report by the American Action Forum (AAF) that $37.4 million of the ransom money likely has been handed over to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the group that carries out terrorist operations around the world and that has murdered Americans.

“Applying the official (Iranian budget) spending levels to the U.S. payment to Iran, the $1.7 billion would mean $37.4 million for the IRGC,” wrote Rachel Hoff, the analyst at the American Action Forum who calculated the amount.

“Paying ransoms in exchange for Americans held abroad is one bad policy,” Hoff said. “Indirectly funding terrorism is another.”

And make no mistake — the IRGC is a terrorist group. A State Department report in 2012 cited the “marked resurgence of Iran’s state sponsorship of terrorism through its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — Quds Force, its Ministry of Intelligence and Security, and Tehran’s ally Hezbollah.” It further warned at the time that these terrorist activities “have reached a tempo unseen since the 1990s.”

Since then, under the desperate-for-a-deal Kerry, State has changed its tune, suggesting that somehow the Iranian Guard is no longer involved in terrorism as it once was. This is not mere naivete — it is a lie, and the State Department knows it.

Iran is responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans, mostly through the Iranian Guard’s terrorist Quds force and its terrorist allies in other countries, including Hezbollah and al-Qaida. In early August, we called the ransom a “regrettably foolish and dangerous error.” This makes it even worse.

There is even the possibility that the support for Iran is far worse than people imagine. Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, says that Iran “may have received an additional $33.6 billion in secret cash and gold payments facilitated by the Obama administration between 2014 and 2016.” This was all part of the bribery of Iranian officials by the U.S. as part of the Iran talks and their aftermath.”

This is what happens when the American people decide to elect a charlatan because of his skin color. Americans made the same mistake twice.

Source:freedom-daily.com

Sylvester Stallone Says That Obama Was Put In Office To Intentionally Weaken America…Do You Think The Same?

To Sylvester Stallone, the elections were an opportunity to possibly put a stop to something far more sinister:

He tweeted, “I voted, did you? Gotta get the Manchurian Candidate out of the drivers seat before were ALL soaring off a cliff into Oblivion … Be smart.” He then added, “The Manchurian

Candidate was a movie about fake president who was put there by foreign enemies to destroy America. Scary concept. Rise up!
When his followers called him out for implying that Barack Obama is a brainwashed plant who took control of the nation as some sort of sleeper agent, Stallone fought back, saying he was “just mixing it up. Getting the blood going! Makes ya passionate, don’t it. Good! Happy with things? OPINIONS?” He also had the ultimate comeback for those who argued with him:

Written any produced screenplays lately?” Well, you’ve got us there. [Vulture] UPDATE: Asked to clarify his remarks for The Hollywood Reporter, Stallone now insists that despite his (factually iffy) insistence that The Manchurian Candidate was about a “fake president,” he actually meant “Manchurian candidate” as a reference to “all career politicians.”Ah… So every politician has been put there by foreign enemies to destroy America? If only we could entrust control of the country to the writers of produced screenplays. On Tuesday, Sylvester Stallone enraged many a Twitter follower(and Movieline commenter) when he tweeted that it was time to “get the Manchurian Candidate out of the drivers [sic] seat before were [sic] ALL soaring off a cliff into Oblivion.” Clarifying his remarks, Stallone said,”The Manchurian Candidate was a movie about fake president who was put there by foreign enemies to destroy America. Scary concept. Rise up!” It’s not every day you see a

major box office star comparing the President of the United States to a sleeper cell, but apparently Stallone wasn’t doing that. See what he meant to say was…
Sylvester Stallone told The Hollywood Reporter that his tweet was only done “in the spirit of creating a conversation” and that the use of “Manchurian candidate” was “a reference to all career politicians.” Ah-ha? So, wait, Stallone thinks all “career politicians” are puppets of some foreign enemy sent to destroy America from within? On second though, maybe Sly was better off when everyone just thought he was only insulting Barack Obama.
Source: www.readfirstoday.com

REVOLT! Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein Calls for Investigation into Obama, Lynch, & Hillary

James Comey has testified that ex-attorney general Loretta Lynch requested from him to refer to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails as a “matter” instead of an investigation.

He testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, claiming that Lynch’s request made him feel “queasy.”

But Feinstein also said that she would have had “a queasy feeling too.”

Feinstein, the committee’s top democrat, said that she didn’t know if Loretta Lynch was providing cover for the Clinton campaign, but said that the request she gave to Comey would have given her a queasy feeling too. “I think we need to know more about that,” the California senator said. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the judiciary committee take a look at that.”

According to our source, Conservative Fighters, Feinstein said that an investigation into Lynch’s conduct with the Clinton campaign should be separate from the current Congressional investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.

“I don’t think we should mix the two,” Feinstein said. “I don’t know whether it’s obstruction of justice. I don’t intend to draw any conclusions until investigations are finished.”

Comey also said that when he asked Lynch if she was going to authorize him to confirm the existence of the Clinton email investigation, she answered, “Yes but don’t call it that. Call it a ‘matter’.” Then, he asked her to give him an explanation why he should call it like that, she did not answer, but she said, “Just call it a matter.”

“I don’t know whether it was intentional or not but it gave the impression that the Attorney General Lynch was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way the political campaign was describing the same activity, which was inaccurate,” Comey stated.

When Obama and Clinton lose Diane Feinstein, it is significant. And it could mean a huge turning point. Feinstein seems to be one of the most powerful leaders the Democrats have and she comes with incredible credibility.

We may disagree with her sometimes, but she has proven some major points over the decades and that she prefers honesty and integrity over partisan politics. She loves her party and is smart enough to know that this issue is quite damaging.

ames Comey has testified that ex-attorney general Loretta Lynch requested from him to refer to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails as a “matter” instead of an investigation.

He testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, claiming that Lynch’s request made him feel “queasy.”

But Feinstein also said that she would have had “a queasy feeling too.”

Feinstein, the committee’s top democrat, said that she didn’t know if Loretta Lynch was providing cover for the Clinton campaign, but said that the request she gave to Comey would have given her a queasy feeling too. “I think we need to know more about that,” the California senator said. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the judiciary committee take a look at that.”

According to our source, Conservative Fighters, Feinstein said that an investigation into Lynch’s conduct with the Clinton campaign should be separate from the current Congressional investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.

Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.

Source: www.readfirstoday.com

Finally It’s About To Go Down: Ted Cruz’ Phenomenal New Investigation, Will Put Soros & Obama In Jail

Senator Ted Cruz and his posse finally decided that are coming out with guns blazing, ready to corner former President Obama and George Soros once and for all.

The republican crew is beginning what will be an EXTREMELY thorough investigation into Obama’s influence in politics in foreign countries. Mind you, the money that was spent by Obama overseas was all done so with hardworking taxpayer’s money… and not to mention done by George Soros’ USAID organization.

Republican senators are demanding that Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, IMMEDIATELY delve into the investigation. Their hope is that the investigation will uncover what really happened when the Obama administration attempted to sway foreign elections. The way that they went about this was by using United States taxpayer’s funds to “extreme and sometimes violent political activists.”

Numerous conversations between foreign diplomats were released, outlining current political tampering by the Obama administration’s State Department.

 Image result for Finally It’s About To Go Down: Ted Cruz’ Phenomenal New Investigation, Will Put Soros & Obama In Jail

This included using hard-working taxpayer’s money to go directly to support far-left causes in Albania, Latin America, Macedonia, and all the way to Africa.

According to the letter which was authorized by Republican Senators Mike Lee (Utah), Jim Inhofe (Oklahoma), Thom Tillis (North Carolina), Ted Cruz (Texas), David Perdue (Georgia), and Bill Cassidy (Los Angeles), it appears that a large percentage of the State Department’s funding went into organizations run and supported by liberal leftist billionaire George Soros himself.

The group of senators is requesting that Tillerson launch a full-scale investigation in order to figure out the truth behind the funding efforts. This will allow them to figure out once and for all exactly how the Obama administration tried to promote left-wing causes and political parties around the entire world.

The newest finds prove efforts by the Obama administration to directly send taxpayer money to Israeli organizations that openly opposed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the country’s most recent election.

Leaders from many different nations decided to figure out a way to inform lawmakers about the activities under investigation.Mike Lee made the statement:

Over the past few months, elected officials and political leaders of foreign nations have been coming to me with disappointing news and reports of U.S. activity in their respective countries. This includes reports of diplomats playing political favorites, USAID funds supporting extreme and sometimes violent political activists, and the U.S. government working to marginalize the moderates and conservatives in leadership roles.

This sort of political favoritism from our missions around the world is unacceptable and endangers our bilateral relationships,” Lee declared.

Let’s hope these guys can get to the root of what really went down during Obama’s time in office. It’s time we find out what happened to our hard-earned money, after all, it wasn’t Obama’s money to give Soros in the first place. I think we can all agree that these senators are doing us a favor by really trying to display Obama and Soros for who they really are, crooks. After all, these two are only billionaires because of other people’s money.

Source:thedeplorablesociety.com

Democrat Congresswoman Returns From Syria with Proof Obama Funded ISIS, Exposes It LIVE On CNN

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard appeared on CNN after finding facts that she believes proves Obama’s involvement in funding ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

Gabbard went to Syria, then was interviewed by CNN afterward with Jake Tapper where she unloaded with information that Tapper didn’t want to hear. Tulsi Gabbard revealed solid proof that the Obama administration was funding the terrorist groups.

She stated that Syrians “expressed happiness and joy at seeing an American walking their streets.” But they also wanted to know “why is it that the United States, its allies and other countries, are providing support, are providing arms, to terrorist groups like Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, who are on the ground there, raping, kidnapping, torturing, and killing the Syrian people?

“They asked me why is the United States supporting these terrorist groups who are destroying Syria – when it was Al-Qaeda who attacked the United States on 9/11, not Syria. I didn’t have an answer for that.“

Jake Tapper, responded with: “Obviously the United States government denies providing any sort of help to the terrorist groups you are talking about, they say they provide help for the rebel groups.“

Gabbard then responded to Tapper saying, “The reality is, Jake, and I’m glad you bought up that point. Every place that I went, every person I spoke to, I asked this question to them. And without hesitation, they said ‘there are no moderate rebels, who are these moderate rebels that people keep speaking of?’

“Regardless of the name of these groups, the strongest fighting force on the ground in Syria is Al-Nusra or Al-Qaeda and ISIS. That is a fact. There are a number of different other groups, all of them are fighting alongside, with or under the command of the strongest group on the ground that is trying to overthrow Assad.”

If this isn’t definitive proof Obama helped ISIS gain power, I don’t know what is. Share this everywhere if you think Barack Obama should be brought to justice!

Source:thedeplorablesociety.com

It Has Been Confirmed That Obama’s CIA Chief Conspired With Foreign Spies To Take Out Trump

KIRSTERS BAISH| The Guardian published an article last week that included information confirming that ex-CIA director John Brennen was indeed the American forerunner of political espionage targeted at defeating President Donald Trump. The side that actually colluded with foreign powers was that of Hilary Clinton. Brennan’s goal was obvious, to retain his position as CIA director under Hilary Clinton. Brennan reportedly worked with British and Estonian spies in order to sabotage the 2016 election in favor of Clinton. Brennan utilized false intelligence as an excuse to set up a multi-agency investigation into Donald Trump. This led the FBI to conduct a search on a computer server connected to Trump Tower, giving Susan Rice and other Clinton supporters a shield in order to spy on Trump’s people.

The CIA acting under John Brennan leaked to the press that this investigation would be happening. His hope was to cause as much political damage to Trump’s campaign as possible. An official within the intelligence community explained that Brennan’s entourage of radicals didn’t even try to hide what they were doing. They yielded “Hillary for president cups” and other Hillary Clinton campaign gear. Brennan did everything in his power to track down radicals and assign them positions of power that would allow for them to leak political espionage against President Trump. He hid their true agenda under the label of “nonpartisan.”

The story that the Guardian published was extremely biased, painting Brennan and his crew as extremely intelligent whistle-blowers. It’s all very clear now why the first criminal leaks against Trump came from British press. The story explains that Brennan received his anti-Trump information from British and Estonian spies. The story also confirms that the idea of the espionage into Trump was started by Estonia. A flaky tip came about in April of 2016, claiming that the Kremlin was giving money to the Trump campaign. Of course, Brennan ran with it without doing any real research to back it up. It was obvious that Estonia wanted Trump to lose since Estonian officials believed Hillary’s lies that Trump was going to pull out of NATO and leave Baltic countries directly exposed to Vladimir Putin.

 

The Guardian claims that the head of the British spies, Robert Hannigan “passed material in Summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan.” Brennan wanted to make sure that the questionable tips were leaked, so he circulated them on Capitol Hill. He gave briefings in September of 2016 to the “Gang of Eight” about the tips, which went on to make the front page of The New York Times.

Keep in mind that all of this was happening at the same time that Brennan was working so hard to suck up to Hillary in order to keep his job. He made it extremely clear that he was completely against Trump’s supposed “Muslim ban.” Brennan hated the thought of a Muslim ban since he has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Since his college years he has been associating himself with Islam. He spent a year in Cairo where he learned Arabic and took courses in Middle Eastern studies. He went on to get his graduate degree with an emphasis on Middle Eastern studies. Fast forward to 1996 when Brennan became the CIA’s station chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

He stated “during a 25-year career in government, I was privileged to serve in positions across the Middle East- as a political officer with the State Department and as a CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, I saw how our Saudi partners fulfilled their duty as custodians of the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina. I marveled at the majesty of the Hajj and the devotion of those who fulfilled their duty as Muslims by making that privilege- that pilgrimage.”

Brennan developed an extreme hatred towards Michael Flynn, who wanted to break the ties with Muslim countries that Barack Obama had worked to build. Brennan and his lackeys worked to take down Flynn, and when they found transcripts of calls between Flynn and the Russian ambassador, they made their move. They caught him in a direct lie to Mike Pence and leaked it to the media.

The media has had their heads so far up Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s asses that they have never seemed to care when they are reporting false news. The Pravda writers made themselves look like total idiots when they released the title “Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dem and Republican House Aides.” We aren’t falling for these liberal lies, and it’s about time that they are exposed once and for all for their complete lack of regard for the truth. 

Source:thedeplorablesociety.com