Trey Gowdy Is Cleared To Go After Hillary Clinton And Loretta Lynch, You’ll Cheer

Hillary Clinton clearly broke the law. Regardless of whether it was a result of her failure to deal with her email system appropriately, it doesn’t make a difference – she should’ve been charged. In any case, James Comey, our previous FBI chief felt that it would be better given her a chance to get away with it. Additionally, Comey had started composing his letter where he exonerates Hillary Clinton before he even had a meeting with her.

Via Fox News:

THE FBI RELEASED DOCUMENTS MONDAY PROVING FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY BEGAN DRAFTING A LETTER REGARDING HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAIL INVESTIGATION MONTHS BEFORE CONDUCTING SEVERAL KEY INTERVIEWS, INCLUDING SPEAKING TO CLINTON HERSELF.

THE DOCUMENT RELEASE WAS TITLED “DRAFTS OF DIRECTOR COMEYS JULY 5, 2016 STATEMENT REGARDING EMAIL SERVER INVESTIGATION PART 01 OF 01.”

THE CONTENTS OF THE EMAIL WERE LARGELY UNCLEAR AS NEARLY ALL OF IT WAS REDACTED. THE NOW-PUBLIC RECORDS SHOW THE EMAIL TITLED “MIDYEAR EXAM — UNCLASSIFIED” WAS SENT BY COMEY ON MAY 2, 2016, TO DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW MCCABE, GENERAL COUNSEL JAMES BAKER AND CHIEF OF STAFF AND SENIOR COUNSELOR JAMES RYBICKI.

Brilliant.

Furthermore, AG Loretta Lynch trusted that it would be an amazing decision to meet with Hillary Clinton’s husband on an airport tarmac while the examination was still crisp and new.

Clearly, they discussed their grandkids. The examination that jeopardized Hillary Clinton’s political profession didn’t ring a bell, by any stretch of the imagination.

That is to say, clearly.

Be that as it may, Trey Gowdy is here and he dispatches an examination to find the answers we all need.

Via Conservative Tribune:

HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN TREY GOWDY HAS ANNOUNCED, ALONG WITH HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN BOB GOODLATTE, THAT THE TWO WILL BE JOINTLY INVESTIGATING THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’S HANDLING OF THE INVESTIGATION OF FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON’S USE OF A PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER, SAYING THAT THE DEPARTMENT’S ACTIONS HAVE LEFT “A HOST OF OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED.”

“OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS REPRESENTED BY A BLIND-FOLDED WOMAN HOLDING A SET OF SCALES… NO ENTITY OR INDIVIDUAL IS EXEMPT FROM OVERSIGHT,” THE TWO CHAIRMEN SAID IN A STATEMENT TUESDAY.

More incredible news.

This is the thing that they will be searching for.

Each and every one of those issues is fundamentally basic.

THE “HOST OF OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS” PERTAIN TO SUBJECTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

“FBI’S DECISION TO PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THE INVESTIGATION INTO SECRETARY CLINTON’S HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION BUT NOT TO PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THE INVESTIGATION INTO CAMPAIGN ASSOCIATES OF THEN-CANDIDATE DONALD TRUMP;

“FBI’S DECISION TO NOTIFY CONGRESS BY FORMAL LETTER OF THE STATUS OF THE INVESTIGATION BOTH IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER OF 2016;

“FBI’S DECISION TO APPROPRIATE FULL DECISION MAKING IN RESPECT TO CHARGING OR NOT CHARGING SECRETARY CLINTON TO THE FBI RATHER THAN THE DOJ;

“FBI’S TIMELINE IN RESPECT TO CHARGING DECISIONS.”

Plainly, Gowdy is going pretty however after Comey.

Via Washington Examiner:

REP. TREY GOWDY PLANS TO GRILL FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY ABOUT HIS DECISION-MAKING AS PART OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE’S DECISION TO RE-EXAMINE THE INVESTIGATION INTO HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER.

“HAVE TO, WON’T WE?” THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN TOLD THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER WHEN ASKED ABOUT INTERVIEWING COMEY.

GOWDY CHAIRS THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE, WHICH HAS OPENED A JOINT INVESTIGATION WITH THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN ORDER TO REVIEW THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S HANDLING OF THE POLITICALLY CHARGED INVESTIGATION. GOWDY IS PARTICULARLY CONCERNED THAT “THE DECISION TO CHARGE OR NOT CHARGE [CLINTON] WAS MADE BEFORE ALL THE WITNESSES WERE INTERVIEWED,” BUT HE EMPHASIZED THAT THE INVESTIGATION TOPICS ARE STRUCTURED IN A NONPARTISAN WAY.

We don’t surmise that there could be anybody more reasonable than Gowdy for this.

Via Business Insider:

THE EMBATTLED CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE ANNOUNCED ON TUESDAY THAT HE HAD OPENED AN INVESTIGATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE INTO A DEAL STRUCK BETWEEN THE US AND A PREDOMINANTLY RUSSIA-OWNED URANIUM COMPANY BASED IN CANADA WHILE HILLARY CLINTON WAS SECRETARY OF STATE.

DEVIN NUNES’ ANNOUNCEMENT CAME ONE WEEK AFTER THE HILL PUBLISHED A REPORT ON A “RACKETEERING SCHEME … DESIGNED TO BENEFIT FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON’S CHARITABLE FOUNDATION DURING THE TIME SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON SERVED ON A GOVERNMENT BODY THAT PROVIDED A FAVORABLE DECISION TO MOSCOW.”

Hillary Clinton is in a crisis. Loretta Lynch is in a crisis. James Comey is in a crisis. Barack Obama is in a crisis.

Basically, every leading and renowned liberal from the most recent couple of years of the Obama administration is catching that the games are finished.

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

 Source:conservativepost.com

Unacceptable! Obama AG Loretta Lynch Refuses Congress: “I Won’t Answer”

Image result for Unacceptable! Obama AG Loretta Lynch Refuses Congress: “I Won’t Answer”

CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES ARE QUITE HELPFUL IF YOU WANT TO PUT SUSPICIOUS INDIVIDUALS IN FRONT OF CAMERAS AND MAKING BIG HEADLINES WHICH CAN BOTH BE USED NOW AND AT THE MOMENT WHEN THEY SEEK REELECTIONS.

The Washington Times reported that on October 20, Barack Obama’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch secretly met with Congressional Republicans about her “tarmac meeting” with previous President Bill Clinton, husband of failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, in June 2016.

What they observed is unknown, yet many assume it was about the Obama DOJ giving Hillary a pass on different scandals, particularly her illegal utilization of a private server to share classified material.

Still,  Lynch didn’t feel much like talking:

Mrs. Lynch has been accused of attempting to influence the FBI’s investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s private email use while secretary of state — and both she and Mr. Clinton say the meeting at the Phoenix airport was a chance social encounter.

In June, during highly anticipated testimony, fired FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee that the Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting caused him to hold a press conference on Mrs. Clinton’s email case.

“AT ONE POINT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL [LYNCH] HAD DIRECTED ME NOT TO CALL IT AN INVESTIGATION BUT INSTEAD TO CALL IT A MATTER, WHICH CONFUSED ME AND CONCERNED ME,” MR. COMEY TOLD THE COMMITTEE. “THAT WAS ONE OF THE BRICKS IN THE LOAD THAT LED ME TO CONCLUDE I HAVE TO STEP AWAY FROM THE DEPARTMENT IF WE’RE TO CLOSE THIS CASE CREDIBLY.”

On Friday, Fox quoted sources saying the former attorney general refused to answer three queries: whether she ever instructed Mr. Comey to characterize the DOJ’s Clinton email investigation a “matter,” whether she liaised with the White House to hold the tarmac meeting with Mr. Clinton and finally — if she could address any issues related to Mr. Comey’s June testimony.

Mrs. Lynch reportedly declined to answer any of the three queries.

Not long ago, TFPP exposed how FBI admitted to having 30 pages or so of reports correlating to the tarmac meeting, in the wake of refusing that it had any such records the previous year. The FBI was forced to alter its narrative after the conservative American Center for Law and Justice got its hands on and afterward discharged email trades between the FBI and DOJ establishing the records’ presence.

SO REPUBLICANS DEMAND THAT LYNCH COMES CLEAN, AND LYNCH SAYS SHE DOESN’T WANT TO TALK.

What should the Republicans do now? Publish a finger-waving official statement, and say “oh well, we tried”?

Or, do they decide that presumes should be dealt with like suspects, and bring more remarkable effort to hold up under?

WE’RE NOT TALKING ABOUT TERRIBLE POLICIES; WE’RE DISCUSSING WRONGDOINGS. CORRUPTION. ABUSE OF POWER.

Lynch should be made these inquiries in court, under oath. Moreover, everybody needs to understand that at the end of the day, the truth will be found somehow, and someone will probably be going to jail for it.

We hope that you found this article informative and helpful. Share your thoughts and opinions with us!

 Source:www.nationalinsiderpatriot.com