Judge Frees Muslim Gang-Rapists, Victim Takes Grisly Matters Into Own Hands

Image result for Judge Frees Muslim Gang-Rapists, Victim Takes Grisly Matters Into Own Hands

A 17-year-old girl was brutally gang-raped by a group of eight men, only to watch as a judge released her attackers on bail. So, when she realized that the justice system wasn’t going to protect her, the devastated victim decided to take gruesome matters into her own hands.

A 17-year-old girl took gruesome matters into her own hands after a judge released her 8 gang rapists on bail.

At 99.9 percent Muslim, Morocco is one of the most concentrated Muslim-majority countries on earth. Of course, this translates into all the barbarity of Sharia law, including the inhumane punishments often given to victims and lenient sentences handed down to heinous offenders.

An innocent civilian has been further victimized as a result of the country’s backward religious laws. A 17-year-old girl, who remains unnamed due to the nature of the attack, had placed the last sliver of hope in the Moroccan Sharia court in Ben Guerir, expecting that the Islamic judge would dispense justice. Unfortunately, not only did the council refrain from giving the depraved rapists a proper sentence, they released the 8 men on an insignificant bail.

Ecstatic at their newfound freedom, the men went after the girl again, this time threatening to upload video footage of the gang rape to social media. Traumatized from watching her rapists walk free and devastated at the thought of being publicly shamed, she grabbed a container of flammable liquid and set herself alight in the middle of a public street in the city’s center, the Daily Mail reports. Shocked onlookers desperately attempted to save the girl, putting out the flames and rushing her to a nearby hospital.

The girl suffered such horrific burns to most of her body that she later died from her injuries. Her death has caused outrage among humanitarians and women’s rights activists who are pointing out the flaws in an Islamic governance.

Omar Arbib, a member of a human rights organization in Marrakech, told reporters that the men had made it known that they had recorded the gang rape and planned on posting it online.

Authorities confirmed that 7 of the men are infamous drug traffickers and that the eighth man was arrested after he was caught abusing a little boy 2 months after the others.

The girl most likely took her own life due to a combination of fear that her attackers would come after her again and shame of no longer being a virgin in an Islamic society. Muslim families are such staunch believers in presenting their daughters as pure for marriage that they too often slaughter their own family members in a bid to avenge any disgrace.

Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide and many of these are motivated by what they consider sexual sin. If these young women are not killed to restore a perverted sense of family honor, they are sometimes forced to marry their own rapists.

Islamic courts often allow rapists to escape punishment if they decide to marry their victims. This results not only in revictimization of women but also child marriage, as some of the victims are minors. Their fate is typically placed in the hands of the men who abused them.

In other cases, a rape victim may be punished in place of her attacker if she cannot provide sufficient evidence that she was raped. This evidence includes having several male witnesses, as the worth of a woman is half of a man, according to Quran 2:282. The punishment for a woman who is raped but cannot produce witnesses is outlined in other scriptures.

Quran (24:4) – “And those who accuse free women then do not bring four witnesses (to adultery), flog them…”

Quran (24:13) – “Why did they not bring four witnesses of it? But as they have not brought witnesses they are liars before Allah.”

Sharia law, which is religiously required for Muslims to implement and enforce, continues to victimize the innocent while allowing the guilty to escape punishment. This is the same legislation that the left is demanding we allow Muslims in the U.S. to be able to observe. Not only is it an illegal foreign legislature but an inhumane one as well.

Source:madworldnews.com

JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Image result for JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Things are about to get really interesting in the Clinton household.

As it turns out fired FBI director James Comey had Hillary Clinton’s backup email device the entire 2016 election cycle but never bothered to searched it. But today thanks to the work of citizen researcher Larry Kawa, the determination of Congressman Ron DeSantis, and the lawyers of Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch, a court ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss ordered the State Department to hand over the contents of the backup device by September 2018. That’s right before the coveted midterm elections where Democrats believe they will be able to win back the house and senate from the Republicans.

This finding apparently came about when the company Hillary Clinton’s used to store her emails, Platte River Networks, subcontracted to a company in Connecticut called Datto. Datto backed up the vast majority of Clinton’s deleted emails, text messages, and other electronic communications and handed six disks containing information to the FBI in October 2015. One of those disks contains at least a great many of her 30 thousand missing emails.

Comey turned the disks over to the State Department, which has been compelled to search them and release the contents.

Attorneys for Judicial Watch stated:

“The documents are part of the accelerated schedule of production ordered by U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg, which requires the State Department to complete processing by September 28, 2018, the remaining documents of the 72,000 pages recovered by the FBI in its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server. These new classified and other emails appear to be among those that Clinton had attempted to delete or had otherwise failed to disclose.”

So it looks like the mystery of the deleted Clinton emails has now been solved thanks to a company which was contracted by a third party to back up information. Let’s hope the information can all be read within the time between September and November so people can have the true facts about what went on in those emails that Hillary so didn’t want us to see. Somehow I very much doubt it has anything to do with Yoga or Chelsea’s multi-million dollar wedding.

Here is what only 22 of those emails revealed via GOPUSA:

“Digging up the Dems’ buried scandal?

The letter written by several House Republicans to Attorney General Jeff Sessions – and to FBI Directory Christopher Wray and U.S. Attorney John Huber – by several House Republicans asks him to open an investigation into Comey, Clinton and other DOJ officials involved in the Russia probe … accusing them of a coordinated bias.

”We write to refer [Comey, Clinton and DOJ members] for investigation of potential violation(s) of federal statutes … [and] are especially mindful of the dissimilar degrees of zealousness that has marked the investigations into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, respectively,” the letter signed by 11 GOP lawmakers on Wednesday reads. “Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately.”

Besides seeking to get to the bottom of Clinton’s alleged criminal behavior, the letter is also looking to open the door on the current controversy revolving around Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who many believe Trump is poised to fire.

“The accusations of political bias toward President Donald Trump are related to events that contributed to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 US election,” the Business Insider reported. “Comey, whom Trump fired last May, was accused of mishandling the investigation in Clinton’s private email server and for leaking classified information of private discussions he had with Trump.”

The letter first mentions how Comey prematurely walked away from investigating Clinton – with criminal evidence stacked against her.

“Incredibly, [Comey’s] judgment [that no reasonable prosecutor would bring a criminal case against Clinton] appears to have been made prior to interviewing Secretary Clinton and as many as 17 key witnesses – including Clinton’s closest aides,” the letter continues. “Comey’s decision to not seek charges against Clinton’s misconduct suggests improper investigative conduct, potentially motivated by a political agenda.”

The letter requesting the probe comes just a day after Comey’s new Trump-bashing book hit bookstores across the nation.

“Comey specifically said in public testimony that he did not coordinate with the DOJ for his July 2016 public recommendation not to pursue charges against Clinton,” Fox News’ Catherine Herridge reported. “Meadows, however, pointed to a series of messages he claims indicate potential coordination at several ‘crucial moments of the investigation’ – including the July statement and the period in February. While the FBI is part of the Justice Department and communication between the two agencies is inevitable, Meadows’ letter also suggests some at the FBI were concerned about the perception it was not acting independently in a politically explosive case.”

Justice put on hold for political purposes?

In one of the recently uncovered messages, former Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Gregory Starr communicated to FBI Head of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap that the State Department was getting ready to punish the people who had misplaced the sensitive messages.

“The Department of State is prepared to take appropriate administrative action for any instances of mishandling of classified information in accordance with our own internal processes,” Starr wrote in a message dated Feb. 8, 2016, according to Fox News.

Yet justice would be put on hold … possibly indefinitely.

“However, the official added that the department did not want to hinder the ongoing FBI investigation and – if instructed – would postpone the ‘administrative action’ over the emails until after the bureau’s case had concluded,” Herridge noted.

The following revealing note written on Feb. 13 – just five days later – by an unidentified senior DOJ official addressed to FBI agent Peter Strzok, FBI criminal division official Jonathan Moffa, the FBI Office of General Counsel and members of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia was also discovered.

“Wanted to make sure that DOJ is kept in the loop as response is drafted,” the unnamed official in the DOJ’s National Security Division impressed in the note, according to Fox. “We have discussed a bit more here at CES [the DOJ’s counterintelligence and export control section] and have some additional thoughts on the best response on the admin action question. Can we make sure we discuss as a group as response is put together?”

It should be noted that the head of CES, David Laufman, left the DOJ earlier this year in February because of “personal reasons,” and essentially nothing has been done to look into the new possibly incriminating evidence.

“The State Department took no immediate administrative action over the 22 ‘Top Secret’ emails on Clinton’s email server,” Herridge pointed out. “Many of those involved in the matter had left the department by the time the FBI investigation closed in July 2016.”

After being buried while former President Barack Obama remained in office, efforts are being made under the Trump administration to get to the bottom of things concerning Clinton’s email scandal.

“Meadows has gotten support for his inquiry from House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.,” Herridge informed. “On Wednesday, Gowdy asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to review allegations of coordination between the FBI and the Justice Department in the Clinton investigation.”

Caught in the web?

A number of key Democrats and others serving under the Obama administration could find themselves in serious trouble in the courtroom in the near future.

“Along with Comey and Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, former Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, and FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were named in the letter,” the Business Insider’s Pat Ralph and Sonam Sheth pointed out.

From attempted cover-ups to intentionally misleading investigations, many Clinton sympathizers and alleged anti-Trump conspirators could be facing serious consequences in the upcoming months.

“Lynch was accused of threatening reprisal of an FBI informant who attempted to present the Justice Department with information on the Uranium One deal in 2016,” Ralph and Sheth recounted. “Along with Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Boente were all accused of presenting false information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with approving surveillance of former Trump aide Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).”

And things can get even worse for a number of them.

“McCabe and Yates, both of whom were fired, approved a FISA warrant on Page, [not to mention that] McCabe was also accused of political bias and lack of candor in his handling of the Clinton investigation,” Ralph and Sheth stressed. “Strzok and Page were also accused of interfering in the Clinton investigation.”

H/T Great American Politics,rwnofficial.com

JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Image result for JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Things are about to get really interesting in the Clinton household.

As it turns out fired FBI director James Comey had Hillary Clinton’s backup email device the entire 2016 election cycle but never bothered to searched it. But today thanks to the work of citizen researcher Larry Kawa, the determination of Congressman Ron DeSantis, and the lawyers of Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch, a court ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss ordered the State Department to hand over the contents of the backup device by September 2018. That’s right before the coveted midterm elections where Democrats believe they will be able to win back the house and senate from the Republicans.

This finding apparently came about when the company Hillary Clinton’s used to store her emails, Platte River Networks, subcontracted to a company in Connecticut called Datto. Datto backed up the vast majority of Clinton’s deleted emails, text messages, and other electronic communications and handed six disks containing information to the FBI in October 2015. One of those disks contains at least a great many of her 30 thousand missing emails.

Comey turned the disks over to the State Department, which has been compelled to search them and release the contents.

Attorneys for Judicial Watch stated:

“The documents are part of the accelerated schedule of production ordered by U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg, which requires the State Department to complete processing by September 28, 2018, the remaining documents of the 72,000 pages recovered by the FBI in its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server. These new classified and other emails appear to be among those that Clinton had attempted to delete or had otherwise failed to disclose.”

So it looks like the mystery of the deleted Clinton emails has now been solved thanks to a company which was contracted by a third party to back up information. Let’s hope the information can all be read within the time between September and November so people can have the true facts about what went on in those emails that Hillary so didn’t want us to see. Somehow I very much doubt it has anything to do with Yoga or Chelsea’s multi-million dollar wedding.

Here is what only 22 of those emails revealed via GOPUSA:

“Digging up the Dems’ buried scandal?

The letter written by several House Republicans to Attorney General Jeff Sessions – and to FBI Directory Christopher Wray and U.S. Attorney John Huber – by several House Republicans asks him to open an investigation into Comey, Clinton and other DOJ officials involved in the Russia probe … accusing them of a coordinated bias.

”We write to refer [Comey, Clinton and DOJ members] for investigation of potential violation(s) of federal statutes … [and] are especially mindful of the dissimilar degrees of zealousness that has marked the investigations into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, respectively,” the letter signed by 11 GOP lawmakers on Wednesday reads. “Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately.”

Besides seeking to get to the bottom of Clinton’s alleged criminal behavior, the letter is also looking to open the door on the current controversy revolving around Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who many believe Trump is poised to fire.

“The accusations of political bias toward President Donald Trump are related to events that contributed to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 US election,” the Business Insider reported. “Comey, whom Trump fired last May, was accused of mishandling the investigation in Clinton’s private email server and for leaking classified information of private discussions he had with Trump.”

The letter first mentions how Comey prematurely walked away from investigating Clinton – with criminal evidence stacked against her.

“Incredibly, [Comey’s] judgment [that no reasonable prosecutor would bring a criminal case against Clinton] appears to have been made prior to interviewing Secretary Clinton and as many as 17 key witnesses – including Clinton’s closest aides,” the letter continues. “Comey’s decision to not seek charges against Clinton’s misconduct suggests improper investigative conduct, potentially motivated by a political agenda.”

The letter requesting the probe comes just a day after Comey’s new Trump-bashing book hit bookstores across the nation.

“Comey specifically said in public testimony that he did not coordinate with the DOJ for his July 2016 public recommendation not to pursue charges against Clinton,” Fox News’ Catherine Herridge reported. “Meadows, however, pointed to a series of messages he claims indicate potential coordination at several ‘crucial moments of the investigation’ – including the July statement and the period in February. While the FBI is part of the Justice Department and communication between the two agencies is inevitable, Meadows’ letter also suggests some at the FBI were concerned about the perception it was not acting independently in a politically explosive case.”

Justice put on hold for political purposes?

In one of the recently uncovered messages, former Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Gregory Starr communicated to FBI Head of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap that the State Department was getting ready to punish the people who had misplaced the sensitive messages.

“The Department of State is prepared to take appropriate administrative action for any instances of mishandling of classified information in accordance with our own internal processes,” Starr wrote in a message dated Feb. 8, 2016, according to Fox News.

Yet justice would be put on hold … possibly indefinitely.

“However, the official added that the department did not want to hinder the ongoing FBI investigation and – if instructed – would postpone the ‘administrative action’ over the emails until after the bureau’s case had concluded,” Herridge noted.

The following revealing note written on Feb. 13 – just five days later – by an unidentified senior DOJ official addressed to FBI agent Peter Strzok, FBI criminal division official Jonathan Moffa, the FBI Office of General Counsel and members of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia was also discovered.

“Wanted to make sure that DOJ is kept in the loop as response is drafted,” the unnamed official in the DOJ’s National Security Division impressed in the note, according to Fox. “We have discussed a bit more here at CES [the DOJ’s counterintelligence and export control section] and have some additional thoughts on the best response on the admin action question. Can we make sure we discuss as a group as response is put together?”

It should be noted that the head of CES, David Laufman, left the DOJ earlier this year in February because of “personal reasons,” and essentially nothing has been done to look into the new possibly incriminating evidence.

“The State Department took no immediate administrative action over the 22 ‘Top Secret’ emails on Clinton’s email server,” Herridge pointed out. “Many of those involved in the matter had left the department by the time the FBI investigation closed in July 2016.”

After being buried while former President Barack Obama remained in office, efforts are being made under the Trump administration to get to the bottom of things concerning Clinton’s email scandal.

“Meadows has gotten support for his inquiry from House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.,” Herridge informed. “On Wednesday, Gowdy asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to review allegations of coordination between the FBI and the Justice Department in the Clinton investigation.”

Caught in the web?

A number of key Democrats and others serving under the Obama administration could find themselves in serious trouble in the courtroom in the near future.

“Along with Comey and Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, former Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, and FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were named in the letter,” the Business Insider’s Pat Ralph and Sonam Sheth pointed out.

From attempted cover-ups to intentionally misleading investigations, many Clinton sympathizers and alleged anti-Trump conspirators could be facing serious consequences in the upcoming months.

“Lynch was accused of threatening reprisal of an FBI informant who attempted to present the Justice Department with information on the Uranium One deal in 2016,” Ralph and Sheth recounted. “Along with Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Boente were all accused of presenting false information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with approving surveillance of former Trump aide Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).”

And things can get even worse for a number of them.

“McCabe and Yates, both of whom were fired, approved a FISA warrant on Page, [not to mention that] McCabe was also accused of political bias and lack of candor in his handling of the Clinton investigation,” Ralph and Sheth stressed. “Strzok and Page were also accused of interfering in the Clinton investigation.”

H/T Great American Politics,rwnofficial.com

At Manafort Hearing, Judge Weighs Scope of Mueller’s Authority

Paul Manafort, right, who was then the Trump campaign manager, being interviewed at the Republican National Convention in July.

WASHINGTON—A federal judge expressed doubt Thursday over efforts by former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort to have criminal charges against him dropped, but she appeared more receptive to his request to dismiss one of the counts.

At a sometimes testy hearing over three hours, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson questioned lawyers for Mr. Manafort and special counsel Robert Mueller, who has charged Mr. Manafort in Washington and Virginia with failing to report his work for the government of Ukraine between 2006 and 2015 and with not paying taxes on the millions of dollars he allegedly earned from that work.

Mr. Manafort has pleaded not guilty and filed motions to dismiss both cases, arguing that they fall outside the bounds of Mr. Mueller’s task of investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Mr. Manafort claims Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s order appointing Mr. Mueller did not give the special counsel authority to investigate the allegations covered in the Manafort indictments.

Judge Jackson, who is overseeing the Washington case, said in court she found it unlikely that Mr. Rosenstein would have appointed Mr. Mueller without explaining what matters he would be examining.

“You’re telling me he didn’t tell him what it was about?” she asked Mr. Manafort’s lawyer, Kevin Downing, her voice rising.

Judge Jackson also said Mr. Manafort appeared to be basing his argument on internal Justice Department regulations governing the appointment of a special counsel that are generally meant to help organize agency processes, not to provide a basis for defendants to challenge their cases.

“Why does that matter in a court of law?” she said.

In court papers, Mr. Mueller’s lawyers have said they have authorization to investigate the Manafort charges, citing among other things an August memo from Mr. Rosenstein laying out avenues of inquiry. Mr. Mueller’s office said the probe “would naturally cover ties that a former Trump campaign manager had to Russian-associated political operatives, Russian-backed politicians, and Russian oligarchs.”

In court on Thursday, Mr. Downing took issue with the timing of the Rosenstein memo, noting that it came months after Mr. Mueller’s appointment in May 2017 and after related search warrants had been executed.

“It seems to me to be very much an after-the-fact memo,” Mr. Downing said.

Judge Berman appeared more receptive, however, to another argument from Mr. Manafort’s legal team, that two of the counts in the indictment against Mr. Manafort essentially charge him with the same crime.

Mr. Manafort was charged with lying about his lobbying work in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. He was also charged with lying about that work in violation of a law that forbids false statements to the federal government.

A prosecution on both counts, Mr. Manafort’s lawyers argued, would seek to punish him twice for the same alleged offense.

In considering that motion, Judge Jackson had pointed questions for Mr. Mueller’s lawyers, asking why the two charges were not duplicative. An attorney with the special counsel’s office said the charges were distinct, and that conduct that violated one law did not always violate the other.

Judge Jackson also considered a third argument from Mr. Manafort’s defense team, seeking to challenge a count of money laundering.

Mr. Manafort is charged with laundering millions of dollars that he allegedly earned through his unregistered Ukraine work. Mr. Manafort’s team argued that the work itself was lawful, so money earned from it isn’t necessarily tainted.

Judge Jackson said that question appeared to be one for a jury to decide, rather than her.

Write to Aruna Viswanatha at Aruna.Viswanatha@wsj.com

Source:www.wsj.com

Judge Who Refused Trump’s Request For a Review of Legally Protected Materials Seized in FBI Raid of His Lawyer Officiated George Soros’ Wedding

The ‘New World Order’, and it’s face, George Soros, have decided to completely uncloak and stop even pretending to abide by the law.  What happened today will echo in history …

The Gateway Pundit Reports: Kimba Wood, the federal judge overseeing the Cohen-Trump case rejected Trump’s request for a temporary restraining order on materials seized after KGB FBI agents raided Cohen’s properties. 

FBI agents raided Cohen’s home and office looking for dirt on Stormy Daniels and seized attorney-client privileged communications between Trump and Cohen.

On Friday, President Trump was officially granted intervention in the Cohen case.

Late Sunday night, President Trump opposed allowing the government to review materials seized by FBI KBG agents in their raid of Michael Cohen’s properties in a court filing.

Federal Judge Kimba Wood made her decision on Monday.

She rejected Trump’s request for a temporary restraining order.

ABC reported:

A federal judge rejected a request from President Donald Trump and his personal lawyer Michael Cohen for a temporary restraining order that would have kept federal prosecutors from reading files seized in raids last week.

Judge Kimba Wood said a government taint team can weed out privileged documents, but she left open the possibility an independent third party could play a role at a later time, in the interest of “the perception of fairness.”

“I have faith in the Southern District prosecutors, that their integrity is unimpeachable,” Wood said.

Her ruling came at the end of a hearing attended by Cohen and Stormy Daniels, who sat feet apart but did not appear to interact.

How’s this for a fun fact? The same federal judge who just rejected Trump’s request for a temporary restraining order, officiated George Soros’ wedding in 2013. Read More @ Gateway Pundit

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Federal judge issues BOMBSHELL ruling against Obama

Image result for Federal judge issues BOMBSHELL ruling against Obama

A federal judge may have just paved the way for Barack Obama AND Hillary Clinton to be put on trial for TREASON.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered the State Department to turn over previously redacted information regarding what Obama and Clinton knew about and how they responded to the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi.

Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch said the emails prove what Clinton and Obama knew and when they knew it.

“The full emails may reveal what former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama knew about the September 11, 2012, terror attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi,” the group wrote in a press release.

State Department cronies are freaking out, and BEGGING Judge Jackson to reconsider, insisting that the emails in question should be classified.

Judicial Watch is urging President Trump to not allow “deep state” agents within his government to get away with protecting Obama and Clinton even one day longer.

If you want to see these two TRAITORS in prison, then SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!

H/T Conservative Fighters,conservativepost.com

Trump Removes Muslim Federal Judge For Trying to Banned Bacon in All 50 States Of America. Do You Stand With Trump ?

Trump Removes Muslim Federal Judge For Trying to Banned Bacon in All 50 States Of America. Do You Stand With Trump ?

Twenty-second Circuit Court of Appeals Justice, Hansam Al Alallawalahi-Smith has made major headlines this week when he overturned a ruling out of Dearborn, Michigan and tried to implement Sharia Law.

The ruling allowed two critical and violent tenets of Sharia Law to be practiced in the United States of America.

 

When he was asked why the feds have the right to allow a man to brutalize his wife for speaking with another man and to beat her nearly to death if she were to act on her impulses, the judge mentioned the systematic infusion clause and said that the Sharia Law should be allowed because the 14th Amendment guarantees them the rights guaranteed by the other states.

The laws may be acceptable to savages, but here, in America, we have higher standards.

Alallaha-Smith stated that the 14th Amendment does not necessarily exclude foreign influence from being allowed by law, citing the Christmas Holiday as a perfect example:

 

“Christmas is a Christian holiday exclusively, yet, if you are a Muslim and you want to go about your day without being bothered you cannot because the laws of a city in a city in Rome take precedent over the First Amendment which guarantees no state-sponsored religion.

A federal Christmas holiday is just that,” said Alallaha-Smith.

 

With that as a precedent, understanding that a higher court may reverse it, my decision is that items one and two on the docket are allowable between family members as prescribed by Sharia Law,” continued Alallaha-Smith.

The Democrats simply cannot stop complaining about this, claiming that since the appointment.

Source: www.usafortrumponline.com

BREAKING: U.S. Judge Sides Trump – California Is Finished

In a shocking move, U.S. District Judge William Orrick balked from ordering President Donald Trump to pay California $1 million in delayed law enforcement funding after Trump refused to make the payment because California is a supposed sanctuary state.

The Trump administration has put a halt to the payout to California because of its support for lawbreaking illegal aliens. But the state took Trump to court to force the feds to hand over the state’s scheduled payment for law enforcement expenditures.

Granted the administration has not said that the state will not ever get the payout, only that the money is delayed while the administration questions California’s policies.

Still, it was a mixed bag on the judge’s ruling. While Judge Orrick didn’t order the administration to immediately hand over the cash — as the state of California demanded — Orrick also didn’t agree to dismiss California’s lawsuit as the administration wanted him to do.

Orrick said the whole situation raised “weighty and novel constitutional issues,” according to the Associated Press.

California is the big test case for the Trump administration. The question is whether the federal government is required to return federal funds to states that buck U.S. immigration policy by creating sanctuary city or sanctuary state rules that prevent local police from cooperating with federal officials.

As the AP notes:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has blamed “sanctuary city” policies for crime and gang violence. In July, Sessions announced that cities and states could only receive Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance grants if they allow federal immigration officials access to detention facilities and provide advance notice when someone in the country illegally is about to be released.

Cities and states were also required to certify that they complied with a particular federal immigration law. The Trump administration says that law requires that California not restrict officials from sharing information regarding immigration status with federal immigration officers, including information regarding a person’s date of release from state custody and home address.

The AP also noted that at least one ruling along this topic has already been handed down:

A federal judge in Chicago last year blocked the advance notice and access requirements in a ruling that applied nationwide. But U.S. District Judge Harry D. Leinenweber said the DOJ could require Byrne Memorial grant recipients to certify compliance with the federal immigration law at issue. Read More @ American News Central 

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Game Changing Ruling: Fed Judge Drives Last Nail Into Obama’s Coffin, Says Trump’s Order Will Stand

Once again “totally inept and inexperienced” President Trump has checkmated the brilliant politicians in Washington.

Federal District Court Judge Roger Titus has dismissed a lawsuit aimed at upholding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that stemmed from an un-Constitutional Executive Order signed by President Obama. 

Judge Titus acknowledged that legally his hands were tied when issuing his opinion:

“This Court does not like the outcome of this case, but is constrained by its constitutionally limited role to the result that it has reached. Hopefully, the Congress and the President will finally get their job done.”

Americans voted for Trump largely because he promised to fix our broken immigration system that the political elite in Washington had failed to do for close to four decades. 

The linchpin of Trump’s strategy to fulfill that promise came back in September of last year when President Trump issued his own Executive Order returning the fate of the 800,000 so-called DREAMERS to Congress, where it belonged in the first place.  Trump gave Congress 6 months to address the DACA problem and they have failed to do so as they have for the past half-century.

President Trump knew he stood on solid legal ground because Obama’s Executive Order establishing DACA was an unconstitutional usurpation of the legislative branch’s authority.  Respected George Washington University Law School Professor Jonathan Turley’s testified before the House Judiciary Committee about DACA’s illegal origins:

“In ordering this blanket exception, President Obama was nullifying part of a law that he simply disagreed with … If a president can claim sweeping discretion to suspend key federal laws, the entire legislative process becomes little more than a pretense … The circumvention of the legislative process not only undermines the authority of this branch but destabilizes the tripartite system as a whole.”

Obama himself had acknowledged this before he signed it.

The deadline in Trump’s September 5th Executive Order expired on Monday leaving the Dem’s, who have built their party’s entire future around keeping the borders open and flooding our country with increasing amounts of immigrants, up the creek without a paddle.

With the six months over Trump declared checkmate:

If the Dems abandon the DREAMERS they face almost certain devastation at the polls in November.  That leaves them with only one other choice – agreeing to Trump’s terms that include building the wall and instituting a merit-based immigration policy that will benefit America.

In a magnanimous show, Trump offered to more than double the 800,000 young immigrants allowed to stay in the country to 1.8 million.  The Democrats would be wise to take the offer and give Trump what he – and the majority of Americans – wants, border security.

The DREAMERS know that the Dems are using them as a political football and have begun applying heat to them by rallying in protest outside the front doors of the DNC.

It sounds like a win-win for everyone and that may force some vulnerable Democrats to break with leadership and support the legislation Trump is pushing for. 

The fact that the Dem’s aren’t happy with Trump’s offer makes you wonder just who they are colluding with?

Source: fbnewscycle.com

BREAKING: Federal Judge Says HELL NO! Trump WINS AGAIN…HELL YEAH!

President Donald Trump was handed another victory by a federal judge in Maryland. Judge Roger Titus ruled against a challenge proposed to battle against Trump and his interest in ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The President would like to stop the program to become tough on the immigration policies and enforce current laws. That does not mean people who are already here will be deported, that just means they will not likely honor any future incidents that would normally be covered under DACA rules.

President Trump has faced an outlandish backlash from Democrats in his desire to end DACA. Numerous people have protested, but have not fully understood what it meant to end DACA. Many people assume that means mass deportation, but that has not been suggested. President Trump provided Democrats with a six month period to create a workable solution to dissolving DACA, but Democrats have come up empty.

Americans would like to protect the borders and enforce the current laws while working diligently to maintain peace, prosperity, and a prosperous America for all who work hard.

The Hill reported more information on Judge Roger Titus’ ruling in favor of Trump:

“A federal judge in Maryland on Monday dismissed a challenge to President Trump‘s decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). 

“This Court does not like the outcome of this case, but is constrained by its constitutionally limited role to the result that it has reached,” Judge Roger Titus said in his opinion. “Hopefully, the Congress and the President will finally get their job done.”

“An overwhelming percentage of Americans support protections for ‘Dreamers,’ yet it is not the province of the judiciary to provide legislative or executive actions when those entrusted with those responsibilities fail to act,” Titus continued. 

The Obama-era program permits immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children to stay in the country without fear of deportation.

The Trump administration moved to end DACA last year and allowed lawmakers on Capitol Hill six months to come up with a permanent fix for the program, with the deadline expiring on Monday.

Dreamers and immigrant rights groups across the country have legally challenged the move to end DACA. 

The deadline, however, was essentially negated after the Supreme Court declined to hear arguments on the legal fight surrounding the program.”

Americans became extremely irritated every time an illegal alien committed a crime. The murder of Kate Steinle was seemingly the last straw as her killer walked free. There have been numerous violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and it’s reported that nearly half of the illegal aliens arrested by ICE, on the West Coast, were in or related to a gang and the violent acts and crimes committed by such gangs.

President Trump had once taken a stand against gang members, targeting the MS-13 gang, which has a reputation for committing violent acts of crime. The President took some heat when he spoke out against the members of the gang when he suggested that law enforcement doesn’t need to be so nice when escorting the gang members to the back of a police vehicle.

Dreamers and immigrant groups continue to protest the end of DACA, even though many of them are in their 30’s by now and they are no longer children.

Trump seems diligent in ending chain migration. He also seems more interested in having more immigrants come to America who has something to offer the country. It is in the best interest of America that our immigrants come ready to work and be productive. The more productive we are, the better we will become, and the less welfare we need to pay to those who might be abusing the system.

Ending DACA would be smart because it will no longer make people feel entitled and could increase the number of people who follow the law regarding immigration. That would be good because we are supposed to follow the law anyway, but it almost seems like we’ve been unable to fully enforce it the way it should be done.

Expect more challenges and for Trump to continue Tweeting about the Democrats who failed to present a working solution to the DACA decision making process.

Democrats spent six months trying to figure it out and came up with a nothing burger.

Source:daily-vine.com