WOW: He Just Called For Hillary To Be SHOT By Firing Squad!! – Do You Agree With Him?

Image result for WOW: He Just Called For Hillary To Be SHOT By Firing Squad!! – Do You Agree With Him?

This language is a bit extreme but I think we can all relate to what is being said.

Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom is telling some harsh truths about what really should be done with Hillary Clinton. And he isn’t playing around.

Kallstrom had no issue whatsoever going on national media and telling it like it is. He confirmed that if Hillary Clinton would have done everything she did with her own private server back during World War 2, she would have faced the firing squad like many others did back then for crimes a lot less grave than the one she committed.

Yup, although Democrats and the left wing media constantly try to convince us that it’s no big deal when Hillary had a home-based private server installed in her own guest bathroom of her private residence, and intentionally used it, emailing out nationals’ most classified documents, this was a crime worthy of treason. And it needs prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.

Trending: 

Officers Just Hauled Rotten Dem Off Capitol Hill In Handcuffs – It’s About Time!

When Hillary made the decision to run off a private server she had no way of securing classified documents. And it’s basically the same thing as just handing our enemies our national secrets. This is considered Treason and Kallstrom is 100% correct to call her out on this, in fact, instead of investigating President Trump on made up talking points charges Hillary is the one who should be investigated.

And the former FBI Assistant Director is 100% correct. Hillary’s crimes were intentional and well thought out. They went against the better interests of the American people and our nation and she needs to be tried under a court of law. And although we don’t use firing squads anymore, prison time would be just as great in this case if only to prove Justice is indeed blind.

Here is more on this double standard via The American Thinker:

“Missing from the leaked list of questions Special Counsel Robert Mueller is said to want to ask President Trump is the classic one: when did you stop beating your wife? This is how farcical Mueller’s witch hunt has become – a list of questions that could have been written by a failing first-year law student amounting to the same perjury trap that got Martha Stewart, Scooter Libby, and Michael Flynn.

Again, what’s the crime? Collusion is not a crime, and the only proven collusion is among the Clinton campaign, the DNC, and a British spy working with Russian sources. Yet President Trump’s legal team has been threatened with a grand jury subpoena. The office and residences of his lawyer, Michael Cohen, have been raided.

While Mueller and Team Trump negotiate the terms of entrapment, Team Trump should consider demanding from Mueller the same deal Hillary Clinton got, including the writing of an exoneration memo before the interview. The interview should be on the Friday of a holiday weekend – Hillary’s was on July 2. There should be no notes taken and no recordings or transcripts made. The interview should not be under oath, and Mueller should not attend, as Comey did not attend Hillary’s.

Trump should insist on an interview limited to just two hours and at which staff members past and current can be present, like Mike Flynn, Carter Page, and Paul Manafort. They should be given immunity deals, as were the likes of Cheryl Mills at Hillary’s interview. His interviewer should be as pro-Trump as Peter Strzok, who conducted Hillary’s interview, was pro-Clinton. He should be allowed to say, “I don’t recall” or its equivalent 39 times, as Hillary did. Prior to the interview, Mueller should have a press conference listing the charges against Trump and then exonerate him, explaining why no reasonable prosecutor, which Mueller is not, would take the case. At least this time, this would be a true statement – Mueller pursues Trump without a crime, in violation of the special counsel statute. Comey acted as a Hillary staffer, ignoring the most obvious and real crimes, such a mishandling classified information and destroying evidence under subpoena.

Wasn’t having a private server that contained classified information, having multiple devices that were later physically smashed, and using BleachBit to destroy 33,000 emails that were under subpoena sufficient evidence of intent?

Only a corrupt and complicit FBI director, acting as Hillary Clinton’s surrogate campaign manager, who months earlier had decided he would exonerate her, could ignore the damning evidence:

As FBI director last year, James Comey began writing drafts of a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton, even before all witnesses in the investigation – including Clinton herself – had been interviewed.

The Senate Judiciary Committee obtained the Comey memos as part of its investigation into his firing by President Trump, which occurred on May 9. The revelation that Comey had begun drafting memos of his exoneration statement comes from transcripts of interviews given last fall by two FBI officials.

James Rybicki, Comey’s chief of staff, and Trisha Anderson, the principal deputy general counsel of national security and cyberlaw at the FBI, gave the interviews as part of an investigation conducted by the Office of Special Counsel into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation.

In a July 5, 2016, press conference, Comey said that he would not be recommending charges against Clinton for mishandling classified information despite her use of a private email server as secretary of state.

While the transcripts of those interviews are heavily redacted, they indicate that Comey started working on an announcement clearing Clinton in April or May of last year, before the FBI interviewed 17 witnesses in the case, including Clinton and some of her top aides.

Having already decided that he would exonerate her regardless of the evidence explains why he did not attended the July 2, 2016 interview of Hillary Clinton, did not put her under oath, and did not ever impanel a grand jury in the – there’s that word again – “matter.” The fix was in.

Unlike Hillary Clinton, who put our national security at risk in order to hide pay-for-play collusion with Clinton Foundation donors, and who allowed the sale of 20% of our uranium to Russian interests, Trump has done everything to hurt Russian interests, from arming Ukraine, imposing stiff sanctions, striking Syria, and boosting American energy to rebuilding the American military.

Yet Hillary was given a free ride, unlike Kristian Saucier, who was imprisoned for taking six photos of his submarine for his personal memory book. He was not a spy for a foreign power; he had no intent, to coin a phrase, to do anything with these photos except keep them as personal memories of his proud and honorable service.

It’s time for these double standards to end. Trump’s interview should be conducted under the same terms and conditions as Hillary’s, or it should not take place at all until Mueller finds an actual crime to investigate. He can find that just by looking in the mirror.”

H/T Mad World News,rwnofficial.com

Clint Eastwood Had Enough, Blows Up On Hillary And Obama… Liberals Are Furious

Image result for Clint Eastwood Had Enough, Blows Up On Hillary And Obama… Liberals Are Furious

One of Hollywood’s most beloved actors couldn’t take it and blew up the spot on Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama. Eastwood is an old-school actor, proud of his country, and living the great American dream and speaking his mind, embracing his wonderful first amendment. It didn’t take long for Eastwood, 87, to open up about his distaste for Clinton and Obama, and thus showing his support for President Trump.

Eastwood firstly didn’t announce his support for Trump, but when asked if he would support Trump or Clinton for President, then he sided with Donald. The reason is that he believed Clinton would follow in the footsteps of Obama and Eastwood wasn’t particularly a fan of Barack’s presidency. America turned soft under Obama and Clint Eastwood seems to despise the weakness that is found in the millennial generation who are offended by everything and trying to live in safe spaces which have proved to be embarrassing to America in general.

Clint comes from the tough generation where people weren’t so soft. His generation believed in the discipline at home and treating people with respect. His generation believed there were only two genders and people could not switch at any given moment in the day. Clint Eastwood is often criticized for his beliefs, but he speaks his mind and that’s something he believes that everyone should be able to do.

The Variety website wrote this bit about him: “Clint Eastwood says that he hasn’t endorsed any candidate for president, but given a choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, he’d choose the latter.

“That’s a tough one, isn’t it? I’d have to go for Trump…you know, ’cause she’s declared that she’s gonna follow in Obama’s footsteps,” Eastwood says in Esquire’s September issue. “There’s been just too much funny business on both sides of the aisle. She’s made a lot of dough out of being a politician. I gave up dough to be a politician. I’m sure that Ronald Reagan gave up dough to be a politician.”

Eastwood was clear that he hasn’t endorsed anyone — “I haven’t talked to Trump. I haven’t talked to anybody.” — but he was full of praises for the Republican nominee for being “onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up.”

In fact, Eastwood said, “We’re really in a p—y generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist.”

He added, “You know, he’s a racist now because he’s talked about this judge. And yeah, it’s a dumb thing to say. I mean, to predicate your opinion on the fact that the guy was born to Mexican parents or something. He’s said a lot of dumb things. So have all of them. Both sides. But everybody — the press and everybody’s going, ‘Oh, well, that’s racist,’ and they’re making a big hoodoo out of it. Just f—king get over it. It’s a sad time in history.”

One thing Eastwood pointed out about Trump is that people called him racist because Trump didn’t approve of a judge. Simply not approving or liking someone does not make one racist. Trump and the judge he criticized are not required to like each other. People are allowed to dislike each other without being labeled as a racist. However, there are many critics who called Trump “racist” for doing something such as disliking the judge or doing a travel restriction (it’s not a ban), and for doing things that help the laws of immigration be followed.

Clint Eastwood references the latest generation as the “p–sy generation” on account of how weak and soft people are in regards to their ability to be easily offended by everything. Combine the softness with the ever-growing emasculation of men and the gender identity politics and we have what could be considered a very sad generation where people have lost their true identity of being male or female.

The other problem is that people are constantly being labeled as racist, sexist, or anything else simply because they disagree with the ideologies of another.

Clint Eastwood isn’t the only celebrity to speak out about Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the generation of people who are easily offended. James Woods and numerous other celebrities have supported Donald Trump as President. Many have supported him as a person well before he ever ran for President.

How do you feel about Clint Eastwood’s opinion of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama? What is your opinion of the generation who is always offended and need to live in a safe space?

Share this story with your friends who like Clint Eastwood or would be interested in reading about his opinion of Hillary and Barack. Don’t forget to add your comments below!

Source:rwnofficial.com

Hillary Announces She’s MOVING Out Of U.S. Because Of Trump – Isn’t Going To Like Place She Picked!

Image result for Hillary Announces She’s MOVING Out Of U.S. Because Of Trump – Isn’t Going To Like Place She Picked!

Hillary Clinton was recently talking about moving out of the United States after she lost the 2016 election. She was likely devastated by the loss as Donald Trump won the election, stopping Hillary from becoming the first female American president. Her stunning loss came at the hands of a man with no political experience, but that of reality television and business and people were left in tears when she lost. People still complain today, over a year after the election and with disregard to Trump making wonderful progress on some issues important to Americans.

Hillary’s talk of moving out of the country saw herself moving to New Zealand, all the way on the other side of the planet from her comfy home here in America where she’s persistently criticized and possibly faces legal trouble after being caught up in a money laundering scandal with the Democratic National Committee. Hillary might claim it was only a joke that she’s moving out of America, but sometimes jokes are later revealed as truth. Even though her comments were jokes, for now, many wonder if they’ll turn out to be true if there are any pending legal actions. It makes sense for her to pull a Roman Polansky and run from the country if she faces legal actions.

Breitbart reported more on Clinton’s joke about moving out of America: “Hillary Clinton joked on Monday that she thought about permanently relocating to New Zealand after her crushing 2016 presidential election loss to Donald Trump.

“I received a number of invitations from Kiwis to permanently relocate here,” Clinton said in Auckland. “I must say I really appreciated the offers and gave them some thought, but I’m going to stay put because we have work to do in my country as well.”

Clinton said she wanted to help Democrats “crack the code” to beat Trump the “reality TV” candidate” in 2020.

“Part of our problem was this unprecedented reality TV campaign and him being the first reality TV candidate in our history,” she reportedly said.

Clinton said reporters were acting like they “were watching a car wreck or train wreck all the time” in 2016 and “they couldn’t take their eyes away.”

“They didn’t know what to make of it,” Clinton said, referring to Trump’s “insults and his scapegoating and his horrible comments about people with disabilities and Latin Americans and immigrants and everybody.” She added, “It was just so hard to understand.”

Clinton then said it took a “perfect storm” of events for Trump to defeat her: “Deep currents of anger and resentment flowing through our culture. Our political press that told voters my emails were the most important story. The unprecedented intervention in our election by the FBI director. The information warfare waged from within the Kremlin.”

She added that the “forces at work in the 2016 election in the United States are still with us” not only in the United States but around the world.

“We’re having a very important struggle in the United States right now,” Clinton said. “It’s difficult to fully grasp because there are 20 stories and people are getting overwhelmed by the strange goings on we are living through.”

What’s very funny is that Hillary and her fans still complain about Trump winning the election and they continue to “resist” the election results. The resistance to accepting the presidential election results shows a great weakness and an ignorant amount of arrogance on one side of politics.

Donald Trump needs support from the politicians who work for him and even those who challenge him. Constructive criticism is good, but blatant ignorance and delusional sideshows show where true failure is and those people who participate in the shenanigans are the same people halting further progress for Americans.

Will Hillary ever move out of the United States? No one truly knows but her. She might be more likely to move if there’s any chance of her facing legal charges for any of her alleged crimes. If she’s about to be prosecuted and finds out about it earlier than expected, then she might get in a plane and really leave for New Zealand.

Will she like it there? No one knows that either. These are all unknown bits of information until Hillary Clinton reveals them herself. Of course, that’s if citizens find out on the mainstream media when something happens legally. Although many people find Hillary Clinton to be untouchable, so the people she worked with might be the first to suffer any legal penalties for various incidents, in particular, the alleged $84 million that was laundered and recently reported on.

Please share this on social media to let your friends know about Hillary’s joke! They might get excited. To be serious with them, use this as a way to start a friendly conversation about what will happen to Hillary Clinton regarding the alleged crimes that she’s being looked at for.

Share and comment this funny story!

Source:rwnofficial.com

FEC COURT DOCUMENTS REVEAL BIG PROBLEMS FOR THE DNC AND HILLARY

Hillary

The media seems to be once again showing their bias against President Trump. They pounced in Friday’s news cycle on the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia. But there was almost nothing in the news of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

YOU CAN READ DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE LAWSUIT HERE.

The latter lawsuit summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, discovered there was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”

Backer filed an 86-page complaint with the FEC against Clinton, her campaign and its treasurer, the DNC and its treasurer, and the participating state Democratic committees. The complaint detailed the misconduct and provided concrete evidence supporting the allegations.

In a nutshell, the evidence suggests that Clinton, the DNC, and participating state Democratic committees established the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) as a joint fundraising committee to accept contributions from large donors, some exceeding $400,000. 

FEC records show several large contributions reported as received by the HVF and the same amount on the same day (or occasionally the following day) recorded as received by the DNC from a state Democratic committee, but without the state Democratic committee ever reporting the contribution.

For more than a year, FEC records show some 30 separate occasions when the HVF transferred contributions totaling more than $10 million to the DNC without any corresponding record of the receipt or disbursement from the state parties. They illegally jumped right over the state Democratic parties. 

According to Politico, “[w]hile state party officials were made aware that Clinton’s campaign would control the movement of the funds between participating committees, one operative who has relationships with multiple state parties said that some of their officials have complained that they weren’t notified of the transfers into and out of their accounts until after the fact.”

It seems that the Clinton campaign was in total control of the transfer of funds and used the party as a “fundraising clearinghouse.”

Former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile acknowledged that “[a]s Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.”

If you wish to read more click here. 

The Supreme Court made evident in the 2014 case, McCutcheon v. FEC, that this exact scenario would violate the law. 

Even with this wave of evidence concerning campaign-finance criminality—more than $84 million—the media instead chose on Friday to chase the story of Trump’s $130,000 payment through Cohen to Stormy Daniels. 

Credit: The Federalist,redbluedivide.com

JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Image result for JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Things are about to get really interesting in the Clinton household.

As it turns out fired FBI director James Comey had Hillary Clinton’s backup email device the entire 2016 election cycle but never bothered to searched it. But today thanks to the work of citizen researcher Larry Kawa, the determination of Congressman Ron DeSantis, and the lawyers of Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch, a court ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss ordered the State Department to hand over the contents of the backup device by September 2018. That’s right before the coveted midterm elections where Democrats believe they will be able to win back the house and senate from the Republicans.

This finding apparently came about when the company Hillary Clinton’s used to store her emails, Platte River Networks, subcontracted to a company in Connecticut called Datto. Datto backed up the vast majority of Clinton’s deleted emails, text messages, and other electronic communications and handed six disks containing information to the FBI in October 2015. One of those disks contains at least a great many of her 30 thousand missing emails.

Comey turned the disks over to the State Department, which has been compelled to search them and release the contents.

Attorneys for Judicial Watch stated:

“The documents are part of the accelerated schedule of production ordered by U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg, which requires the State Department to complete processing by September 28, 2018, the remaining documents of the 72,000 pages recovered by the FBI in its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server. These new classified and other emails appear to be among those that Clinton had attempted to delete or had otherwise failed to disclose.”

So it looks like the mystery of the deleted Clinton emails has now been solved thanks to a company which was contracted by a third party to back up information. Let’s hope the information can all be read within the time between September and November so people can have the true facts about what went on in those emails that Hillary so didn’t want us to see. Somehow I very much doubt it has anything to do with Yoga or Chelsea’s multi-million dollar wedding.

Here is what only 22 of those emails revealed via GOPUSA:

“Digging up the Dems’ buried scandal?

The letter written by several House Republicans to Attorney General Jeff Sessions – and to FBI Directory Christopher Wray and U.S. Attorney John Huber – by several House Republicans asks him to open an investigation into Comey, Clinton and other DOJ officials involved in the Russia probe … accusing them of a coordinated bias.

”We write to refer [Comey, Clinton and DOJ members] for investigation of potential violation(s) of federal statutes … [and] are especially mindful of the dissimilar degrees of zealousness that has marked the investigations into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, respectively,” the letter signed by 11 GOP lawmakers on Wednesday reads. “Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately.”

Besides seeking to get to the bottom of Clinton’s alleged criminal behavior, the letter is also looking to open the door on the current controversy revolving around Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who many believe Trump is poised to fire.

“The accusations of political bias toward President Donald Trump are related to events that contributed to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 US election,” the Business Insider reported. “Comey, whom Trump fired last May, was accused of mishandling the investigation in Clinton’s private email server and for leaking classified information of private discussions he had with Trump.”

The letter first mentions how Comey prematurely walked away from investigating Clinton – with criminal evidence stacked against her.

“Incredibly, [Comey’s] judgment [that no reasonable prosecutor would bring a criminal case against Clinton] appears to have been made prior to interviewing Secretary Clinton and as many as 17 key witnesses – including Clinton’s closest aides,” the letter continues. “Comey’s decision to not seek charges against Clinton’s misconduct suggests improper investigative conduct, potentially motivated by a political agenda.”

The letter requesting the probe comes just a day after Comey’s new Trump-bashing book hit bookstores across the nation.

“Comey specifically said in public testimony that he did not coordinate with the DOJ for his July 2016 public recommendation not to pursue charges against Clinton,” Fox News’ Catherine Herridge reported. “Meadows, however, pointed to a series of messages he claims indicate potential coordination at several ‘crucial moments of the investigation’ – including the July statement and the period in February. While the FBI is part of the Justice Department and communication between the two agencies is inevitable, Meadows’ letter also suggests some at the FBI were concerned about the perception it was not acting independently in a politically explosive case.”

Justice put on hold for political purposes?

In one of the recently uncovered messages, former Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Gregory Starr communicated to FBI Head of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap that the State Department was getting ready to punish the people who had misplaced the sensitive messages.

“The Department of State is prepared to take appropriate administrative action for any instances of mishandling of classified information in accordance with our own internal processes,” Starr wrote in a message dated Feb. 8, 2016, according to Fox News.

Yet justice would be put on hold … possibly indefinitely.

“However, the official added that the department did not want to hinder the ongoing FBI investigation and – if instructed – would postpone the ‘administrative action’ over the emails until after the bureau’s case had concluded,” Herridge noted.

The following revealing note written on Feb. 13 – just five days later – by an unidentified senior DOJ official addressed to FBI agent Peter Strzok, FBI criminal division official Jonathan Moffa, the FBI Office of General Counsel and members of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia was also discovered.

“Wanted to make sure that DOJ is kept in the loop as response is drafted,” the unnamed official in the DOJ’s National Security Division impressed in the note, according to Fox. “We have discussed a bit more here at CES [the DOJ’s counterintelligence and export control section] and have some additional thoughts on the best response on the admin action question. Can we make sure we discuss as a group as response is put together?”

It should be noted that the head of CES, David Laufman, left the DOJ earlier this year in February because of “personal reasons,” and essentially nothing has been done to look into the new possibly incriminating evidence.

“The State Department took no immediate administrative action over the 22 ‘Top Secret’ emails on Clinton’s email server,” Herridge pointed out. “Many of those involved in the matter had left the department by the time the FBI investigation closed in July 2016.”

After being buried while former President Barack Obama remained in office, efforts are being made under the Trump administration to get to the bottom of things concerning Clinton’s email scandal.

“Meadows has gotten support for his inquiry from House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.,” Herridge informed. “On Wednesday, Gowdy asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to review allegations of coordination between the FBI and the Justice Department in the Clinton investigation.”

Caught in the web?

A number of key Democrats and others serving under the Obama administration could find themselves in serious trouble in the courtroom in the near future.

“Along with Comey and Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, former Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, and FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were named in the letter,” the Business Insider’s Pat Ralph and Sonam Sheth pointed out.

From attempted cover-ups to intentionally misleading investigations, many Clinton sympathizers and alleged anti-Trump conspirators could be facing serious consequences in the upcoming months.

“Lynch was accused of threatening reprisal of an FBI informant who attempted to present the Justice Department with information on the Uranium One deal in 2016,” Ralph and Sheth recounted. “Along with Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Boente were all accused of presenting false information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with approving surveillance of former Trump aide Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).”

And things can get even worse for a number of them.

“McCabe and Yates, both of whom were fired, approved a FISA warrant on Page, [not to mention that] McCabe was also accused of political bias and lack of candor in his handling of the Clinton investigation,” Ralph and Sheth stressed. “Strzok and Page were also accused of interfering in the Clinton investigation.”

H/T Great American Politics,rwnofficial.com

Trump Announces Plan to Legally ‘Seize’ Servers Of DNC, DWS & Hillary’s Emails That She Refused to Surrender to FBI

Image result for Trump Announces Plan to Legally ‘Seize’ Servers Of DNC, DWS & Hillary’s Emails That She Refused to Surrender to FBI

Just when the left was hopeful that the whole Clinton server investigation was in the past, news has broken that President Trump may have a few tricks up his sleeve. Breitbart News reported that after President Trump heard the news that the Democratic Party was suing his campaign for “Russian collusion” in the 2016 presidential election, he felt it was time to pull out the big guns when it comes to DNC’s email server.

It was reported by CNBC that the ridiculous lawsuit that the Democrats have concocted claims that President Trump’s campaign worked with Russia and WikiLeaks in order to discredit his opponent, Hillary Clinton, by releasing her emails… It sounds too ridiculous to even be true, but that’s the Democratic Party for you.

President Trump had the perfect response to the suit… He has reportedly threatened to bring Hillary Clinton’s infamous email server back into the game.

REPORT: Hillary Whined On Election Night; “They Were Never Going To Let Me Be President”

As reported in the new book from Amy Chozick, Clinton knew her campaign was doomed early on.

Chozick covered the Clinton campaign from the beginning, giving her book some unique insights and perspectives into the campaign that would fall hard and without grace.

Hillary is alleged to have made multiple melancholy remarks in regards to her faith in the campaign’s success, and they’re all really cringy…

Here are a few:

According to the book, Hillary declared. “You know, I am getting pretty tired of hearing about how nobody likes me.”

“‘Oh, what’s the point? They’re never going to like me.”

Recounting the evening Hillary’s infamous ‘deplorables’ shtick went public, Clinton told aides, “I really messed up.

Chozick writes, “Robby, drained and deflated, watching the results with his team in a room down the hall from Hillary’s suite, labored into the hallway of the Peninsula to break the news. Hillary didn’t seem all that surprised. ‘I knew it. I knew this would happen to me….’ Hillary said, now within a couple of inches of his face. ‘They were never going to let me be president.’”

Another interesting note Chozick brings up is Hillary’s furious reaction to the prospect of a Joe Biden Presidential run.

She writes that “Biden had confided (off the record) to the White House press corps that he wanted to run, but he added something like ‘You guys don’t understand these people. The Clintons will try to destroy me.’”

Boy, did Biden dodge a bullet there! (No pun intended)

Do you think Hillary knew she had lost early on? Your thoughts below!

Source:ilovemyfreedom.org

JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Image result for JUST IN: Federal Judge Orders Release Of Hillary’s Found Deleted Emails

Things are about to get really interesting in the Clinton household.

As it turns out fired FBI director James Comey had Hillary Clinton’s backup email device the entire 2016 election cycle but never bothered to searched it. But today thanks to the work of citizen researcher Larry Kawa, the determination of Congressman Ron DeSantis, and the lawyers of Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch, a court ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss ordered the State Department to hand over the contents of the backup device by September 2018. That’s right before the coveted midterm elections where Democrats believe they will be able to win back the house and senate from the Republicans.

This finding apparently came about when the company Hillary Clinton’s used to store her emails, Platte River Networks, subcontracted to a company in Connecticut called Datto. Datto backed up the vast majority of Clinton’s deleted emails, text messages, and other electronic communications and handed six disks containing information to the FBI in October 2015. One of those disks contains at least a great many of her 30 thousand missing emails.

Comey turned the disks over to the State Department, which has been compelled to search them and release the contents.

Attorneys for Judicial Watch stated:

“The documents are part of the accelerated schedule of production ordered by U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg, which requires the State Department to complete processing by September 28, 2018, the remaining documents of the 72,000 pages recovered by the FBI in its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illicit email server. These new classified and other emails appear to be among those that Clinton had attempted to delete or had otherwise failed to disclose.”

So it looks like the mystery of the deleted Clinton emails has now been solved thanks to a company which was contracted by a third party to back up information. Let’s hope the information can all be read within the time between September and November so people can have the true facts about what went on in those emails that Hillary so didn’t want us to see. Somehow I very much doubt it has anything to do with Yoga or Chelsea’s multi-million dollar wedding.

Here is what only 22 of those emails revealed via GOPUSA:

“Digging up the Dems’ buried scandal?

The letter written by several House Republicans to Attorney General Jeff Sessions – and to FBI Directory Christopher Wray and U.S. Attorney John Huber – by several House Republicans asks him to open an investigation into Comey, Clinton and other DOJ officials involved in the Russia probe … accusing them of a coordinated bias.

”We write to refer [Comey, Clinton and DOJ members] for investigation of potential violation(s) of federal statutes … [and] are especially mindful of the dissimilar degrees of zealousness that has marked the investigations into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, respectively,” the letter signed by 11 GOP lawmakers on Wednesday reads. “Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately.”

Besides seeking to get to the bottom of Clinton’s alleged criminal behavior, the letter is also looking to open the door on the current controversy revolving around Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who many believe Trump is poised to fire.

“The accusations of political bias toward President Donald Trump are related to events that contributed to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 US election,” the Business Insider reported. “Comey, whom Trump fired last May, was accused of mishandling the investigation in Clinton’s private email server and for leaking classified information of private discussions he had with Trump.”

The letter first mentions how Comey prematurely walked away from investigating Clinton – with criminal evidence stacked against her.

“Incredibly, [Comey’s] judgment [that no reasonable prosecutor would bring a criminal case against Clinton] appears to have been made prior to interviewing Secretary Clinton and as many as 17 key witnesses – including Clinton’s closest aides,” the letter continues. “Comey’s decision to not seek charges against Clinton’s misconduct suggests improper investigative conduct, potentially motivated by a political agenda.”

The letter requesting the probe comes just a day after Comey’s new Trump-bashing book hit bookstores across the nation.

“Comey specifically said in public testimony that he did not coordinate with the DOJ for his July 2016 public recommendation not to pursue charges against Clinton,” Fox News’ Catherine Herridge reported. “Meadows, however, pointed to a series of messages he claims indicate potential coordination at several ‘crucial moments of the investigation’ – including the July statement and the period in February. While the FBI is part of the Justice Department and communication between the two agencies is inevitable, Meadows’ letter also suggests some at the FBI were concerned about the perception it was not acting independently in a politically explosive case.”

Justice put on hold for political purposes?

In one of the recently uncovered messages, former Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Gregory Starr communicated to FBI Head of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap that the State Department was getting ready to punish the people who had misplaced the sensitive messages.

“The Department of State is prepared to take appropriate administrative action for any instances of mishandling of classified information in accordance with our own internal processes,” Starr wrote in a message dated Feb. 8, 2016, according to Fox News.

Yet justice would be put on hold … possibly indefinitely.

“However, the official added that the department did not want to hinder the ongoing FBI investigation and – if instructed – would postpone the ‘administrative action’ over the emails until after the bureau’s case had concluded,” Herridge noted.

The following revealing note written on Feb. 13 – just five days later – by an unidentified senior DOJ official addressed to FBI agent Peter Strzok, FBI criminal division official Jonathan Moffa, the FBI Office of General Counsel and members of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia was also discovered.

“Wanted to make sure that DOJ is kept in the loop as response is drafted,” the unnamed official in the DOJ’s National Security Division impressed in the note, according to Fox. “We have discussed a bit more here at CES [the DOJ’s counterintelligence and export control section] and have some additional thoughts on the best response on the admin action question. Can we make sure we discuss as a group as response is put together?”

It should be noted that the head of CES, David Laufman, left the DOJ earlier this year in February because of “personal reasons,” and essentially nothing has been done to look into the new possibly incriminating evidence.

“The State Department took no immediate administrative action over the 22 ‘Top Secret’ emails on Clinton’s email server,” Herridge pointed out. “Many of those involved in the matter had left the department by the time the FBI investigation closed in July 2016.”

After being buried while former President Barack Obama remained in office, efforts are being made under the Trump administration to get to the bottom of things concerning Clinton’s email scandal.

“Meadows has gotten support for his inquiry from House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.,” Herridge informed. “On Wednesday, Gowdy asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to review allegations of coordination between the FBI and the Justice Department in the Clinton investigation.”

Caught in the web?

A number of key Democrats and others serving under the Obama administration could find themselves in serious trouble in the courtroom in the near future.

“Along with Comey and Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, former Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, and FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were named in the letter,” the Business Insider’s Pat Ralph and Sonam Sheth pointed out.

From attempted cover-ups to intentionally misleading investigations, many Clinton sympathizers and alleged anti-Trump conspirators could be facing serious consequences in the upcoming months.

“Lynch was accused of threatening reprisal of an FBI informant who attempted to present the Justice Department with information on the Uranium One deal in 2016,” Ralph and Sheth recounted. “Along with Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Boente were all accused of presenting false information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with approving surveillance of former Trump aide Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).”

And things can get even worse for a number of them.

“McCabe and Yates, both of whom were fired, approved a FISA warrant on Page, [not to mention that] McCabe was also accused of political bias and lack of candor in his handling of the Clinton investigation,” Ralph and Sheth stressed. “Strzok and Page were also accused of interfering in the Clinton investigation.”

H/T Great American Politics,rwnofficial.com

Just In: Hillary Walks Into Trap -Trump To Countersue Democrats … ‘Let’s See Their Server’

Image result for Just In: Hillary Walks Into Trap -Trump To Countersue Democrats … ‘Let’s See Their Server’

It didn’t take a genius to predict President Trump’s response to the announcement by Democratic National Committee Chairmen Tom Perez yesterday.

Perez, in what was either a case sophomoric stupidity, or an intra-party powerplay released a written statement:

“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign.

“This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery: the campaign of a nominee for President of the United States in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency.”

If Tom really believes that then he’s suing the wrong campaign. 

Or, perhaps Perez is using the lawsuit as a way to finally cleanse the party that he is responsible for of all the Obama-ites and Clintonoids that are dragging it down. 

If that’s the case then he’s got President Trump to do his dirty work.

Don Jr. got the ball rolling when he suggested that discovery would work in his favor:

Yesterday, after Perez’s announcement, we wrote that “It’s a pretty fair bet that Trump’s cyber forensic team are salivating at getting their hands on the “hacked” DNC server and Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s laptop and records on the Awan brothers. 

And, Trump did exactly as we predicted last evening when he posted this to Twitter:

Perez had to have known President Trump, known as an incredible counter-puncher, would react in this manner.  He also knows that the sins of the Obama-Clinton loyalists couldn’t be kept secret much longer. 

Is this Perez’s attempt to solidify his control of the Democratic Party and drag it even farther towards socialism, this time by running openly socialist candidates?

At times like this I’m reminded of the words of the Democrat standard-bearer, Franklin D. Roosevelt:

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

Source: fbnewsupdate.com

Hillary’s Lawyer Grows Conscious & Drops Bombshell, Turns Over Evidence That Exposes Comey’s & McCabe’s Big Secret

Bill O’Reilly and Lanny Davis are two seasoned warriors from opposite sides of the political aisle.  Now that they are pretty much out of the fray their ability to hold an honest discussion can be quite revealing.

Davis, who served both Clinton’s loyally opened up to O’Reilly about James Comey as the disgraced former FBI director prepares to embark on his blame Trump tour.  Davis says the Inspector General has some incriminating evidence regarding Comey’s handling of the HRC email investigation because he (Davis) gave it to him:

“I was interviewed by the Inspector General. I have only told one reporter that and it was never written. This is my first time to say that I was interviewed after, I, making a phone call and researching my book, that I consider James Comey to have acted unethically and he should have been fired by Barack Obama and Loretta Lynch because he violated Justice Department policies by holding a press conference and expressing his opinion publicly on the evidence. That’s a firing offense.  His decision to write a letter eleven days before the election, that hurt Clinton or hurt Trump was not consistent with fifty years of Justice Department policy to do nothing that might impact the presidential election.

[I told the Inspector General] and I gave them documents that were never seen before but posted two months after the election, that showed that the whole email investigation was botched. So, I think that’s where I think the Inspector General will come down on Comey very hard as well as on McCabe.”

Start clip at 7:34 for partial transcript below.

Video Player

Source:fbnewscycle.com