Maxine Waters Suffers Screaming Meltdown After PA Rep Mike Kelly Says 3 Words

Image result for Maxine Waters and Mike Kelly

The unhinged Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) suffered a screaming meltdown on the House floor after Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) said three words that she just couldn’t bear, and it was all caught on video for our viewing enjoyment. This is pure unadulterated fun.

Mike Kelly (left), Maxine Waters (right) (Photo Credits: Twitter/Financial Svcs Dems)

The crazy Congresswoman from California is making headlines again with another unforgettable meltdown in front of other House members on Tuesday, May 8, 2018, according to Breitbart. Apparently, Kelly uttered the wrong three words in front of “Auntie” Maxine, and that was all she could bear in her little liberal mind.

Waters’ meltdown was bizarre, even for her, and seemed to be triggered when Kelly suggested that America should shift its focus from the things that divide us to the things which unite us. “We are trying to make sure we are making America great every day in every way and the best way to do that is to stop talking about discrimination and start talking about the nation,” Kelly said Tuesday, aiming his comments toward Waters. “We’re coming together as a people, in spite of what you say.”

Then, Committee chairman Tom McClintock interjected to remind the lawmakers to direct their comments to him, rather than each other, before yielding to “the gentlelady from California.” Waters ignored his request and instantly launched a nasty screaming attack on Kelly, pointing to her special victim status as a black woman.

“Mr. Kelly, please do not leave because I want you to know that I am more offended as an African American woman than you will ever be. And, this business about making America great again, it is your president that’s dividing this country,” Waters exclaimed. “And, don’t talk to me about the fact that we don’t understand … that’s the attitude that’s been given toward women time and time again,” she added.

Kelly made an attempt to chime back in with an explanation, but Waters was too far gone and refused to yield for a response from the Congressman. Again, McClintock reminded Waters to direct her remarks to him, and she ignored the request a second time. Leave it to a liberal to expect others to give consideration and then give none in return.

“I respect the chair, but don’t stop me in the middle when you didn’t stop him in the middle, and so I shall continue,” Waters said, turning back to attack Kelly. “Don’t you dare talk to me like that and think that somehow women don’t understand what goes on on the floor of automobile dealers,” she said. At this point, McClintock was fed-up with Waters’ outburst and again requested that she respect the rules, which sent the 79-year-old politician into a tirade about President Donald Trump.

“I don’t appreciate that you did not interrupt him when he was making those outrageous remarks about him knowing more about discrimination than I know about discrimination,” Waters screamed. “I resent that, and I resent the remark about making America great again,” she continued.

“He’s down here making a speech for this dishonorable president of the United States of America. Having said that, I reserve the balance of my time. And no, I do not yield, not one second to you,” she screamed at Kelly like a hysterical circus clown. “Not one second,” she shouted. “Not one second to you,” Waters repeated angrily.

The purpose of the hearing was to review Obama-era anti-discrimination regulations for auto lenders, which Republicans and some Democrats voted to reverse. The measure, which was previously approved by the Senate, is now awaiting President Trump’s signature, according to The Hill.

There was no need for Maxine Waters to explode like she did in such dramatic fashion, but in all seriousness, at the end of the day, that is what most liberals have to resort to when they encounter a logical 0pponent.

As a Congresswoman, Maxine Waters continues to be not just an embarrassment to the state of California but also to our country. How can other civilized nations look at this spectacle and not wonder why people like Waters are able to weasel their way into Congress? Here is another good example of why Congress needs to have term limits.

Source:madworldnews.com

BIG Billboard Goes Up On Busy California Highway Overnight With 4 Words That Makes Maxine Waters PANIC

Image result for BIG Billboard Goes Up On Busy California Highway Overnight With 4 Words That Makes Maxine Waters PANIC

A massive billboard appeared in California that absolutely roasted Maxine Waters and likely has her fuming from the four words it says so big people can read it from the highway in their cars. The well-known Democrat popular among her party, yet often ostracized for mumbling and not making sense while working at an age indicating that she should’ve retired many, many years ago. Nevertheless, she persists and she continues clamoring on with her #Resist antics and trying to bully President Trump into resignation.

Her antics aren’t working, but there’s finally people speaking out about her in a big way. This time someone paid to have a billboard blasting Maxine Waters and how many in the public truly view her. The billboard said “Rotten to the core” and it labels her as one of the most corrupt politicians to grace the country. In fact, many people don’t know much about Maxine Waters except for every time she stumbles on her own words or babbles about something incoherently. Many people aren’t sure how she was brought into politics or what she does to earn a salary.

It was Omar Navarro who posted a photograph of the billboard which is shown below. The billboard was reported to be paid for by the Stars & Stripes Forever PAC which appears to be in support of conservative values – the same common sense and logical values that many people like Maxine Waters fight against.

Trending: 

Military Moms Never Heard A Word From Michelle In 8 Years, In Tears Over What Melania Just Gave Them

The Facebook post can be seen here with so many comments that support the billboard that talks poorly of Maxine Waters and references her as being corrupt.

Maxine Waters now calls for President Trump to be impeached after pulling out of the Iran deal. It seems as though Maxine Waters still doesn’t have a grasp on politics at her ripe age of 79. Waters continuously calls for Trump’s impeachment, but she may not have an idea of how the impeachment process works either. Her constant badgering of politicians she opposes of continuously paint her as the corrupt and rather useless person who’s stealing a job from someone more competent who could actually accomplish something.

The Hill reported more on Maxine Waters and her desire for Trump’s impeachment: “Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said Wednesday that impeaching President Trump is the “only option” for Democrats following his decision to exit the Iran nuclear deal.

In a tweet, Waters said Trump “thinks he knows better” than negotiators and U.S. allies — France, Germany and the United Kingdom — which issued a joint statement this week condemning Trump’s decision to abandon the agreement.

“Trump, further isolating the United States, thinks he knows better than our negotiators and all of our global allies who agreed to the Iran deal,” Waters tweeted. “How long do we have to suffer his gigantic ego and narcissistic behavior? Impeachment is the only answer.”

Maxine’s comments are funny because she assumes people are suffering under the leadership of President Trump. That is untrue. People are working, the stock market was doing well, North and South Korea ended their war, and there have been so many “winning” moments in Trump’s first year and a little beyond. Trump had no political experience going into the election in 2016, but his campaign was different and gave voters an option for people to chose a non-politician. Trump won and those who oppose him, such as Maxine Waters, have wasted the last year or so complaining instead of working hard to help make real progress in America. In other words, the progressives are the ones halting any hope of progress.

Trump would only be impeached when, or if, there’s anything he can be impeached for that would cost him his job. Bill Clinton was impeached for committing adultery with an intern, IN the White House, but look how that turned out. Trump has the backing of the American people, with the exception of a few from the #Resist movement who commit crimes or cause harm and vandalism to property while fighting against free speech.

Will Maxine Waters continue crying about everything? Will she ever resign and step out of the spotlight so that someone else can take her job since she’s not doing much with it?

What’s your opinion of all this? Share your comments below and then post this on Facebook so your friends can join the conversation too!

Source:rwnofficial.com

Mad Maxine Waters Make A Statement About Comey That’s So INSANE That Even MSNBC Calls Her Out

Image result for Mad Maxine Waters Make A Statement About Comey That’s So INSANE That Even MSNBC Calls Her Out

It seems that California Congresswoman Maxine Waters has made herself look like a total fool… once again. You may be wondering what she could have said this time that tops her having called for Trump’s impeachment. Well, wonder no more. This time, Waters had something to say about disgraced former FBI Director James Comey.

The former FBI Director’s anti-Trump rhetoric lately has been taking over mainstream media headlines, but what Waters just said has taken it a step too far for even the most liberal news networks.

During an interview on Monday evening on MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes,” the California Congresswoman was shown a clip of her during the presidential transition period, in which she claimed that Comey was unreliable.

She can be heard saying in the clip, “All I can tell you is the FBI director has no credibility.”

Hayes stated on the air during Monday’s interview, “You and Donald Trump do agree on that. That sentence you said that, ‘the FBI director has no credibility.’ You and Donald Trump are in agreement on that.”

Waters was clearly confused, as she isn’t used to being questioned by a fellow liberal. She seemed to stutter a bit before going into one of her normal babbling responses.

“I’ve tried to clarify that and to say, yes, coming out of that classified briefing, I said that, and I certainly meant it. However, I think it is quite different when you take a look at Comey and his relationship to the president, what he said, what he’s done. I believe him,”Waters stated.

“Then is then, and now is now.”

Conservative Tribune reports:

At The Washington Post, “The Fix” writer Aaron Blake practically spluttered on his keyboard. (His piece is headlined “Maxine Waters’s cringe-worthy explanation for her 180 on James Comey.”)

“Part of being a politician is showing that you have some consistent moral compass — that you don’t just promote things and people because they say things you like and denounce them when it’s inconvenient. Saying Comey has ‘no credibility’ means he lacks character and can’t be trusted to tell the truth. That doesn’t really change with circumstances and with the passage of 15 months,” he wrote.

“Politicians aren’t viewed as the most consistent and trustworthy people; in fact, Gallup polling shows that members of Congress are basically tied with lobbyists as the least-trusted of 21 professions tested. And sometimes they show us why.”

Twitter users really let Waters have it for her comments:

The Washington Post tore Waters apart for her comments.

The Post reports, “Part of being a politician is showing that you have some consistent moral compass — that you don’t just promote things and people because they say things you like and denounce them when it’s inconvenient. Saying Comey has “no credibility” means he lacks character and can’t be trusted to tell the truth. That doesn’t really change with circumstances and with the passage of 15 months.”

The Post also claimed that Waters either acknowledged that she is a bad judge of credibility or she basically admitted that her political opinions have changed rather conveniently.

Maxine Waters’ comment proved that the Democrats are so ready and willing to bend the truth in order to push their agenda that even their own beliefs are subject to change by the day. Waters flip-flopping on what she said isn’t much of a surprise, but it isn’t every day that an MSNBC host calls out a fellow liberal on the air and the Washington Post throws a Democrat under the bus.

I guess Waters has become even too much of a looney toon for the left to deal with at this point.

Source: fbnewsupdate.com

MAXINE GETS TAKEN TO SCHOOL ON EXECUTIVE POWERS DURING HEARING

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters may want to do a little more homework before launching into questions at hearings with the House Committee on Financial Services. She dove right into a line of questions for Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director Mick Mulvaney on Wednesday.

Waters asked him why people should trust him to run the CFPB when he previously sponsored legislation to get rid of that bureau. During those questions, she insisted that it was the responsibility of herself and her colleagues to implement Dodd Frank financial regulations.

“With respect, congresswoman, I would say that I am the one for responsible for implementing Dodd Frank, not you,” Mulvaney retorted. “You were responsible for passing legislation and then the executive branch implements it.”

“I have not burnt the place down,” he continued. “Despite what you may have heard about what I was going to do when I got in there — I think that we have ten fewer people working there now than the day I took over, and that’s out of 1627 people.”

Waters was not amused with his government lesson and in fact cut his answer off.

“I’m reclaiming my time,” Waters declared. “Let me just say to you that you couldn’t implement a thing unless, first of all, there was legislation that was passed to deal with what you’re doing, and second, we have responsibility for the oversight of your implementation.”

Well, sounds like she tried to back out of that line of questioning pretty quickly, doesn’t it? Take a look at this clip and let us know what you think.

Credit: Daily Caller,redbluedivide.com

Maxine Waters Is Asked What Crime Specifically Trump Has Committed. Her Response Is Both Hilarious And Sad

Image result for Maxine Waters Is Asked What Crime Specifically Trump Has Committed. Her Response Is Both Hilarious And Sad

Loudmouth Rep. Maxine Waters has reinvented herself as the bullhorn of the Democrats’ anti-Trump “resistance.”

Everywhere she goes, Waters can be heard shouting “Impeach 45!”

But, as many have pointed out, impeachment requires some very specific conditions to be met.

Specifically, the president needs to have committed certain actual crimes, and in a certain way.

But the facts and details, the actual laws governing this nation, don’t seem to concern this LAWMAKER.

At a recent rally, Waters insisted:

“Impeachment is about whatever the Congress says it is. There is no law that dictates impeachment. What the Constitution says is ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ and we define that.”

In other words, in Waters’ world, Congress can just impeach anyone it pleases, and make up the rules as it goes.

Law Newz explained that while that notion is somewhat accurate, Waters had grossly skewed the reality of how impeachment works:

The framers, as we all know, were hell-bent on making sure that the American president could not become tyrannical; a key facet to their planning was to give Congress the final word on whether the chief executive was carrying out his responsibilities with the requisite dignity befitting the office. Such an concept of impeachment may provide us significant discomfort in that it varies so profoundly from the criminal justice system, but that’s precisely the point. Impeachment is inherently a political process, not a criminal one.  The numbers required for impeachment and conviction ensure that the process isn’t likely to oust a president who is merely unpopular; supermajorities aren’t easy to come by, and are inherent guards against arbitrary or capricious actions.

Trump’s been in office less than a year, and most of what Waters is bringing against him remains in the realm of far-fetched allegation and personal dislike.

“Arbitrary” would be an understatement for Waters’ efforts to impeach Trump.

Source:conservativepost.com

California Democrat Maxine Waters Charged on 3 Counts. Do You Support This?

The House ethics committee on Monday outlined its charges against Rep. Maxine Waters, who is accused of helping a bank in which her husband owned stock secure federal bailout funds.Image result for California Democrat Maxine Waters Charged on 3 Counts. Do You Support This?..The committee charged the 10-term California Democrat with three counts of violating House rules and the federal ethics code in connection with her effort to arrange a 2008 meeting between Treasury officials and representatives with OneUnited bank.

The panel said Waters, who sits on the Financial Services Committee, broke a House rule requiring members to behave in a way that reflects “creditably” on the chamber. The committee said that by trying to assist OneUnited, she stood to benefit directly, because her husband owned a sizable amount of stock that would have been “worthless” if the bank failed.

The committee also accused Waters of violating the “spirit” of a House rule prohibiting lawmakers from using their positions for financial gain, as well as a government ethics statute banning the dispensing of “special favors.”

Waters has vehemently denied wrongdoing and said she would rather defend herself at an ethics trial than admit to “something I did not do.”

In a motion to dismiss the charges, which the ethics panel has denied, Waters’s attorney, Stanley M. Brand, said the congresswoman had done nothing wrong. Image result for maxine waters“This committee asserts that Rep. Waters improperly used her position to ‘preserve her husband’s investment in OneUnited,’ ” he wrote. “Yet, after its exhaustive investigation, it cannot identify a single active step taken by Rep. Waters in furtherance of that goal.”

The release of the formal charges comes at a bad time for Democrats, as Waters is the second party lawmaker heading to a public trial after the August recess — with time running out before the November midterms. In late July, the House ethics committee charged Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) with 13 counts of breaking House rules and federal ethics statutes.

Now, for the third straight week, as House lawmakers return from recess Tuesday to pass a $26 billion state aid package, Democratic leaders must watch their legislative agenda take a backseat to ethics scandals that Republicans already are using against them.

The ethics committee last week released a detailed report, by the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), on Waters’s alleged wrongdoing in the OneUnited matter, but it did not outline the formal charges against her until Monday.

The panel’s investigative subcommittee, to buttress its case, released more information Monday about Waters’s involvement with OneUnited and a meeting she helped arrange between the National Bankers Association (NBA), a trade group of minority owned banks of which OneUnited is a member, and Treasury officials. Three of the four attendees NBA invited had ties to OneUnited, according to the OCE report.Image result for California Democrat Maxine Waters Charged on 3 Counts. Do You Support This?..OneUnited asked for $50 million in assistance to cover expected losses from the collapse of the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but Treasury lacked the authority to grant the request, the ethics committee said.According to the 10-page Statement of Alleged Violation, Waters “did not instruct” her chief of staff, Mikael Moore, to stop assisting OneUnited after she told Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) she would halt her outreach.

In early September, Frank had warned Waters against getting involved because of her husband’s ties, telling her he would handle all contact on behalf of the bank, according to the report, even before he knew about her husband’s OneUnited stock. It is unclear when Frank learned about his holdings.

But Moore, who is Waters’s grandson, contacted OneUnited executives in late September, sending them publicly available draft legislation of a broad Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) bill that would have permitted Treasury to buy certain assets of banks.

OneUnited CEO Kevin Cohee and OneUnited senior counsel Robert Cooper exchanged several e-mails with Moore that September. In one, Cooper wrote: “Thank you for all your hard work!”

In October, the legislation authorizing the TARP contained language intended to apply to OneUnited, according to Frank. The bank eventually applied for TARP funds and received $12 million in December.Image result for California Democrat Maxine Waters Charged on 3 Counts. Do You Support This?..The ethics committee valued Williams’s stock holdings at over $350,000 at the end of 2007, between 4.6 and 15.2 percent of the couple’s net worth, according to Waters’s financial disclosure reports. By the end of September 2008, the stock’s value plummeted more than 50 percent, to $175,000, because of the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“If OneUnited failed, [Waters’s] husband’s investment would have been worthless,” the subcommittee wrote.

The panel also reported that Cohee had previously hosted a fundraiser for Waters at his home and that he and his wife contributed to her campaign on “numerous occasions.”

The investigative subcommittee denied two motions filed by Waters: one to provide further clarification of the charges against her and another to dismiss the case.

The fact that her grandson handled the OneUnited matter for her raises even more ethics concerns, watchdogs argue. House rules bar members from hiring for their congressional offices nearly anyone with a family relationship, though not grandchildren.Image result for California Democrat Maxine Waters Charged on 3 Counts. Do You Support This?..“Congress has anti-nepotism rules, which sadly don’t rule out members from hiring their grandchildren,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Public Citizen’s Craig Holman said, “The family and the business relationship is just so close — it defies credibility that he would be acting on his own without her knowledge.”

Waters plans a vigorous defense this week. Her attorneys previously have argued that Moore acted without her knowledge and compared her office’s activities to those of Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.), whom the committee exonerated last year.

Graves had invited a business partner of his wife’s to testify before a committee. The hearing covered the industry in which the witness and Graves’s wife were investors, and he failed to disclose the relationship at the hearing.

This post was originally posted at 12:33 p.m. and updated at 1:56 p.m. and 8:24 p.m.

SOURCE: thehill.com,thedeplorablesociety.com

Maxine Waters Caught Defrauding Americans Out Of $1.2 Billion

Elder Patriot – Apparently Maxine Waters didn’t get the memo that there’s a new sheriff in town.

While President Trump is reshaping government so that it once again serves the people rather than the other way around, poverty pimp Maxine Waters has introduced a bill designed to defraud Americans of another $1.2 billion.  But the money isn’t for the impoverished and underserved community she represents.

Judicial Watch provides the details:

Called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Outreach for the Uninsured, Transformative Recruitment, and Enrollment Action for Compassionate Healthcare (ACA OUTREACH) Act, Waters bill is cosponsored by 36 other lawmakers. If it passes, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would dole out $300 million annually through 2021 for “navigator” grants. Minority and underserved communities would be especially targeted, according to language in the bill’s text.

Translation: a return to the fraud and corruption of the original Obamacare navigator program that served as a conduit for funneling tens of millions of dollars to leftist front groups including ones headed by and serving illegal aliens.

Judicial Watch provided details on some of the recipients of your tax dollars:

  • An Arizona nonprofit called “Campesinos Sin Fronteras” that provides services to farm workers and low-income Hispanics
  • A south Florida legal group that provided navigators in “racially, ethnically, linguistically, culturally and socioeconomically diverse” communities
  • Three Planned Parenthood branches—in Iowa, Montana and New Hampshire—got a combined $655,000 to serve as navigators.
  • An Arab Community Center in Michigan, which got nearly $300,000 to reach out to and engage uninsured community members through “multicultural” media.
  • A Black Chamber of Commerce in South Carolina received north of $230,000 to “provide outreach around new coverage options”
  • A Hispanic aging group in Texas got over $646,000 help members that are “socially isolated due to cultural and linguistic differences.”
  • A labor front group called Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York headed by an illegal immigrant activist named Maria Marroquin. The group received navigator funds shortly after Marroquin, an illegal alien from Peru, had been arrested for participating in disruptive demonstrations protesting the deportation of fellow undocumented immigrants and demanding amnesty.

These navigators were given access to the sensitive personal information of healthcare enrollees including their Social Security numbers, which illegal aliens use for identity theft when seeking to establish residency and land jobs in the U.S.

Navigator funds also went to a nonprofit (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), with such a huge history of corruption that Congress issued a federal funding ban. As part of a broader investigation into ACORN Judicial Watch obtained records showing that HHS violated the congressional ACORN funding ban by awarding a Louisiana nonprofit called Southern United Neighborhoods (SUN) a $1.3 million Obamacare navigator grant.

Trump had funding for ACA OUTREACH slashed by 90%, which put a severe crimp in Maxine’s cash flow threatening her power base. 

Waters is desperate to regain access to that lost money to keep her coalition fed and $1.2 billion spread over four years would make up for it in spades and revitalize these leftist organizations to new levels.   

No wonder why she wants Trump impeached. 

Source:thedeplorablesociety.com

BREAKING: Maxine Waters Will Deliver “Racist” State Of The Union Address

It’s certainly not a stretch for one to question Rep. Maxine Waters’ mental faculties… especially given the bizarre speeches she’s given over the past year not to mention her body language and movements. But no matter how low or weird this woman continues to get, her announcement today about the state of the union address takes the cake.

Promising to deliver her own version of the annual Presidential address, Waters picked the predominantly African-American cable channel “BET” — a channel that has roughly 15 white viewers. It’s clear that she’s aiming to further her race narrative knowingly catering to an almost all-black audience.

DailyWire reports:

Rep. Maxine Waters won’t be attending the State of the Union — and it follows that she won’t be tuning in, either — but she will give her very own “national address” following President Trump’s annual speech, as part of a post-SOTU analysis on BET.

Buzzfeed reports that the California Democrat, who came unhinged most recently last week when calling for Trump to be impeached over “insults” (an action not generally supported by the United States Constitution), will kick off a new politically focused line-up on BET which includes the new news program, “Angela Rye’s State of the Union.”

According to BET representatives speaking to the online newsmagazine, Waters will focus her speech on “building black politics and the value of engagement across today’s socio-political landscape.”

Waters has, of course, been one of President Trump’s harshest — and perhaps least logical — critics, routinely calling for Trump’s impeachment at such appropriate times as the “Glamour Women of the Year Awards,” and was forced last year to apologize after telling media that she would “take Trump out.” Most recently, Waters suggested that Trump should be impeached (yet again) because he reportedly referred to Haiti as a “sh*t hole” in a meeting on immigration reform.

In fairness to Rep. Waters, the official Democratic State of the Union response may be as irrelevant. Rep. Joseph Kennedy III — the heir to the Kennedy dynasty — will give the rebuttal in an effort to convince Americans that the Democratic Party is one of middle class values and is in touch with the needs of blue collar, working Americans.

SHARE this all over Facebook to remind conservatives exactly what we’re up against in 2018 and 2020.

Source: patrioticexpress.com

Army Vet Who Called Out Maxine Waters for Skipping Trump’s SOTU Address Gets a Surprise Invite

The U.S. Army veteran who offered to take Rep. Maxine Waters’ (D-CA) seat at President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address just got a big surprise.

After Waters said last week she would be skipping Trump’s address on Jan. 30 because the president “lies in the face of facts,” Ricky Taylor, who served two tours of duty in Afghanistan, said he’d “gladly” take her place:

Rep. Sean Duffy (R-WI) saw Taylor’s appearance this week on Fox News and decided to give him a ticket to Trump’s State of the Union address. Duffy described attending the event as “a great American experience.”

The Army veteran said Thursday morning he hasn’t heard back from Waters because he — a black Latino veteran — doesn’t fit her “narrative.”

“She wants to portray Donald Trump supporters as middle-aged white men that live in trailers and have Confederate flags sticking out,” he said, “so I just don’t think it fit her narrative and I pretty much knew I wouldn’t get a response from her.”

Source:worldpoliticus.com

Kamala Harris Caught in Money Funneling Scheme with Maxine Waters

In the latest news, it looks as if California Democrat, Rep. Maxine Waters, has been exposed as part of a major money funneling scheme that channels money directly into her campaign.  Perhaps most importantly, the scandal could have major implications in the next presidential election.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, nearly $750,000 has been funneled through an endorsement and mailing list operation run by Waters and her daughter, Karen:

“The mailers list the candidates endorsed by Waters and is sent to the more than 200,000 constituents in South Central Los Angeles area, where the congresswoman holds considerable clout. The mailers contain an “official sample ballot” with brief quotes from the congresswoman.”

“The operation is run by Karen Waters, the daughter of Rep. Waters, who has collected more than $650,000 to date for running the endorsement mailers. Karen is owed another $108,000 from her mother’s campaign committee, according to its most recent records. Once Karen is paid, her total payments will reach more than $750,000 since 2006.”

One would think that paying such ludicrous amounts of money for endorsements would be a bit unusual, but that isn’t the case according to California’s Sen. Kamala Harris, who has reportedly paid Waters tens of thousands of dollars to be included on the printed list of endorsements.

“Harris — who has garnered media attention and earned speculation that she is positioning herself to run for president in 2020 following her performance during recent Senate hearings, including that of former FBI Director James Comey — has kicked $63,000 to the campaign of Maxine Waters, the congressional face of the anti-Trump movement, in exchange for placement on the endorsement mailers,” the Free Beacon reported, citing Federal Election Commission records.

Pretty alarming, isn’t it, folks?  Politics can be so sick and twisted at times.  Apparently, the Waters campaign operation, the only one of its kind, has been able to bypass contribution limits that restrict other people, thanks in part to a decade-old legal loophole.  Pretty ironic when you consider most Democrats are against money in politics, huh?

Source: theviralpatriots.com