Criminal Referral for McCabe Signals Takedown of Entire Obama DOJ & FBI Coming Next

Related image

Last month former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was the subject of the Office of Inspector General’s initial 39-page report.  As a result, he was fired following the recommendation of the Office of Professional Responsibility.

That report, compiled by Obama appointee Michael Horowitz, was released last week.  Today, the Department of Justice’s internal watchdog sent a criminal referral to the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington citing McCabe’s wrongdoing.

Anyone who thinks, or hopes, this is the end of any future criminal referrals of high-level Obama appointees running the DOJ or FBI is whistling past the graveyard.

It’s a virtual certainty that the illegalities outlined in the initial report were only a hint of the criminal appropriation of the investigative powers of the two powerful agencies under the leadership of Obama’s minions.

There’s a reason that IG Horowitz has had nearly 500 investigators unraveling the extent of the Obama era corruption of the Justice Department for the past year and it wasn’t to compile a simple report with a single target.

There’s also a reason that President Trump announced the addition of former federal prosecutor and NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani to his legal team earlier today.  Thirty-five years ago, as U.S.  Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Giuliani spearheaded the fight against organized crime and broke the web of corruption in government.  His prosecution of white-collar criminals also made him a legend that few US Attorneys in history can match.

Remember, Guiliani’s relationship with the New York office of the FBI as well as with the NYPD was forged under extreme circumstances when he was the mayor following 9/11.  Relationships that strong have provided him with access to the evidence on Anthony Weiner’s laptop.  That includes 650,000 of Hillary Clinton’s emails, most likely including those that she erased.  It is likely Rudy has already completed an extensive mapping of the Obama-Clinton crime family and is coming in prepared to hit the ground running.

Giuliani’s record and experience probably makes him the most qualified candidate to direct John Huber’s efforts in prosecuting the case against not just the DOJ and the FBI but also the corporate executives, government employees in other agencies, and those leaders in foreign governments that had colluded to defraud American workers and taxpayers under Obama’s reign. 

John Huber is the Utah-based prosecutor that Jeff Sessions appointed to prosecute the OIG’s findings.  Huber’s appointment adds teeth to the Inspector General’s effort because he can convene grand juries, subpoena people not, or no longer working for the DOJ or the FBI which the IG isn’t empowered to do.

We’ve been speculating about when Rudy Giuliani, a close friend and confidant of President Trump’s, would surface.  His expertise in prosecuting this massive case, coupled with his absence for public life had us sure he was doing his legwork in anonymity. 

After we read the initial OIG report we wrote that we were on the verge of a huge political explosion.  Following the initial report it became obvious that the full OIG report would be damning.  The addition of a resurfaced Rudy Giuliani only adds to the certainty that the Obama-Clinton crime family is about to prosecuted.

Oh yeah, do you remember when all of this was fake news back when we started reporting it?

Source: fbnewsupdate.com

FBI IS BRACING FOR IMPACT: INSPECTOR GENERAL ANNOUNCES RELEASE DATE FOR REPORT

Inspector General

The DOJ inspector general, Michael Horowitz, will release the long-awaited report on the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation in May, according to Catherine Herridge of Fox News. 

Horowitz wrote about the release in a letter to Senator Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. He said that the report, which began in January of 2017, has been extended because of “potentially important additional information and documents that recently came to our attention, and the interviews they have required us to conduct.”

Horowitz continued, “my expectation is that we will issue our report in May, absent any new developments.”…

The inspector general has apparently focused on political bias and how evidence was handled in the Clinton email case. According to the Washington Post, the report will also look into McCabe’s possible failure to pursue a probe into the Clinton case. 

The IG has looked at why Andrew McCabe, the #2 official at the FBI, did not act on a request to examine a load of Clinton related emails for three weeks while in the latter stages of the 2016 presidential campaign. 

Horowitz has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the emails found on the laptop of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) until late October, three weeks after they were first alerted to them.

A prominent question is whether McCabe or anyone else in the FBI wanted to avoid action until after the November 8th election. The investigation seemed to stall right at McCabe’s desk. Some within the FBI felt McCabe had repeatedly moved to hinder that probe and were suspicious of his motives for doing so, according to people familiar with the case.

Horowitz released a report last week which revealed that McCabe lied under oath to FBI investigators about approving the leaks to the Wall Street Journal. And according to that report, a WSJ reporter had information claiming McCabe had issued a stand-down order related to the Clinton Foundation probe. 

Will even more heads roll at the FBI when this report is released? What do you think Clinton’s response is going to be?

Credit: Hot Air,redbluedivide.com

FBI’s Unethical Raid of Trump Lawyer’s Office Has Already BACKFIRED on Mueller In a Huge Way

Following Monday’s FBI raid on the home and office of President Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, a poll was released by Rasmussen. This particular poll found that American voters are becoming more and more suspicious of the “Trump/Russia collusion” investigation, and are starting to think that there was more to the motivations behind it’s inception.

President Trump’s insistence that the entire thing was a “witch hunt” may be proving to be true after all, and things aren’t looking so good for special counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation. Out of 1,000 likely voters who were polled, less than half of them believed that Robert Mueller’s investigation is characterized as an “honest attempt to determine wrongdoing,” Rasmussen found.

In the meantime, a much higher number of people polled feel that it is a “partisan witch hunt,” vs the amount of people who felt this way back in October when a similar survey was conducted.

Neither one of the polls makes the Democrats look good, and it’s definitely not doing any favors for the mainstream media’s attempts to try and impeach President Trump.

Rasmussen reported“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 46% of Likely U.S. Voters still believe Mueller’s investigation is an honest attempt to determine criminal wrongdoing, but that’s down from 52% last October. Forty percent (40%) now consider Mueller’s probe a partisan witch hunt, an eight-point increase from 32% in the earlier survey. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided.”

It’s beginning to look like the FBI raid on Cohen’s office is going to backfire on Mueller in a big way, but only time will tell just how big.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Judge Who Refused Trump’s Request For a Review of Legally Protected Materials Seized in FBI Raid of His Lawyer Officiated George Soros’ Wedding

The ‘New World Order’, and it’s face, George Soros, have decided to completely uncloak and stop even pretending to abide by the law.  What happened today will echo in history …

The Gateway Pundit Reports: Kimba Wood, the federal judge overseeing the Cohen-Trump case rejected Trump’s request for a temporary restraining order on materials seized after KGB FBI agents raided Cohen’s properties. 

FBI agents raided Cohen’s home and office looking for dirt on Stormy Daniels and seized attorney-client privileged communications between Trump and Cohen.

On Friday, President Trump was officially granted intervention in the Cohen case.

Late Sunday night, President Trump opposed allowing the government to review materials seized by FBI KBG agents in their raid of Michael Cohen’s properties in a court filing.

Federal Judge Kimba Wood made her decision on Monday.

She rejected Trump’s request for a temporary restraining order.

ABC reported:

A federal judge rejected a request from President Donald Trump and his personal lawyer Michael Cohen for a temporary restraining order that would have kept federal prosecutors from reading files seized in raids last week.

Judge Kimba Wood said a government taint team can weed out privileged documents, but she left open the possibility an independent third party could play a role at a later time, in the interest of “the perception of fairness.”

“I have faith in the Southern District prosecutors, that their integrity is unimpeachable,” Wood said.

Her ruling came at the end of a hearing attended by Cohen and Stormy Daniels, who sat feet apart but did not appear to interact.

How’s this for a fun fact? The same federal judge who just rejected Trump’s request for a temporary restraining order, officiated George Soros’ wedding in 2013. Read More @ Gateway Pundit

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Hannity’s ethics under fire

Sean Hannity is pictured. | Getty Images

Fox News host’s failure to disclose his relationship with Trump attorney Michael Cohen puts his credibility on the line.

Sean Hannity has wavered over the years on whether he is a journalist or conservative activist, but ethics specialists say that whichever hat the Fox News host was wearing last week when he condemned the FBI raid on attorney Michael Cohen’s office, he should have disclosed that he’s a client of Cohen’s.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re a newspaper reporter or an opinion journalist,” said Indira Lakshmanan, the journalism ethics chair at the Poynter Institute. “If you want to maintain credibility with an audience, and be honest with them, you have to disclose all facts.”

Just hours after the raid on the office of Cohen, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Hannity inveighed that special counsel Robert Mueller had “declared war against the president of the United States.” But Hannity didn’t disclose that he, too, had received legal advice from Cohen. Hannity’s relationship with the embattled attorney was revealed during Monday’s hearing over materials gathered during the raid — and only after a judge pressed Cohen’s attorney on the identity of a previously unnamed third client.

The omission raised questions about whether Hannity had violated journalistic ethics — or whether he was a journalist at all.

Hannity has shifted in recent years on that point. “I never claimed to be a journalist,” Hannity told The New York Times in 2016 when asked about his informal advising of then-candidate Trump. The next year, Hannity referred to himself in a Times magazine profile as an “opinion journalist” or “advocacy journalist.” He said last month that his show “breaks news daily” in response to colleague Shep Smith characterizing Fox News’ prime-time lineup as entertainment.

Kathleen Bartzen Culver, director of the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin, said you don’t “move out of the realm of ethics when we move into the realm of opinion.” She said commentators should still be expected to maintain independence from subjects they are covering and disclose relevant ties.

“This is not a small matter,” she said. “We’re talking about one of the most important new stories of this time and he did not disclose his connection to it while commenting on it. His audience deserves to know when he has connections that may be affecting that commentary.”

Bartzen Culver added: “An organization needs to have standards for the people who do its reporting or commenting.”

Hannity, the top-rated Fox News host and an especially influential voice in the Trump era, appears to have few constraints at the network. He immediately began discussing the Cohen situation on his afternoon radio show and tweeted responses to the controversy.

A Fox News spokesperson did not directly respond to a question about Hannity not disclosing his relationship to Cohen, but provided a statement from the host.

“Michael Cohen has never represented me in any matter. I never retained him, received an invoice, or paid legal fees,” Hannity said. “I have occasionally had brief discussions with him about legal questions about which I wanted his input and perspective. I assumed those conversations were confidential, but to be absolutely clear they never involved any matter between me and a third party.”

On Twitter, Hannity disputed reporting by Vanity Fair’s Gabriel Sherman that he brought in Cohen last year when facing an advertiser boycott spurred by progressive groups over his fueling of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. “What part of Michael and I never discussed anything that involved any third party is so hard to understand?” Hannity tweeted.

On Fox News’ “The Five,” Juan Williams said there was no evidence Cohen was involved in any third-party disputes on Hannity’s behalf, as was the case with Trump and Republican National Committee Deputy Finance Chair Elliott Broidy. Cohen arranged to pay $130,000 to adult film star Stormy Daniels for her silence over an alleged affair with Trump and reportedly negotiated a $1.6 million payment to a former Playboy model who claimed Broidy impregnated her.

But Williams questioned why Hannity “didn’t disclose this earlier.”

“Why when Sean was on the air, strongly an advocate for President Trump, not saying, ‘Hey, I’ve got a relationship with the lawyer?’” Williams asked. “I think that’s a question.”

 Source:www.politico.com

BOOM: Benghazi Hero Responds PERFECTLY After The FBI Raids Trump Lawyer

Kris Paronto, a well-known survivor of the 2012 Benghazi attacks, dropped an incredible tweet after reports of President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, being raided by the FBI.

Kris Paronto said in a tweet, “Wait wait @FBI , you raid Trumps lawyer because a porn star’s allegations while you ignore the criminal clinton’s destruction of subpoenaed classified emails,using open servers to save and send classified info,Bill’s rape and sexual assault allegations&foundation $ laundering”

“And uranium one, and collusion with the @DNC to rig the democratic primary and assisting the transfer of Libyan arms to Syrian Rebels, and standing down the military response leaving us to die in Benghazi Libya… i could go on @HillaryClinton @jeffsessions @FBI,” Paronto added.

 

The raid comes just days after Donald Trump was questioned about Cohen’s payment to Trump’s accuser Stormy Daniels.

“You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael is my attorney, and you’ll have to ask Michael Cohen,” Trump replied when pressed on the Stormy Daniels payment.

As we reported at I Love My Freedom earlier, President Trump wasn’t happy about the Cohen raids, calling it a “disgraceful situation” and “an attack on our country.”

“I just heard that they broke into the office of one of my personal attorneys. Good man. And it’s a disgraceful situation. It’s a total witch hunt,” Trump said Monday to a pool of reporters.

“It’s an attack on our country,” Trump said. “It’s an attack on what we all stand for.”

It’s interesting how efficient the FBI seems to be when it comes to attacking the current President. Is this the “insurance policy” referred to by the Strzok texts?

Lou Dobbs released a tweet with a video about the raid, stating the raid on Cohen’s office proves Mueller is “acting in bad faith.”

On Twitter, people have been slamming the “witch hunt.”

“The FBI raided the home and offices of Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen over Stormy Daniels payments? I thought Mueller’s witch hunt was supposed to be about Russia…” tweeted one user.

How do you feel about the raid?

 

Source:ilovemyfreedom.org

FBI Informant Says Feds Asking NEW Questions About Crooked Hillary!…GAME ON!

Image result for FBI Informant Says Feds Asking NEW Questions About Crooked Hillary!…GAME ON!

FORMER FBI INFORMANT WAS QUESTIONED FOR FIVE HOURS ABOUT THE CLINTONS, URANIUM ONE AND THE CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE. IT’S GAME ON WHEN IT COMES TO CROOKED HILLARY!

Now that President Trump is in office, you may be asking yourself will justice be served when it comes to Crooked Hillary Clinton, her private email server, Uranium One, and all the other pay-to-play scandals tied to the Clinton Global Initiative?

President Trump is putting the ‘A Team’ back together. He’s assembled people like former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Victoria Toensing, along with prosecutor Joe DiGenova, and newly appointed National Security Advisor John Bolton. I’m sure you recognize some of those names from the Reagan era. So it’s game on when it comes to the Clintons. Trump means business.

The former FBI informant at the heart of the Russian Uranium scandal, William D. Campbell,  just gave an exclusive interview to The Hill Campbell was interviewed for FIVE HOURS about the Crooked Hillary Clinton by Toesning and team. They are NOT messing around when it comes to dealing with high crimes in high places. Campbell can deliver the goods when it comes to the Clintons and their bribery schemes related to the Clinton Global Initiative. In fact Campbell has collected over 5,000 documents over a six-year period.

According to ‘The Hill’ and ‘Zero Hedge’ in January, the Little Rock FBI field office opened a new investigation into the Clintons and their various charitable foundations – focusing on pay-for-play schemes and tax code violations, according to law enforcement officials and a witness who wishes to remain anonymous.

The officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the probe is examining whether the Clintons promised or performed any policy favors in return for largesse to their charitable efforts or whether donors made commitments of donations in hopes of securing government outcomes.

The probe may also examine whether any tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use and whether the Foundation complied with applicable tax laws, the officials said. –The Hill (1/4/2018)

Campbell told The Hill that the Arkansas agents specifically asked about donations to the Clinton charitable trusts:

Campbell said he was asked specifically about whether donations to the Clintons charitable efforts were used to influence U.S. nuclear policy during the Obama year, and that agents questioned him extensively about claims the Russians made to him thatthey had routed millions of dollars to an American lobbying firm in 2010 and 2011 with the expectation it would be used to help President Clinton’s charitable global initiative while major uranium decisions were pending before Hillary Clinton’s State Department. –The Hill

As Campbell states,

They were looking into the Clintons, and the information that I provided to them about the Clintons and about what was said and confirmed by Russian leadership seemed to be very important to them.

In February, Campbell gave closed-door testimony to three Congressional panels – which Congressional Democrats Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings wrote, smearing Campbell as he suffered from cognitive issues due to chemotherapy.

The former CIA and FBI asset dismissed the Democrats’ attacks as partisan.

I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. I’m not an independent. I am a damn American,” he said. “I’d like to remind those Democratic staff members who wrote that interview summary that none of ’em have ever worked undercover as a confidential informant … and put themselves in clear and present danger with Russian criminals who are breaking U.S. law.”

FBI INFORMANT CAMPBELL IS SMEARED BY THE DRIVE BY MEDIA

Moreover, after details of Campbell’s undercover work for the FBI first emerged in an October 2017 report by The Hill – which did not divulge his name, Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News and Joel Schectman of Reuters published articles smearing Campbell, saying he was “so unreliable that prosecutors dropped him as a witness” in a case unrelated to his undercover work – while two “senior officials” within the Justice Department fed Congressional investigators the same thing during a December 15 briefing.

Both statements were lies, as the case was related to Campbell’s undercover work, and he was dropped as a witness after the Baltimore U.S. Attorney’s office botched their case – which Campbell’s testimony would have weakened.

FBI INFORMANT CAMPBELL CLEARLY HAS CHARACTER ASSASSINATION BY THE FBI OFFICIALS

In response to the smears, Victoria Toensing fired off a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Tuesday demanding an investigation into Campbell’s character assassination mainly by officials at the FBI- CC’ing DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, along with several Congressional Investigators and others involved in the matter.

Click here for Toensing’s letter.

WITH FBI INFORMANT CAMPBELL, THE ‘A TEAM’ AND TRUMP,  IT’S GAME ON BEYOTCHES!

The FBI officials and the MSM PURPOSELY assassinated William Campbell’s character. They publicly displayed his name as an undercover and destroyed his reputation so that he could no longer work.  That sure sounds like the Clintons and their supporters doesn’t it. If they don’t get want they want from you, they destroy you and your reputation or worse – just mysteriously get rid of you like Shawn Lucas, Seth Rich, Bernie Whisenant and others. Right Hillary?

It’s so convenient when you have so many scumbags working for you and putting money over principles, truth and justice in our country. But what do the Clintons care? They are all about the money! Which by the way, I must say, Crooked Hillary had a nice gig going until former FBI informant William Campbell came along or President Trump with his ‘A Team’. Talk about upsetting the apple cart. Now, it’s GAME ON Beyotches!

 

 

 

Resources: The Hill, ZeroHedge,joeforamerica.com

The FBI Just Blew the Hillary Clinton Case Wide Open. She Could Literally Be Going to Jail

Related image

That Hillary Clinton is a hypocrite, a crook and possibly even a murderer is already well known.

But the bombshell that the FBI just dropped could put her in the category of bonafide traitor.

The evidence being provided appears to confirm allegations contained in Peter Schweizer’s bestselling book Clinton Cash, which documents the corruption tactics employed by Hillary in 2010 when she pushed through Russia’s purchase of 20 percent of US uranium.

Yes, that’s right. Hillary has a dirty link to Russia. One that’s documented, unlike the spurious allegations of President Trump’s collision with Moscow.

The Hill reports:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

That the FBI failed to do something about this much earlier is a scandal in itself.

But even after the fact, the willing involvement of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in Russian economic corruption carried out on US soil is without question a punishable offense.

They both abused the power entrusted to them by the American people for their own benefit and for the benefit of foreign powers hostile to the United States.

Source:conservativepost.com

Fmr Asst. FBI Director: Brennan & Obama Were Committing Felonies … Not General Flynn (VIDEO)

It takes a lot of gall to stand up in front of the world and project your crimes onto the man now leading the free world and his team.  It does not stop former Obama officials from doing just this every day in the media.  Too bad for them Trump is a self-described ‘counter puncher’ …

Via Sunday Morning Futures: Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom told Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures that there was likely a “big sign of relief” after Andrew McCabe was fired on Friday.

Kallstrom went on to tell Maria Bartiromo that John Brennan and Barack Obama were the ones who committed the felonies and not General Flynn.

James Kallstrom: My sources tell me [Brennan] was leaking almost weekly or daily, and he was taking that bunch of phony crap supposedly from Russia, and peddling that through the Congress and the media, he was one of the active people. I’ve known him a long time and I think he’s involved, and quite frankly, I think it goes right to the top, quite frankly.

Maria Bartiromo: To President Obama?

James Kallstrom: It goes right to the top, and it involves that whole strategy. They were going to win [the 2016 election], nobody would ever know this stuff, and they just unleashed the intelligence community. Look at the unmasking? We haven’t even heard about that yet. Look at the way they violated the rights of these American citizens?… I hope Gen. Flynn sues a lot of people, because he was handled so bad… He didn’t lie to the FBI. They didn’t even interview him about a crime. They are the people who committed felonies, not the General.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

FBI AGЕNT GOЕS ROGUЕ – STUNS NATION WITH MAJOR ANNOUNCЕMЕNT

A longtime veteran of the FBI just spoke out to reveal the truth behind the 13 indictments White House Special Counsel Robert Mueller handed down last Friday.

Last week, Mueller’s office announced that a grand jury indicted 13 Russian nationals, along with 3 Russian entities, accused of “supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump … and disparaging Hillary Clinton.” The Gateway Pundit reported that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein admitted that no American had knowledge they were interacting with Russians who were posing as Americans; the outcome of the election wasn’t impacted.

This means that Trump’s campaign never did collude with Russia, just as the president has said all along. Now, reporter Paul Sperry has come forward to say that a veteran FBI agent told him that the 13 indictments by Mueller are moot and it was done for show to solely justify the Special Counsel’s existence and salary.

Sperry tweeted, “BREAKING: This just in from a veteran FBI C.I. official: ‘The 13 indictments by Mueller are moot. These subjects are all in Russia and will never be arrested or incarcerated. This is solely to justify his existence and salary. This is a ‘show’ indictment for public relations.’”

This comes after it was announced that Mueller has reportedly just expanded his investigation into Kushner’s business dealings with foreign investors during the presidential transition period. Bizpac Review reported that Mueller’s team has asked witnesses in interviews as recently as this month about Kushner’s negotiations for financing for a New York City office building owned by his family’s company, Kushner Companies.

These new inquiries indicate that Mueller’s interest in Kushner has grown beyond any contacts he had with Russians during the 2016 campaign. Mueller is especially interested in Kushner’s meetings just after the election with the chairman of Anbang Insurance, a Chinese company that purchased a stake in the Kushner Companies property at 666 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.

What do you think about this? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

From: Maxipolitics.com, trumptopteam.com