Trump Axes Obama 13 Billion-Dollar Deal in 2 Democrat States

While he was in office, former President Barack Obama worked out a $13 billion rail tunnel for two deep-blue Democrat states in which U.S. taxpayers would be paying for half of the bill. Luckily for the American people, President Donald Trump is in office now to put a stop to this overpriced project.

According to Fox News, the plan was supposed to renovate Amtrak tunnels and tracks between New York state and New Jersey that have fallen into disrepair.

Amtrak contends that these tracks and tunnels are so bad that they “could fail within 10 to 15 years, threatening daily rail transportation in the Northeast.”

However, the issue isn’t whether the repairs should be made. The issue is with who will pay for them.

Under the original plan, the costs would be split up three ways between New York state, New Jersey, and the federal government.

According to Fox, the two states have started to back out of their end of the deal. They now want to make up their payments using loans from the federal government. In other words, pay nothing at all for themselves up front, while the rest of the country picks up the tab for improvements to a transportation system overwhelmingly used by residents of New York, New Jersey and other Northeastern states.

As a result, according to Fox, K. Jane Williams — deputy administrator of the Federal Transit Administration — sent New York and New Jersey a letter stating “that the Obama-era deal was now ‘non-existent’ because the states recently requested that their portions be covered by loans from the federal government — meaning Washington would supply all of the initial funding for what the Trump White House is calling ‘a local project.’”

Of course, not everyone is happy about Williams’ letter — especially the Democrat states that were trying to get a deal from the taxpayers in the rest of the country.

According to Fox, Gateway Development Corp., the project overseer composed of representatives of New York, New Jersey and Amtrak called the federal letter “posturing” and said “we are confident that the Trump Administration will engage with us as the President turns to infrastructure in 2018.”

Social media users, though, questioned the reasoning of why other U.S. taxpayers should pay for something overwhelmingly benefits only two states.

Later this month, Trump is expected to unveil his 2018 $1 trillion national infrastructure plan.

This letter, though, leaves some doubt that these repairs will be part of it.

The states just need to pony up the money and help fix their own infrastructure. The federal government can help, but it’s time these liberal states pull their share of the load as well instead of putting the financial burden on the rest of the American taxpayers.

Source: BizPac Review,

Unbelievable! Congress Just Dropped Billion Dollar Cash Bombshell On Barack Obama, Americans Are Furious

That unbridled and unaccountable power is a defiling impact has been demonstrated. History points to interest this reality in agonizing and frequently sickening subtle element. While the corruption is very every now and again showed in pitilessness to a great many lives, it is considerably more typical in financial transactions. Give enough individuals enough influence and cash while legitimate experts look the other way, and you ensure financial fraud.

This poses a potential threat over the Clinton Foundation. Call it a slush-fund, a vehicle for taking bribes, a money laundering operation, or out and out fake, the one thing you can’t connect it with is uprightness. In any occasion, we are not shocked.

Neither should we be shocked that transactions between the major money-center commercial banks and the federal government amid the Obama administration were false. For this situation, the funds were occupied to liberal associations as opposed to twisting up where they should. These are not unimportant sums either. We’re discussing a billion dollars or more abused to associations supporting liberal causes. However, up until now, nobody had been held accountable. What’s more, individuals ask why our government funds are in absolute confuse?

“Emails written by Obama administration Department of Justice officials confirm reports the agency engaged in a systemic effort to funnel money to liberal advocacy organizations from settlements reached with big banks.


“The internal DOJ documents represent the latest revelation in a two-year investigation spearheaded by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte.”

Once more, take note of that nobody has been accused of this wrongdoing to date. That crooked government authorities do abnormal things isn’t an astonishment, despite the fact that the extent of the totals required here is staggering. Is particularly upsetting that the wrongdoing is intensified by the way that nobody is held accountable.

“The investigation has thus far yielded evidence implicating the Obama DOJ in using mandatory donations to funnel roughly $1 billion in settlement money to activist groups, including The National Council of La Raza, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition and the National Urban League.”

Being very much associated with effective liberal government officials positively has money related advantages.

Here’s the pathetically weak and fraudulent excuse given for funneling money to these groups: “The list of third party organizations were unrelated to the legal settlements, except through general claims that they would use the funds to aid the low income Americans most severely harmed by predatory lending practices.”

Right. Who trusts that hogwash? Furthermore, who trusts the accompanying jabber?

“Obama DOJ officials implicated in the effort have defended the settlements on the grounds that the banks made the donations willingly before signing the agreements. Critics allege, and documents suggest, the donations were prearranged and stipulated as requirement under the settlement deals.”

This could be investigated further, yet the point has been made. The Obama administration utilized the huge settlements separated from the banks that were blamed for misrepresentation amid the lodging emergency to improve liberal associations. This was done on the fraud affection that such associations spoke to methods for aiding those professedly harmed by the activities of those banks.

While it is far-fetched that any Obama administration authority will be punished for this act, in any event amid the Trump administration such corruption will be abridged.

Sessions’ remarks are obvious to the point that one may ask why they even should have been uttered.

The appropriate responses incorporate Obama period and liberal corruption.

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

Source: Daily Caller,