DEMS UNVEIL PREPOSTEROUS BILL TO ‘ELIMINATE’ UNEMPLOYMENT

Senator Bernie Sanders along with Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cory Booker are unveiling a plan to eliminate unemployment forever! (Drum roll).

EMPLOYMENT FOR ALL! No, I’m dead freaking serious….

The senator is crafting the bill but the Washington Post is reporting that the bill will provide a job and the required training for any American “who wants or needs one.” The Hill reports:

Sanders’ office has yet to release the details of the plan’s funding, but previous large-scale projects proposed by the Vermont progressive have involved ending tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans and large corporations.

The Vermont senator joins two other possible 2020 Democratic contenders, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who have also expressed support for similar proposals in recent weeks.

“The goal is to eliminate working poverty and involuntary unemployment altogether,” Darrick Hamilton, an economist at the New School, told the Post.

“This is an opportunity for something transformative, beyond the tinkering we’ve been doing for the last 40 years, where all the productivity gains have gone to the elite of society.”

Critics of federal jobs proposals say that government intervention to raise wages could lead to private businesses cutting costs in other areas, including hiring less employees. Sanders is a longtime advocate of #FightFor15, the national movement aimed at raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour.

“It completely undercuts a lot of industries and companies,” Brian Riedl of the conservative-leaning Manhattan Institute told the Post. “There will be pressure to introduce a higher wage or certain benefits that the private sector doesn’t offer.”

So here’s my question if we have guaranteed employment what do we do with the people those that refuse to work because they don’t want to? Do we jail them? Are we going to eliminate unemployment contribution altogether since anyone can get a job? Hell, while we are at it who wants a house?

Source:redbluedivide.com

Criminal McCabe Could Get His Entire Pension After What Rotten Dems Just Did Behind Trump’s Back!

Say what you will about the left side of the political spectrum in this country, but at least they stick together and support their own.

After President Donald Trump instructed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire the former FBI director Andrew McCabe for leaking classified information just two days before his scheduled retirement where he would have been entitled to a sum of over 2 million dollars as a retirement package which is paid by none other than the American Taxpayer. The left and their cohorts in the in mainstream media are trying to help McCabe beat the system.

What Andrea Michelle and Congressman Pocan don’t seem to understand, or care to understand is that McCabe even confessed to what he did. But in order to defend himself from being fired two days before getting his pension, he pointed the finger at Comey as the one who was leaking confidential information to the media. Along with lying to Congress while under oath.

McCabe later added he was singled out after attacks by President Trump and his critics within the FBI and Congress. But in order to defend his actions, McCabe explained that what he had done with the reporter wasn’t a secret and it took place over several days. Which would prove there is no way he could have done this leak alone.

We know neither Andrea Mitchell or Congressman Pocan are on President Trump’s side, so who’s side are these people on? Comey’s or McCabe’s? Because after this revelation it can’t be both. Either McCabe or Comey has to be lying at this point since McCabe’s comments claim the former FBI director knew very well he was talking to a journalist from the Wall Street Journal.

Seems like they only care about getting one over on the President.

Here is more information on McCabe’s pension via The Freebeacon:

‘FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe is set to receive a nearly $2 million pension, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

The top law enforcement official, who has come under scrutiny for overseeing the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, stepped aside on Monday. McCabe took early retirement, which he was eligible for after serving at the bureau for over 20 years.

McCabe joined the FBI in 1996 and worked his way up to high paying executive service positions. He was serving as the assistant director in charge of the Washington, D.C., field office until July 2015, when he was named the FBI’s associate deputy director, carrying an ES Level 4 pay scale.

The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) calls for law enforcement officers to receive 1.7 percent of the officer’s average highest salary over a period of three consecutive years per year for the agent’s first 20 years of service. Additionally, they receive 1 percent of the highest average salary for each year exceeding 20 years of service. McCabe served 21 years.

At executive and senior pay levels, McCabe’s average highest salary is estimated at $157,800, taken from his various roles at the FBI between 2015 and 2017. The estimate is based on executive service pay levels compiled by FederalPay, a public resource that uses data from the General Services Administration and the Office of Personnel Management.

In 2015, McCabe received roughly $151,200, after reaching the higher ES Level 4 salary in July after being named associate deputy director. McCabe received $160,300 in 2016, after James Comey appointed him deputy director. In 2017, remaining in an ES Level 4 position, he received $161,900.

By multiplying McCabe’s highest average salary of $157,800 by 1.7 percent, for each of his first 20 years of service, he receives an annual $53,652 pension. He receives an additional 1 percent for one year of service, having served since 1996. This gives McCabe an additional $1,578, giving him an annual pension of $55,230.

The Office of Personnel Management has set the average life span of law enforcement officers at nearly 83 years. The lifetime value of McCabe’s pension is estimated at $1.8 million.

McCabe is 49, though he likely had enough paid vacation days saved up to step down before his 50th birthday, the age requirement for those taking early retirement with at least 20 years of service.

As a law enforcement officer, McCabe is also eligible for cost of living adjustment on top of his pension.

McCabe has been at the center of controversy over leadership at the FBI since before the 2016 presidential election, when the Wall Street Journal revealed his wife received over $600,000 for her failed Virginia state senate campaign from political groups tied to Terry McAuliffe, a long-standing ally of Hillary Clinton. McCabe oversaw the investigation into Clinton’s misuse of classified information.

McCabe received the statement drafted by Comey exonerating Clinton months before she was ever interviewed for the investigation. He was also referenced in text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the anti-Trump FBI officials who discussed an “insurance policy” if Trump won the presidential election.’

Source:daily-vine.com

BREAKING!!! CONGRESS Just SAID IT… Prison Is Coming For Dems!

Looks like Attorney General Jeff Sessions is finally being called to task over what has been a less than stellar performance.

Congressmen Gaetz, Gowdy and Goodlatte are now joining forces by calling for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate FISA warrant abuses under the Barack Hussein Obama presidency. And Gaetz has gone as far as saying Obama’s state department functioned as an arm of Hillary Clinton’s failed Presidential Campaign.

Appearing on Monday morning’s edition of “Rose Unplugged,” Republican Congressman from Florida Matt Gaetz spoke at great lengths about the information which would be uncovered if there was a special council appointed to the FISA mess. Gaetz also noted that more revelations would come to light regarding the State Department under President Obama and the way they operated against people they deemed to be a threat to the Democrat Party establishment.

 

Although we all know the Clinton Machine is one of the most corrupt and crooked organizations in history, they always seem to get away with their crimes. No one is ever made to pay for their twisted ways. Don’t take my word for it, ask the Haitians who were swindled out of the multi-millions they were supposed to get from the Clinton Foundation after the earthquake which left most of the nation in ruins.

I can’t for the life of me understand is why Attorney General Jeff Sessions is sitting in the sidelines while President Trump is being investigated on false Rusian collusion charges while the Clintons and the Obamas run free and clear of any investigation whatsoever.

Is he really a plant from the left? Maybe. But whatever reason, he perfectly illustrates the reason why President Trump won and we are sick and tired of the Republican Party. They are just a bunch of weak hacks who are afraid of their own shadow and spend their whole time in office defending themselves.

It’s about time the GOP gets on the offensive! Are you listening, Attorney General Sessions?

Via Fox News:

“House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Rep. Trey Gowdy on Tuesday demanded the appointment of a special counsel to investigate “conflicts of interest” and decisions “made and not made” by current and former Justice Department officials in 2016 and 2017, noting that “the public interest requires” the action.

Gowdy, R-S.C., and Goodlatte, R-Va., penned a letter Tuesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

“Matters have arisen—both recently and otherwise—which necessitate the appointment of a Special Counsel. We do not make this observation and attendant request lightly,” Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote.

They pointed, specifically, toward the use of the infamous anti-Trump dossier used in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain a warrant to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

“There is evidence of bias, trending toward animus, among those charged with investigating serious cases,” they wrote. “There is evidence political opposition research was used in court filings. There is evidence this political opposition research was neither vetted before it was used nor fully revealed to the relevant tribunal.”

Asked why a special counsel was needed, Gowdy told Fox News, “Congress doesn’t have the tools to investigate this… We leak like the Gossip Girls.”

 

They added: “Questions have arisen with the FISA process and these questions and concerns threaten to impugn both public and congressional confidence in significant counterintelligence program processes and those charged with overseeing and implementing these counterintelligence processes.”

Goodlatte also told Fox News he thought the FISA process “was abused.”

Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote that because the “decisions of both former and current Department of Justice and FBI officials are at issue,” they do not believe the DOJ is “capable” of investigating the “fact patterns in a fashion likely to garner public confidence.”

Last week, Sessions announced that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz would investigate allegations of government surveillance abuse in light of memos released on Capitol Hill by the House Intelligence Committee which suggested, at least on the Republican side, that the dossier compiled by ex-British Intelligence officer Christopher Steele was used to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil Page.

President Trump, though, blasted Sessions’ decision, saying he appointed an “Obama guy” to investigate “potentially massive FISA abuse.”

Horowitz also is investigating former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and whether he wanted to avoid taking action on new Clinton emails found on disgraced Democratic New York Rep. Anthony Weiner’s laptop, reports said. According to records, McCabe knew about the emails belonging to Hillary Clinton in September 2016, but did not choose to brief former FBI Director James Comey until October 26, 2016 — prompting the re-opening of the Clinton email investigation just one week before the presidential election.

“While we have confidence in the Inspector General for the Department of Justice, the DOJ IG does not have the authority to investigate other governmental entities or former employees of the Department, the Bureau, or other agencies,” Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote. Gowdy also serves as chairman of the House Oversight Committee.

They added: “Some have been reluctant to call for the appointment of a Special Counsel because such an appointment should be reserved for those unusual cases where existing investigative and prosecutorial entities cannot adequately discharge those duties. We believe this is just such a case.”

Goodlatte, who penned a letter to Sessions in July 2017 and September 2017 calling for the appointment of a second special counsel, received only one response from the Justice Department, suggesting that Sessions had directed senior federal prosecutors to investigate matters involving the Clinton Foundation and the sale of Uranium One — leaving the door open to consider whether “the matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., slammed Goodlatte and Gowdy, saying they are “simply off base.”

“Chairman Goodlatte and Chairman Gowdy are simply off base–just as they were last year, when they called for a new special counsel to investigate a slew of Hillary Clinton conspiracy theories,” Nadler said in a statement in response to their letter. “Where there is no crime, there is no criminal investigation for a second special counsel to manage.”

Goodlatte and Gowdy’s letter comes just days after more than a dozen other House Republicans penned a similar note, requesting the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate the same issues.

The 13 lawmakers signed onto the letter that stated: “Evidence has come to light that raises serious concerns about decisions and activities by leadership at the highest levels of the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding how and why the Clinton probe ended and how and why the Trump-Russia probe began.””

Source: www.usafortrumponline.com

BREAKING: Dems DEMOLISHED In Monumental Fight Over God-Given Right – HELL YEAH!

Southern Democrats are feeling demolished after they just lost a significant vote that will effectively save lives right away. Democrats were against this, but the House voted 75-34 in favor of saving lives, and the Mississippi Republican lawmakers just got a major victory in what could become America’s most restrictive abortion law.

The new law, which Democrats tried stopping, bans abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. That means any woman who is just over three months pregnant will be forbidden from getting an abortion. This will be controversial in nature as the leftists claim it is “their body, their right” and most people with common sense will state that anyone who is 15 weeks pregnant should have already decided if they want to keep or kill their baby. Any requested abortion after 15 weeks will be rejected in Mississippi, except there are certain circumstances that will be defined. Those might incur any abortion that is required to save the mother’s life if an emergency situation happens and doctors need to make a fast decision. Another situation could be something that will prevent the child from living outside of the womb. The bill, for some reason, does not include victims of rape or incest – but it absolutely should as any woman raped should not be forced to carry the child of the person who attacked her.

Democrats expect to push back against Republicans who fought for the God-given right to live.

NBC News reports more about the controversial law that upset Democrats:
“The owner of Mississipi’s only abortion clinic has said she’ll sue if the bill goes into law — a move lawmakers not only know to expect, but seem to be encouraging, in hopes of eventually getting the nation’s highest court to revisit its rulings and allow states to begin restricting abortion earlier in pregnancy.

“It seems like a pretty simple bill designed to test the viability line that the Supreme Court has drawn,” said David Forte, a law professor at Ohio’s Cleveland State University.

There are two exceptions to House Bill 1510: if the fetus has a health problem that would prevent it from surviving outside the womb at full term, or if the pregnant woman’s life or a “major bodily function” is threatened by the pregnancy. Pregnancies as a result of rape and incest are not exempt.

A number of states, including Mississippi, have already tiptoed up to the viability line with 20-week bans, although the U.S. Senate earlier this year rejected such a ban nationwide when supporters couldn’t reach a 60-vote supermajority to act.

An appeals court in 2015 struck down efforts in North Dakota to ban most abortions after sixweeks, when a fetus develops a detectable heartbeat, and in Arkansas after 12 weeks. Abortion rights supporters are dubious that the outcome in Mississippi would be any different.

“The Supreme Court has said and resaid again and again that states cannot prohibit women from obtaining abortions prior to viability, which is what a 15-week ban would do,” said Hillary Schneller, staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights. The New York-based group, which advocates for free access to abortion, called the bill unconstitutional and “medically unsound.”

Mississippi’s own 20-week ban has never been legally challenged, in part because the state’s only abortion clinic, the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, doesn’t perform abortions that late in pregnancy. According to state Department of Health statistics, 85 percent of abortions in Mississippi took place before 12 weeks in 2016.

But Diane Derzis, who owns the clinic, has said the clinic does provide abortions until about 18 weeks after pregnancy. Most of Mississippi’s 2,500 abortions in 2015 took place at the clinic”

The only striking part of this bill that caused some Republicans to question the situation was that rape and incest victims might not be protected after 15 weeks. However, that shouldn’t be much of a problem as doctors will likely see rape and incest victims before 15 weeks and make their ultimate decision, if needed, at that point.

Democrats will potentially take this to court and try to reverse the decision. The “my body, my choice” movement will fight back, but the opposing side will remind them that they should decide before 15 weeks – otherwise, they’re essentially killing a child.

This bill will save lives, not ruin them. Democrat pushback is expected but should be easily defeated. Saving lives of unborn children should be more important than taking their lives away when they’re  already half developed and on their way to being born.

Source:daily-vine.com

BREAKING!!! CONGRESS Just SAID IT… Prison Is Coming For Dems!

Looks like Attorney General Jeff Sessions is finally being called to task over what has been a less than stellar performance.

Congressmen Gaetz, Gowdy and Goodlatte are now joining forces by calling for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate FISA warrant abuses under the Barack Hussein Obama presidency. And Gaetz has gone as far as saying Obama’s state department functioned as an arm of Hillary Clinton’s failed Presidential Campaign.

Appearing on Monday morning’s edition of “Rose Unplugged,” Republican Congressman from Florida Matt Gaetz spoke at great lengths about the information which would be uncovered if there was a special council appointed to the FISA mess. Gaetz also noted that more revelations would come to light regarding the State Department under President Obama and the way they operated against people they deemed to be a threat to the Democrat Party establishment.

Although we all know the Clinton Machine is one of the most corrupt and crooked organizations in history, they always seem to get away with their crimes. No one is ever made to pay for their twisted ways. Don’t take my word for it, ask the Haitians who were swindled out of the multi-millions they were supposed to get from the Clinton Foundation after the earthquake which left most of the nation in ruins.

I can’t for the life of me understand is why Attorney General Jeff Sessions is sitting in the sidelines while President Trump is being investigated on false Rusian collusion charges while the Clintons and the Obamas run free and clear of any investigation whatsoever.

Is he really a plant from the left? Maybe. But whatever reason, he perfectly illustrates the reason why President Trump won and we are sick and tired of the Republican Party. They are just a bunch of weak hacks who are afraid of their own shadow and spend their whole time in office defending themselves.

It’s about time the GOP gets on the offensive! Are you listening, Attorney General Sessions?

Via Fox News:

“House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Rep. Trey Gowdy on Tuesday demanded the appointment of a special counsel to investigate “conflicts of interest” and decisions “made and not made” by current and former Justice Department officials in 2016 and 2017, noting that “the public interest requires” the action.

Gowdy, R-S.C., and Goodlatte, R-Va., penned a letter Tuesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

“Matters have arisen—both recently and otherwise—which necessitate the appointment of a Special Counsel. We do not make this observation and attendant request lightly,” Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote.

They pointed, specifically, toward the use of the infamous anti-Trump dossier used in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain a warrant to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

“There is evidence of bias, trending toward animus, among those charged with investigating serious cases,” they wrote. “There is evidence political opposition research was used in court filings. There is evidence this political opposition research was neither vetted before it was used nor fully revealed to the relevant tribunal.”

Asked why a special counsel was needed, Gowdy told Fox News, “Congress doesn’t have the tools to investigate this… We leak like the Gossip Girls.”

 

They added: “Questions have arisen with the FISA process and these questions and concerns threaten to impugn both public and congressional confidence in significant counterintelligence program processes and those charged with overseeing and implementing these counterintelligence processes.”

Goodlatte also told Fox News he thought the FISA process “was abused.”

Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote that because the “decisions of both former and current Department of Justice and FBI officials are at issue,” they do not believe the DOJ is “capable” of investigating the “fact patterns in a fashion likely to garner public confidence.”

Last week, Sessions announced that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz would investigate allegations of government surveillance abuse in light of memos released on Capitol Hill by the House Intelligence Committee which suggested, at least on the Republican side, that the dossier compiled by ex-British Intelligence officer Christopher Steele was used to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil Page.

President Trump, though, blasted Sessions’ decision, saying he appointed an “Obama guy” to investigate “potentially massive FISA abuse.”

Horowitz also is investigating former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and whether he wanted to avoid taking action on new Clinton emails found on disgraced Democratic New York Rep. Anthony Weiner’s laptop, reports said. According to records, McCabe knew about the emails belonging to Hillary Clinton in September 2016, but did not choose to brief former FBI Director James Comey until October 26, 2016 — prompting the re-opening of the Clinton email investigation just one week before the presidential election.

“While we have confidence in the Inspector General for the Department of Justice, the DOJ IG does not have the authority to investigate other governmental entities or former employees of the Department, the Bureau, or other agencies,” Gowdy and Goodlatte wrote. Gowdy also serves as chairman of the House Oversight Committee.

They added: “Some have been reluctant to call for the appointment of a Special Counsel because such an appointment should be reserved for those unusual cases where existing investigative and prosecutorial entities cannot adequately discharge those duties. We believe this is just such a case.”

Goodlatte, who penned a letter to Sessions in July 2017 and September 2017 calling for the appointment of a second special counsel, received only one response from the Justice Department, suggesting that Sessions had directed senior federal prosecutors to investigate matters involving the Clinton Foundation and the sale of Uranium One — leaving the door open to consider whether “the matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., slammed Goodlatte and Gowdy, saying they are “simply off base.”

“Chairman Goodlatte and Chairman Gowdy are simply off base–just as they were last year, when they called for a new special counsel to investigate a slew of Hillary Clinton conspiracy theories,” Nadler said in a statement in response to their letter. “Where there is no crime, there is no criminal investigation for a second special counsel to manage.”

Goodlatte and Gowdy’s letter comes just days after more than a dozen other House Republicans penned a similar note, requesting the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate the same issues.

The 13 lawmakers signed onto the letter that stated: “Evidence has come to light that raises serious concerns about decisions and activities by leadership at the highest levels of the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding how and why the Clinton probe ended and how and why the Trump-Russia probe began.””

Source:www.usafortrumponline.com

Dems Stop Fighting For Gun Control, Demand MUCH BIGGER BAN Now – They’ve Lost Their Minds!

The recent call for gun control seems to have simmered to a low boil. Liberal Democrats realize that banning particular guns probably won’t happen thanks to the fact that an AR-15 is a single shot weapon, much like a handgun, and they will face an expensive uphill battle that not even Bernie Sanders could afford on his magical source of income. Changing gun laws to include more in-depth background checks, mental health checks, and police report investigations would be more sufficient causes to fight for instead of trying to ban all guns and control the American people by violating their second amendment Constitutional rights.

Some liberal Democrats have cruised over to a much more significant subject than guns. One liberal journalist went on a major Tweet episode where he shuns moto vehicles and mostly appears as though he wants to ban cars. It wasn’t that long ago when someone from BuzzFeed stated that vehicles don’t belong on the road. Even BuzzFeed readers probably gaffed at that claim.

The Twitter user is David Klion. Brian Anderson from DownTrend found his Tweets and pointed out the comedy behind them and the concept of banning cars. Just imagine you had to walk 20 miles to work every day because a liberal got their way and had cars banned. Or imagine hearing the clip-clop of your horse ride to work. Wouldn’t that be amazing? I suppose so many Democrats wouldn’t care if cars were banned considering how many of them don’t go to work every day and live on the government teet of welfare. In particular, those who are able-bodied and refuse to work, or illegal immigrants just here to milk the system and send the money to their family in their homeland.

Here are Klion’s Tweets:

People who think like this, and are not being sarcastic, belong in a museum that features the liberally insane. Driving should be abolished as much as clean drinking water should be banned.

We built our cities because we are a great civilization which has made incredible breakthroughs. If David does not prefer to be around cars, then perhaps he would move to a third world location in Africa where it’s mostly villages, no running water, and he has to hunt for his food. Perhaps he can fire a Tweet-storm at an animal who merely falls over in shock after reading his liberal lunacy.

In this case, then we’re also banning trains, boats, planes, and any other form of transportation that’s larger than a car. The only thing that might survive the ban is the pint-sized smart car which probably weighs as much as a dumpster filled with all of Klion’s tweets printed out and set on fire.

Wrong. Sad. Nope. People don’t feel bad about driving. People do feel bad about being late when they should have left five minutes earlier, which is me just about every day. He doesn’t need to wait for technology to make cars obsolete. He can just make himself obsolete. Then again, his Tweets are fun to read because they make average people realize how sane they really are compared to the DC native who states he’s a 5th generation New Yorker. Maybe he dislikes cars because traffic in NYC is pitiful?

What about people who live just outside of the city, where there are no skyscrapers and things are not within walking distance? There are areas between urban cities and the suburbs that still require vehicles to get around. At this point, he’s no longer making much sense, and it appears as though his tweets are a babbling reach for logic, of which there is none present.

Maybe it was built around the fact that people wanted things close by and they established cities from the center and expanded. A city will obviously need roads to travel from place to place, regardless of whether it’s by foot, bus, car, bike, or horse. In fact, you can find all of those forms of transportation in almost any city with fair weather.

What about delivery trucks who bring supplies to the city from factories located outside the city? How would they get around if there were no roads? There are so many holes in the “ban cars” logic that it’s just another far left reach that would point humanity back to obscurity.

Cars aren’t mandatory. People can walk, bike, or run to work or around town if they chose. No one forces anyone to buy or lease their own vehicle. That’s the extremist coming out of Klion. People drive by choice, not by mandatory rules. If someone works at a job that is far away, then they can take a bus, train, or walk four hours early if they chose. No one forces anyone to drive a motor vehicle. Most people just chose to and it’s their right to do it.

Another right that we won’t be taking away anytime soon.

Here’s a possible solution for David Klion:

Source:daily-vine.com

Lawmakers Just DEFIED Dems, Order HUGE Sign To Go Up EVERYWHERE Effective NOW!

For eight years, former president Barack Obama disregarded and destroyed all that is sacred to our country, and got a lot of liberal lawmakers on board with this plan to dismantle America piece by piece. President Donald Trump has worked diligently to put it back together and has just a masterful job in doing so. However, Democrats weren’t ready to relinquish the control, even after having lost so much of it, and have been fighting for months over one major decision, which they just lost.

Republican lawmakers succeeded in defying their liberal counterparts over the one major demand that’s most important to them. Now, Democrats will be reminded of that defeat every time they see huge signs that will now be going up everywhere after the newly approved rule that’s effective immediately. While this may not be the final piece to the puzzle to put our country back together again, it’s most certainly the biggest as all else hinges on it.

One of the key elements to destroying our Christian nation was to remove God from every facet of society. Obama succeeded in doing that under the guise of “separation of church and state,” which ultimately proved to only apply Christianity, which was often replaced with other beliefs taught in classrooms, such as Islam and even Satanism. Bibles were not allowed in classrooms, “In God we Trust” was removed from the Pledge of Allegiance recited daily, and students who silently prayed from their desks were punished for it.

The rapid and continual moral and behavioral decline in society that ensued was no coincidence. More shootings occurred on campuses since then, which was always, and still is, blamed on the weapon rather than the root of the issue. Where God isn’t allowed, evil flourishes. The state of Florida has seen this first-hand in the aftermath of the Parkland, Florida school shooting, and were quick to make an important decision that’s long overdue and has nothing to do with guns.

Orlando Sentinel reports what lawmakers in their state just made mandatory in every classroom:

Every Florida public school would need to display “In God We Trust” in a “conspicuous place,” under a bill the Legislature will soon send to the governor’s desk.

The requirement, which had passed the House last month, had looked dead in the Senate. But then it was added to a separate, lengthy and controversial education bill (HB 7055) that both chambers approved Monday.

If Gov. Rick Scott signs the 207-page proposal, all public schools — and any other buildings used by local school boards — would need to display “In God We Trust,” the state motto.

The measure was sponsored by Rep. Kimberly Daniels, who runs a Christian ministry.

This move against the liberal left is well played since they have spent the last three weeks since the shooting demanding something be done to stop these attacks. Their argument almost entirely surrounded guns and ignoring the Second Amendment. However, disregarding our God-given constitutional rights doesn’t make Americans safer. These lawmakers just proved the importance of the document our forefathers created based on the foundation in which our Christian nation was built on. Bringing God back into the classrooms is the first step in preventing these atrocities from happening.

“This motto is inscribed on the halls of this great capitol and inked on our currency, and it should be displayed so that our children will be exposed and educated on this great motto, which is a part of this country’s foundation,” Daniels said when asked about the bill (HB 839). “Something so great should not be hidden.”

“In God We Trust” has been part of Florida’s state seal since 1868 and on the state flag since 1900, but has been the state motto only since 2006, according to the Florida Department of State, Orlando Sentinel explained.

What’s particularly impressive, is that Daniels, who sponsored the bill, is a Democrat and wasn’t afraid to go against the biased beliefs of her party to do what she truly recognized was right and missing. This is true politics, the way that it was supposed to done, to better citizens and our nation, not make decisions or take stances simply to be divisive and combative.

Naturally, not everyone is so understanding or really cares about solving problems and restoring communities as Daniels is. A Monroe County mother in Florida who belongs to the education advocacy group called Common Ground, complained that the bill is unnecessary and too costly to taxpayers. It’s a comical assertion from a liberal since Democrats have proven to never care about dolling out tax funds by the handful to a long list irrelevant and unimportant causes.

The upset mother/advocate lawmakers should not take up bills that “fail to address real issues in education and waste taxpayers’ dollars and time.”

Sure, there will be a nominal cost to schools districts to display this motto, but is nothing compared to the cost of life by keeping it off campus.

Source:daily-vine.com

Senate Republicans Just Defeated Dems, Restore God-Given Constitutional Right

The United States Constitution is a document that we’re probably all familiar with. It’s the one that recognizes that no country or human institution gives rights; God gives them, and it’s up to the government to accept them. When they said that we are “…endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights…” they just acknowledged that this government would be one that yields to God-given rights. They wanted to work with God, not against him.

A lot has changed since 1776, and not many of our politicians still have those beliefs. Our elected officials almost exclusively lean on their understanding and listen to whatever the majority wants. That failing on the part of our government remember their mission, to keep the people safe, is what lead to the one thing that has killed more Americans than anything else; abortion.

Since the 1970’s, Americans have been systematically killing off the next generation, all for the sake of convenience. Government rationalized it, claiming that the unborn aren’t alive at all. The battle for the lives of the unborn has been raging for decades, but the state of Iowa has just taken an enormous leap to saving lives.

In honor of Women’s Day, we tell you about all the women who won’t be slaughtered on the altar of convenience. We can tell you that the Iowa Senate has decided that once a heartbeat can be detected, the baby can no longer be killed. The American Conservative Herald reports that this comes after a long hard debate about the interpretation of life, and how we define it:

“Quite simply, the debate over constitutional and God-given rights is never going to end. The most vocal folks on both sides of the argument have their feet completely dug into the ground, and that’s not a recipe for a meaningful debate over the facts. However, there remains plenty of room for debate when it comes to what’s legal and what’s not.

For conservatives, we firmly believe that the words stated in both our Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution mean exactly what they mean and that their words stand the test of time. If a new proposed law defies either one of these documents, then it’s time to throw it out.

And then you have Liberals, who believe that these two precious documents are always open to new interpretation. So in their minds, anything goes and any bill that would naturally destroy either the Declaration or Constitution is no big deal. To them, changing laws to go with the current times is necessary.

Thankfully, one Midwest state was able to put a kibosh on Democrats who were trying to deny our most basic right by a vote of 30-20.

Conservative Tribune has the details.

The Iowa Senate voted Wednesday to pass a bill banning abortions if an unborn child’s heartbeat is detected upon ultrasound, moving Iowa one step closer to becoming the first state to ban abortions.

Iowa lawmakers voted 30 to 20 Wednesday for Senate Bill 3143, which outlaws abortion upon the presence of a fetal heartbeat. A heartbeat typically becomes detectable between six and nine weeks gestation. The pending legislation entails any doctor being charged with a Class D felony — subject to five years in prison and a $750-to-$7,500 fine — if they perform or attempt an abortion on a woman after an unborn child’s heartbeat is detected.

Needless to say, critics have blasted the bill and will do whatever they can to continue to fight their heinous fight.

There were Senate members who voted against the bill, of course. ‘This bill is dangerous. This bill is unconstitutional. This bill devalues Iowa women,’ Democratic Senate Minority Leader Janet Petersen said, according to The Courier.

The bill is ‘unpopular, unconstitutional, and unconscionable,’ Parenthood of the Heartland public affairs Director Erin Davison-Rippey said. ‘Seven in 10 Americans agree that abortion should remain safe and legal,’ Davison-Rippey added.

However, public sentiment indicates that changes are needed, and the bill amounts to a huge step in the right direction.

Seventy-six percent of Americans, however, want significant abortion restrictions, including making abortion illegal after three months into pregnancy. Ninety-two percent of Republicans, 61 percent of Democrats and 78 percent of Independents want significant abortion restrictions.”

The career politicians in Washington like to pretend that they have a whole lot of jobs, but American was founded on the principle that the people needed to be free, and the government needed to be small. The truth of the matter is that they’ve only got a few things on their to-do list, and protecting the innocent is right there at the top.

Whether they want to believe it or not, Iowa’s policy change is a win for all. Taking away the option of murder is something that saves both the murderer and the would-be victim. One last thought on abortion from one of the greatest Presidents in American history, the late great Ronald Reagan:
“I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.” – Ronald Reagan

Source:daily-vine.com

Trump Just Pissed Off Dems With This AWESOME New Picture That He Put Up In White House! HELL YEAH!

The White House is filled with historical pieces and artifacts that represent our nation’s history, but perhaps none are so controversial as what President Donald Trump just donned the walls of the West Wing with today. Among the painted pieces of notable figures in our nation’s history, is a new framed piece of work that comes with a clear message that cannot be ignored. Now, idiots everywhere are infuriated about what our leader had the guts to put up that we’re pretty sure his supporters are going to love.

The First Family is getting comfortable in their new home, just as the Obamas did in their disrespectful way that nobody seemed to have a problem with. When Trump moved in and began putting his personal touch on the People’s House, all hell broke loose with accusations of tactless taste that his predecessor never got when hosting rappers and their wives. Whether people agree or disagree with what our President just put on the walls, he had the right to celebrate his victory in the way he chose to decorate.

The White House isn’t just a place where the president lives, it’s a monument that represents milestones in leadership throughout our nation’s history. Perhaps not a single leader has been so controversial as our current Commander-in-Chief who overcame all odds to call this place home. Because of that, he has every right to document this incredible feat with a framed piece that shows exactly how that happened.

The media tried to portray that Trump’s opposition, Hillary Clinton, had a huge lead in the presidential race. However, one picture proved that wrong, which has now become the West Wing’s latest and perhaps most extraordinary piece of artwork.

Trump didn’t become president by a mere margin — he won by a landslide of votes where it counted most. The Electoral College is the deciding vote and the now infamous image of which way each area of every state went has become its own modern art on display in the White House, and for good reason.

Trey Yingst was among the first to spot this new display and seemingly without realizing the can of controversy he was opening with this Tweeted picture of it, he simply stated, ” Spotted: a map to be hung somewhere in the West Wing.” The image of the Electoral College Map from the election Trump swept in 2016 accompanied his sentiment and infuriated idiots around the country who couldn’t fathom why Trump would display such a thing.

It’s unknown at what point these Democratic degenerates forgot who they were talking about — thinking that somehow it was out of character for Trump to gloat. When it’s his right to do so by having earned it through honest means and against all odds, he should display that victory since it sends a message about what America is all about. Trump was truthful in his lead and the media was not, however, this is photo proof of that bias and that the American dream can be accomplished despite any adversary against you, and needs to be displayed for that reason..

Perhaps the most humorous part of the outrage over this imagery in the West Wing is that the same people who publicly express how tasteless and gross it is, in their opinion, were in support of a wife using the desk her husband received disgusting sexual favors at during his time in office. I think what it comes down to is that the truth hurts and no matter how much some people in America hate Trump, they can’t deny that he legitimately painted the country red in approval of him.

It’s often said that “a picture says a thousand words” but this one speaks volumes beyond that. Trump beat supposed frontrunner Hillary Clinton by far more than a thousand Electoral College votes. This wasn’t just a victory for him, but for the American people who were heard and deserve to have the piece of our country’s history commemorated on the wall of the White House. Every little girl and boy in America with a dream to make a difference and become president one day can do that, just like Trump did as a non-career politician. That’s significant and part of what makes America great.

Source:freedom-daily.com

Judge Behind FISA Warrant Deep Ties To Obama Just Revealed! Dems Attempt To Shield Obama FAILS!

The one glaring name that has thus far been purposely excluded from this tapestry of corruption and malfeasance is without a doubt the puppet master himself…“BARACK OBAMA.”

The mounting evidence of White House involvement which had eluded investigators is now beginning to reach inside the Oval Office, of what is without a doubt becoming the biggest abuse of power scandal within the history of this great nation.

A new revelation just uncovered regarding the crucial FISA warrant granted in 2016 based on a phony Clinton funded dossier was granted and “signed-off” by an OBAMA appointed judge.

The astounding news that FISA Judge Rudolph Contreras (an Obama appointee), was the judge who issued a surveillance warrant on private citizen Carter Page based on a bogus Yahoo News article, that was actually created by British spy Christopher Steele who masterminded the phony dossier in the first place.

Not even the comedic genius of British actor Peter Sellers portrayal of the bubbling Chief Inspector Clouseau in the Pink Panther film series could have envisioned such a ridiculously absurd plot.

And yet here we are once again, with FISA Judge Rudolph Contreras becoming a major player appointed to rule on yet another case, General Fynn, no doubt another unique coincidence.

The unraveling revelation that an OBAMA appointed FISA judge granted warrants on a political hit piece paid for by the Clinton campaign and used that information as the bases to spy on the Trump team is astounding, moreover by a foreign entity within a political campaign is yet another law which has been violated.

Thus far the silence from both the OBAMA camp and the mainstream media is deafening, perhaps thinking that ignoring the widening scandal and not reporting on the drip, drip, drip of incriminating evidence will somehow run its course.

However, this isn’t merely corruption of politician’s simply accepting bribes to enrich themselves or engaging in some nefarious personal actions. This is an ABUSE OF POWER, to actually change and interfere with our most sacred institution, that of a free and open election.

Do you believe that former President Obama will finally be compelled before Congress to testify under oath regarding his involvement with the 2016 election?

Source: Patriot Beat, everydayconservative.com