McCabe’s Bombshell Confession: High Level Obama Official Ordered Me to Shutdown The Clinton Investigation

Image result for McCabe’s Bombshell Confession: High Level Obama Official Ordered Me to Shutdown The Clinton Investigation

The initial OIG report that was released a week ago Friday and that resulted in Andrew McCabe’s firing also contained other “staggering” revelations as well.  The implications likely reach all the way to then-President Obama.


Directly from the OIG report:

“McCabe told the OIG that on August 12, 2016, he received a telephone call from PADAG [Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General] regarding the FBI’s handling of the CF Investigation (the “PADAG call”).

“McCabe said that PADAG expressed concerns about FBI agents taking overt steps in the CF [Clinton Foundation] Investigation during the presidential campaign.

“According to McCabe, he pushed back, asking ‘are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?’ 

“McCabe told us that the conversation was ‘very dramatic’ and he never had a similar confrontation like the PADAG call with a high level Department official in his entire FBI career.”

The call from the as yet un-named PADAG came on August 12, 2016 only months before the presidential election and at a time when McCabe was building the case that would prove the Clinton Foundation served as a money laundering facility for her multi-billion dollar pay-to-play scheme that relied on her power as the Secretary of State to deliver on the improper deals.

What all of this means is that at a time when the FBI was most important in rooting out the criminal activity of a person who would be entrusted to become president, Barack Obama ordered that McCabe stand down.  Instead of applying a higher standard to the potential future president he was applying no standards at all to Madame Clinton.

Compare that to the full-scale investigation, complete with illegal surveillance, of Donald Trump without proof of anything other than innuendo created and presented to the FBI by his political opponent.

J. Christian Adams, formerly served as an attorney in the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division under George W. Bush said, “This is a top-level DOJ official who called the FBI and said shut down the Hillary [Clinton] Foundation investigation.”


“What kind of Justice Department do we have, that a couple weeks before the election, that presidential political appointees are calling the No. 2 guy at the FBI, essentially saying, give Hillary a pass?  That’s in the OIG report! That’s the real bombshell!”

The Deputy Attorney General at that time was Sally Yates who President Trump later found it necessary to fire because she refused to enforce his immigration policies.

The Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General serving under Yates in 2016 was Bill Baer.  It is not yet known whether he was the person who placed the August 12, 2016 call to McCabe.

Under any circumstances this level of corruption touches too high up the food chain to be dismissed as the action of a rogue Clinton supporter.  Obama had to have had knowledge of this incident even if he didn’t order it directly.  We know that Obama was monitoring the FBI investigations of both Clinton and Trump because he admitted as much. 

Source: fbnewsupdate.com

Developing: McCabe Cracks, Throws Comey Under Bus, Accuses of Perjury

Image result for Developing: McCabe Cracks, Throws Comey Under Bus, Accuses of Perjury

Disgraced former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was fired Friday night, two days prior to his official retirement with full benefits, by Attorney General Jeff Sessions on recommendations from both the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility and the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General.

And it looks like he might not want to go down alone.

McCabe was fired for allegedly lying to federal investigators and for making alleged unauthorized disclosures to the media about sensitive investigations. Basically, he is alleged to have “lacked candor” with investigators about making anonymous leaks to a Wall Street Journal reporter about the status of the Clinton Foundation investigation in 2016.

In what could only be described as an already prepared statement, McCabe released a letter shortly after his termination that attempted to give his side of the story and asserted that he had been “singled out” by a vindictive President Donald Trump for removal, a laughable claim given the recommendations of the Obama-era-initiated inspector general’s investigation led by the Obama-appointed IG and career bureaucrats at the FBI’s OPR.

But there was something else in McCabe’s statement that caught the eye of law professor Jonathan Turley, who described in The Hill how McCabe appeared to have contradicted his former boss, former FBI Director James Comey, and essentially accused him of committing perjury.

In dispute of the allegations of unauthorized leaks to the media, McCabe wrote, “I chose to share with a reporter through my public affairs officer and a legal counselor. As deputy director, I was one of only a few people who had the authority to do that. It was not a secret, it took place over several days, and others, including the director, were aware of the interaction with the reporter.”

Turley pointed out that since Comey was the director at that time, McCabe’s claim that his leaks were authorized — or at least done with the knowledge of — his boss would run completely counter to testimony delivered under oath by Comey in May 2017 during a congressional hearing.

In that hearing, Comey was asked directly by Sen. Chuck Grassley if he himself had “ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation” or if he had “ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation,” to which Comey had replied without hesitation “Never” and “No.”

Thus, we now know that either Comey or McCabe has lied about the leaks to The Wall Street Journal reporter. If Comey told Congress the truth that he never authorized any leaks to the media, then McCabe just lied and threw Comey under the bus to save his own skin.

Likewise, if McCabe is telling the truth that he had permission to leak information to the reporter, then that means Comey lied under oath to Congress when he denied ever authorizing such leaks.

If it turns out that McCabe just lied, it represents little more than cornered rats biting each other as they attempt to flee a sinking ship, as he was already fired for lying and faces potential prosecution for such. What is one more charge in that case?

But if Comey is the one who lied, he stands to suffer more than McCabe from the exposure, as he is about to launch a lucrative book tour to promote his memoir, “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership.”

Oh, the irony.

Furthermore, Comey is already facing scrutiny over how he handled the Clinton investigation as well as memos he allegedly wrote about his interactions with Trump and kept after he was fired, some of which were leaked to a friend in the media and which may contain classified information.

On top of that, Turley noted that if it were McCabe who lied and he somehow avoids prosecution for the crime, then he just inadvertently opened the door for President Donald Trump to issue a full pardon for former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who was forced by special counsel Robert Mueller to plead guilty to lying to investigators, a crime it appears McCabe just committed.

One of these two individuals — Comey or McCabe — was lying about leaks to the media, as they both can’t be telling contradictory truth about the same incident in question.

We will know for sure which is the case when the OIG report is released to the public and the full extent of alleged partisan misconduct of FBI leadership is revealed.

What do you think of these contradictory statements from Comey and McCabe about leaks to the media? Scroll down to comment below!

Source:conservativetribune.com

BREAKING! Justice Department Finally Bringing Major Charges After Reopening Huge Investigation

More political theater?

The U.S. Justice Department under President Donald Trump has now agreed to provide congressional investigators confidential records on the failed Barack Hussein Obama era gun-trafficking operation known as “Fast and Furious” that has long has been criticized by Republican lawmakers.

In an agreement that would end the six-year-long battle between GOP lawmakers and the Obama administration Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the justice department would immediately turn over documents to the Republican-led Congress Committee of Oversight and Government reform which were previously withheld by the Obama Administration.

Congressional Republicans had been pressuring the Justice Department for years about this operation which is named after a movie franchise about car racing. The operation was supposed to curb gun-trafficking criminals who were selling weapons to Mexican drug cartels by having to compete with the United States Government. Although this was originally started under the George W. Bush Administration, he scrapped it when he saw it wasn’t working as intended. But since Obama was only for disarming law-abiding American citizens, he took it upon himself to try it again, only to find that American guns were used in multiple Mexican cartel massacres.

In June 2012, the Republican-led House voted to hold Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to turn over documents about the operation. The committee sued Eric Holder for access to the documents in August 2012. Obama later asserted executive privilege to block the disclosure of the documents. And it didn’t go any further because the GOP was afraid to go after the first African American President and his Attorney General.

The best part of this whole saga is that at the time Democrats accused Republicans of engaging in a partisan witch hunt. Can anyone say “Fake Russian Trump Dossier?”

Let’s hope this time we can get some answers and see a few people responsible behind bars.

Via National Review:

“Obama-administration scandals never resolve. They just vanish — usually, under a new scandal.

So it was with one of this president’s earliest embarrassments, “Operation Fast and Furious,” designed to help the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) dismantle drug cartels operating inside the United States and disrupt drug-trafficking routes. Instead, it put into the hands of criminals south of the border some 2,000 weapons, which have been used to kill hundreds of Mexicans and at least one American, U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

Now, Fast and Furious is back in the news. Earlier this month, a raid on the hidey-hole of drug kingpin Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman recovered not only the notorious drug lord, but a (“massive”) .50-caliber rifle, capable of stopping a car or shooting down a helicopter, that originated with the ATF program. Rest easy, though: Only 34 such rifles were sold through the program.

The news comes just days after a federal judge rejected President Obama’s assertion of executive privilege to deny Congress access to Fast and Furious–related records it requested back in 2012 as part of an investigation into the gun-walking operation. Despite the IRS scandal, Benghazi, and a host of other accusations of malfeasance against this White House, it remains this president’s sole assertion of executive privilege.

Three-and-a-half years later, the question is still: Why?

In November 2009, the ATF’s Phoenix field office launched an operation in which guns bought by drug-cartel straw purchasers in the U.S. were allowed to “walk” across the border into Mexico. ATF agents would then track the guns as they made their way through the ranks of the cartel.

At least, that was the theory. In reality, once the guns walked across the border, they were gone. Whistleblowers reported, and investigators later confirmed, that the ATF made no effort to trace the guns.

In March 2010, a few ATF agents voiced an obvious concern: Couldn’t the guns end up being used in crimes? Seven months later, that’s exactly what happened. The brother of the former attorney general of the state of Chihuahua was murdered, and Fast and Furious weapons were found at the scene.

In December, the scheme’s ramifications crossed back over the border. On December 14, four Border Patrol agents were staked out near Rio Rico, Ariz., eleven miles north of the Mexican border. A five-man “rip crew,” a group looking to rob drug smugglers crossing the border, opened fire when the agents attempted to apprehend. Agent Terry was struck in the back and bled to death. Two of the guns involved in the shootout were traced back to Fast and Furious, which continued for another six weeks.

The operation was finally shut down with the help of Senator Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), then ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who promptly opened an investigation. Two months later, Darrell Issa (R., Calif.), then chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, opened his own investigation in the House.

#share#Operation Fast and Furious would have been bad enough. But the investigation made clear a widespread cover-up. In February, in response to a request from Grassley, Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich submitted for the record a letter declaring that any claim “that ATF ‘sanctioned’ or otherwise knowingly allowed the sale of assault weapons to a straw purchaser who then transported them to Mexico — is false. ATF makes every effort to interdict weapons that have been purchased illegally and prevent their transportation to Mexico.” In November, Attorney General Eric Holder admitted that gun-walking was, in fact, used, and in December the Obama administration formally withdrew Weich’s letter from the congressional record — because it was, in Holder’s words, “inaccurate.”

Operation Fast and Furious would have been bad enough. But the investigation made clear a widespread cover-up.

By that time, Holder had become a figure of particular interest. What did the attorney general know about the operation, and when did he know it? In May 2011, he claimed to have known about gun-walking tactics for only a few weeks. But by October, new documents showed that Holder had been briefed about Operation Fast and Furious as early as July 2010. And in January 2010, just months after the ATF had launched Operation Fast and Furious, personnel from the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, a multi-agency network run by the Department of Justice, had been brought in to provide additional manpower.

Furthermore, the operation may have had an explicitly political angle. E-mails obtained by CBS News in late 2011 showed ATF officials corresponding about the possibility of using Fast and Furious to push through a regulation requiring gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or “long guns.” In other words, the ATF permitted certain gun shops to conduct certain, inadvisable sales to dangerous people and then planned to point to those sales to justify the need for new reporting requirements.

By the summer of 2012, Holder and the House Oversight Committee were at a standoff, the attorney general claiming he had been fully responsive to the committee’s request for documents, Issa claiming that the DOJ had withheld 1,300 key pages. President Obama, intervening, declared that the documents were protected under executive privilege — a risible claim, legally, and a suggestive one, given the White House’s denial of involvement. In late June, at the recommendation of the committee, Holder became the first sitting member of a presidential cabinet to be held in contempt by the House of Representatives.

In September, the administration declared victory. The Department of Justice’s inspector general released a report recommending disciplinary action against 14 federal officials and absolving Holder — seemingly. In fact, the report noted a series of extraordinary coincidences in which, several times in 2010 and 2011, information about the program made it all the way to Holder’s desk — but without the attorney general’s ever managing to pass his eyes over it. Odd, that.

Since then, the investigation into Fast and Furious has been tied up in the courts, where the House challenged the president’s executive-privilege claim.

But the ATF & Co.’s horrendous judgment continues to take a toll. By the time of the House’s contempt vote, some 300 Mexicans had been killed or wounded by Fast and Furious firearms, and that number has surely risen. In December 2013, a walked gun was found at the site of a gunfight at a Mexican resort that left five cartel members dead.

The guns have found their way north, too. A weapon owned by Nadir Soofi, one of the two Muslim terrorists who tried to shoot up Pamela Geller’s “Draw Muhammad” contest in Texas last May, was acquired through Fast and Furious.

The guns have found their way north, too.

It is difficult to overstate both how stupid and how incompetent were the whole host of federal officials involved in this fiasco, who first thought it was a swell idea to traffic thousands of guns to Mexican criminals, then blithely forgot about them. It is difficult, too, to overstate the contempt of this administration for transparency, given that, having made those fatal mistakes, its response was to hide them from a congressional inquiry, going so far as to invoke executive privilege to do so. At best, the operation and its aftermath were an exercise in astonishing malpractice; at worst, the administration knowingly exhibited a reckless disregard for human life — then covered it up.

Under “Operation Fast & Furious,” the U.S. government became a de facto arms dealer to Mexican drug cartels and Islamist criminals.

But this administration still wants to lecture Americans about gun control . . .”

H/T The Gateway Pundit,daily-vine.com

What Newt Gingrich Just Told Hannity About Hillary-Podesta Investigation Will SCARE THE HELL OUT OF YOU

Newt Gingrich joined Sean Hannity last night to discuss the breaking news that Tony Podesta, Democratic Lobbyist and Brother to Hillary’s Campaign chairman, is now reportedly under federal investigation due to his ties to the Russians. Newt dropped  a bombshell about this new investigation. (Video Below)

This comes just a couple days after evidence was uncovered that Russians funneled money to the Clinton Foundation before Obama and Hillary sold Uranium to the Russians.

Hannity was giving a brief rundown of the shocking news, and Newt Gingrich interrupted him to explain just how significant and unprecedented this. As a historian, Gingrich knows the details of Presidential scandals from the past 250 years and he told Hannity the shocking truth about this latest Hillary scandal.

Gingrich was contacted by Dr. Allen C. Guelzo, a world-renowned historian at Gettysburg College, after seeing these new revelations about Hillary and Podesta were made public. He told Newt this is the biggest corruption scandal he has ever seen, going all the way back to the Civil War era. Here’s what Newt told Hannity:

“I think we’re on the edge of the greatest corruption scandal in American History… The breaking point will come when Congress has the courage to demand that every donation to the Clinton Foundation be published and we learn how tremendous the foreign influence buying was, and what a threat that was to American Democracy… By the time this is all out. Every other presidential scandal in American history will look trivial. This is the most corrupt, the most unbelievably unlawful administration in American History. and the Apex was the Clinton team. (Bill Hillary & the Podestas)” But he didn’t stop there.

WATCH this video then SHARE on Facebook because the media is ignoring this!

From Fox News:

“THE LEVEL OF FOREIGN MONEY PENETRATING THIS COUNTRY IS VERY DISTURBING,” NEWT GINGRICH SAID ON “FOX & FRIENDS.”

HE SAID IT’S “CRAZY” THAT TRUMP ASSOCIATES ARE BEING INVESTIGATED FOR THEIR ALLEGED TIES TO RUSSIA, AS OPPOSED TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION’S ROLE IN THE URANIUM ONE DEAL OR THE PODESTA GROUP DOING REPRESENTATIONAL WORK FOR RUSSIA’S NEIGHBOR.

“THE TOTAL SURROUND FOR HILLARY CLINTON OF RUSSIAN INFLUENCE-PEDDLING WAS STUNNING,” GINGRICH SAID, ADDING THAT HE’S SURPRISED THERE HASN’T BEEN A DEMAND FOR ALL THE CLINTON FOUNDATION’S DONATIONS TO BE MADE PUBLIC.

“ALL OF THIS STUFF OUGHT TO COME OUT AND BE OUT IN THE OPEN,” HE SAID.

Source: www.libertyonenews.com

It’s Official Sessions Is Back! DOJ Opening Investigation Into Obama Admin Crimes

Elder Patriot – Attorney General Jeff Sessions yesterday reiterated the promise he made on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” that the Justice Department would be investigating the FBI for abuses of power committed by the agency under the Obama administration.

“Let me tell you, every FISA warrant based on facts submitted to that court has to be accurate. 

“That will be investigated and looked at, and we are not going to participate at the Department of Justice in providing anything less than the proper disclosure to the court before they issue a FISA warrant.”

The investigation will initially focus on the manner and evidence that the Obama administration used to obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on members of the Trump campaign.

Sessions’ decision was, at least in part, a response to a criminal referral Senators Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham sent to the Department of Justice on January 4, 2018 outlining potential violations of 18 U.S. Code § 1001.

The statements of facts listed in the new memo corroborate expand on those in the Nunes memo and, coupled with the 18 U.S. Code § 1001 referral, would indicate that Steele is not the lone prize Grassley and Graham are targeting.  Not even close.

Keeping in mind Sessions’ announcement last November that he had directed prosecutors to “evaluate certain issues” involving Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation there is ample evidence that the Obama administration is finally coming under the scrutiny that it deserves.

For those who have been victims of the Obama administration’s lawless disregard of the Constitutional restraints put on government as Obama sought unbridled power and control, this moment is especially sweet.

Right up until this week Obama has continued pitching his snake oil to us, telling an audience at MIT “We didn’t have a scandal that embarrassed us.” 

That, of course, was the result of an FBI and a Justice Department that came under the jack-booted but sweet-talking, snake oil selling president with the charming smile.

Here are just a few scandals list by Breitbart just before Obama left office in January of 2017 that would’ve ended the presidency of any Republican president:

  • The great stimulus heist that left Americans footing the bill for was an army of government jobs, and a lavish network of slush funds for the Democratic Party and its union allies. 
  • Operation Fast and Furious that used American gun dealers and straw purchasers to arm Mexican drug lords, and that resulted in a huge body count including prominently including Border Patrol Agents.
  • Eric Holder was the first sitting member of a president’s cabinet in the history of the United States to be held in contempt of Congress.
  • ObamaCare is a scam, pure and simple – sold on false pretenses by people who knew it wasn’t going to work the way they promised. It doesn’t feel right to dismiss it as a “failed” scheme when so much of the failure was intentional. 
  • Multiple occasions where his administration was caught spying on journalists
  •  The selective targeting of conservative groups by a politicized Internal Revenue Service
  • Hillary Clinton’s use of an illegal server in violation of the Espionage Act and that Obama had full knowledge of and participated in.
  • The NSA spying scandal that focused more on intelligence gathering on Americans than foreign enemies.
  • Building Iran into a nuclear power and funding that development
  • Shutting down the investigation into Hezbollah’s billion dollar per year drug operation in the United States
  • The sale of 20% of Uranium One to Russia that can be viewed as nothing other that selling out vital American national security interests.

Incredibly, this is only a partial list.  As indicated above, the mild mannered Attorney General should not be underestimated.  The FISA investigation is just the tip of the iceberg.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

FISA FALLOUT: Nunes Focuses Investigation To Clinton Crime Network – Demands Answers Over FBI’s Use of ‘Trump Dossier’

Elder Patriot – House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes has ratcheted up the heat on nearly two-dozen “current and former” high-ranking officials.

Those who had hoped they had weathered the worst of the fraudulent dossier fallout are now on notice that Nunes is just getting started.  Nunes is a pit bull and, unlike the limp wristed Republicans these anti-Trump bureaucrats have become accustomed to rolling over, they are beginning to come to terms with the fact that they may be facing their Armageddon.

The recipients of the letters were not identified but the demands for information were clear:

Former FBI Director James Comey testified that the dossier was both “salacious and unverified.”  But, that didn’t stop any number of Obama officials from making it the central piece of evidence in an application to the FISC to secure a surveillance warrant on Carter Page, and by extension as many of the Trump campaign team members as Page would come in contact with.

Now, Nunes wants to know what they knew and when, every last one of them. Including Obama.  And the HPSCI chairman left little wiggle room for those who might try to avoid answering.

Every letter included this warning: “If you do not provide timely answers on a voluntary process, the Committee will initiate compulsory process,” suggesting that subpoenas would be forthcoming to those who refused to respond by the date the letters compel then to.

Moreover, question 9 is aimed straight at Obama.  Comey testified that he had briefed Obama for the first time on January 5, 2017, fifteen days before his term ended.

But, four months before that, in a September 2, 2016 text from FBI attorney Lisa Page wrote to FBI Counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok President Obama wanted “to know everything we’re doing.”

The following month, in October of 2016, the first FISA warrant was issued authorizing surveillance against Carter Page.  Are we to believe that Obama had no knowledge of the FISA warrant until January of the following year?

Nunes can read those discrepancies better than you can.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

REVOLT! Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein Calls for Investigation into Obama, Lynch, & Hillary

James Comey has testified that ex-attorney general Loretta Lynch requested from him to refer to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails as a “matter” instead of an investigation.

He testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, claiming that Lynch’s request made him feel “queasy.”

But Feinstein also said that she would have had “a queasy feeling too.”

Feinstein, the committee’s top democrat, said that she didn’t know if Loretta Lynch was providing cover for the Clinton campaign, but said that the request she gave to Comey would have given her a queasy feeling too. “I think we need to know more about that,” the California senator said. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the judiciary committee take a look at that.”

According to our source, Conservative Fighters, Feinstein said that an investigation into Lynch’s conduct with the Clinton campaign should be separate from the current Congressional investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.

“I don’t think we should mix the two,” Feinstein said. “I don’t know whether it’s obstruction of justice. I don’t intend to draw any conclusions until investigations are finished.”

Comey also said that when he asked Lynch if she was going to authorize him to confirm the existence of the Clinton email investigation, she answered, “Yes but don’t call it that. Call it a ‘matter’.” Then, he asked her to give him an explanation why he should call it like that, she did not answer, but she said, “Just call it a matter.”

“I don’t know whether it was intentional or not but it gave the impression that the Attorney General Lynch was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way the political campaign was describing the same activity, which was inaccurate,” Comey stated.

When Obama and Clinton lose Diane Feinstein, it is significant. And it could mean a huge turning point. Feinstein seems to be one of the most powerful leaders the Democrats have and she comes with incredible credibility.

We may disagree with her sometimes, but she has proven some major points over the decades and that she prefers honesty and integrity over partisan politics. She loves her party and is smart enough to know that this issue is quite damaging.

ames Comey has testified that ex-attorney general Loretta Lynch requested from him to refer to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails as a “matter” instead of an investigation.

He testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, claiming that Lynch’s request made him feel “queasy.”

But Feinstein also said that she would have had “a queasy feeling too.”

Feinstein, the committee’s top democrat, said that she didn’t know if Loretta Lynch was providing cover for the Clinton campaign, but said that the request she gave to Comey would have given her a queasy feeling too. “I think we need to know more about that,” the California senator said. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the judiciary committee take a look at that.”

According to our source, Conservative Fighters, Feinstein said that an investigation into Lynch’s conduct with the Clinton campaign should be separate from the current Congressional investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.

Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.

Source: www.readfirstoday.com

Finally It’s About To Go Down: Ted Cruz’ Phenomenal New Investigation, Will Put Soros & Obama In Jail

Senator Ted Cruz and his posse finally decided that are coming out with guns blazing, ready to corner former President Obama and George Soros once and for all.

The republican crew is beginning what will be an EXTREMELY thorough investigation into Obama’s influence in politics in foreign countries. Mind you, the money that was spent by Obama overseas was all done so with hardworking taxpayer’s money… and not to mention done by George Soros’ USAID organization.

Republican senators are demanding that Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, IMMEDIATELY delve into the investigation. Their hope is that the investigation will uncover what really happened when the Obama administration attempted to sway foreign elections. The way that they went about this was by using United States taxpayer’s funds to “extreme and sometimes violent political activists.”

Numerous conversations between foreign diplomats were released, outlining current political tampering by the Obama administration’s State Department.

 Image result for Finally It’s About To Go Down: Ted Cruz’ Phenomenal New Investigation, Will Put Soros & Obama In Jail

This included using hard-working taxpayer’s money to go directly to support far-left causes in Albania, Latin America, Macedonia, and all the way to Africa.

According to the letter which was authorized by Republican Senators Mike Lee (Utah), Jim Inhofe (Oklahoma), Thom Tillis (North Carolina), Ted Cruz (Texas), David Perdue (Georgia), and Bill Cassidy (Los Angeles), it appears that a large percentage of the State Department’s funding went into organizations run and supported by liberal leftist billionaire George Soros himself.

The group of senators is requesting that Tillerson launch a full-scale investigation in order to figure out the truth behind the funding efforts. This will allow them to figure out once and for all exactly how the Obama administration tried to promote left-wing causes and political parties around the entire world.

The newest finds prove efforts by the Obama administration to directly send taxpayer money to Israeli organizations that openly opposed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the country’s most recent election.

Leaders from many different nations decided to figure out a way to inform lawmakers about the activities under investigation.Mike Lee made the statement:

Over the past few months, elected officials and political leaders of foreign nations have been coming to me with disappointing news and reports of U.S. activity in their respective countries. This includes reports of diplomats playing political favorites, USAID funds supporting extreme and sometimes violent political activists, and the U.S. government working to marginalize the moderates and conservatives in leadership roles.

This sort of political favoritism from our missions around the world is unacceptable and endangers our bilateral relationships,” Lee declared.

Let’s hope these guys can get to the root of what really went down during Obama’s time in office. It’s time we find out what happened to our hard-earned money, after all, it wasn’t Obama’s money to give Soros in the first place. I think we can all agree that these senators are doing us a favor by really trying to display Obama and Soros for who they really are, crooks. After all, these two are only billionaires because of other people’s money.

Source:thedeplorablesociety.com

It’s Official: Jeff Session Is BACK! Trump’s DOJ Opens Massive Investigation In Clinton Foundation Money Laundering

Elder Patriot – Step out from the mainstream media matrix and look around.  The sunlight will be blinding for those of you who have only been relying on the MMM for your information.

Thanks to investigative reporter Jerome Corsi, Infowars Washington Bureau Chief, we have learned that Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered the Department of Justice to open criminal investigations against the Clinton Foundation in both Little Rock and in New York.

This was long overdue but as we have learned already, the corruption of the DOJ and the FBI under Barack Obama’s administration was extensive and intended to protect fat cat Dems who were growing rich off of Hillary Clinton’s pay-to-play schemes.

As early as April of 2013 the New York Times cited evidence of Hillary’s illicit money laundering scam when they ran this headline:

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal 

The article provided a roadmap for anyone who cared to follow up with an investigation:

Included was a simplified graphic that pointed directly to the corruption:

No one in Obama’s Justice Department did.

The Times article came two years after they ran their original article:

After that the Times abandoned the story:

The response from Obama’s DOJ and FBI was silence worthy of the three blind mice.

Investigative reporter Peter Schweizer took up the scent.  By mid-2015 he had released a book chronicling numerous examples of Hillary’s corrupt pay-to-play scheme while she served herself as Secretary of State and she used the Clinton Foundation as her money-laundering piggy bank.

In May of 2015, the Wall Street Journal reported that, “For eight years, Bill wasn’t paid to speak in Nigeria. Once Hillary became secretary of state, he got $700,000 for a single talk.”

By November of 2016 Senator Tom Cotton who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee had seen enough to claim that the Clinton Foundation “increasingly looks like one of the largest money-laundering and influence peddling operations in the world.” 

Then in July of 2017 it was revealed that an Iranian foundation that had been convicted as a front organization for the theocratic regime in Tehran had donated five-figure sums to the infamous Clinton Foundation.

Remember these revelations came after the meteoric growth of the Clinton Foundation following the so-called “relief” effort after the earthquake in Haiti that saw massive sums of donations filtered through the distressed island nation and then back to the Clintons and their associates.

Obama’s DOJ sat on their hands as one by one these revelations of wrongdoing came to light.  Now they want us to believe that a drunken boast by a 28-year old campaign stringer in a London bar is the reason behind the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

That dog don’t hunt.  However, when Sessions’ investigation is concluded we are likely to find Obama’s fingerprints all over corruption at the Clinton Foundation.  That is because, as former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy has so adroitly pointed out “Hillary couldn’t be proven guilty without proving the president guilty as well.”

The Dems brought all of this on themselves.  The facts that not a single one broke ranks and instead Hillary and her Foundation’s dark secrets shows just how complete her corruption of the entire party was.

Finally, there is hope the swamp is going to be drained.

Source: unabashedconservative.com

BREAKING! McCain Hit With MASSIVE Investigation Before He Dies – This Will KILL HIM!

New information is now raising significant questions about the Senator from Arizona, John McCain, and his role in delivering the now infamous and totally discredited 35-page Fusion GPS dossier on President Donald Trump and Russia to the U.S. intelligence community under Barack Obama’s corrupt administration.

The dossier was allegedly paid for by the Democrat Party and the Crooked Hillary Clinton’s campaign and actually picked up by the GOP traitor John McCain in order to stop then-candidate Donald Trump from winning the Republican primaries.

And interestingly enough McCain’s office refuses to answer 3 pressing questions about his involvement in the dossier.

Via Breitbart:

1 – Did McCain know about the role of the controversial Fusion GPS firm in compiling the dossier?

In August testimony released publicly last week, the co-founder of Fusion GPS revealed that an associate of McCain first reached out to Christopher Steele, the former British spy who compiled the questionable dossier, in order to obtain the anti-Trump information for McCain to pass to the FBI’s leadership.

In the August 22 testimony, Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn R. Simpson divulged that contact between Steele and McCain’s office was initiated by David Kramer, a former State Department official who was described by Simpson as a “long-time advisor to Senator McCain.”

Simpson said that Kramer related to Steele that Kramer and McCain were at a security conference in Nova Scotia where the contents of the dossier were discussed with the two by Sir Andrew Wood, a former British ambassador to Moscow. Kramer had reached out to Steele for more information, Simpson stated.

Simpson made clear that the request for more information was initiated by McCain’s associate, Kramer. He said that Wood’s sharing of the information with McCain and Kramer at the security conference “caused David Kramer to follow up with Chris (Steele) and that it was passive. In other words, it was initiated by Mr. Kramer.”

Simpson said that the goal of McCain’s camp in obtaining the dossier information was to inquire about the document’s contents with FBI leadership.

In a New York Times oped last week, Simpson and Fusion GPS co-founder Peter Fritch wrote that they helped get the dossier to McCain using an “emissary” with the goal of McCain passing the information contained in the questionable document to U.S. intelligence agencies.

While Kramer reached out to Steele, who was hired by Fusion GPS to assemble the dossier, it was not immediately clear whether Kramer or McCain knew about the firm’s involvement in the anti-Trump document.

Breitbart News twice sent the following question to McCain’s office but did not receive a reply: “Given that Fusion GPS is openly an opposition research firm, did Sen. McCain know that he was sharing political opposition research on Trump with the intel community?”

A January 11 statement from McCain attempted to explain why he provided the documents to the FBI but did not mention how he came to possess the dossier or whether he knew who funded it.

“Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the director of the FBI,” McCain said at the time. “That has been the extent of my contact with the FBI or any other government agency regarding this issue.”

2 – Did McCain know the anti-Trump dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign?

In October, the Washington Post reported that in April 2016, attorney Marc E. Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained Fusion GPS to conduct the anti-Trump work on behalf of both the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Through Perkins Coie, Clinton’s campaign and the DNC continued to fund Fusion GPS until October 2016, days before Election Day, the Post reported.

McCain’s office did not respond to a request for comment on the issue.

3 – Why did McCain need to provide the dossier to the FBI leadership in the first place?

Fusion GPS co-founder Simpson testified that McCain associate Kramer reached out a few weeks after the November presidential election last year to obtain the dossier’s information and pass it to FBI leadership.

Referring to Kramer, Simpson stated, “He says he wants information to give to Senator McCain so that Senator McCain can ask questions about it at the FBI, with the leadership of the FBI.

“That was essentially — all we sort of wanted was for the government to do its job and we were concerned about whether the information that we provided previously had ever, you know, risen to the leadership level of the FBI. We simply just didn’t know. It was our belief that Director Comey, if he was aware — if he was made aware of this information would treat it seriously.”

It was unclear from Simpson’s testimony why McCain would feel the need to get the dossier to the FBI leadership a few weeks after the November election. According to numerous reports and Capitol Hill testimony, the FBI immediately took Steele’s information seriously when the ex-spy reportedly provided his anti-Trump claims to a contact at an FBI field office in Rome last July.

Mother Jones reported that a “few weeks” after Steele allegedly went to the FBI on his own in July, “the bureau asked him for information on his sources and their reliability and on how he had obtained his reports.”

“He was also asked to continue to send copies of his subsequent reports to the bureau,” Mother Jones reported.

“In other words, by the end of the July, the leadership of the FBI was paying attention,” the Washington Post reported.

Not only were they paying attention, the BBC reported that Steele’s information served as a “roadmap” for the FBI’s investigation into claims of coordination between Moscow and members of Trump’s presidential campaign.

Last April, CNN reported that the dossier served as part of the FBI’s justification for seeking the FISA court’s reported approval to clandestinely monitor the communications of Carter Page, the American oil industry investor who was tangentially and briefly associated with Trump’s presidential campaign.

If only Senator McCain would fight as hard for our side as he does for the Democrats the man would be a Republican powerhouse and an all-around hero to our cause. Instead, he’s a powerhouse and hero for the left. Every time there is a chance to rip any Republican a new one, he is first in line. But when a Democrat gets into some sort of controversy, he is 100% silent. He has always been like this, ever since the Reagan Presidency.

McCain might brand himself a “Maverick,” but all he is is a failure. He ran for the presidency against Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 but it was obvious he never cared to win. He viciously fought against Candidate Mitt Romney in the primaries but all he would say against Obama was “He’s a nice family man.” Makes you wonder if he just hasn’t been paid off by the Democrat Party all along to be a spoiler for Republican ideals.

Please share if you agree McCain needs to retire already….

Source:freedomdaily.com