Top Democrats Caught Meeting With Radical Islamists Including Iranian Prez & Louis Farrakhan

Elder Patriot – Three high profile Democrats who are leaders of the resist trump movement were discovered to have previously undisclosed ties with leading anti-Semites according to a Wall Street Journal column that ran yesterday.

Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Andre Carson of Indiana and Gregory Meeks of New York attended A private dinner, along with Louis Farrakhan, the notorious anti-Semite who leads the black supremacist group Nation of Islam, that was hosted by Iranian President, Hassan Rouhani.

Ellison was appointed the Vice-Chair of the DNC after having lost a close vote to head the Democratic Party.

The lack of journalistic curiosity displayed by the mainstream media is as astounding as it should be troubling.  This dinner took place in 2013!

According to the Untied States government, Iran was at that time, and remains to this day, the world’s number one state sponsor of terrorism.  And, Farrakhan is as detestable a racist as any leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

Now that the Democrats have completely unmasked, an article recounting the dinner at that time that had appeared the Nation of Islam publication Final Call, has finally been reported by a mainstream media outlet.

The presence of the three Democrat representatives (all members of the Congressional Black Caucus) provides further proof of the alignment that has taken place between their party and radical Islam.

The WSJ article comes only two weeks after photographer Askia Muhammad shared a picture of Illinois Senator Barack Obama, the CBC, and Farrakhan yucking it up at another, earlier dinner:

None of the 21 current members of the CBC who were part of the caucus that attended that dinner in 2005 were willing to denounce Farrakhan.

Even the extreme left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled Farrakhan’s organization, the Nation of Islam as a hate group because of the “theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, anti-Semitic and anti-gay rhetoric of its leaders.”

It would be hard to fathom the outcry had President Trump – or any Republican – attended a similar dinner especially after we pause to consider how severely Donald Trump was roasted for having received David Duke’s endorsement – one that he neither sought nor accepted.

The article from Final Call can be accessed here.


Flashback: Democrats Defended Sen. Sherrod Brown Against Wife Abuse Claims

When Ohio State Treasurer Josh Mandel noted in 2012 that Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) had been accused of abusing his wife, liberals accused Mandel of abusing women by raising the issue.

Rita Smith, executive director of the Denver-based National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, declined at the time to criticize Brown. Instead, she defended Brown’s voting record on women’s issues. And she told an interviewer that Mandel’s attack on Brown was “‘actually abusive,’ because he is putting Brown’s family, including his former wife, in a negative spotlight, ‘and that is abusive of women.’”

That is how many Democrats really feel about politicians who abuse women. As long as they have a “D” after their names, and vote for abortion, they are almost incapable of abuse.

True, the allegations against Brown came in an ugly divorce, where it is not unknown for warring spouses to make all kinds of claims against each other. And Mandel raised the issue in the context of a tough Senate race, where accusations are always subject to distortion.

But in the Rob Porter case, the standard that Democrats and the media are applying to the White House is that even defending the presumption of innocence — as President Donald Trump did Friday and Saturday, after letting Porter go — amounts to condoning the abuse.

Former Vice President Joe Biden — that paragon of propriety when it comes to respecting women’s bodies — said Friday that there were “abusers … within the Oval Office.” He said that Trump’s praise for Porter’s performance on the job was like saying an “axe murderer” was a “great painter.”

Perhaps Biden should look closer to home, in Delaware. His former colleague, U.S. Senator Tom Carper (D-DE), “admitted to hitting his ex-wife hard enough to give her a black eye,” the Washington Free Beacon notes.

And yet no Democrats have called on Carper to resign.

Not even Porter could deny all of the allegations against him. The photographs and the statements of his former wives are more than credible: they are convincing. Chief of Staff John Kelly, whom the media are busy dragging through the mud, said Friday that 40 minutes after he learned of the full extent of the allegations, Porter was gone.

Everyone can agree that there is no place in public leadership for people who abuse their partners.

Everyone except partisan Democrats, who accuse the accusers of abusing women.


Republicans And Democrats Join Forces To Crush Barack’s Pet Project 266-157

You should thank God every day we are no longer under the scourge of President Obama.

It seemed like he wanted to ruin our lives, on every level. He destroyed our health care. He tried to destroy our energy section. And of course, he devastated our immigration system.

Perhaps the most shocking was how he interfered with private businesses. Pretending to help the consumer, his administration burdened small businesses with far too many rules.

One particular rule would have inflicted tedious and costly changes to hundreds of thousands of businesses. Businesses you support every day.

But thankfully, the majority of House lawmakers saw fit to undo it.

From Daily Caller:

The House passed a bill undoing many of former President Barack Obama’s restrictive menu labeling rules Tuesday, giving hope to restaurants that they won’t have to label the calories for every variation of items on their menu…

The bill allows restaurants to disclose a range of calories, rather than list the calories for every single option on the menu, which pizza shop owners said would be an insurmountable burden…

The menu rules, required as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that created Obamacare, have been delayed multiple times after rigorous lobbying from restaurant groups.

So many lawmakers voted on this law. That signifies just how unpopular it was. According to the FDA, if a pizza place added just an extra olive or pepperoni, they’d have to change the calorie numbers. Imagine having to change every menu, sign, and option. It would be a nightmare.

Of course, there are some advocates for the insane rules. Democrats claim because of America’s “obesity epidemic” Obama’s rule is needed to confront this “crisis.”

Um, there are better ways of informing the public about nutrition. Burdening local businesses with ridiculous, bureaucratic rules is not one of them.

In order for the rules to be completely undone, a companion bill must pass in the Senate. If not, these tyrannical rules will go into effect this May.

Let’s hope there are enough Senators smart enough to do the right thing.

Source: Daily Caller,

Mad Maxine BUSTED in $1.2 BILLION FRAUD!!! Democrats FREAKING OUT!

According to Judicial Watch, a longtime liberal lawmaker has now introduced a bill that moves over a billion dollars to “Obamacare navigators.”

This ridiculous bill introduced by none other than the California Democrat Congresswoman Maxine Waters just a few week ago calls to recruit customers for the health insurance exchanges set up under Obama’s disastrous health care overhaul known as Obamacare.

Keep in mind most of these so-called navigators are big-time Democrat Party donors so Waters seems desperate to feed Obamacare as a source of money laundering for liberal groups who will, in turn, donate to her and her Democrat colleagues in the Democrat Party. Convenient Huh?

According to the 14-term congresswoman from California who has been investigated by the House Ethics Committee for steering federal funds away from other institutions to her husband’s failing Massachusetts bank and who can’t even reside in her own district because it’s overrun by crime and poverty, wrote the law because the Trump administration rightly slashed Obamacare outreach funding by more than 90%.

Via Judicial Watch:

Obamacare Recruiters Get $1.2 Billion Under Proposed Law
FEBRUARY 01, 2018

A fraud-infested Obamacare “outreach” program will get an astounding $1.2 billion from American taxpayers if legislation introduced by a veteran congresswoman becomes law. The preposterous measure, introduced by California Democrat Maxine Waters a few week ago, aims to recruit customers for the health insurance exchanges set up under Obama’s disastrous healthcare overhaul. The 14-term congresswoman, investigated by the House Ethics Committee for steering federal funds to her husband’s failing Massachusetts bank, crafted the law because the Trump administration slashed Obamacare outreach funding by more than 90%.

“Our health care system is under attack by a president, administration, and Republican-controlled Congress that – after numerous failed attempts to repeal Obamacare – are sabotaging it for political gain,” Waters said in a statement. “My legislation seeks to reverse their vindictive efforts to undermine and de-stabilize our health care system by ensuring that all consumers are provided with the information they need to make timely and well-informed decisions when purchasing health coverage through the federal and state-run marketplaces.” The bill, Affordable Care Act (ACA) Outreach for the Uninsured, Transformative Recruitment, and Enrollment Action for Compassionate Healthcare (ACA OUTREACH) Act, is cosponsored by 36 other lawmakers. If it passes, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would dole out $300 million annually through 2021 for “navigator” grants. Minority and underserved communities would be especially targeted, according to language in the bill’s text.

The Obamacare navigator program was rife with fraud and corruption and Judicial Watch sued HHS back in 2014 to obtain records that the agency refused to provide under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In 2013, the Obama administration gave dozens of leftists organizations a whopping $67 million to help people “navigate” health insurance exchanges that weren’t even fully established. In a “culturally competent manner” the so-called navigators were tasked with helping people shop for and enroll in plans that would eventually be available on the federal government market places. The money was divided between 105 mostly leftist groups that assisted and recruited the uninsured to sign up for coverage and understand their options.

Here are a few examples of the community organizations that received navigator grants from the government; an Arizona nonprofit called “Campesinos Sin Fronteras” that provides services to farm workers and low-income Hispanics; a south Florida legal group that provided navigators in “racially, ethnically, linguistically, culturally and socioeconomically diverse” communities; three Planned Parenthood branches—in Iowa, Montana and New Hampshire—got a combined $655,000 to serve as navigators. Others include; the Arab Community Center in Michigan, which got nearly $300,000 to reach out to and engage uninsured community members through “multicultural” media. A Black Chamber of Commerce in South Carolina received north of $230,000 to “provide outreach around new coverage options” and a Hispanic aging group in Texas got over $646,000 help members that are “socially isolated due to cultural and linguistic differences.”

Some of the navigator money went to a labor front group called Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York headed by an illegal immigrant activist named Maria Marroquin. The group received navigator funds shortly after Marroquin, an illegal alien from Peru, had been arrested for participating in disruptive demonstrations protesting the deportation of fellow undocumented immigrants and demanding amnesty.

Besides the outrage of hiring an illegal immigrant to promote a U.S. government program, it’s equally disturbing to know that navigators have access to the sensitive personal information of healthcare enrollees. This includes Social Security numbers, which can be used for identity theft, a rampant crime among illegal alien populations seeking to establish residency and land jobs in the U.S.

Navigator funds also went to a nonprofit (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), with such a huge history of corruption that Congress issued a federal funding ban. As part of a broader investigation into ACORN Judicial Watch obtained records showing that HHS violated the congressional ACORN funding ban by awarding a Louisiana nonprofit called Southern United Neighborhoods (SUN) a $1.3 million Obamacare navigator grant to recruit customers. Headquartered in New Orleans, SUN is dedicated to combating poverty, discrimination and community deterioration that keep low-income people from taking advantage of their rights and opportunities, according to its website.

“Auntie Maxin’s” proposed bill is officially being called the “ACA OUTREACH Act.” And it would for all intent and purpose direct $300 million taxpayer dollars annually for the next four years from Health and Human Services to Democrat party supporting “navigators,” who are supposed to help “minority and underserved” people understand the health insurance process. Because you know, according to the “tolerant” Democrat Party these people are too stupid to figure it out on their own. Kind of like how these same minorities can’t seem to be able to get an ID card in order to vote.

How long will our nation have to support Democrat Party kickbacks? I’m sure President Trump won’t sign this bill if by some miracle it passes the GOP Congress and the Senate. But this shouldn’t even be a bill in the first place, and Waters shouldn’t be in Congress either.

Please share if you want an end to the Democrat Party corruption….

Two Republicans Betray Trump, Ensuring Defeat Of Historic Conservative Bill

Trump has been enjoying one success after another. Yet one of the biggest problems he faces is support from his own party.

During the election, ‘NeverTrumpers’ opposed his campaign. Even after winning, several notable Republicans continued to defy the new Commander-in-Chief.

In recent months, that seemed to end. Republicans got on board to vote for historic tax cuts. The party seems to be getting in line with President Trump’s vision for America.

However, the country was stunned when two Republicans violated their supporters’ convictions. In the worst possible way.

From Daily Wire:

On Monday, Senate Democrats declined to implement a ban on abortions past 20 weeks, or five months into a pregnancy, known as the “Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.”

Only three Democrats — Indiana’s Joe Donnelly, Pennsylvania’s Bob Casey, and West Virginia’s Joe Manchin — voted for the ban, along with 48 Republican senators. Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine also disgracefully refused to protect life, voting “no” to the bill…

On Monday, President Donald Trump expressed disappointment with the rejection of the 20-week abortion ban, putting us in the company of China and North Korea…

Here’s what an opinion piece published in Newsweek (a left-wing outlet) has to say about what we know about life in the womb at 20-weeks:

…Ultrasounds show unborn babies at five months of pregnancy sucking their thumb, yawning, stretching and making faces—detailed 3-D images that we haven’t seen until the last decade. In utero, these babies have 10 fingers, 10 toes, a beating heart and unique DNA that is different than the mom and the dad—they are humans that deserve the right to live. Thusly, this is a human rights issue.

All but three Democrats and two Republicans voted to murder these unborn people. Say all you want about immigration, economics, and national security. There should be no division when it comes to abortion. This barbaric and outdated practice must come to an end.

In this day and age, we know even more about human development than ever before. There is no denying that an unborn child is alive and deserves the same rights as every American. The 20-week ban was a step in the right direction. It would acknowledge what we’ve learned over the last forty years.

Those that voted against it aren’t only heartless killers, but they are denying basic science.

All for what? So that vile feminists can continue to claim abortion is a women’s rights issue? I guess they don’t care about women in the womb.

Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins are traitors. Not only to the Republican Party, but to the human race. Imagine all the children who will die, thanks to their vote.

It’s time for every pro-choice politician to be ejected from office.

Source: Daily Wire,

James Woods Calls Kennedy and Pelosi “Political Roadkill” in Epic Post-SOTU Tweet

A petty attempt by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to slam President Donald Trump for his otherwise very well-received State of the Union address this week failed epically after conservative actor James Woods fired back with one of the most brutal replies in recent Twitter history.

“@realDonaldTrump may have painfully tried to deceive the American people into thinking he’s not an unstable person, but no one’s falling for it,” Pelosi tweeted early Wednesday morning, a couple hours after Trump delivered the speech.

“Rep. Joe Kennedy, on the other hand, embodied our values as a country and exemplified the optimism that Americans are seeking,” she added, referencing the widely ridiculed Democrat rebuttal delivered after the SOTU.


Just to be clear, a CBS News poll showed that a 97 percent majority of Republicans, 72 percent majority of Independents and a stunning 43 percent of Democrats approved of the president’s speech. Not Pelosi, though, who spent much of the speech making odd facial gestures that made it look as if she was munching on her dentures.

Conversely, the small number of Americans who tuned in for Kennedy’s rebuttal were too distracted by what People magazine described as “the Massachusetts representative’s shiny lips” to pay much heed to the nonsense he was spouting.

According to WBZ, the official story is that Kennedy had put on too much ChapStick.

Considering the way the mainstream media still fawns over all things Kennedy, that story isn’t likely to be questioned too closely. But James Woods had a different take.

Now, cue his brutal reply:

Ouch. He somewhat nailed it, though. I say only “somewhat” because, truthfully speaking, Trump rolled over the entire Democrat Party that night by demonstrating how much contemporary Democrats hate America.

In an op-ed Wednesday for The Daily Wire, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro explained it:

“They grimaced. They groaned. They booed and hissed,” he wrote, describing the Democrats’ behavior during the SOTU. “And it wasn’t just that they disapproved of Trump on policy. It’s that they refused to stand for things they supposedly believe in because they hate Trump so much. Paid family leave? They sat. Infrastructure spending? They sat. Amnesty for 1.8 million illegal immigrants? They sat.

“And then they sat some more. They sat when Trump touted the American flag. They sat when Trump touted American freedom. They sat when Trump touted low black unemployment rates. They sat when Trump cheered American opportunity.”

Shapiro believes they sat because they hate Trump more than they love America, but I contend they sat because they hate America, period. They hate American freedoms and liberties; they hate the American culture of entrepreneurship, innovation and success; and they most certainly hate American history.

And by putting their hatred of America on full display Tuesday night, the Democrats may have just turned themselves into “political roadkill” for real.

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about James Woods’ brutal reply to Pelosi.

What do you think about the Democrats’ behavior during the SOTU address? Scroll down to comment below!

House Republicans Defeat Dems 13-9 To Restore Major Constitutional Right

Things are about to get even more interesting in Washington, D.C. And Liberals are beginning to panic.

There have long been rumblings that things just aren’t right in some of our nation’s most ‘sacred’ institutions, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice. But truly, just how ‘sacred’ are these two administrative forces?

Well, in recent months, it has become quite apparent that those rumblings of such things as abuse and political profiling are spot on. And the Obama swamp slugs that haven’t been drained from these two departments will have a good reason to flee now. And it’s all thanks to House Republicans.

From Breitbart:

The House Intelligence Committee voted Monday to release a classified memo to the public detailing alleged abuse by senior Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigations officials in their investigation of the Trump campaign.

The committee voted on a party line — all 13 Republicans for and all nine Democrats against, according to the Ranking Member Adam Schiff (D-CA), who gave a press conference after the decision.

Schiff, who has never come across a camera that he didn’t sprint towards like an Olympic athlete, has been all over the airwaves pounding his chest and pontificating about how downright awful this development is.

The memo reportedly details — among other things — how senior officials abused FISA to obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump foreign policy campaign adviser Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Unfortunately for Schiff and his Leftist pals, he’s failed miserably in his latest attempt to demonstrate that obstructionism is the only tool he carries around in his tool belt. Which means that the House Republicans are ensuring that our 4th Amendment rights to warrants before search and seizure are still protected, despite what Democrats want to do with conservatives.

The memo reportedly will show that the senior DOJ and FBI officials did reveal to the secret court that grants FISA warrants that the dossier was a political document.

Democrats on the committee have drafted their own counter-memo and sought a vote to have it released to the public at the same time as the other memo.

The committee rejected releasing the Democratic memo to the public, but approved releasing it to House members, as was the procedure with the FISA memo. The committee could later vote to make that memo public as well.

While it’s no secret that Schiff has a tortured relationship with facts that don’t support his preferred narrative, don’t allow the wool to be pulled over your eyes.

The Democratic memo will go through the same exact process that the GOP memo just went through, and it too will see the light of day.

In reality, that’s not really necessary. The Democratic talking points are blared from the rooftops on a daily basis by the mainstream media, which has dissolved into nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Left.

You can be sure that we’ll see an immediate dismissal of the findings of the GOP memo with the patented snide remarks and mock indignation.

We’ll take that as further confirmation that the curtain is finally starting to be pulled back. And Democrats are in a big heap of trouble.

Source: Breitbart,

Hey Democrats… Obama Broke 78 Laws As President… Here’s The List

The list is might long, and is a striking record of Obama’s real legacy — the one the media pundits and Democrats will not tell you about:

1) Illegally armed Mexican drug cartels and ISIS militants

In Operation Fast and Furious, the Obama administration facilitated the sale of thousands of guns to Mexican drug cartels and stopped tracking those weapons once they crossed the border so the administration could later blame the Second Amendment.

The Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives apparently ordered one of its own agents to purchase firearms with taxpayer money, and sell them directly to a Mexican drug cartel,” the New York Post reported. “Let that sink in: After months of pretending that ‘Fast and Furious’ was a botched surveillance operation of illegal gun-running spearheaded by the ATF and the US attorney’s office in Phoenix, it turns out that the government itself was selling guns to the bad guys.

Even more shocking, President Obama authorized a shipment of guns to the Syrian opposition, a.k.a. ISIS-linked militants, on the exact same day he demanded more gun control in response to the Oregon shooting.

“…The President also emphasized to his team that the U.S. would continue to support the Syrian opposition as Russia enters the war-torn country,” CNN reported in October.

But virtually all of the rebels in Syria have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State since at least 2013.

The Free Syrian Army and the Syrian National Council, the vaunted bulwarks of the moderate opposition, only really exist in hotel lobbies and the minds of Western diplomats,” Journalist Ben Reynolds wrote in November. “There is simply no real separation between ‘moderate’ rebel groups and hardline Salafists allied with al-Qaeda.

2) Attempting to shut down gun stores outside of law

In a classic case of criminal racketeering, the U.S. Department of Justice was pressuring banks to refuse service to gun stores in a program entitled Operation Choke Point.

Under the program started in 2014 if not before, the DOJ was attempting to shut down legal gun dealers by coercing financial institutions to close the bank and merchant accounts associated with their businesses.

In 2012, Bank of America told a gun company, McMillan Group International, that because the company was expanding into firearms manufacturing, the bank no longer wanted McMillan’s business.

We have to assess the risk of doing business with a firearms-related industry,” the bank’s representative told operations director Kelly McMillan.

And not long after, BitPay, a U.S.-based bitcoin processor, likewise refused to do business with gun dealer Michael Cargill of Central Texas Gunworks due to a similar policy.

3) Spent tax dollars to re-settle illegals inside U.S.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrol has been purchasing bus tickets and vouchers for illegal immigrants in order to ship them deeper into the country at taxpayers’ expense, according to a McAllen, Texas city official.

They’re not bringing them here, they’re bringing them to our bus terminals because that’s where the Border Patrol understands that they have transportation to go to the interior,” McAllen, Texas City Attorney Kevin Pagan said in an interview with Infowars. “So they’re dropping them off and it’s our understanding that they were dropped off with tickets or with vouchers for tickets, but it turns out that some of them tonight didn’t have their tickets or their vouchers for tickets, or like I said their buses are tomorrow, so they have no where to stay.

Several months earlier, Obama ordered the Border Patrol to stand down from protecting the border and enforcing immigration laws.

We are simply being ordered to stand down and stop tracking and trying to apprehend the criminals,” Shawn Moran, Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council, told Breitbart.

4) Using executive action to restrict Second Amendment

Obama decided to use his “pen and his phone” to enact gun control without Congressional approval.

Without a Democratic majority in Congress, and faced with a GOP that is firmly against any form of gun control measures, Obama has repeatedly warned that he would act on his own,” Zero Hedge reported.

For one thing, Obama is attempting to require private sellers to conduct background checks.

“The action, officials explained, would include guidance on how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives will now determine who is “engaged in the business” of selling firearms under federal law and, therefore, who is required to obtain a license to sell firearms,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.

Obama may also try and prevent people on the no-fly list from being able to purchase guns, which violates the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process by allowing the government to deprive people of their rights based only on suspicion.

Additionally, numerous law-abiding Americans have been wrongly placed on the No-Fly list due to false information, clerical errors or political persecution.

The U.S. government maintains a massive watchlist system that risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of people – including U.S. citizens – as terrorism suspects based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence,” the ACLU reported. “The consequences of being placed on a government watchlist can be far-reaching; they can include questioning, harassment, or detention by authorities, or even an indefinite ban on air travel.

5) Illegally targeted conservative groups via IRS

Obama’s IRS had illegally targeted conservative groups for additional “reviews” of their tax status applications.

Organizations with the phrases “tea party” or “patriot” in their names were singled out for harassment, such as requiring them to provide information about their family members, their social media posts and a list of donors.

Obama had met with a key IRS official who was involved in the targeting just two days before the key official told his colleagues how to target conservative groups. The Daily Caller reported:

The Obama appointee implicated in congressional testimony in the IRS targeting scandal met with President Obama in the White House two days before offering his colleagues a new set of advice on how to scrutinize tea party and conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.

IRS chief counsel William Wilkins, who was named in House Oversight testimony by retiring IRS agent Carter Hull as one of his supervisors in the improper targeting of conservative groups, met with Obama in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on April 23, 2012. Wilkins’ boss, then-IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman, visited the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on April 24, 2012, according to White House visitor logs.

On April 25, 2012, Wilkins’ office sent the exempt organizations determinations unit “additional comments on the draft guidance” for approving or denying tea party tax-exempt applications, according to the IRS inspector general’s report.

During Obama’s first four years as President, IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman made 157 visits to the White House.

This is more visits to the White House – by a very large margin – than any other cabinet member during Obama’s first term,” Journalist Tim Brown revealed. “By comparison, during the four years that Mark Everson was IRS commissioner when Bush was president, Everson made only one visit to the White House.

6) Secretly obtained phone records from Associated Press journalists

In May 2013, Associated Press reported:

The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative’s top executive called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into how news organizations gather the news.

The records obtained by the Justice Department listed outgoing calls for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP. It was not clear if the records also included incoming calls or the duration of calls.

Trump Just Pissed Democrats Off With The AWESOME New Picture That Went Up In White House!!

The White House is filled with historical pieces and artifacts that represent our nation’s history, but perhaps none are so controversial as what President Donald Trump just donned the walls of the West Wing with today. Among the painted pieces of notable figures in our nation’s history, is a new framed piece of work that comes with a clear message that cannot be ignored. Now, idiots everywhere are infuriated about what our leader had the guts to put up that we’re pretty sure his supporters are going to love.

The First Family is getting comfortable in their new home, just as the Obamas did in their disrespectful way that nobody seemed to have a problem with. When Trump moved in and began putting his personal touch on the People’s House, all hell broke loose with accusations of tactless taste that his predecessor never got when hosting rappers and their wives. Whether people agree or disagree with what our President just put on the walls, he had the right to celebrate his victory in the way he chose to decorate.

The White House isn’t just a place where the president lives, it’s a monument that represents milestones in leadership throughout our nation’s history. Perhaps not a single leader has been so controversial as our current Commander-in-Chief who overcame all odds to call this place home. Because of that, he has every right to document this incredible feat with a framed piece that shows exactly how that happened.

The media tried to portray that Trump’s opposition, Hillary Clinton, had a huge lead in the presidential race. However, one picture proved that wrong, which has now become the West Wing’s latest and perhaps most extraordinary piece of artwork.

Trump didn’t become president by a mere margin — he won by a landslide of votes where it counted most. The Electoral College is the deciding vote and the now infamous image of which way each area of every state went has become its own modern art on display in the White House, and for good reason.

Trey Yingst was among the first to spot this new display and seemingly without realizing the can of controversy he was opening with this Tweeted picture of it, he simply stated, ” Spotted: a map to be hung somewhere in the West Wing.” The image of the Electoral College Map from the election Trump swept in 2016 accompanied his sentiment and infuriated idiots around the country who couldn’t fathom why Trump would display such a thing.

It’s unknown at what point these Democratic degenerates forgot who they were talking about — thinking that somehow it was out of character for Trump to gloat. When it’s his right to do so by having earned it through honest means and against all odds, he should display that victory since it sends a message about what America is all about. Trump was truthful in his lead and the media was not, however, this is photo proof of that bias and that the American dream can be accomplished despite any adversary against you, and needs to be displayed for that reason..

Perhaps the most humorous part of the outrage over this imagery in the West Wing is that the same people who publicly express how tasteless and gross it is, in their opinion, were in support of a wife using the desk her husband received disgusting sexual favors at during his time in office. I think what it comes down to is that the truth hurts and no matter how much some people in America hate Trump, they can’t deny that he legitimately painted the country red in approval of him.

It’s often said that “a picture says a thousand words” but this one speaks volumes beyond that. Trump beat supposed frontrunner Hillary Clinton by far more than a thousand Electoral College votes. This wasn’t just a victory for him, but for the American people who were heard and deserve to have the piece of our country’s history commemorated on the wall of the White House. Every little girl and boy in America with a dream to make a difference and become president one day can do that, just like Trump did as a non-career politician. That’s significant and part of what makes America great.

Democrats Move To Impose ‘Sin Tax’ On One Food Americans Eat Every Day

It’s official: Democrats hate everything you love. That’s clear simply from the way they opposed the tax cut bill. Americans saving money? We can’t have that!

But it goes beyond their desire to rob you of cash. Democrats love to regulate everything. Much like Big Brother of 1984, they want to control every last bit of your personal life. From marriage to business to eating, Democrats want to decide what you can or cannot do.

There are even groups who want to punish you for eating. PETA and other unhinged, radical leftists, are pushing for bills that will excessively tax meat. Yep, the most basic source of protein in the world.

Cue the clown music.

From Daily Wire:

If environmentalists and health nuts get their way, your steak could be getting a little more expensive.

According to Bloomberg, governments looking to improve their citizens’ eating habits, and simultaneously protect the environment from the disastrous impact of cattle, pig, and goat farming, are suddenly turning “bullish” on the idea of implementing a “sin tax” against people who purchase meat, either at grocery stores or in restaurants…

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals… is one of the organizations behind the push, of course.

If there is a “meat tax,” Bloomberg notes, it’ll probably happen in Europe first, where everything is taxed and no one complains, and would probably impact the meat industry first and meat eaters only eventually.

Activists reluctantly admit that the United States, at least, probably won’t embrace a meat tax as readily as our European cousins, not just because we like meat, but because “sin taxes” are on the decline. Even Chicago, which has readily embraced a whole measure of sin taxes, was forced to reconsider — and ultimately repeal — a tax on sugary beverages, after stores put drink tax information directly in front of consumers.

There are regions of the world that are starving. Often a single goat can mean the difference between life or death for families. Yet these entitled liberals only care about pushing their bogus vegan ideology.

You might like having a B-vitamin deficiency, PETA, but the rest of us want to be healthy.

This pathetic agenda is simply a way to control your eating habits. Instead of believing you have the right to choose what to eat, democrats want to decide for you. A heavy tax on meat is a way to discourage people from eating it.

And it has nothing to do with the environment. If it did, they would only focus on beef, which they claim harms the atmosphere. To lump in pigs and goats is simply a big “screw you” to non-vegans the world over.

Are you going to let unwashed hippies deprive you of your steaks? I hope not.

Source: Daily Wire,