BREAKING!!! Somali Muslims Go On RAMPAGE In America Town Overnight, Force Hell On Residents!

Twenty-six-year-old Morgan Evenson was attacked December 13 while walking home from her job at the Apple store just two weeks before Christmas in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Stabbed some 14 times by a Somali refugee and left with a lacerated kidney Everson bears the scars on her face, arm, neck, and back that will forever remind her of this brutal attack levied against her. Yet Everson’s story has been largely ignored by the city’s largest newspaper, the Star Tribune and many local news stations.  Minneapolis police are making little effort to bring this vile and crazed maniac to justice all due to his status as a Muslim Somali refugee.  Does Minneapolis believe that refugees have more rights than American citizens regards of their crimes? Everson believes that may be the case.

Everson describes her attack as random.  She did not know the man and has no idea why he attacked her. She describes walking the eight blocks home from work in uptown Minneapolis and being dragged off of a public street, as the man stabbed and slashed at her relentlessly.

She states the Somali man tackled her from behind – “This guy was following me maybe 10-15 feet behind me so I kept checking his distance to me and he started getting closer so I sped up. I was pretty nervous, and I was shaking a little bit and all of a sudden I check again and he’s running at me. It was horrifying because I could feel something that felt like it was stinging me, but it was him stabbing me. Doctor’s told me I had 14 wounds that needed stitches, including a lacerated kidney. I cannot imagine anyone attacking someone like that and as a woman, it is especially frightening, but I knew I had to fight back…”

Patrick Stellick, Evenson’s fiance described how Everson survived the harrowing and vicious attack and the neighbors that helped rescue her – “She fought him, and that’s when he started stabbing her repeatedly and then neighbors who heard her screaming for help came to assist, and that is when the suspect ran away. She suffered a lacerated kidney and multiple stab wounds on her arms and upper body, but doctors said her strong health and a winter parka probably saved her life.”

Stellick said Evenson suffered serious injuries, but is now resting at home and expected to make a full recovery. They describe their neighborhood as a nice area and a relatively safe one with Everson working in a high-end shopping district that includes a Victoria’s Secret, high-end jewelry stores, and coffee shops, in addition to the Apple store where Everson was employed.

Everson is extremely grateful to neighbors and passersby who heard her screaming and came to her aid which ultimately led to her attacker running away, stating – “It is very touching to see and hear from so many people who care. I am forever grateful to the people who came to my aid and without them I might not have survived.

Then there is the fact that a violent and vicious Somali refugee with an apparent hatred for white women still on the loose and police have made no arrests in the crime against Everson. A situation that has many women watching their backs, afraid to walk alone on the public streets of this popular shopping district that they previously thought was safe. Then there is the official police narrative that seems to indicate a cover-up perhaps due to the attacker’s refugee status, likely Muslim heritage, or ethnicity?

Minneapolis police have labeled the December 13 attack against Everson as an attempted robbery. Crime Prevention Specialist Jennifer Neale told the Southwest Journal on Dec. 20: “We’re still scratching our heads about it, because it’s just so brazen,” noting the level of violence used to “get a purse.” Except Everson says the man made no attempt whatsoever to grab her purse and nothing whatsoever was taken from her.

She fought back with all she had as he continuously thrust his knife into her torso, wrists, arms, and shoulders, resisting long enough for a neighbor to hear her screams and come running to her aid, sending the Somali attacker fleeing. As she fought for her life, Everson got a very clear look at her attacker whom she described as a black man in his early 20s, thin build, low-cut afro and a slight Somali accent.

Everson states – “I would say it was two to three minutes of struggling with him as he was dragging me through the snow. This person who did this to me is still out there. I don’t know if he intends to do this to someone else, or if this was a one-time thing. Was it because I was a woman? Was it the color of my skin? Was it the purse on my shoulder even though you didn’t take anything from me?

I don’t want this to change who I am because I don’t want to be a scared person but it would be so, so amazing to have this person turned in and to look at him in the face and to hopefully convict him of something.”

Yet despite Everson’s clear and distinct description of the man the Minneapolis police have not released a composite sketch of the suspect.  Neither is the Minneapolis Police Department a stranger to controversy when it comes to cases that involve Somali refugees. The city boasts the nation’s largest Somali population of more than 50,000 many of which have been hand selected for resettlement in America by the United Nations.

In August of 2017 the Minneapolis Police Department fifth precinct’s first Somali police officer, Mohamed Noor, shot and killed an armed white woman, Australian national Justine Damond.  Since her murder, he has refused to answer any and all questions posed to him by internal affairs and the department has yet to file any charges against him.

In the summer of 2016 a violent band of more than a dozen Somali men went on a 3 day terror binge in the city’s Linden Hills community threatening to rape a woman, beating a resident’s dog, and shouting “jihad” as they drove vehicles over residents’ lawns and pretended to shoot people through their duffle bags. Yet again, no arrests were made.

And then there was the mysterious 2014 apartment explosion in a Somali neighborhood of Minneapolis in which three people lost their lives. No arrests were ever made in that case either, nor any explanation for the cause of the explosion.

It seems for the police in Minneapolis, political correctness is all and protecting the refugee population is paramount and at the expense of the taxpaying American citizens who pay their salaries.  It also appears that the news media is too busy creating “fake news” stories and bashing President Trump with ridiculous commentary about third world countries to worry about legitimate criminals.

Source:freedomdaily.com

BREAKING!! She BANNED Muslims! Now She’s Running For Governor!

If there’s one thing that pisses liberals off  more than anything, it’s people speaking out against their precious Muslims. With President Trump building a wall and rounding up illegal vermin to ship back to their home country of Mexico, liberals are freaking the hell out, as illegals comprise the majority of their faithful swath of brainless voters. With their Mexican voter base drying up, liberals are now frantically fighting to keep and bring more Muslim “refugees” to our country, knowing that these invaders will provide a nice cushy voter base for years to come. But now liberals have a brand new reason to be pissed off today, after learning that the very same feisty outspoken conservative woman who banned Muslims from firing at her gun range is now announced her plans to run for governor, and already leftists are pitching a giant fit.

Jan Morgan is a FOX News contributor who is very outspoken in her conservative beliefs and echos Trump’s goal to “make America safe again.” So obviously, letting a bunch of Muslims into her gun range to practice their future jihad skills on America immediately made Morgan change the policy at the Gun Cave Indoor Firing Range, the range she owns in Hot Springs, Arkansas. She decided to make her range a “Muslim free zone,” which of course sent liberals into a collective meltdown, where they immediately branded Morgan as a “bigot.” “I refuse to train the next Islamic terrorist,” Morgan wrote on her site at the time, the Kansas City Star reported.

But banning Muslims at the facility she owns could soon be the least of liberals’ distress, as Morgan has now announced her plans to throw her hat in the race for Arizona governor. New York Daily News reported on Morgan’s decision to run. 

“My American Dream is to wake up one day to discover I no longer have to fight. My dream is a victorious end to the constant attacks on our Constitution and Bill of Rights by our own citizens and an out-of-control government,” Morgan stated.

Morgan’s signature issue will be gun rights, according to campaign materials.

“I have devoted my time and energy to fighting the persistent attacks on the Second Amendment because, without it, we have no means to defend the remaining Bill of Rights,” Morgan says on her site.

She states that her “goal” is to repeal “the thousands of gun control laws on the books in America so we can return to our Founders’ original position on gun rights.”

“The Second Amendment is my line in the sand,” she writes, adding the Greek phrase “Molon labe” meaning “come and take.”

In the “Meet Jan” section of the gubernatorial candidate’s site, Morgan is described as a “wife and a mother” who “also shoots guns and riders her own Harley!”

A photo shows her wearing a Trump hat that says, “Make American Great Again.”

It’s so awesome to see a strong conservative woman taking the reins in our country and doing her part to make our country great again. More than ever, we need more outspoken warriors like Morgan who doesn’t give a flying crap about political correctness when it comes to doing what’s right for our country. Be sure to follow Morgan on her facebook page here,and share this article so we can get the word out about this woman make her the next governor of Arkansas!

Source:freedomdaily.com

Owner Who Banned Muslims From Gun Range Now Running for Governor Gun Range Owner Who Banned Muslims Running for Governor

A conservative woman who banned Muslims from her gun range has announced plans to throw her hat int the political ring.

Jan Morgan, owner of the Gun Cave Indoor Firing Range in Hot Springs, announced on Dec. 31 that she will be running for governor of Arkansas.

Morgan will be challenging incumbent Asa Hutchinson in the Republican primary in 2018.

Hutchinson was elected in 2014.

Morgan has been very critical of Hutchinson, saying the governor “campaigns like a conservative Republican but governs like a liberal Democrat,” according to the Texarkana Gazette.

Prior to announcing a run for governor, Morgan made headlines in 2014 when she had a direct message for radical Islamic extremists, and banned Muslims from her firing range, as Fox News reported at the time.

“I refuse to train the next Islamic terrorist,” Morgan wrote on her site JanMorganMedia, explaining her decision.

Citing safety concerns, Morgan said that the religion of Islam represents and promotes a “theocracy, terrorist organization, not a religion.”

Naturally, the story drew major attention, including a lengthy (and reasonably fair) interview in The Washington Post.

According to The Arkansas Times, Morgan has been a stalwart for the Second Amendment and will likely make that a top issue for her campaign.

Morgan said she plans to hold an event toward the end of the month to speak with voters and discuss the issues they care deeply about.

If elected, Morgan would become the first female governor of Arkansas.

While Morgan would be an ardent advocate for several conservative issues, her candidacy would make her a lightning rod in national politics.

It’s unclear how Morgan will fare against Hutchinson, but one could certainly assume it’s going to be an interesting, and possibly raucous Republican primary.

Get ready for fireworks, Arkansas.

Please like and share this story on Facebook and Twitter with your thoughts on Jan Morgan running for governor of Arkansas.

What do you think about Morgan banning Muslims from her gun range in 2014? Scroll down to comment below!

Source:conservativetribune.com

HOLY CRAP! Muslims Just Took Over DFW With Horrifying Thing They’re Forcing On People

HOLY SH*T! DISGUSTING Muslims Just Took Over DFW With Horrifying Thing They’re Forcing People To Do!

Travelers landing at the Dallas Fort Worth Airport arrived on a horrifying scene in the terminal they weren’t expecting when a swarm of disgusting Muslims decided to take over. Before anyone could stop them, they began forcing a foul Islamic ritual on these innocent people who wanted no part in it.

While mostly peaceful protests took place at airports around the country over the weekend, what happened in Dallas wasn’t like the rest. The media actually refused to show the reality of what happened since it would destroy their narrative that Muslims are great and should be allowed into the U.S. no matter what terrorist-tied country they come from.

The mayor of Dallas announced that Muslim travelers were welcome at his airport and apologized profusely to those who had been detained at DFW, in a complete show of defiance to our president’s executive order on the matter. No sooner did he fall all over himself and shower these detained Muslim travelers with gifts, that hundreds of Muslims swarmed where he just stood to profess his appreciation for their culture and displayed their dominance.

Filling the area in and around the baggage claim, Muslims from all over Dallas began participating in a loud Arab call to prayer as a form of protest against President Trump’s ban. Although they called it a protest, it was a really a show of power as they forced everyone around them to listen to this obnoxious ritual and blocked them from getting around them. They are clearly trying to take over America with their beliefs and liberals are trying their hardest to let it happen.

Christians or Jews would never be able to religiously gather in an airport in an Islamic country because Muslims wouldn’t allow it. Even in America, it wouldn’t be allowed without the left losing their minds over it, but yet they think this massive public prayer is acceptable. The revolt against Trump’s ban is empowering to Muslims who are laughing at us and taking advantage of the situation for their ultimate gain.

Source:GatewayPundit,freedomdaily.com

Liberals Demand Police Take Down Christian’s Sign Because Of Sharia Law — Cops Have Better Idea Instead

When the Liberal professors at all the universities around the country were preaching their special brand of intolerance and hatred of White men and White privilege, the Right went nuts. They wanted action taken, they wanted something to be said or done to fix this injustice. Instead, what they got was a big fat guffaw and an invitation to leave through the nearest door. Liberal professors had been preaching and teaching this tripe for so long that it was second nature for them. And they never expected it to boomerang.

Much like how the Left called on Congress to look into voter fraud after Donald Trump was elected and the commission was formed and began discovering case after case of voter fraud on the parts of Democrats, the Left is now discovering that this teaching of intolerance and how students should be rising up against it, has now come to roost. Liberal professors are now increasingly more likely to be called out in the classroom by a Liberal student who believes they’ve been verbally or mentally assaulted by the pedagogue when they hear something they cannot tolerate. Ironic, huh?

Now, the argument is beginning to move into the realm of religion in the neighborhoods of America. A Christian man in Wisconsin has put up a placard in his yard that quotes Quran scriptures depicting violence and intolerance and local Leftists were outraged. They called the police and demanded the abomination be removed. The police had a classic response that left the Christian man all smiles!

Image result for Wisconsin Christian make war until allah reigns supreme

Mad World News:

When a Wisconsin Christian placed a sign in his yard with one of the Quran’s commands, enraged liberals began calling the police to demand that the politically incorrect sign be removed before it offended Muslims. However, the liberal snowflakes were left utterly shocked when they heard the brilliant 7-word response from local officers.

As statistics have shown, when the Muslim population grows in any region, so does violence. This is why it’s pertinent for those who defend Islam to ceaseless repeat that it is a peaceful religion that’s been perverted by the “tiny minority of extremists.”

Despite the Quran explicitly commanding the mass slaughter of unbelievers and the prophet Muhammad modeling this, sympathizers continue to defend the ideology and its followers.

For months, a Wisconsin native has placed a sign in his yard, typically depicting biblical verses to express his Christian faith. However, this time, the unnamed Brookfield resident decided to showcase a comparative Quranic scripture. It was only then that neighbors began complaining about the message, arguing that it’s wholly Islamophobic and must be destroyed.

Determined to have the sign taken down and possibly get the homeowner punished, irritated residents called the Brookfield Police to ask that they remove the politically incorrect yard sign, TODAY’S TMJ4 reports. Much to the dismay of the disgruntled liberals, the police informed them that the homeowner is entitled to free speech and displaying a sign with a quote from the Quran, no matter how offensive it is to Muslims, is not breaking any laws or violating city codes.

The sign reads, “Make war until Allah reigns supreme” with references to Quran 8:39 and 2:193, which explicitly instructs, “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world].” This command was carried out by the prophet Muhammad, who ambushed and beheaded an entire peaceful Jewish tribe and took their women and girls as sex slaves for refusing to convert.

Knowing that criticizing Islam can get an individual killed, which no peaceful religion would promote, the homeowner has understandably refused to reveal his identity. His neighbor, however, has boldly come forward to applaud the man’s decision to express free speech but worries that it could make him a target.

Here we can see that it doesn’t matter what a Muslim says about a Hindi, Christian, Jew or Buddhist. But put the shoe on the other foot and suddenly we have enough cause for a full-blown mini-war. The Left is good at choosing their battles, but often appeals to the most base attitudes, which in turn nets them zero successes.

The loud-mouthed Libs in this case probably thought they could ingratiate themselves to their Muslim neighbors who might then “go easy on them” when the real crisis breaks out. It’s a ridiculous way to live and an even more dangerous point of view. Because when it comes down to it, Muslims hate Liberals even more than they do the Christians. And that’s saying a lot.

Source: Mad World News,americanconservativeherald.com

What This Hotel Just Banned Has Muslims Ready To Riot Around The World Right Now

Now, this is a smart move in today’s world.

The Malaysian Association of Hotels or also known as MAH has now defended its members’ policy of prohibiting their frontline staff from wearing the hijab, or headscarf while at work saying it is international practice and not meant to be discriminatory.

A spokesperson for the hotels, Cheah Swee Hee, said the hotels, especially the international hotels in Malaysia, which has a huge Muslim population, followed a standard operating procedure and policy on the matter and that it shouldn’t be called discrimination because these hotel companies have international policies to follow. He later added that it’s not about “Islamophobia” because the practice of not letting women wear headscarves has been done from the beginning. But of course, the left is going crazy over this policy.

Via FMT News:

I regret that Muslim women in Malaysia still face religious discrimination, when it comes to the wearing of the hijab, which is a religious requirement that many of them adhere to.

This is according to the report by the Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF).

MEF executive director Shamsuddin Bardan said he had received complaints from hotel employees regarding the banning of headscarves or hijab at the workplace.

This is something we should not tolerate especially when there’s no plausible explanation as to why the hijab is a hindrance to the nature of their work.

This is even more so in a country which holds Islam as the religion of the Federation.

Simply being in the private sector does not exclude the party from respecting one’s right to practice their religious requirements.

This argument also applies to our national airlines, Malaysia Airlines, where there are also calls from flight attendants to be allowed to observe their religious requirement in wearing hijab.

The fact that flight attendants with hijab had been serving the pilgrims during the Hajj season in flights to Mecca is testimony that wearing the hijab does not determine inefficiency.

With regard to hospitality industries, it is not easy for these women to actually lodge reports, especially when allowances, salaries and placement for internship are involved.

If these are students, we know that internship is part of the requirement in their last semester before they can graduate.

Our Muslim students are trapped in a systematic discriminatory process along the line.

I urge Muslim ladies who face such discrimination to come forward and report it to us at wafiq3108@gmail.com. We promise to maintain their confidentiality.

Now here is the thing. No one is forced to work at this establishment. Just like an individual can pick and choose where they will work, a business should have the right to dictate what and what should not be worn by their employees, especially those who have direct access to the public. I am sure this rule must have been in the contract every employee needs to sign in order to get employment from this company.

The Malaysian Insight Reports:

Wafiq president Associate Professor Dr Rafidah Hanim Mokhtar said the NGO has received four direct complaints while her personal Facebook page has received dozens ofgrouses .

“Since we have many universities producing graduates in hospitality and tourism, it’s kind of a setback to have international hotels having (such) standards.

“It’s discriminatory against our citizens in terms of employment and training.  I’ll have to work with the respective ministries, such as higher education and tourism (on this matter),” she told The Malaysian Insight in a WhatsApp message.

Syukri, a hotel banquet manager in Kuala Lumpur said the hijab policy had been in place for at least 10 years.

“At a five-star hotel in KL where I once worked, Muslim female staff were not allowed to wear the headscarf so as to attract customers.

“If a woman wanted a job as a waitress, she could not wear a scarf. It was considered unfashionable and unattractive,” said Syukri who did not want to give his full name.

As he was in charge of hiring temporary workers for big functions, he had to tell recruits that they could not wear the headscarf. He said the policy consistently applied to those working in food and beverage, such as servers, and in frontline positions, such as receptionists.

Syukri left the five-star hotel three years ago and found another job at a hotel that did not have such a policy.

“I moved to another hotel because I did not want to be a part of that kind of practice,” the 39-year-old said.

Farisha, who has worked for a year as a receptionist at a five-star hotel in Putrajaya, said she removed her headscarf whenever she went to work

“To be a receptionist at this hotel, you can’t wear the ‘tudung’. They say that this is in line with the image of an international hotel.

“So after I finish work, I will put it back on. I just don’t wear it at work. What else can I do? It is not easy to find a job now,” said the 29-year-old. – November 11, 2017.

Let us be honest with ourselves. This isn’t about a headscarf. This rule has been applied for years. I bet if any of us worked there we wouldn’t be allowed to wear a New York Yankee’s hat. All this is is the left and how they try to push Islam on the rest of the freedom loving world. And if anyone dares to say “NO” they are branded as racists, bigots and “Islamaphobes” which is a term that doesn’t even exist. It’s all part of the globalization movement and some of us just aren’t having anything to do with it. This is a great example as to why we elected President Donald Trump. We are sick and tired of people pushing their own beliefs and culture on us while if we do the same we are branded as criminals.

Please share if you stand against the globalists….

Source:freedomdaily.com

Muslims Demand Infidel Owner Remove ‘Perfect Man’ Sign — He Has Brilliant Counter-Offer

When Muslims noticed a billboard insulting their prophet Muhammad, they immediately demanded the removal of the “racist and Islamophobic” message. However, the uproar forced the billboard’s owner to come forward — and he has just one thing to say to them.

Leftists and Muslim groups across the U.S. loudly condemned a billboard along Interstate 465 in Indianapolis, Indiana. The sign contains a simple message which reads, “The Perfect Man,” with check-marked bullet points including “Rapist,” “13 wives, 11 at one time,” and “Tortured & killed unbelievers.”

Although Islam was never mentioned, instantly, Muslims knew the billboard was calling out their prophet Muhammad, prompting them to demand the sign’s removal in accordance with Sharia blasphemy laws. This national outcry has already prompted the sign’s owner to relinquish his personal safety by coming forward to not only take credit for the billboard’s construction but issue yet another daring message to “truthophobes” who deny its credibility.

WTHR reports that Don Woodsmall, who is a Duke law school graduate, has proudly taken responsibility for owning the billboard but says that while he is unafraid to show his face to the Muslim community, he’ll protect his clients’ identities. Woodsmall came forward to local media to slam free speech objectors, confidently declaring that he would gladly remove the sign himself — all they have to do is prove the statement wrong.

In his statement, Woodsmall says, “It is interesting to note… the Muslim community knew exactly who it was referring to. The truth is a powerful weapon.”

Woodsmall explained that he only agreed to erect the sign after thoroughly researching each claim and finding proof directly in the passages of the Quran and hadith. In addition, he spoke to at least half a dozen Islamic scholars who confirmed the scriptures in question.

“I was convinced that each point listed on the billboard was historically and factually true. I would encourage others to do their own research to verify the veracity of each and every point,” Woodsmall wrote. He also noted that he would remove the billboards if the statements are proven to be false.

Despite Muslims demanding that Woodsmall names his clients, undoubtedly for nefarious purposes, the billboard owner refuses to endanger their lives. The unwavering owner slammed the sign’s critics, reminding them that it is the very definition of free speech to question and tear apart lies and toxic ideologies.

“My clients want this national conversation to happen if we are ever to overcome the violence that plagues Islam,” he wrote to 13 Investigates. “This is not only pro-American, but beneficial to Muslims who came to America to escape the Sharia.”

Disturbingly, designated terrorist group CAIR and lying Muslims are declaring the message “racist” and “Islamophobic,” although none can provide any scripture or historical text to back up their claims. On the other hand, each one of the bullet points has a direct correlation to the Quran and hadith.

If the Muslim critics were honest, they’d point out that the only flaw in Woodsmall’s message is that Muhammad didn’t necessarily behead 600 Jews in one day — historical records suggest it a number between 500 and 900 Jews and likely over a period of several days. Potato, potato.

If the left considers it “hate speech” to summarize these Islamic passages, then it would mean that the Quran and hadith are hate speech. It’s not racist to denounce Muhammad’s ownership of dozens of black slaves as racist. In fact, it’s racist to defend Muhammad’s slave ownership and attempt to censor it.

The truth is that the prophet Muhammad boasted of his own slave ownership, sex slavery, marriage to a child, and mass slaughter of unbelieving men, women, and children. These are not fear-mongering allegations but direct quotations from the prophet, his closest companions, and even his favorite child bride, Aisha.

It is inexcusable for Muslims to demand we shut up or apologize for pointing out the behavior of their prophet. Instead, they are the ones who should be apologizing.

Source:madworldnews.com

BREAKING: Look What Obama’s Muslims In Homeland Security Can Do To Flights Mid-Air And Aren’t Done Yet

What we have learned from a high-positioning Homeland Security authority will give you bad dreams for quite a long time and months to come when you consider who was accountable for Homeland Security under Barack Hussein Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama’s did obvious harm as president, where he worked eagerly to promote the reason for Islam while taking a walk through our nation and our Constitution.

One of  Obama’s strategies was to place Muslims into high state positions all through our legislature, where he put an ISIS-supporting Muslim fear monger by the name of Mohammad Elibiary accountable for Homeland Security in 2014.

While Elibiary was expelled briefly later because of shock in the interest of Americans, we will everlastingly ask what top-level government secrets Elibiary brought out with him on out the entryway.

Another Obama agent seems to have as of late ruptured Homeland Security, after we discovered that the individual set to assume control as head of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielsen, is a Muslim fanboy, as well as has communicated her objective to surge Europe with Muslim refugees, so what do you think this lady’s expectations for our nation is.

Homeland Security examiner Robert Hickey uncovered at CyberSat Summit in Virginia this past week that he could effectively assume control full control of plane that was on the runway, after his group utilized radios to hack the plane.

This could act like a noteworthy danger to companies, in spite of the fact that Boeing authorities are attempting frantically to make light of this digital security hole as “not a major ordeal.”

“A GOVERNMENT official revealed that he and his team of IT experts remotely hacked into a Boeing 757 as it sat on the runway and were able to take control of its flight functions,” The Sun.UK detailed.

And the worst news is that the gadgets that Hickey used to hack the plane were things that you could without a problem get through airplane terminal security.

How about we all hope the main individuals who have the knoweldge to hack into a plane and take it over are just individuals who like to work in America’s best interest.

Source: MPolitical,conservativeflag.com

What Federal Judges Just Gave Muslims In America The Right To Do Will Chill You To The Bone

The left will do everything they can to undermine our safety.

Even though we know that radical Islam is the cause of terrorism, liberals still try to ignore it. They claim any attempt at preventing the spread of terrorism is an attack on Muslims. They are not willing to distinguish between peaceful citizens and radical terrorists.

So, they pass rulings and decisions that give more power to a single group, and enable more violence and bloodshed to occur.

It’s almost as if they want terrorists to win.

Muhammed

From Breitbart:

Ten progressive judges in Virginia have decided that Muslims can ask judges to change the nation’s national security and immigration policies whenever prior campaign statements in democratic political elections can be described as unfair to Muslims living in America.

“To the extent that our review chills campaign promises to condemn and exclude entire religious groups, we think that a welcome restraint,” boasted the majority opinion, which was approved by 10 judges on the Richmond-based Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and announced May 25…

“Unless corrected by the Supreme Court, the majority’s new approach, which is unsupported by any Supreme Court case, will become a sword for plaintiffs to challenge facially neutral government actions, particularly those affecting regions dominated by a single religion.”

“Government officials will avoid speaking about religion, even privately, lest a court discover statements that could be used to ascribe a religious motivation to their future actions.”

“And, in the more immediate future, our courts will be faced with the unworkable task of determining when this President’s supposed religious motive [in the 2016 election] has sufficiently dissipated so as to allow executive action toward these or other majority Muslim countries.”

Even if you agree with the judges, you can’t deny they are giving one religious group an advantage. Now our leaders can’t do anything, for fear of offending Muslims? Since when does this one group deserve more rights and privileges than any other?

And how can we confront the real dangers of terrorism without acknowledging their root in radical Islam? Only liberals seem to group all Muslims together with terrorists. The rest of us understand the difference.

But that ignores the real point: that judges are using their own, biased politics to interfere with our national security. They assume things about the president’s motives (that cannot be proven) to undermine lawful executive orders.

It’s time we replace these hack judges for people who actually do their job.

Source: Breitbart, myrightamerica.com

Texas Mayor Hears About Sharia Court Being Held In Her City, What She Does Next Is Epic

The time has come to take a stand against any way of life that threatens United States law.

It’s clear that many Muslims living in our communities wish to overthrow our laws and government. While they abuse freedom of religion in America, they seek to establish Sharia law.

Sharia law is incompatible with the United States. It violates our most fundamental freedoms and liberties. It is a rival government system that has no place in a sovereign nation like America. Yet many Muslims in our country seek to impose this religious system not only on their communities, but on every American.

Already we have seen states take action against this kind of sick and evil practice. Yet, Muslims continue to push Sharia law — knowing it is illegal.

In Texas — of all places — mosques were openly defying state and federal law by operating their own, rebel courts. So our leaders took steps to bring it to an end.

Image result for Mayor Beth Van Duyne

From The Political Insider:

This radical group of Muslims is not pleased with the Mayor of Irving, Texas after she put the end to America’s first “Sharia Court.” Mayor Beth Van Duyne has accused mosque leaders of creating separate laws for Muslims, which is why the city voted to stop these supposedly “voluntary” tribunals from operating.

In a very close 5-4 vote, the city of Irving ruled to back the Texas state bill banning foreign law from the state. The bill doesn’t mention Sharia or any religion, but it’s a huge defeat for Sharia supporters, as such courts are in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

All four of the “voluntary” court’s lawyers were unlicensed in the state of Texas, a third degree felony. Mayor Beth Van Duyne received several phone calls on the matter.

It seems that the Islamic Tribunal not only was unlicensed, but they failed to notify the city of their illegal court being operated in city limits. She promised to get to the bottom of it, and she did.

Sharia law treats women as second-class citizens. It also punishes non-Muslims, including Christians and Jews and calls for the death penalty for homosexuals. It obviously has no place in American society, officially or unofficially.

Yet, this group of Muslims was conducting their own Sharia courts in defiance of our society. Their website clearly stated they followed Sharia law over American law.

This has nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with open treason. These people were living in America, but were following laws contrary to our own. State and federal government has every right to shut them down — and shut them down they must.

Muslim groups like CAIR and others are fighting every day to force Sharia law and practice onto our society. They want to transform America into a Muslim state from the inside out. The end result is a society that protects and elevates Muslims and punishes the vast majority of everyone else.

This cannot stand. Local and state governments must pass laws that forbid such a vile agenda. More than that, our President must take action against the advancement of Sharia law.

This threat must be stopped, once and for all.

Source: The Political Insider, myrightamerica.com