FEC COURT DOCUMENTS REVEAL BIG PROBLEMS FOR THE DNC AND HILLARY

Hillary

The media seems to be once again showing their bias against President Trump. They pounced in Friday’s news cycle on the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia. But there was almost nothing in the news of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

YOU CAN READ DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE LAWSUIT HERE.

The latter lawsuit summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, discovered there was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”

Backer filed an 86-page complaint with the FEC against Clinton, her campaign and its treasurer, the DNC and its treasurer, and the participating state Democratic committees. The complaint detailed the misconduct and provided concrete evidence supporting the allegations.

In a nutshell, the evidence suggests that Clinton, the DNC, and participating state Democratic committees established the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) as a joint fundraising committee to accept contributions from large donors, some exceeding $400,000. 

FEC records show several large contributions reported as received by the HVF and the same amount on the same day (or occasionally the following day) recorded as received by the DNC from a state Democratic committee, but without the state Democratic committee ever reporting the contribution.

For more than a year, FEC records show some 30 separate occasions when the HVF transferred contributions totaling more than $10 million to the DNC without any corresponding record of the receipt or disbursement from the state parties. They illegally jumped right over the state Democratic parties. 

According to Politico, “[w]hile state party officials were made aware that Clinton’s campaign would control the movement of the funds between participating committees, one operative who has relationships with multiple state parties said that some of their officials have complained that they weren’t notified of the transfers into and out of their accounts until after the fact.”

It seems that the Clinton campaign was in total control of the transfer of funds and used the party as a “fundraising clearinghouse.”

Former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile acknowledged that “[a]s Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.”

If you wish to read more click here. 

The Supreme Court made evident in the 2014 case, McCutcheon v. FEC, that this exact scenario would violate the law. 

Even with this wave of evidence concerning campaign-finance criminality—more than $84 million—the media instead chose on Friday to chase the story of Trump’s $130,000 payment through Cohen to Stormy Daniels. 

Credit: The Federalist,redbluedivide.com

FBI Turns Over To Congress Necessary Documents For Prosecution Of Hillary Clinton

The Federal Bureau of Investigation started the procedure of transferring hundreds of pages of memos and other records to Congress about the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of her private email server, reported The Hill.

Bob Goodlatte, head of the House Judiciary Committee and Trey Gowdy, chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee revealed during the past months that they want to question the Bureau about the decision to publicly investigate Clinton’s email server where it was shown that she obviously mishandled sensible data while not disclosing their probe into Trump’s campaign staff members about the alleged collusion with Russia.

There’s an obvious prejudice in investigating the uncorroborated accusations of a collusion between the Trump camp and Russia over Hillary’s confirmed mishandling of top-secret data.

“Decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 have led to a host of outstanding questions that must be answered,” Goodlatte and Gowdy said in a joint statement.

Nevertheless, this is only one of the problems the Bureau has. They also have to explain to Gowdy and Goodlatte how and why then-FBI Director James Comey begun the process of drafting Clinton’s acquittal statement prior to even making interviews with main witnesses.

From The Hill:

As The Hill reported, the FBI said they also want to know why the FBI decided to formally notify Congress of the Clinton probe on two separate occasions; why the FBI — rather than the Justice Department — recommended that Clinton not be charged after the investigation concluded; and the reasoning behind their timeline for announcing such decisions.

“The Committees will review these decisions and others to better understand the reasoning behind how certain conclusions were drawn. Congress has a constitutional duty to preserve the integrity of our justice system by ensuring transparency and accountability of actions taken,” their statement continued.

The FBI told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday that they would soon start giving over the requested records.

The release of the documents also comes as reports revealed that FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe recused himself from Clinton’s probe about a week before the general election in 2016. He was enticed to resign over questions regarding a possible conflict of interest including hundreds of thousands of dollars that were transferred to his wife’s political campaign from a Hillary Clinton associate.

WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS AND PREDICTIONS.

Source:www.nationalinsiderpatriot.com

BREAKING: NEW CLINTON DOCUMENTS REVEAL FBI HAS BEEN LYING FOR HER ALL ALONG (VIDEO)

clinton documents lynch tarmac fbi

Many Americans are furious at how Hillary Clinton has been able to get away with murder (quite literally). If any regular U.S. citizen did a third of what she did, they’d be sentenced to jail for life. It seems that the FBI has been complicit in her crimes as well, because it’s now been uncovered that they were hiding 30 pages of documents from the U.S. public.

The documents are related to the June 2016 airport tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, which has caused many to grow suspicious of our very own government. FBI lawyers begrudgingly admitted their existence, only after Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act.

The FBI had previously claimed that they “did not have records” related to the meeting, but apparently this has now been exposed as a lie. Judicial Watch reports that they expect to receive the documents no later than November 30th of this year.

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch was informed yesterday by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that the FBI has located 30 pages of documents related to the June 27, 2016, tarmac meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, and proposes non-exempt material be produced no later than November 30, 2017 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:16-cv-02046)).

The new documents are being sent to Judicial Watch in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the Justice Department failed to comply with a July 7, 2016, FOIA request seeking the following:

  • All FD-302 forms prepared pursuant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server during her tenure.
  • All records of communications between any agent, employee, or representative of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding, concerning, or related to the aforementioned investigation. This request includes, but is not limited to, any related communications with any official, employee, or representative of the Department of Justice, the Executive Office of the President, the Democratic National Committee, and/or the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.
  • All records related to the meeting between Attorney General Lynch and former President Bill Clinton on June 27, 2016.

The FBI originally informed Judicial Watch they did not locate any records related to the tarmac meeting.  However, in a related case, the Justice Department located emails in which Justice Department officials communicated with the FBI and wrote that they had communicated with the FBI.  As a result, by letter dated August 10, 2017, from the FBI stated, “Upon further review, we subsequently determined potentially responsive documents may exist. As a result, your [FOIA] request has been reopened…”

(Surprisingly, the Trump Justice Department refuses to disclose the talking points developed by the Obama Justice Department to help it respond to press inquiries about the controversial June 27, 2016, tarmac meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.)

On June 27, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton on board a parked private plane at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona. The meeting occurred during the then-ongoing investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email server, and mere hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving both Mrs. Clinton and the Obama administration. Judicial Watch filed a request on June 30 that the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General investigate that meeting.

“The FBI is out of control. It is stunning that the FBI ‘found’ these Clinton-Lynch tarmac records only after we caught the agency hiding them in another lawsuit,” stated Judicial Watch Tom Fitton. “Judicial Watch will continue to press for answers about the FBI’s document games in court. In the meantime, the FBI should stop the stonewall and release these new records immediately.”

There is an incredible amount of controversy surrounding Barack Obama’s presidency, and whether or not he ordered the FBI to stand down on the Clinton investigation. It wouldn’t be surprising if he did, seeing that the Obama administration already granted numerous immunity agreements to everyone from terrorists to IT workers on private, non-government servers.

Eventually, the truth will come out—and while it may take a little bit longer than we’d like, we’re willing to wait. President Trump promised us that he would throw Hillary Clinton in jail when he campaigned in 2016, and now that he’s in office we’re all waiting for that fateful day.

Share this to let President Trump know you want Hillary Clinton thrown in JAIL!

Source:silenceisconsent.net