Dairy Queen Just Enraged Every Democrat With New Warning Sign To Liberals That Went Up Overnight

Image result for Dairy Queen Just Enraged Every Democrat With New Warning Sign To Liberals That Went Up Overnight

There was a time when social media was used to post funny pictures of our kids, adorable pet videos, and of course, the obligatory dinner plate, however, now it has been taken over by social justice warriors. We have all seen these keyboard warriors online with their unchecked virtue signaling and shrill screams that everyone is a racist or bigot that voted for Donald Trump. These entitled leftists scour the county looking for ways to be offended in order to post it online for all to see. So, when one Wisconsin Dairy Queen posted a politically incorrect sign in their window it was inevitable that liberals would soon be triggered, and of course, we were not disappointed.

Wisconsin Dairy Queen owner Kevin Scheunemann has created quite the stir on social media and it was not for his delicious frozen treats. Scheunemann posted on his door a sign that the left would deem as politically incorrect, and in all reality, it isn’t. The simple sign consists of a list of sayings and core values that the majority of Americans in our country hold dear, but leave it a liberal to find that offensive.

The sign reads, “This restaurant is politically incorrect we have been known to say “Merry Christmas, Happy Easter, God Bless America and give away free ice cream sundaes to veterans on Veterans Day. The bottom of the sign says in large letters “In God We Trust.”

The sign was posted four years ago after a customer came into the establishment and complained that there was Christian music being played. Then another customer complained that Scheunemann was giving away free ice cream to veterans and found that to be unfair. So, Scheunemann thought the best way to curtail these snowflakes delicate feelings was to post this sign so that customers knew where he stood.

“I felt the sign was appropriate to hang in terms of being transparent about the views of the owner and staff supporting God and country,” Scheunemann explained to CBS 58.

“It just seems that those kinds of values and principles are becoming controversial in society,” he added.

The sign has hung there for the last four years without a problem, but that streak ended about a week ago when one snowflake saw the sign and took to social media to complain. Ashley Coleman saw the sign hanging outside the door and was triggered by the sentiment and needed to take a snapshot of the sign.

“I find this extremely offensive,” whined an Oregon woman who goes by the name Ashley Coleman on Facebook. “Please speak with the franchise owner,” she added.

The post quickly picked up steam on Facebook as over a thousand people shared it and over two people commented, but if Coleman thought the town would get behind her she would be sorely mistaken. In fact, the community in this small town has rallied around the Dairy Queen seemingly in agreement with sign’s views.

Daily Wire reported:

“Business is good,” noted local CBS reporter Julie Parise, “thanks in part to a sign that’s hanging on the front door.”

Business owners in the area also came to Scheunemann’s defense.

“He posted it on the door so you see it before you walk in,” said local store owner April Serwe. “You don’t have to walk in if you don’t agree with it.”

Some Kewaskum residents even said the sign is unnecessary since most all of them “share the same values,” notes CBS 58.

“In this small community, I don’t think it’s a problem,” said local Liz Torrison. “We’re all just liking each other and having fun.”

Dairy Queen has not dictated the owner take down the sign, but they did distance themselves from the poster in a statement:

American Dairy Queen Corporation does not encourage our independently owned and operated franchisees to post non-business related messages in their locations or on their external reader boards. This sign expresses the views of this independent owner only and does not speak for ADQ Corporation or any of our other independent franchise owners. We expect our franchisees and employees to treat every person who walks through our doors with the utmost dignity and respect. Nothing less is acceptable.

Scheunemann said he’d be willing to make accommodations for anyone uncomfortable with the declarations made by the poster.

There is nothing wrong with anything that was said on this sign but leave it to a liberal to be triggered by it. America is a melting pot but that does not mean we need to abandon our customs for others people’s feelings. If they do not like that this place says Merry Christmas then are free to go to a place that says Happy Holidays and so forth. Being offended by something does not mean they get to force other people to see it their way it just simply means that is their views. To many people that seem simple enough but thanks to the liberal indoctrination, these entitled leftists believe everyone must bend to them. It will take time to fix this mess, but until then we cannot bend to these liberal idiots and we must continue forging on.

America is a melting pot but that does not mean we need to abandon our customs for others people’s feelings. If they do not like that this place says Merry Christmas then are free to go to a place that says Happy Holidays and so forth. Being offended by something does not mean they get to force other people to see it their way it just simply means that is their views. To many people, that seems simple enough, but thanks to the liberal indoctrination, these entitled leftists believe everyone must bend to them.

It will take time to fix this mess, but until then we cannot bend to these liberal idiots and we must continue forging on.


Source:Daily Wire, rwnofficial.com

“Yo Black Slavers Stop Holding Us Down!” Diamond & Silk Call Out Democrat Reps To Their Faces [Videos]

Image result for “Yo Black Slavers Stop Holding Us Down!” Diamond & Silk Call Out Democrat Reps To Their Faces [Videos]

Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, better known by their Facebook followers and legions of Trump supporters as Diamond and Silk, were invited to provide testimony to the House Judiciary Committee today.  The experts, aside from Diamond and Silk, were three highly polished leftwing lawyers doubling as lobbyists.  House Democrats believed the trap had been set.

Diamond and Silk hadn’t read the script where they were expected to be exposed as stupid black chicks and they set about steamrolling their Democrat inquisitors to the point of embarrassment – embarrassment for the voters who elected these frauds to represent them in the first place.   

Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), the ranking member of the committee was so astonished that two black women could answer questions so factually and with so much authority that he claimed they couldn’t possibly represent a wider group of aggrieved Facebook users, not Black Facebook users anyways, and dismissed Facebook’s censorship of their account as “anecdotal.” 

Hey, but what would you expect from a rich, fat, race-baiting white Democratic powerbroker?  After all, the Klan was founded by rich, fat, race-baiting white Democratic powerbrokers.

It was the questioning by the Black members of the Democratic caucus on the committee though that exposed their ignorance and how dismissive of freethinking Blacks these Congressional Black Slavers are willing to be in order to keep their Black brethren in “line.”

Congressman Hank Johnson (D-GA) took home the award for the most embarrassing performance.  Johnson is no stranger to this award having been the runaway winner in 2011 when he openly questioned if Guam would capsize. 

The race was a closer this time around but Ol’ Hank proved he still had it in him – that’s a nice way to say he’s still a moron after almost seven more years in Washington.

Poor Hank, whose been fleecing his constituents for more than 11 years, charged Diamond and Silk with “making a ton of money or Facebook.”  Ain’t no uppity Black women supposed to do that, don’t ya know.

Watching Black slaver Hank made me rethink the value of the Department of Education after witnessing first-hand just how stupid the voters of Georgia’s Fourth Congressional District must be.  This mutt is in his sixth term and he hasn’t gotten the DOE to raise the educational standards even a little bit in his district yet?

The award for most venial was a close call but went to Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) who was intent on tripping up the fearless duo by confusing then on dates in a trap reminiscent of Al Franken’s on Jeff Sessions. 

Black slaver Jackson Lee kept hammering them in an attempt to get an admission that they lied about being contacted directly by Facebook prior to appearing on the Laura Ingraham show when they hadn’t been.  The girls were way ahead of Jackson Lee and let her know there would be no sound bites coming from a cheap splicing effort by Media Matters.

The award for most hypocritical went to Representative Hakeem Jeffries whose plantation boss in the 2016 election – Hillary Clinton – has recently been accused of failing to report $84,000,000 to the Federal Election Commission during her campaign.

Jeffries, another black slaver tried to discredit Diamond and Silk for accepting payment from the Trump campaign for, get this, $1,274.94.  The payment was a reimbursement for travel expenses.

When Jeffries made his ridiculous assertion that was some form of remuneration Silk unloaded on him:

“We’re familiar with that particular lie. We see that you do look at fake news.” 

“What should have happened is, you should have come to our mouth to see what exactly happened, before a false narrative was put out there about the $1,274.94. 

“There may have been a mistake from the Trump campaign when they wrote what the $1,274.94 was for. Actually, this was because we were asked to join the ‘Women for Trump’ tour.

“And Ms. Laura Trump asked that our airline tickets be refunded back to us because we paid for those tickets when we went from New York to Ohio.

“We’ve never been paid by the Trump campaign.” 

The only saving grace for the Congressional Black Slavers was that this hearing wasn’t televised and only available through online feeds. 

But it doesn’t matter any longer.  Between Kanye West, and Rapper Chance, Blacks are woke and time’s are a changing.

Source: fbnewsupdate.com


The reports that you have heard from a former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) official regarding negative information about Administrator Scott Pruitt is likely false. The official is said to not have his facts straight, according to sources familiar with the EPA’s inside information.

Kevin Chmielewski is the former EPA official who served as deputy chief of staff operations. He likely gave congressional Democrats a list of accusations against Pruitt that supposedly detailed the administrator’s “wasteful spending” and “disregard for ethical and legal requirements.”

But Chmielewski was allegedly removed from his position at EPA for challenging Pruitt, but that hasn’t been confirmed, reports said. Many of his claims have been called into question by two sources familiar with EPA’s inner-workings. 

One source said of Chmielewski’s claims that “more than 60 percent is false, the other 40 percent is information he distorted.”

One of the allegations against Pruitt by Chmielewski claimed that “a $30,000 contract with private Italian security personnel entered into by Mr. [Pasquele] Nino Perrotta,” was ahead of Pruitt’s attendance of a G7 summit in Italy.

But two sources familiar with Pruitt’s security said that it never happened. They also added that Perrotta, the special agent in charge of Pruitt’s security detail, would not have had authority to enter into such a contract on his own. 

The “special agent in charge has no authority to make purchase agreements or authorize people to make purchases,” one source said. Perrotta would have needed approval from higher-ups in the Office of Criminal Enforcement and Forensic Training, the source said.

Perrotta has become known through intense media scrutiny as Pruitt’s “sheriff,” according to a New York Times article that was published the same day as many of Chmielewski’s accusations.

“Perrotta has clashed — at least once physically — with top EPA officials who challenged Mr. Pruitt’s spending and has steered at least one EPA security contract to a business associate,” current and former officials told NYT.

Of course, if the media and Democrats weren’t so desperate they could have vetted the information and found out for themselves.

Likewise, “at least one security-related contract was awarded to an individual who works at Mr. Perrotta’s private security firm, and he believes that other contracts may also have been awarded to friends or associates of Mr. Perrotta’s,” Chmielewski told Democrats.

Are these allegations regarding Pruitt more “fake news” propagated by the media?

Credit: Daily Caller,redbluedivide.com

It’s Happening. Another Democrat Just Broke Party Lines, Big Win For Trump

Image result for breaking news

Senator Joe Manchin (D – W.Va) has broken with his party’s line and will be the second Democrat to vote to confirm Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State.

Manchin tweeted, “After meeting with Mike Pompeo, discussing his foreign policy perspectives, & considering his distinguished time as CIA Director & his exemplary career in public service, I will vote to confirm Mike Pompeo to be our next Secretary of State.”

Pompeo likely has the votes to be confirmed, but Manchin’s vote is helpful considering Rand Paul will be voting “no.”

On Monday, President Trump called out the “Obstructionist” Democrats.

Trump tweeted, “Hard to believe Obstructionists May vote against Mike Pompeo for Secretary of State. The Dems will not approve hundreds of good people, including the Ambassador to Germany. They are maxing out the time on approval process for all, never happened before. Need more Republicans!”

It’s time for the Democrats to stop their crying and whining and jump on the Trump train!


Michelle Obama Gets Schooled By Melania When She Showed Up at U.S.-Japan State Dinner

Image result for Top Democrat Who Liberals Hoped Would Beat Trump in 2020 Just Found Himself in Hot Water

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois has made himself a hero of the liberal left by spending the past 12 months doing nothing but “resisting” President Trump.

He’s even been arrested, TWICE, for publicly protesting. It seems to be all he’s good for these days.

Of course, to liberals, that makes Gutierrez a perfect candidate to field against Trump in the 2020 election.

Gutierrez gave Democratic voters a bit of a scare recently when he abruptly announced he’d be leaving Congress after 13 terms.

But, now, it appears that move is all part of his maneuvering to contest the White House.

Ironically, Gutierrez kicked off his tentative presidential campaign by declaring himself the candidate who’s going to do something about “guaranteeing regulations and rules about campaign financing.”

The problem there is that Gutierrez and his wife (who’s also his campaign manager and a political lobbyist) have been involved in some pretty shady maneuvering when it comes to campaign finances.

From the Washington Free Beacon:

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Ill.), who announced last week that he will not seek reelection after spending 24 years in the U.S. House of Representatives, will no longer be able to pay his wife hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaign funds once he officially departs from Congress.

Soraida Gutierrez, his wife, has collected more than $430,000 from Gutierrez for Congress, Luis’s campaign committee, since 2010. Soraida is the top recipient of expenditures this year.

Soraida, who was a registered lobbyist in Illinois prior to appearing on the campaign’s payroll, has been listed as the campaign’s office manager, fundraiser, and treasurer for the past seven years.

Gutierrez’s campaign committee has reported $77,838.69 in operating expenditures from the beginning of January to the end of September. Soraida has received seven checks for $6,000 each—or $42,000 total—during this time, meaning that she has collected more than half of his campaign’s disbursements.


Beloved Hollywood Actor Turns on Democrats, Delivers 7 Brutal Words of Truth

Image result for Beloved Hollywood Actor Turns on Democrats, Delivers 7 Brutal Words of Truth

Liberal Democrats have been so thoroughly exposed for the divisive hypocrites they are that even some in Hollywood are now openly turning on them.

Sure, most of Hollywood remains bitterly entrenched in liberal-land.

But a growing number of more level-headed actors are starting to wake up to the sad reality.

One of them is Bill Murray, one of America’s most beloved comedic actors.

In an interview on CNBC, Murray decried the divisive nature of politics today, especially as practiced by Democrats, and how that whole mess is amplified in hyper-liberal Hollywood.

“My friend who’s a great comedy writer, Jim Downey, he’s accused of being a right-wing comedy writer, if there is such a thing,” said Murray. “‘No, no,’ he says, ‘I just think the way Democrats handle things is poor. They pick out little pieces of a population and say they represent it — we represent the Hispanics, we represent the LGBT, or something.’ They’re not speaking to everyone at once. It’s almost demeaning to say I’m choosing you, because you’re a splinter group, there’s almost a resentment, to say you’re my people. We’re being separated again by a politician.

Via Daily Wire,conservativepost.com

Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order And It Will Effectively Eliminate Mass Amounts Of Democrat Voters

Image result for Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order And It Will Effectively Eliminate Mass Amounts Of Democrat Voters

On April 10th of this year, the President officially signed an executive order that will aid in reducing poverty in the United States by promoting financial opportunity and economic mobility. However, it has largely been under-reported on. The White House press office did, however, release a statement on it saying,

“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to promote economic mobility, strong social networks, and accountability to American taxpayers, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Purpose.  The United States and its Constitution were founded on the principles of freedom and equal opportunity for all.  To ensure that all Americans would be able to realize the benefits of those principles, especially during hard times, the Government established programs to help families with basic unmet needs.  Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds.  While bipartisan welfare reform enacted in 1996 was a step toward eliminating the economic stagnation and social harm that can result from long-term Government dependence, the welfare system still traps many recipients, especially children, in poverty and is in need of further reform and modernization in order to increase self-sufficiency, well-being, and economic mobility.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  (a)  In 2017, the Federal Government spent more than $700 billion on low-income assistance.  Since its inception, the welfare system has grown into a large bureaucracy that might be susceptible to measuring success by how many people are enrolled in a program rather than by how many have moved from poverty into financial independence.  This is not the type of system that was envisioned when welfare programs were instituted in this country.  The Federal Government’s role is to clear paths to self-sufficiency, reserving public assistance programs for those who are truly in need.  The Federal Government should do everything within its authority to empower individuals by providing opportunities for work, including by investing in Federal programs that are effective at moving people into the workforce and out of poverty.  It must examine Federal policies and programs to ensure that they are consistent with principles that are central to the American spirit — work, free enterprise, and safeguarding human and economic resources.  For those policies or programs that are not succeeding in those respects, it is our duty to either improve or eliminate them.

(b)  It shall be the policy of the Federal Government to reform the welfare system of the United States so that it empowers people in a manner that is consistent with applicable law and the following principles, which shall be known as the Principles of Economic Mobility:

(i)     Improve employment outcomes and economic independence (including by strengthening existing work requirements for work-capable people and introducing new work requirements when legally permissible);

(ii)    Promote strong social networks as a way of sustainably escaping poverty (including through work and marriage);

(iii)   Address the challenges of populations that may particularly struggle to find and maintain employment (including single parents, formerly incarcerated individuals, the homeless, substance abusers, individuals with disabilities, and disconnected youth);

(iv)    Balance flexibility and accountability both to ensure that State, local, and tribal governments, and other institutions, may tailor their public assistance programs to the unique needs of their communities and to ensure that welfare services and administering agencies can be held accountable for achieving outcomes (including by designing and tracking measures that assess whether programs help people escape poverty);

(v)     Reduce the size of bureaucracy and streamline services to promote the effective use of resources;

(vi)    Reserve benefits for people with low incomes and limited assets;

(vii)   Reduce wasteful spending by consolidating or eliminating Federal programs that are duplicative or ineffective;

(viii)  Create a system by which the Federal Government remains updated on State, local, and tribal successes and failures, and facilitates access to that information so that other States and localities can benefit from it; and

(ix)    Empower the private sector, as well as local communities, to develop and apply locally based solutions to poverty.””

The executive order continues to describe in great detail and length how the administration intends on curbing poverty. But most importantly it focuses on several key factors in achieving this outcome,

  • improve employment outcomes and economic independence;
  • promote marriage and family as a way of escaping poverty;
  • address the challenges of hard-to-employ populations;
  • provide more flexibility to States, while ensuring accountability for achieving outcomes;
  • streamline services to more effectively use taxpayer resources;
  • reserve benefits for those truly in need;
  • consolidate duplicative programs;
  • facilitate greater sharing of information between States and localities; and
  • empower the private sector to find solutions to poverty

In the fine print of the executive order, the administration makes it clear they will be increasing work requirements for those utilizing subsidized government benefits, focusing on using taxpayer dollars for their intended purpose, as well as empowering state and local authorities to provide services to those in need.

This executive order is going to be yet another notch under the belt of the administration in curbing poverty and decreasing unemployment. For the third straight month, the United States has maintained a 4.1 percent unemployment rate which is the lowest it has been since 2000. These are near record low numbers at a time when businesses are dealing with a shortage of labor.

President Trump brought this order about because despite the labor shortage federal government assistance benefits are being used at an all-time high. In 2016 alone, a total of 16 million able-bodied individuals were enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program (SNAP). While in January 2018 74 million were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). These numbers continue to increase and something must be done about it which is exactly why the President introduced and signed this executive order.

By focusing on creating more opportunities for Americans to work it will lead to more income in their pockets and less of a need for governmental assistance programs. That means they’ll be less likely to vote Democrat. This is what provides people a pathway to financial freedom and the middle class and that is what this administration is all about. Especially given the fact the statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau indicate that 97 percent of full-time workers eventually move out of poverty.

Share if you agree with this message of the President


Trump fires back on Twitter over Democrats’ lawsuit

Image result for Trump fires back on Twitter over Democrats' lawsuit

President Donald Trump took to Twitter on Friday night to fire back at a Democratic Party lawsuit alleging a widespread conspiracy to tilt the 2016 election in his favor.

On a night when he was also tweeting about perceived progress on the denuclearization of North Korea, the president had this to say about the Dems’ lawsuit:

“Just heard the Campaign was sued by the Obstructionist Democrats. This can be good news in that we will now counter for the DNC Server that they refused to give to the FBI, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Servers and Documents held by the Pakistani mystery man and Clinton Emails.”

The Democratic Party on Friday filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government and WikiLeaks, alleging an election conspiracy.

Calling it an “all-out assault on our democracy,” the Democratic National Committee filed the civil suit in federal district court in Manhattan. The suit amounts to another legal broadside related to the 2016 race, on top of the special counsel’s ongoing Russia probe and the FBI raid on Trump’s personal attorney this month.

“The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency,” the suit states.

The new suit claims that Trump campaign officials worked in tandem with the Russian government and its military spy agency to bring down Hillary Clinton by hacking into the computer networks of the Democratic National Committee and spreading stolen material.

The suit names several Trump campaign aides who met with Russian nationals during the campaign, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, former campaign chair Paul Manafort and former campaign deputy Rick Gates.

Gates and Manafort have both been charged in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The suit also claims WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange “shared the defendants’ common goal of damaging the Democratic Party in advance of the election.” The suit states that Russia, using WikiLeaks, would disseminate information stolen from the DNC “at times when it would best suit the Trump campaign.”


Law Enforcement, ACLU, Alan Dershowitz, Civil Liberties, FBI raid, Fifth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Michael Cohen, Sixth Amendment

FILE - In this Sept. 10, 2014, file photo, Missouri state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal speaks on the Senate floor in Jefferson City, Mo. Chappelle-Nadal says she posted and then deleted a comment on Facebook that said she hoped for President Donald Trump's assassination. The Democratic Senator says she didn't mean what she posted Thursday, Aug. 17, 2017, but was frustrated with the president's reaction to the violence last weekend in Charlottesville, Va.(AP Photo/Jeff Roberson, File)

A black Missouri state senator who said she hoped President Donald Trump would be assassinated is now calling for reparations for blacks because of slavery.

During the debate over a tax bill on April 17, Democrat Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal (University City) took to the Senate floor at the state capital in Jefferson City to demandthat the state pass a reparations policy. Chappelle-Nadal also criticized members of her own party for not joining in her effort, the Kansas City Star reported.

Chappelle-Nadal insisted that Democrats like Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) are “no different” than Republicans who generally oppose reparations for slavery.

“Neither one of them give a heck about the black community, only the votes,” Chappelle-Nadal said during her comments on the floor of the Senate.

Chappelle-Nadal was motivated by emails and phone calls from constituents on the issue, saying, “When I’m getting a single mother of three children calling me trying to find a place to live because they don’t have a place to live, that’s what’s on my mind today and every single day.”

The senator also insisted that black Missourians—including her own ancestors—don’t get enough for their past work, saying, “In Boone County, Missouri, in Callaway County, Missouri—what my family contributed to making the state what it is today is incredible, and my family deserves way more than what it is getting today.”

Chappelle-Nadal was in the news last August when she posted to social media her hopes that President Trump would be assassinated.

After a backlash ensued, Chappelle-Nadal backed off and apologized for the post, but said she had no intention of resigning over the incident.

“I am not resigning. … What I said was wrong, but I am not going to stop talking about what led to that, which is the frustration and anger that many people across America are feeling right now,” she said.

Chappelle-Nadal found few of her fellow legislators to come to her side during her attack on Trump. Even Democrats like McCaskill and Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO 1st District) said she should resign for her comments.

Source: www.breitbart.com

Democrats Reveal the Real Reason for “March for Our Lives”… and it’s Worse Than We Thought

Kirsters Baish| Masses of brainwashed Americans made their way to the “March for Our Lives” rally in Washington, D.C. this Saturday. Credit for putting on this event is being given to the kids from the Parkland, Florida school shooting. The thing is, we are a little more aware than the mainstream media wants us to believe, and the kids weren’t the ones putting on the march. The Democratic Party and it’s special interest groups are responsible. The march was organized by far left groups such as Planned Parenthood and the Women’s March. They kept claiming that the whole thing wasn’t meant to be political. They claimed that it was simply about stopping gun violence in our country and that it was a bipartisan event. The whole thing was simply a big DNC voter registration push.

Fox News attended a march in Parkland, Florida, where some of the survivors of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting were protesting. As the rallies progressed, it was clear that the majority of those marching had no idea what they were marching for. Many attendees didn’t have the slightest clue about guns or details of the Second Amendment.

One teen who was interviewed literally had zero idea what she was saying. She thought assault rifles were legal in the United States. They are not. She believed that AR-15s were weapons of war. They are not. No modern military would send their solders into combat with a semi-automatic rifle.  She also believed that all mass shooters use AR-15s… because that is what the mainstream media keeps insisting. Most mass shootings are committed with handguns. No one with a mental health issue should not be able to have access to guns, this is something we all seem to agree on and should work to do our best to achieve. Authorities need to enforce the laws that are already in effect.

What has David Hogg been doing since the Parkland shooting except attacking all conservatives in our country and the entire NRA. He has been hanging up on President Trump and showing a complete lack of respect for our country and the rights of all American citizens.

The real reason for the march was announced by Parkland survivor Emma Gonzalez who stated, “Get out there and vote. Get our there and get registered.” It’s all about pushing people to vote for Democrats.

The whole thing is a big DNC voter registration rally. That’s all the entire march was.

It was reported that almost every single block in Washington D.C. had a voter registration table.

Just in case you weren’t aware who they were targeting:

All the Democrats are trying to do is get more voters. They don’t care that they’re using these kids in the process. They are hoping to win the midterms and get ready for the 2020 presidential election where they hope to take back the White House. Insert eye roll here. Taking away people’s rights isn’t the way to get votes.

Source: fbnewscycle.com