Trump Declares War On Obama Deep State, Sessions Must Obey 1 Order Or Go

Related image

President Donald Trump just made a shocking announcement, declaring war on Barack Obama’s deep state. Attorney General Jeff Sessions must now obey one order or go. Things are about to get very messy in Washington, D.C.

President Donald Trump (left), Barack Obama (middle), Jeff Sessions (right) (Photo Credits: Pool/Getty Images News/Getty Images, Anadolu Agency/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images, Alex Wong/Getty Images News/Getty Images)

Millions of American patriots are cheering after Trump recently blasted the deep state for conducting illegal spying operations on his presidential campaign under the Obama administration. In a sudden move that so many of us have been waiting for, Trump announced that he will officially order Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fully investigate the FBI’s and DOJ’s political surveillance of his campaign.

“I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes – and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!” Trump wrote, according to Daily Caller.

Finally, Trump has taken the one step for which many of his supporters have been waiting. For more than a year, the President has been patient while the deep state continued its sham Russian collusion investigation under their operative Special Counsel Robert Mueller and a team of Trump-hating Democrat lawyers.

Mueller was only allowed to run amock and aim his unchecked power at any political enemy after Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself on Thursday, March 2, 2017, just weeks after Trump’s inauguration. Anyone who doesn’t realize Sessions is the lynchpin to the deep state’s operation is a fool.

Numerous federal lawmakers have called for Mueller to bring his investigation to end after a year of investigating with nothing to show for it besides a screwy court case against a Russian corporation named Concord Management and Consulting LLC, that recently humiliated Mueller’s legal team in court.

According to The Hill, Mueller has still failed to hand over two terabytes of evidence his team claims to have possession of to the court, and that data is said to be composed mostly of Facebook profiles in Russian. The defense attorney for the company, Eric Dubelier, complained to the court that Mueller’s team has likely not translated the data into English, leaving many to believe that Mueller is resorting to sloppy litigation tactics to cover his butt.

In addition to Mueller’s most recent humiliating court episode, numerous reports have surfaced of a spy monitoring the Trump campaign in 2016 before the FBI opened an official investigation. Disturbing reports were published by The New York Times and The Washington Post on Friday, May 18, 2018, which provided details of a top-secret CIA and FBI source who was employed to spy on two Trump campaign advisers and reportedly initiated contact with a third.

The reports did not directly identify Cambridge University professor Stefan Halper for fears of threats to his physical well being, but investigative reports from the Daily Caller News Foundation and other news sources matched the description of the top-secret spy with him.

Halper had made contact with Trump advisers George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, and Sam Clovis during the 2016 campaign. As the reports broke, Trump lit up Twitter with a furious tweet in response to the shocking news.

“If the FBI or DOJ was infiltrating a campaign for the benefit of another campaign, that is a really big deal. Only the release or review of documents that the House Intelligence Committee (also, Senate Judiciary) is asking for can give the conclusive answers. Drain the Swamp!” Trump wrote.

On Sunday, May 20, 2018, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes supported the President during an interview with Fox News‘ Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo. “If they ran a spy ring or an informant ring and they were paying people within the Trump campaign if any of that is true, that is an absolute red line,” Nunes said.

“There is not an honest person in this country who can believe that taxpayer dollars, going to fund this ring and operate like this, like what’s said in The New York Times I would think had quite a bit of detail on it. If any of that is true, that’s a red line in this country. You can’t do this to political campaigns,” Nunes continued.

In my opinion, a showdown with Obama’s deep state is long overdue. Trump’s new order for the Department of Justice isn’t going to be optional. Sessions can either comply or step down as attorney general. Under Obama, the FBI and CIA were operating like rogue arms of the government for the benefit of one political party. This must never happen again in our country.

QUESTION: O’Reilly Says, Obama’s ‘DEEP Ties To Islam’ Have HURT America. Do You Agree?

Thank you, Mr. O’Reilly. We can always count on you for the truth.

The Obama era made it too easy for radical Islam to spread. Obama needs to admit that he failed our country.

Radical Islam is not compatible with our values. We do not want Sharia law in our country.

We need to take a stand against the spread of radical Islam. Thank goodness Donald Trump is not afraid to say the words “radical Islam.”


We finally have a president that isn’t going to kneel before the “politically correct” altar. What a refreshing change!

Unfortunately, the liberals are conspiring against him. The Left won’t rest until they have ruined our great nation. The establishment is helping the Left, too. The swamp is working overtime to eject Trump from the presidency. Every day we hear stories about “impeachment.” Nonsense!



mainstream media loves to spin Trump’s actions into failure. Luckily, Mr. O’Reilly is still around to give a “No Spin Zone.” The liberals love to silence conservative voices.

Thankfully, they cannot silence Mr. O’Reilly. He will say what needs to be said. Bill O’Reilly is not going anywhere. He will not allow the liberals to take him down. We need more honest journalists like Mr.




Congress Wants to Take Away Obama’s Pension After They Made Shocking Discovery

Image result for Congress Wants to Take Away Obama’s Pension After They Made Shocking Discovery

Now, this has to be the best news we’ve heard in a long time.

Congress has now officially put Barack Hussein Obama on notice that his generous Tax Payer funded pension would be taken away if he keeps living like the life of the high rolling, jet-setting elitist that he thinks he is.

It’s being reported that Congress is taking a second look at and might be canceling his $400,000 taxpayer-funded pension.

The bill which was introduced while Obama was still in office would forfeit the pension if any former president made more than $200,000 per year. Of course because Obama saw what was coming when it came to his own pocketbook he vetoed it. But under President Trump the reality is different.

$400,000 just to give a speech? A speech that most certainly involved the word “I” at least 60% of the time? Are you kidding me?

Come on people, this is a no-brainer. There is no reason why we the taxpayers need to be paying these bums a pension for the rest of their lives. Even presidents who weren’t rich when elected to the office leave rich after eight years of cheating and stealing from the hard-working people of this country.


Officers Just Hauled Rotten Dem Off Capitol Hill In Handcuffs – It’s About Time!

Here is more on this via USA Today:

“WASHINGTON — Last year, then-president Barack Obama vetoed a bill that would have curbed the pensions of former presidents if they took outside income of $400,000 or more.

So now that former president Barack Obama has decided to accept $400,000 for an upcoming Wall Street speech, the sponsors of that bill say they’ll reintroduce that bill in hopes that President Trump will sign it.

“The Obama hypocrisy on this issue is revealing,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and sponsor of the 2016 bill. “His veto was very self-serving.”

Chaffetz and Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, the sponsor of the companion Senate bill, say they will re-introduce the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act this month. The bill would cap presidential pensions at $200,000, with another $200,000 for expenses. But those payments would be reduced dollar-for-dollar once their outside income exceeds $400,000.

The issue isn’t a partisan one — or at least, it wasn’t last year. The bill passed both the House and Senate with no opposition, and no veto threat had come from the White House.

So when Obama’s veto came one Friday night last July — on the last day for him to sign or veto the legislation — it took lawmakers by surprise. It was the 11th of Obama’s 12 vetoes.

At the time, Obama argued that the bill would have “unintended consequences” and “impose onerous and unreasonable burdens” on former presidents by requiring them to immediately lay off staff and find new office space.

Republican leaders did not call up the bill for a veto override, which would have required a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

Democrats say they won’t necessarily oppose changes.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the top Democrat on Chaffetz’s committee, was a co-sponsor of the original bill. “Cummings definitely supports the concept, and if we can work out the technical issues with the bill that arose late in the last Congress, we expect he would strongly support it again,” said spokeswoman Jennifer Hoffman Werner.

Trump has not taken a position on the legislation. But during the campaign, he said he’d take a close look at pensions for elected officials — especially members of Congress.

“The first thing I’m going to do is tell you that if I’m elected president, I’m accepting no salary, OK?” he said at a town hall in 2015. “They get benefits that nobody else can even think about, OK. And they don’t like to talk about it. But we’ll work on that.”

Under the Former Presidents Act, the nation’s five living former presidents — Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama — get a pension equal to the salary of a current cabinet secretary: $207,800 in 2017. They also get $150,000 to pay staff, and “suitable office space, appropriately furnished and equipped.”

In 2015, the entire benefit package ranged from $430,000 for Carter to $1.1 million for George W. Bush.

With Obama joining the club as of Jan. 20, the 2017 spending bill approved by the House Wednesday contained nearly $3.9 million for all the former presidents through Sept. 30 — a $588,000 annual increase.

Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said the former president had no comment on the legislation.

Obama has already shown he has considerable potential to raise money in his post-presidential career. He and his wife Michelle have signed a publishing deal for two separate books, which the Financial Times reported was worth at least $65 million. And the Wall Street speech — a health care conference planned by investment firm Cantor Fitzgerald in September — will reportedly net him another $400,000.

“President Obama will deliver speeches from time to time,” said Eric Schultz, a former White House spokesman who continues to advise Obama. “Some of those speeches will be paid, some will be unpaid, and regardless of venue or sponsor, President Obama will be true to his values, his vision, and his record.”

Obama has said he also plans to use his post-presidency to work on a range of issues through his presidential center in Chicago. On Wednesday, he unveiled the design of that center and said he would donate $2 million to a summer jobs program for Chicago youth.

A spokesman for President George H.W. Bush said he does not oppose changes to the law, and expects that Congress will likely take some action.

“At age 93, he recognizes that any change to the act would have a greater impact on the other former presidents,” said spokesman Jim McGrath. “For the sake of future occupants of the office, he does think some consideration should be given to the public role former presidents play — and we are told that very positive conversations addressing that and other matters have taken place.”

The bill would cap presidential pensions at $200,000, with another $200,000 for expenses. But those payments would be reduced dollar-for-dollar once their outside income exceeds $400,000.

I think too many people, including all of the former presidents who are still with us don’t fully grasp the notion that we as a nation are for all intent and purpose, broke. And just like they have all told us in the past that we had to “live without” it’s about damn time they start setting an example like in the way President Trump is doing so by donating his full presidential salary.

Clint Eastwood Had Enough, Blows Up On Hillary And Obama… Liberals Are Furious

Image result for Clint Eastwood Had Enough, Blows Up On Hillary And Obama… Liberals Are Furious

One of Hollywood’s most beloved actors couldn’t take it and blew up the spot on Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama. Eastwood is an old-school actor, proud of his country, and living the great American dream and speaking his mind, embracing his wonderful first amendment. It didn’t take long for Eastwood, 87, to open up about his distaste for Clinton and Obama, and thus showing his support for President Trump.

Eastwood firstly didn’t announce his support for Trump, but when asked if he would support Trump or Clinton for President, then he sided with Donald. The reason is that he believed Clinton would follow in the footsteps of Obama and Eastwood wasn’t particularly a fan of Barack’s presidency. America turned soft under Obama and Clint Eastwood seems to despise the weakness that is found in the millennial generation who are offended by everything and trying to live in safe spaces which have proved to be embarrassing to America in general.

Clint comes from the tough generation where people weren’t so soft. His generation believed in the discipline at home and treating people with respect. His generation believed there were only two genders and people could not switch at any given moment in the day. Clint Eastwood is often criticized for his beliefs, but he speaks his mind and that’s something he believes that everyone should be able to do.

The Variety website wrote this bit about him: “Clint Eastwood says that he hasn’t endorsed any candidate for president, but given a choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, he’d choose the latter.

“That’s a tough one, isn’t it? I’d have to go for Trump…you know, ’cause she’s declared that she’s gonna follow in Obama’s footsteps,” Eastwood says in Esquire’s September issue. “There’s been just too much funny business on both sides of the aisle. She’s made a lot of dough out of being a politician. I gave up dough to be a politician. I’m sure that Ronald Reagan gave up dough to be a politician.”

Eastwood was clear that he hasn’t endorsed anyone — “I haven’t talked to Trump. I haven’t talked to anybody.” — but he was full of praises for the Republican nominee for being “onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up.”

In fact, Eastwood said, “We’re really in a p—y generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist.”

He added, “You know, he’s a racist now because he’s talked about this judge. And yeah, it’s a dumb thing to say. I mean, to predicate your opinion on the fact that the guy was born to Mexican parents or something. He’s said a lot of dumb things. So have all of them. Both sides. But everybody — the press and everybody’s going, ‘Oh, well, that’s racist,’ and they’re making a big hoodoo out of it. Just f—king get over it. It’s a sad time in history.”

One thing Eastwood pointed out about Trump is that people called him racist because Trump didn’t approve of a judge. Simply not approving or liking someone does not make one racist. Trump and the judge he criticized are not required to like each other. People are allowed to dislike each other without being labeled as a racist. However, there are many critics who called Trump “racist” for doing something such as disliking the judge or doing a travel restriction (it’s not a ban), and for doing things that help the laws of immigration be followed.

Clint Eastwood references the latest generation as the “p–sy generation” on account of how weak and soft people are in regards to their ability to be easily offended by everything. Combine the softness with the ever-growing emasculation of men and the gender identity politics and we have what could be considered a very sad generation where people have lost their true identity of being male or female.

The other problem is that people are constantly being labeled as racist, sexist, or anything else simply because they disagree with the ideologies of another.

Clint Eastwood isn’t the only celebrity to speak out about Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the generation of people who are easily offended. James Woods and numerous other celebrities have supported Donald Trump as President. Many have supported him as a person well before he ever ran for President.

How do you feel about Clint Eastwood’s opinion of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama? What is your opinion of the generation who is always offended and need to live in a safe space?

Share this story with your friends who like Clint Eastwood or would be interested in reading about his opinion of Hillary and Barack. Don’t forget to add your comments below!

Kanye West Just Exposed Obama For Who He Really Is & What He’s Actually Done

Image result for Kanye West Just Exposed Obama For Who He Really Is & What He’s Actually Done

Outspoken rapper Kanye West has done the unthinkable. Not only has he been tweeting his support for President Donald Trump, but he has also trashed former President Barack Obama for not doing anything about the violence in Chicago.

Kanye tweeted: Obama was in office for eight years and nothing in Chicago changed.

Recently, the rapper was quoted having said that he “loves Trump” and went so far as to call him a “brother.” West blew up Twitter after he tweeted a photo of himself with a famous red “Make America Great Again” hat.

The President responded to Kanye’s sentiment twice on Twitter.

CNN reported:

Kanye West remained defiant Wednesday amid mounting backlash from fans over the rapper’s positive words about President Donald Trump, tweeting a picture of himself wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat and criticizing former President Barack Obama.

“Obama was in office for eight years and nothing in Chicago changed,” he tweeted on Wednesday.
Obama publicly called West a “jackass” in 2009 after the rapper interrupted Taylor Swift’s speech at the VMAs.
“You don’t have to agree with trump but the mob can’t make me not love him,” West tweeted earlier Wednesday. “We are both dragon energy. He is my brother. I love everyone. I don’t agree with everything anyone does. That’s what makes us individuals. And we have the right to independent thought.”
Fox News reported that Kanye’s wife, Kim Kardashian, stepped in to clarify a few things about her husband’s tweets. She confronted the media via Twitter, defending Kanye’s behavior. She wrote, “To the media trying to demonize my husband let me just say this… your commentary on Kanye being erratic & his tweets being disturbing is actually scary. So quick to label him as having mental health issues for just being himself when he has always been expressive is not fair.”
Kardashian went on to note that she didn’t agree with her husband all the time, but she supports his decision to think for himself.
She clarified, “Kanye will never run in the race of popular opinion and we know that and that’s why I love him and respect him and in a few years when someone else says the same exact thing but they aren’t labeled the way he is and you will all praise them! Kanye is years ahead of his time.”
The left will continue to attack Kanye and anyone else who speaks out against the liberal agenda, but they will not stop the free thinkers of America.

Kellyanne Brutally Slams Michelle Obama And Now She’s Being Called A Racist For It

Image result for Kellyanne Brutally Slams Michelle Obama And Now She’s Being Called A Racist For It

And the leftists in this country once again are in a tizzy because someone from the Trump Campaign spoke some truths.

This time it was Kellyanne Conway who caused an uproar by saying that First Lady Melania Trump is “superior” former First Lady Michelle Obama after being asked by a TMZ reporter if it was unfair that Melania hasn’t been on any magazine covers while First Lady Michelle Obama would be on multiple covers per week.

After watching the video above can anyone please explain to me what exactly did she say that was wrong or racist? “Melania Trump is such a superior and excellent First Lady. This country is so lucky to have her,” is all she said, where is the racism in this statement?

Yes, Melania is superior to Michele in many ways, she has class Michele could only dream of having, she speaks 5 languages and doesn’t feel she needs to tell us what we need to feed our children, all in a strikingly beautiful package. What’s not love about Melania? But the only way Melania gets on the cover of any magazine is if it’s in some way made to make her or the president look bad.

Liberals are really grasping at straws, now. If saying one first lady is superior to another is in any way taken as being racist it shows the people who are reading in between the lines are the racists.

Many times it was said that Laura Bush was a superior first lady to Hillary Clinton and not once was anyone ever get called out for being a racist.

Note to the left side of our political spectrum, not everything said is code for racism, but of course, something tells me you don’t care because to we all know it’s all about furthering the agenda, nothing else. If anything, the question I really would like answered is if magazines don’t like Melania because of the fact she has an accent and was born abroad?

More info on Melania Trump via Biography:

Who Is Melania Trump?
Born on April 26, 1970, First Lady Melania Trump is a former model and the third wife of U.S. President, real estate billionaire and former reality TV star Donald Trump.

Early Life
Melania Trump (born Melanija Knavs, Germanized to Melania Knauss) was born on April 26, 1970, in Novo Mesto, Slovenia (then part of communist Yugoslavia). Her father was a car dealer and her mother was a designer for children’s clothing. She grew up in a modest home with her younger sister and later discovered she had an older half brother, whom her father had from a previous relationship.

Modeling Career
Trump began modeling at age 16, and two years later she signed on with an agency in Milan. She enrolled at the University of Ljubljana, but dropped out after one year to pursue her modeling career.

In her early days of modeling, Trump worked in Milan and Paris, before moving to New York in 1996. There she gained steady work, working with well-known photographers like Patrick Demarchelier and Helmut Newton, and landing covers on magazines such as Harper’s Bazaar (Bulgaria), Vanity Fair (Italy), GQ (for which she posed nude in January 2000) and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue.

In March 2001, she was granted a green card for permanent residency in the U.S. through the EB-1 program. Her acceptance later came under scrutiny, as the so-called “Einstein visa” is often allocated to top academics, business leaders, Oscar-winning actors and others who demonstrate “extraordinary ability,” though others suggested she easily qualified for EB-1 approval.

Melania Trump Photo
Melania Trump attends the 2016 Time 100 Gala at Frederick P. Rose Hall, Jazz at Lincoln Center on April 26, 2016 in New York City. (Photo by Mark Sagliocco/Getty Images)

Marriage to Donald Trump
Melania met her future husband Donald Trump at a New York fashion party in 1998. Although she first refused to date him, the couple eventually began establishing a relationship and were engaged in 2004. The following year they married in a lavish Palm Beach, Florida, ceremony, with celebrity attendees including Shaquille O’Neal, Barbara Walters, Kelly Ripa, Matt Lauer, Katie Couric, former President Bill Clinton and then New York Senator Hillary Clinton.

In 2006, Trump gave birth to Barron William Trump. Their son is husband Donald’s fifth child. That same year she also became a U.S. citizen.

Presidential Campaign Trail
When Donald Trump announced his intentions to make a 2016 presidential bid for the White House, the normally private Melania was pushed into the national spotlight along with her past modeling work, some of which was considered racy. One of the first controversial images that began circulating online was her 2000 British GQ spread that had her lying naked on a fur blanket.

The controversy didn’t stop there: In July 2016, Melania Trump gave a speech at the Republican National Convention, from which some passages were found to be identical to Michelle Obama’s 2008 Democratic National Convention speech. Initially claiming she wrote the speech, Trump was lambasted by the media and the public for plagiarism.

Shortly thereafter, Trump staff writer Meredith McIver took responsibility for the gaffe, claiming she accidentally included part of Obama’s speech in Trump’s talking points. McIver issued the following statement explaining what transpired:

“In working with Melania on her recent first lady speech, we discussed many people who inspired her and messages she wanted to share with the American people. A person she has always liked is Michelle Obama. Over the phone, she read me some passages from Mrs. Obama’s speech as examples. I wrote them down and later included some of the phrasing in the draft that ultimately became the final speech.”

Not long after, more controversy followed. On July 30, 2016, the New York Post published nude photos of a then 25-year-old Melania Trump, including one in which she lay in bed with another woman. Many of the photos were published for a men’s French magazine that is no longer in circulation.

Discussing the nude photos, Donald told The Post: “Melania was one of the most successful models and she did many photo shoots, including for covers and major magazines. This was a picture taken for a European magazine prior to my knowing Melania. In Europe, pictures like this are very fashionable and common.”

In November, Melania Trump delivered a rare speech on the campaign trail outlining how fighting cyberbullying would be a priority for her if she were to become first lady. “We need to teach our youth American values: Kindness, honesty, respect, compassion, charity, understanding, cooperation,” said Trump. News outlets were quick to point out the irony that her husband was known for his use of the social media platform Twitter to insult opponents.

First Lady
On November 8, 2016, Donald Trump won the majority of electoral college votes and was elected the 45th president of the United States in a stunning defeat of Hillary Clinton. With her husband’s victory, Melania Trump became the first foreign-born U.S. first lady since Louisa Adams, John Quincy Adams’s wife, who was born in London.

As Donald Trump prepared for his transition to power, he told reporters that Melania and their son Barron would stay in New York City while he moved into the White House, allowing Barron to finish the year at his private school on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. In June 2017, Melania and Barron finally joined the President in the White House.

An early attempt to use the first lady platform for public good generated attention for the wrong reasons: In September, Melania sent a package of Dr. Seuss books to one deserving school in each state as part of National Read-a-Book Day. However, the gift was spurned by a Massachusetts elementary school librarian, who decried both the selection of her school and the choice of Dr. Seuss as a “tired and worn ambassador for children’s literature.”

The first lady hoped to achieve better results through her passion for combating bullying. In October, she made a surprise visit with Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to Orchard Lake Middle School in Michigan, as part of the #NoOneEatsAlone initiative. “I always believe that you need to treat each other with respect, and kindness and compassion,” she told the students.

The following month, the secretive first lady was profiled in Vanity Fair. According to the article, it was Melania who pushed a waffling Trump into announcing his candidacy for president, knowing that he would regret the missed opportunity if he didn’t. On the flip side, she supposedly never expected to find herself in the White House. “This isn’t something she wanted and it isn’t something he ever thought he’d win,” said one longtime friend of the couple. “She didn’t want this come hell or high water. I don’t think she thought it was going to happen.”

Whether or not she ever intended to live in the White House, the first lady went all-out for her first holiday season as a resident there. She publicly revealed her Christmas decorations on November 27, 2017, showcasing her Balsam fir trees draped with “icicles” and trimmed with glass ornaments emblazoned with the seal of each state and territory. The display reportedly came together with the assistance of 150 volunteers from 29 states.

“The President, Barron, and I are very excited for our first Christmas in the White House,” Melania said in a statement. “As with many families across the country, holiday traditions are very important to us. I hope when visiting the People’s House this year, visitors will get a sense of being home for the holidays.”

Policy Focus and Controversies
In January 2018, Melania Trump hired 27-year-old Reagan Thompson, previously an executive assistant on the National Security Council and adviser to Congressman turned CIA Director Mike Pompeo, to serve as her policy director. A spokesperson said the new hire would help prepare and roll out the first lady’s official platform in the coming months.

The move came shortly after the publication of the explosive book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, which described Melania as an unwilling participant in her husband’s campaign who broke down in tears the night he was elected. The first lady was reportedly angered by that account and instructed her staff to push back against the book’s claims.

More controversy soon surfaced with a report that Donald Trump had been involved with an adult film star a decade earlier, with the starlet allegedly paid to keep quiet just before the 2016 election. The first lady subsequently canceled a trip to attend the World Economic Forum in Switzerland with her husband and kept a low profile for several days, prompting speculation of a rift between the two. Her spokesperson eventually broke the ice by slamming the “salacious & flat-out false reporting” on Twitter, and Melania followed by confirming that she would attend the president’s State of the Union address on January 30.

Other Projects
In 2010, Melania Trump launched a jewelry line, as well as a skincare line. She has appeared in an Aflac commercial, co-hosted on The View, and appeared on her husband’s NBC reality show, Celebrity Apprentice.

Trump is said to be fluent in the Slovenian, English, French, Serbian and German languages, with other outlets reporting that she speaks Italian, as well. “

BREAKING: New Texts Reveal Obama Admin Is Probably In Massive Legal Trouble

We all know that the Obama administration was — most of the time — up to no good and probably committing shady deals and colluded with Lord knows who. But what we’re just finding out two years after he held the Oval Office, is enough to thrust his administration back into the limelight.

What they could have been involved with right before Trump was elected is absolutely disgusting.

DailyWire reports:

GOP congressional investigators are examining newly-released texts between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that may indicate there was coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership near the beginning of the Trump/Russia investigation.

The investigators gleaned their information from Fox News and assert that it “strongly” suggests coordination between former President Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan.

The chronology of events looks like this:

August 2, 2016: Page texts Strzok “Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign. Just thinking about congress, foia, etc. You probably know better than me.”

August 3, 2016: Strzok texts Page and paints former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe as worried about “information control” regarding the initial investigation into the Trump campaign. On Wednesday, Fox News reported, “According to a report from the New York Times, Brennan was sent to Capitol Hill around the same time to brief members of Congress on the possibility of election interference.”

August 8, 2016: Strzok texts Page: “Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be pulled. I’d let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before the Wed WH session.” “D” was reportedly FBI Director James Comey; “McDonough” referred to Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, according to GOP investigators.

August 25, 2016: Brennan briefs Harry Reid. A congressional source told Fox News that it is unknown whether a representative from the FBI was present.

August 27, 2016: Reid writes Comey asking him to investigate possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. He states:

The evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign continues to mount and has led Michael Morrell, the former Acting Central Intelligence Director, to call Trump an “unwitting agent” of Russia and the Kremlin. The prospect of a hostile government actively seeking to undermine our free and fair elections represents one of the gravest threats to our democracy since the Cold War and it is critical for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to use every resource available to investigate this matter thoroughly and in a timely fashion.

Reid also stated, “Recent staff changes within the Trump campaign have made clear that the Trump campaign has employed a number of individuals with significant and disturbing ties to Russia and the Kremlin,” adding that he wanted Comey to make the investigation “public.”

Aug. 30, 2016, Strzok texted Page: “Here we go,” and included a link to a New York Times report titled, “Harry Reid Cites Evidence of Russian Tampering in U.S. Vote and seeks FBI inquiry.” Strzok answered, “D [Comey] said at am brief that Reid called him and told him he would be sending a letter.”

Fox News writes, “Congressional investigators suggested that the Reid letter possibly provided ‘cover’ for the fact that the FBI and Justice Department had already begun investigating the Trump campaign in mid-July on what they called “questionable ethical and legal grounds.”

One congressional source told Fox News, “The ‘here we go’ text between Strzok and Page indicates the FBI/ DOJ knew the letter from Reid was coming. This created the inference they knew it would create public calls for an investigation into Russian interference — covering them.”


Trump Just Took Away the Thing Obama Loved Most in This World

Image result for Trump Just Took Away the Thing Obama Loved Most in This World

In his delusions of grandeur, Barack Obama believes he accomplished much as America’s 44th president.

But there’s one thing he was consistently most proud of doing, or at least thinking he had done–bringing America closer to the Muslim world.

You’ll recall that one of Obama’s first big events abroad was a speech at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, intellectual heart of the Sunni Muslim world.

From the time he was first elected and up until that speech, the Arab Muslim world saw Obama as a natural ally, many even believing him to still be a fellow Muslim (Obama was born to a Muslim father, and in the Muslim world, that means Barack Hussein Obama was himself a Muslim, too).

But, oh, did things go downhill quickly.

From misreading Egypt’s anti-authoritarian revolution to squandering America’s deterrence when Syria used chemical weapons, Obama’s blunders in the Middle East quickly piled up.

Still, Democrats surely thought that Donald Trump, the man who insists on “America first,” could never possibly be as popular in the Middle East as Obama, even at his lowest point.

If they did think that, they were dead wrong.

From The Daily Express:

DONALD Trump is more more popular with Middle Eastern leaders compared with former president Barack Obama because of the current leader’s desire to attack first and ask questions later.

The stark admission from Lebanese prime minister Saad Hariri, suggests that therapturous welcome that Mr Trump received during his recent tour of the Middle East was genuine.

Mr Hariri blasted Mr Obama for his “naiveté” during his tenure as American president and the gap between his “inspirational rhetoric” and his actions.

Clarity, he claims, and the hope for a more decisive approach to Arab problems is the reason why he and other Arab leaders prefer Mr Trump.

The Middle East is an overwhelmingly Muslim region, but the leaders are willing to overlook Mr Trump’s Muslim ban, as long as he gets the job done.

What a tremendous humiliation for Barack Obama.

Obama Freaking Out as John Bolton Begins to Purge His White House Informers

Image result for Obama Freaking Out as John Bolton Begins to Purge His White House Informers

For the first full year of Donald Trump’s presidency, Barack Obama and other shadowy Democratic figures have successfully harassed our elected leader.

They did this thanks to the embedding of their people in key positions. They also managed to get some of Trump’s own appointees on “their” side.

But with the appointment of John Bolton as the new National Security Advisor, you better believe a major house-cleaning is coming.

Via The Daily Caller:

Sources told Foreign Policy that Bolton’s planned purge will start with Obama administration holdovers and eventually broaden to include leakers and those disloyal to the president.

“Bolton can and will clean house,” a former White House official told Foreign Policy.

Another official issued a warning to former Obama officials — “Everyone who was there during Obama years should start packing their shit.”

BREAKING: Obama DOJ Illegally Spied On Trump ‘NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED’ To Warrant Spying (VIDEO)

Image result for BREAKING: Obama DOJ Illegally Spied On Trump ‘NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED’ To Warrant Spying (VIDEO)

This morning there was a very interesting exchange between Republican Congressman Devin Nunes from California and Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo.

In the interview which aired on Fox News this morning, Nunes, who is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, actually confirmed to Bartiromo that the Department of Justice had no evidence whatsoever of any wrongdoing against Donald Trump’s campaign when they began the investigation. And because of this, it was immoral, unethical and illegal to start such an action for political reasons.

So this is all starting to make perfect sense now. The Democrat Party had Hillary, the socialist Sanders, and Webb running for President. Since Webb is too sane and grounded to run on a liberal platform, they got rid of him quickly. Then came Sanders who was bought off easily since he is a devout socialist and that’s what socialists do best, they line their pockets.

But the only problem was they were left with Hillary Clinton who no one really wanted or trusted. So because of this the Deep State and Swamp needed to somehow give the illusion that Donald Trump was more crooked than Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party. So with President Barack Hussein Obama’s help, they decided to try to frame candidate Trump with whatever they could get on him, even a fake Russian dossier which seems like a joke all onto its self.

The Obama Department of Justice never had any intelligence whatsoever that Trump or his campaign had ever worked with the Russians. But they used this fake excuse to start spying and wiretapping him and his family nonetheless. Now keep in mind our government used the information they knew to be fake in order to spy on a private citizen and we need to get to the bottom of this so it never happens again.

More on the Trump Wiretapping via Fox News:

“A new report that former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was wiretapped under secret court order could bolster President Trump’s explosive March claim about surveillance under the previous administration, after months of media mockery.

The CNN report said the surveillance of Manafort continued into early 2017, covering the period before and after the November presidential election. This reportedly covered a stretch when Manafort was known to talk to Trump, though it’s unclear whether Trump’s discussions were ever picked up.

Also unclear is where the wiretapping occurred. Manafort has a residence in Trump Tower, as well as a home in Alexandria, Va.

But the report has forced the media to give a second look at Trump’s widely derided claims this past March that former President Barack Obama had his “wires tapped” at Trump Tower. The hashtag “TrumpVindicated” was taking off on Twitter Tuesday morning.

Andrew Napolitano, Fox News senior judicial analyst, said the latest report is “absolutely consistent” with allegations made by Trump and others. And WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange took a jab at CNN for slamming the president’s surveillance claims earlier this year.

Back in March, the same outlet declared Trump’s claim “baseless” – it was hardly alone in doing so, as PolitiFact also called the statements “false.”

Trump, in a seemingly puzzling tweetstorm at the time, said in March that Obama had his wires tapped before the election.

“I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!” he wrote, later adding: “This is Nixon/Watergate.”

An Obama spokesman at the time adamantly denied that Obama or any White House official ordered such surveillance.

The latest report does not indicate Obama was involved. It also does not make clear whether Trump himself was tapped or whether Trump Tower was wired, but leaves open the possibility.

“If true, it is a felony to reveal the existence of a FISA warrant, regardless of the fact that no charges ever emerged. The U.S. Department of Justice’s Inspector General should immediately conduct an investigation into these leaks and to examine the motivations behind a previous Administration’s effort to surveil a political opponent. Mr. Manafort requests that the Department of Justice release any intercepts involving him and any non-Americans so interested parties can come to the same conclusion as the DOJ – there is nothing there,” Manafort’s spokesman, Jason Maloni, said Tuesday.

Many questions remain unanswered. The Justice Department itself, in a recent court filing, said the DOJ and FBI did not have evidence of any Trump Tower surveillance during the election.

At the least, the latest report shows a close member of his inner circle was surveilled. The wiretapping was authorized by a secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court after the FBI started to investigate Manafort in 2014, CNN reported. He’s been under scrutiny over his financial dealings and lobbying efforts with pro-Russia and Ukrainian officials but has denied colluding with Russia to influence the election.

The order to monitor Manafort was discontinued in 2016, but investigators obtained another FISA warrant that stretched into early 2017, according to the report.

Some of the intelligence collected during the surveillance reportedly signaled that Manafort may have pushed for Russian officials to help try to get then-candidate Donald Trump elected. However, sources told CNN the evidence was not conclusive.

Manafort, according to the report, was not surveilled during the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting in which Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Manafort met with Kremlin-linked attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya.

Manafort – who is a key figure in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s involvement with the election – had his Virginia home raided in July by FBI agents who were looking for financial documents related to the election.

The raid was followed up with a warning to Manafort from Mueller’s prosecutors that they planned to indict him, The New York Times reported.

Manafort, a longtime GOP operative who worked for former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, stepped down as the Trump campaign’s chairman in August 2016 amid mounting speculation surrounding his ties to Ukrainian politics.

If the CNN report is confirmed, Manafort would be the second person affiliated with the Trump campaign known to be monitored under a FISA warrant, behind former campaign adviser Carter Page.

Manafort, who registered as a foreign agent this summer, has said his work in Ukraine was not related to the 2016 campaign.”

H/T The Gateway Pundit,