Theresa May said that Britons could benefit a great deal from teachings of Sharia Law because Islam is absolutely compatible with western democracy

INCOMING Prime Minister Theresa May has defended her position on Sharia Law on the eve of taking over as the leader of the Conservative party.


May sparked controversy when she spoke out in support of the Islamic courts operating in the country, telling the nation they could “benefit a great deal” from Sharia teachings.

The future Tory leader made the comments as she ordered a review into the system which are accused of ordering women to stay with abusive partners.

Mrs May, said she is worried the courts are “misused” and “exploited” to discriminate against Muslim women, but defended their place in society.

Sharia is Islam’s legal system derived from both the Koran, Islam’s central text, and fatwas – the rulings of Islamic scholars.

There are thought to be around 100 Sharia Law courts operating throughout the UK, dispensing Islamic justice outside the remit of our own legal system.

Judgements handed down by the informal courts have no legal basis, but there are fears their presence means many Muslim women are not getting access to the justice they deserve.

Now, before she takes over Number 10, May has been forced to restate her position on Sharia Law.

The Home Secretary, when asked by Buzzfeed’s Emily Ashton about a group which says she supports Sharia in the UK, said she is “concerned” that the ‘law’ is operating in a way that could be counter to “our single rule of law”.

She said: “I’ve been the politician who’s been willing to say no.

“I’m concerned that Sharia law is operating in a way that could discriminate against women and that could be counter to what is our single rule of law that we have in the UK.

“So there is one rule of law in the UK – that’s why I’ve set up the review that I have, chaired by Professor Mona Siddiqui, and that will be looking at the operation of Sharia law and whether it is actually operating to discriminate against women and counter to our overall rule of law.”

New York City Reaches $180,000 Settlement with Three Muslim Women over Hijab Lawsuit

New York City has reached a $180,000 settlement with three Muslim women after they sued the NYPD for forcing them to remove their hijabs for mugshots.

The lawsuits, which sought to change the NYPD’s policy on Muslim women refusing to wear their head coverings in mugshot photos, were settled in Brooklyn federal court Monday, the New York Daily News reported.

Each woman received a $60,000 settlement.

The cases, dating back to 2012, began when a Brooklyn teen only known as “G.E.” was arrested for getting into a fight with two girls.

When NYPD officers brought her to the 62nd precinct, they instructed her to remove her headscarf. The teen refused the officers’ orders, and was taken to a private room where a female officer took her photo separate from the men.

After being taken to a Brooklyn jail for booking, officers informed her that they could not accommodate her request because no female officers could take the photo and the camera was in a fixed spot.

The teen claimed that she felt “exposed, violated, and distraught” after a male officer took her mugshot photo of her without her hijab while officers and prisoners watched.

The NYPD issued an order that changed its policy on people who refused to remove their headscarves in March 2015. The resulting policy change required officers to inform people that the NYPD provides the option of taking booking photos in a private room with an officer of the same gender.

In Islam, it is considered sacrilegious to remove the headscarf of a Muslim woman by force. It is typical for only a Muslim woman’s husband or her family members to see her without her headscarf.


American Retailer Now Publicly Supports Sharia. Are You Shopping Here?

We all know how Sharia Law works here in America. Muslims come into our country and slowly but surely start demanding certain Islamic rights that are a direct threat to the United States and its western culture.

What is so frustrating is that these radical demands are veiled in the form of liberalism. To promote ‘diversity.’ To be ‘accepting’ of all cultures. To increase religious ‘awareness.’

Poppycock. Sharia Law has a very serious and deadly calling: to either convert the world to Islam or kill those who refuse to bow down to Allah.

Unfortunately, mainstream America is choosing to play with fire when it comes to supporting Sharia. Liberals would rather sacrifice western culture and possibly the lives of Americans for the sake of proving their allegiance to Islam. And that is just exactly what one major retailer is doing.

From The Blaze:

Macy’s announced Wednesday the launch of a clothing line aimed at its Muslim shoppers that will include dresses, tops, cardigans, pants, and hand-dyed hijabs.

The retailer partnered the Verona Collection, which describes itself as Modern Islamic Clothing, to make the brand’s modest, ready-to-wear pieces available on the department store’s website, according to a news release

The Workshop, which marked its seventh year in 2017, is one element of Macy’s commitment to “vendor diversity,” the company said.

“Through The Workshop at Macy’s, Lisa shared her vision to create a collection that speaks to a community of women looking for a solution to their fashion needs,” Cassandra Jones, senior vice president of Macy’s Fashion, said in the release.

Vendor diversity? Could Macy’s act anymore pathetically politically correct?

What needs to happen is this: any person who wants to come to America to start a new life is welcome if they legally apply for citizenship, learn the English language, prove they have a valuable skill or trade, and embrace western culture. To become an American citizen doesn’t mean you forget where you came from, but it does require you to renounce all that is un-American in your previous culture and work to preserve the new culture you have entered.

But radical Muslims refuse to do that. And somehow Liberals are letting them get away with this.

It’s time for Republicans to stand up to this shady business, call out those who publicly support Sharia law, and stop those who follow Sharia to the letter from becoming part of American culture.

For now, a good place to start would be to boycott Macy’s. Are you in?

Source: The Blaze,

QUESTION: O’Reilly Says, Obama’s ‘DEEP Ties To Islam’ Have HURT America. Do You Agree?

After eight years of Obama, the field of “journalism” has become a joke. Thankfully, there are still some honest journalists out there.Bill O’Reilly came out swinging against Obama and his connections. O’Reilly explained that Obama’s “emotional attachment to the Muslim world has hurt” the United States; and that, “The Obama administration’s greatest failure is allowing the Islamic terror group ISIS to run wild, murdering thousands of innocent people all over the world, including many Muslims.”

Thank you, Mr. O’Reilly. We can always count on you for the truth.

The Obama era made it too easy for radical Islam to spread. Obama needs to admit that he failed our country.

Radical Islam is not compatible with our values. We do not want Sharia law in our country.

We need to take a stand against the spread of radical Islam. Thank goodness Donald Trump is not afraid to say the words “radical Islam.”

We finally have a president that isn’t going to kneel before the “politically correct” altar. What a refreshing change!

Unfortunately, the liberals are conspiring against him. The Left won’t rest until they have ruined our great nation. The establishment is helping the Left, too. The swamp is working overtime to eject Trump from the presidency. Every day we hear stories about “impeachment.” Nonsense!


mainstream media loves to spin Trump’s actions into failure. Luckily, Mr. O’Reilly is still around to give a “No Spin Zone.” The liberals love to silence conservative voices.

Thankfully, they cannot silence Mr. O’Reilly. He will say what needs to be said. Bill O’Reilly is not going anywhere. He will not allow the liberals to take him down. We need more honest journalists like Mr.


POLL: Should the Federal Judge That Ruled That Americans Could NOT Criticize Islam Be Removed?

Federal Judge Michael A. Shipp signed off on a court order that does not allow New Jersey residents to criticize Islam.

 In Bernards Township, New Jersey, residents have been discussing whether or not a mosque should be built in their town. As a public hearing approaches to continue this discussion, the court order says: No commentary regarding Islam or Muslims will be permitted.”

So, basically, this judge has stripped the residents of Bernards Township of their First Amendment rights to free speech. Aren’t judges supposed to be working for Americans by helping to PRESERVE their constitutional rights?

What do you think? Should this federal judge be removed by Congress?


Pope Says Christianity No Better Than Islam

On Wednesday, Pope Francis put Islam, Christianity, and Judaism all in the same boat.

In an impassioned address the Vicar of Christ denied the existence of Islamic terrorism, while simultaneously asserting that “the ecological crisis is real.”

“Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist,” Francis said in his speech to a world meeting of populist movements.

What he probably should have said is that “not all Christians are terrorists and not all Muslims are terrorists” — a fact evident to all — however, the terminology he used suggests that the hundreds of Islamic terror groups around the world do not exist.

Overlooking ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood, and terrorists for the sake of political correctness will never yield good results.

“No people is criminal or drug-trafficking or violent,” Francis said, while also suggesting that terrorism the terrorism that does occur is primarily a result of “economic inequalities” rather than religious beliefs. “The poor and the poorer peoples are accused of violence yet, without equal opportunities, the different forms of aggression and conflict will find a fertile terrain for growth and will eventually explode.”

In addition, the Guardian reported that Pope Francis said it was wrong to identify Islam with violence and that social injustice and idolatry of money were among the prime causes of terrorism.

“I think it is not right to identity Islam with violence,” he told reporters aboard the plane taking him back to Rome after a five-day trip to Poland. “This is not right and this is not true.”

The pope was responding to a question about the killing on 26 July of an 85-year-old Roman Catholic priest during a church service in western France. The attackers forced the priest to his knees and slit his throat. The killing was claimed by Islamic State.

“I think that in nearly all religions there is a always a small fundamentalist group,” he said, adding “We have them,” referring to Catholicism.

“I don’t like to talk about Islamic violence because every day when I look at the papers I see violence here in Italy – someone killing his girlfriend, someone killing his mother-in-law. These are baptised Catholics,” he said.

“If I speak of Islamic violence, I have to speak of Catholic violence. Not all Muslims are violent,” he said.

He said there were various causes of terrorism.

“I know it dangerous to say this but terrorism grows when there is no other option and when money is made a god and it, instead of the person, is put at the centre of the world economy,” he said.

“That is the first form of terrorism. That is a basic terrorism against all humanity. Let’s talk about that,” he said.

When he started the trip on Wednesday, the pope said the killing of the priest and a string of string of other attacks were proof the “world is at war” but that it was not caused by religion.

He told reporters on the plane that lack of economic opportunities for young people in Europe was also to blame for terrorism.

“I ask myself how many young people that we Europeans have left devoid of ideals, who do not have work. Then they turn to drugs and alcohol or enlist in Isis,” he said, referring to the group also known as Islamic State.

SHARE on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that Pope Francis is dead wrong!


Clash Poll: Hillary’s Been Labeled ‘ISLAM’S WH*RE’ – Do YOU Agree?

Carville’s ‘$100 bill in a trailer park’ jab is about to bite Hillary in the ass.

In the “Bimbo Eruptions” days, when Bill was being accused, Carville blew it off as trailer trash women chasing after a $100 bill.

Hillary: same trash, higher fees.

This certainly explains the new ‘tolerant’ attitude toward Islam — she loves their money.

Here’s the breakdown:

• Algeria donated $250,000 to $500,000
• The Nation of Brunei donated $1,000,000 to $5,000,000
• Kuwait donated $5,000,000 to $10,000,000
• Sultanate of Oman donated $1,000,000 to $5,000,000
• Qatar donated $5.8 million
• Saudi Arabia donated up to $50 million
• United Arab Emirates donated up to $11.5 million
• Morocco-owned OCP, a phosphate exportation company, donated $1,000,000 to $5,000,000

…By taking this filthy Islamic lucre, Hillary has prostituted herself out to whatever these ‘donors’ desire, including shutting up our First Amendment rights, as she has been a proponent of the blasphemy law the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation) has been pushing at the UN…

…America and the free world have no place for conduits for Muhammed.

It’s now imperative to keep Islam’s Whore out of the White House.
Read more: Liberty GB

How bad is it?

The New York Post had this as their cover image when the story broke:

The stench of corruption here is so repugnant the New York Post ran with a cover Thursday depicting Clinton wearing a dealer’s visor and smoking a cigar, along with the caption: “New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary.”

“It is becoming clear the foundation was a center of influence peddling. Rock stars. Soccer players. Conglomerates. Crown princes. All of them paid in. All of them expected access to the US government,” the newspaper declared.
Bizpac Review

Hillary was willing to exchange cash for political favors — from places in the world that don’t value freedom and democracy like we do.

Do you know why that is?

Because she’s evil.


Hillary just might be ‘The Beast’ from the Book of Revelation.

If you think so, have we got the shirt for you.
Beware of the Hildebeest

Ladies, click here for yours.

It has been estimated that one in 25 Americans is a sociopath. As described by Dr. Martha Stout in The Sociopath Next Door, a sociopath is a person who lacks a conscience and whose behavior is marked by deceitfulness, irritability, and lack of remorse or responsibility when causing harm to others. Can you say, ‘Hello Hillary!’ She fits that description to a ‘T’, eh? That’s why we renamed her, ‘The Hildebeest.’ Buy this shirt and warn others of her menacing presence. Make sure to wear it around relatives and associates who voted for her. Enjoy.

Does your grandpa go off on paltry politicians, whether they be Democrats or Republicans? Does he get misty eyed when he talks about God and Country and America’s future? And have you ever heard him scream, ‘Awww … Hell no!’ when Rosie O’Donnell starts yapping on television? If you answered yes to one, or all of the above, then your gramps will love Doug Giles’ latest book, My Grandpa Is A Patriotic Badass.

Don’t be fooled by the title — this ain’t just for Grandpa.
The Snowflake Generation — and the rest of America — needs a good ol’ dose of ‘Grandpa wisdom’.
Especially if that Grandpa is Doug Giles.
You’ll love My Grandpa Is A Patriotic Badass just as much as Grandpa will.

Donald Makes Stealth Move Against Sharia Law In 18 States

Most Americans will agree that Sharia law has no place in the United States. Yet there are Muslim groups and communities throughout the country that think differently. Thanks to President Trump’s influence, states are moving to stop them.

Sharia law puts itself above the laws of a country. Muslims who adhere to it view it above the Constitution or any other legislation. Sharia law makes women second-class citizens. It calls for the death of homosexuals. And it persecutes Christians and Jews.

Clearly it has no place in the United States. But some Muslims groups try to practice it, anyway. They’ve tried to set up their own Sharia courts. Many seek to impose Sharia rules onto communities throughout the country.

Thankfully, at least a few states are fighting back.

From The Guardian:

In 2017 there were 23 new bills introduced in 18 states attempting to prohibit the practice of Islamic religious law, or sharia, in US courts. The rash of new bills brings the total number of such legislative efforts since 2010 to 217 in 43 states, according to the Haas Institute at UC Berkeley which monitors the anti-sharia movement…

Of the 23 bills introduced to state legislatures this year, only two became law – in Arkansas and Texas. Four new states joined the growing list of legislatures where anti-sharia legislation has been attempted: Colorado, Connecticut, North Dakota and Wisconsin…

Most of the recent bills are careful not to refer overtly to sharia or Islam, as to do so would be to expose the legislation to the scrutiny of federal courts on grounds of religious discrimination. Instead, they talk of “foreign laws” being banned in US jurisdictions.

The tone of the Guardian’s article is shockingly ignorant. They call anti-sharia policy “Islamophobic” and hateful towards Muslims. They continue the tired and debunked attack against Donald Trump that he is going after Muslims. Despite the fact that he’s done no such thing.

The Guardian, like most liberal rags, refuses to acknowledge the great danger Sharia law poses. It is a set of rules that are not compatible with Western society. Muslims who embrace Sharia law want it practiced across the globe. They demand non-Muslims to bow to their rules. How could U.S. lawmakers not want to ban it?

Liberals are deliberately stupid when it comes to Sharia law. They convince themselves that any move to protect American customs and traditions is hateful. Yet they don’t bother to investigate the toxic practice they defend. Sharia law does not belong in the United States.

There are plenty of Muslims who would agree. Yet the left does not acknowledge that. Any excuse to bash the President, eh Guardian?

We need anti-Sharia laws. Why? Because it gives our government and law enforcement the power to prevent attempts to install it in our communities. Extremist groups try to impose Sharia law across America. They set up their own courts, in violation to our courts. They require their followers to abide by laws that are not in line with our own. Anti-Sharia laws empower our government with the tools to put a stop to it.

Thankfully, more states are seeing the light. Let’s hope the rest will follow.

Source: The Guardian,

Libs Want Police To Remove ‘Islamophobic’ Sign From Christian’s Yard, But Cops Have Bad News For Them

As much as liberals would love for it to be the case, one simply can’t have things both ways.

Unfortunately, there’s plenty of examples of backwards leftist thinking that demonstrate they need a reminder on that simple piece of wisdom.

One of the more alarming ones has to do with matters of censorship. In a nutshell, an overwhelming number of liberals continually demonstrate that anything that doesn’t align with their preferred narrative needs to be stifled completely.

However, those same out of touch folks feel that anything they have to say is perfectly fine.

It doesn’t take more than a first-grade education level to poke a ton of holes in those wayward thoughts.

If one is going to continually light their hair on fire about free speech and whatnot, it’s pretty tough to take those same folks seriously when they engage in oppressive tactics for things they don’t agree with.

WTMJ shares another example of faux outrage over a questionable sign that doesn’t point to hugs and safe spaces for all.

A controversial sign on private property in Brookfield is turning heads, and prompting calls to police.

The photo says “Make war until Allah reigns supreme” and asks people to read the Quran.

This is where things get sticky when it comes to the free speech debate. Exactly what purpose does posting such an inflammatory sign serve?

The answer is not all that much, but that doesn’t change the rights of the homeowner.

Upset neighbors have contacted the police in regards to the sign, and they have received yet another lesson on how free speech works.

“He and his wife are great people,” said Tony Tenaglia, who lives across the street. “Very smart, very religious. I don’t think they did it to upset people. We had a debate about it.”

The message on the sign changes every few weeks, and typically shares different bible verses. Never before has it referenced war, or the Quran, the central text of Islam.

“I like that he takes it upon himself to do something that’s sort of unique, and I respect his opinion,” Tenaglia said. “I enjoy the biblical verses he puts up. But the Quran stuff, I’m not sure what that does. That might not be a good choice, you know?”

In the grand scheme of things, it sounds like the homeowner in question simply likes the attention.

Those that give it to him feed the beast – so to speak – and he’s inspired to post even more signs as a result.

For a simple solution, neighbors can simply stop paying attention to the homeowners attempts to stir the pot.

However, a ton of neighbors see things differently: they don’t like it, they don’t agree with it, and they want it gone.

That’s not going to happen, so perhaps they can devote their energies towards understanding how free speech works instead.

Source: WTMJ,

Dad Finds Out Teacher Is Forcing Daughter To Convert To Islam In Assignment, He Has A Much Better Idea

While it’s no secret that liberals control our nation’s educational system, that control doesn’t translate into a green light for educators to fill children’s heads with a bunch of nonsense.

Unfortunately, there are far too many teachers that disagree with that assessment.

There has been an alarming rise in classroom incidents across the nation in which teachers are essentially allowing liberal talking points to guide the information they share with students.

This problem is made worse by highly-questionable lessons that are designed to do little more than brainwash children into subscribing to a specific narrative.

Mad World News passes along another frightening example of that.

Mark McLachlan, 43, found the homework task (pictured) in his stepdaughter's planner and refused to let her finish it

When a 12-year-old student brought home her assignment requiring her to “convert” religions, her understandably outraged father wasn’t about to let her participate in the indoctrinating lesson.

However, instead of just sending her back empty-handed, the fed-up dad completed the assignment himself with his own brilliant answer.

The student was tasked with writing a letter to her family explaining that she had decided to convert to Islam.

The dad completed the assignment, but he put his own spin on things. He wrote a lengthy letter that exposed the basic principles of Islam, and he would later take to Facebook to expose the assignment that his child had been assigned.

Of course, McLachlan didn’t stop there.

To ensure that the indoctrination comes to an end, the indignant dad went to the school and demanded to know why his child was being forced to give reasons for converting to Islam when they would not require children to do the same for any other religion.

The school defended the assignment, arguing that it was part of the curriculum, according to Daily Mail.

Fortunately, McLachlan stuck to his guns, assuring the school that his child will not be participating in any assignment or activity promoting Islam.

“I just don’t see why they should ask a child to write a letter addressed to their family about converting to another religion. I really just don’t see what the letter will gain,” he said.

“If they want children to learn about Islam, then go teach them all about it and its history. What I don’t want is a school asking my stepdaughter to look into reasons for converting to another religion.”

“Like every parent, it is our decision on how we raise them and once they are old enough to make decision, then it is there choice.”

The fact that the teacher came up with this assignment is bad enough, but to have the school defend it as part of the curriculum is downright alarming.

What purpose does it serve to have a 12-year-old child assume the role of someone that wants to convert to Islam?

There’s no lesson to be found there. Instead, the child is essentially being taught to be sympathetic to the plight of those that wish to convert to Islam.

Kudos to the dad for standing up as he did. Other parents would be wise to take this as the latest red flag that they need to be as involved as possible in the education of their children.

Source: Mad World News,