It’s Happening. Another Democrat Just Broke Party Lines, Big Win For Trump

Image result for breaking news

Senator Joe Manchin (D – W.Va) has broken with his party’s line and will be the second Democrat to vote to confirm Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State.

Manchin tweeted, “After meeting with Mike Pompeo, discussing his foreign policy perspectives, & considering his distinguished time as CIA Director & his exemplary career in public service, I will vote to confirm Mike Pompeo to be our next Secretary of State.”

Pompeo likely has the votes to be confirmed, but Manchin’s vote is helpful considering Rand Paul will be voting “no.”

On Monday, President Trump called out the “Obstructionist” Democrats.

Trump tweeted, “Hard to believe Obstructionists May vote against Mike Pompeo for Secretary of State. The Dems will not approve hundreds of good people, including the Ambassador to Germany. They are maxing out the time on approval process for all, never happened before. Need more Republicans!”

It’s time for the Democrats to stop their crying and whining and jump on the Trump train!

Michelle Obama Gets Schooled By Melania When She Showed Up at U.S.-Japan State Dinner

Image result for Top Democrat Who Liberals Hoped Would Beat Trump in 2020 Just Found Himself in Hot Water

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois has made himself a hero of the liberal left by spending the past 12 months doing nothing but “resisting” President Trump.

He’s even been arrested, TWICE, for publicly protesting. It seems to be all he’s good for these days.

Of course, to liberals, that makes Gutierrez a perfect candidate to field against Trump in the 2020 election.

Gutierrez gave Democratic voters a bit of a scare recently when he abruptly announced he’d be leaving Congress after 13 terms.

But, now, it appears that move is all part of his maneuvering to contest the White House.

Ironically, Gutierrez kicked off his tentative presidential campaign by declaring himself the candidate who’s going to do something about “guaranteeing regulations and rules about campaign financing.”

The problem there is that Gutierrez and his wife (who’s also his campaign manager and a political lobbyist) have been involved in some pretty shady maneuvering when it comes to campaign finances.

From the Washington Free Beacon:

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Ill.), who announced last week that he will not seek reelection after spending 24 years in the U.S. House of Representatives, will no longer be able to pay his wife hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaign funds once he officially departs from Congress.

Soraida Gutierrez, his wife, has collected more than $430,000 from Gutierrez for Congress, Luis’s campaign committee, since 2010. Soraida is the top recipient of expenditures this year.

Soraida, who was a registered lobbyist in Illinois prior to appearing on the campaign’s payroll, has been listed as the campaign’s office manager, fundraiser, and treasurer for the past seven years.

Gutierrez’s campaign committee has reported $77,838.69 in operating expenditures from the beginning of January to the end of September. Soraida has received seven checks for $6,000 each—or $42,000 total—during this time, meaning that she has collected more than half of his campaign’s disbursements.

Beloved Hollywood Actor Turns on Democrats, Delivers 7 Brutal Words of Truth

Image result for Beloved Hollywood Actor Turns on Democrats, Delivers 7 Brutal Words of Truth

Liberal Democrats have been so thoroughly exposed for the divisive hypocrites they are that even some in Hollywood are now openly turning on them.

Sure, most of Hollywood remains bitterly entrenched in liberal-land.

But a growing number of more level-headed actors are starting to wake up to the sad reality.

One of them is Bill Murray, one of America’s most beloved comedic actors.

In an interview on CNBC, Murray decried the divisive nature of politics today, especially as practiced by Democrats, and how that whole mess is amplified in hyper-liberal Hollywood.

“My friend who’s a great comedy writer, Jim Downey, he’s accused of being a right-wing comedy writer, if there is such a thing,” said Murray. “‘No, no,’ he says, ‘I just think the way Democrats handle things is poor. They pick out little pieces of a population and say they represent it — we represent the Hispanics, we represent the LGBT, or something.’ They’re not speaking to everyone at once. It’s almost demeaning to say I’m choosing you, because you’re a splinter group, there’s almost a resentment, to say you’re my people. We’re being separated again by a politician.

Via Daily Wire,

Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order And It Will Effectively Eliminate Mass Amounts Of Democrat Voters

Image result for Trump Signed His Latest Executive Order And It Will Effectively Eliminate Mass Amounts Of Democrat Voters

On April 10th of this year, the President officially signed an executive order that will aid in reducing poverty in the United States by promoting financial opportunity and economic mobility. However, it has largely been under-reported on. The White House press office did, however, release a statement on it saying,

“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to promote economic mobility, strong social networks, and accountability to American taxpayers, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Purpose.  The United States and its Constitution were founded on the principles of freedom and equal opportunity for all.  To ensure that all Americans would be able to realize the benefits of those principles, especially during hard times, the Government established programs to help families with basic unmet needs.  Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds.  While bipartisan welfare reform enacted in 1996 was a step toward eliminating the economic stagnation and social harm that can result from long-term Government dependence, the welfare system still traps many recipients, especially children, in poverty and is in need of further reform and modernization in order to increase self-sufficiency, well-being, and economic mobility.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  (a)  In 2017, the Federal Government spent more than $700 billion on low-income assistance.  Since its inception, the welfare system has grown into a large bureaucracy that might be susceptible to measuring success by how many people are enrolled in a program rather than by how many have moved from poverty into financial independence.  This is not the type of system that was envisioned when welfare programs were instituted in this country.  The Federal Government’s role is to clear paths to self-sufficiency, reserving public assistance programs for those who are truly in need.  The Federal Government should do everything within its authority to empower individuals by providing opportunities for work, including by investing in Federal programs that are effective at moving people into the workforce and out of poverty.  It must examine Federal policies and programs to ensure that they are consistent with principles that are central to the American spirit — work, free enterprise, and safeguarding human and economic resources.  For those policies or programs that are not succeeding in those respects, it is our duty to either improve or eliminate them.

(b)  It shall be the policy of the Federal Government to reform the welfare system of the United States so that it empowers people in a manner that is consistent with applicable law and the following principles, which shall be known as the Principles of Economic Mobility:

(i)     Improve employment outcomes and economic independence (including by strengthening existing work requirements for work-capable people and introducing new work requirements when legally permissible);

(ii)    Promote strong social networks as a way of sustainably escaping poverty (including through work and marriage);

(iii)   Address the challenges of populations that may particularly struggle to find and maintain employment (including single parents, formerly incarcerated individuals, the homeless, substance abusers, individuals with disabilities, and disconnected youth);

(iv)    Balance flexibility and accountability both to ensure that State, local, and tribal governments, and other institutions, may tailor their public assistance programs to the unique needs of their communities and to ensure that welfare services and administering agencies can be held accountable for achieving outcomes (including by designing and tracking measures that assess whether programs help people escape poverty);

(v)     Reduce the size of bureaucracy and streamline services to promote the effective use of resources;

(vi)    Reserve benefits for people with low incomes and limited assets;

(vii)   Reduce wasteful spending by consolidating or eliminating Federal programs that are duplicative or ineffective;

(viii)  Create a system by which the Federal Government remains updated on State, local, and tribal successes and failures, and facilitates access to that information so that other States and localities can benefit from it; and

(ix)    Empower the private sector, as well as local communities, to develop and apply locally based solutions to poverty.””

The executive order continues to describe in great detail and length how the administration intends on curbing poverty. But most importantly it focuses on several key factors in achieving this outcome,

  • improve employment outcomes and economic independence;
  • promote marriage and family as a way of escaping poverty;
  • address the challenges of hard-to-employ populations;
  • provide more flexibility to States, while ensuring accountability for achieving outcomes;
  • streamline services to more effectively use taxpayer resources;
  • reserve benefits for those truly in need;
  • consolidate duplicative programs;
  • facilitate greater sharing of information between States and localities; and
  • empower the private sector to find solutions to poverty

In the fine print of the executive order, the administration makes it clear they will be increasing work requirements for those utilizing subsidized government benefits, focusing on using taxpayer dollars for their intended purpose, as well as empowering state and local authorities to provide services to those in need.

This executive order is going to be yet another notch under the belt of the administration in curbing poverty and decreasing unemployment. For the third straight month, the United States has maintained a 4.1 percent unemployment rate which is the lowest it has been since 2000. These are near record low numbers at a time when businesses are dealing with a shortage of labor.

President Trump brought this order about because despite the labor shortage federal government assistance benefits are being used at an all-time high. In 2016 alone, a total of 16 million able-bodied individuals were enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program (SNAP). While in January 2018 74 million were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). These numbers continue to increase and something must be done about it which is exactly why the President introduced and signed this executive order.

By focusing on creating more opportunities for Americans to work it will lead to more income in their pockets and less of a need for governmental assistance programs. That means they’ll be less likely to vote Democrat. This is what provides people a pathway to financial freedom and the middle class and that is what this administration is all about. Especially given the fact the statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau indicate that 97 percent of full-time workers eventually move out of poverty.

Share if you agree with this message of the President

Trump fires back on Twitter over Democrats’ lawsuit

Image result for Trump fires back on Twitter over Democrats' lawsuit

President Donald Trump took to Twitter on Friday night to fire back at a Democratic Party lawsuit alleging a widespread conspiracy to tilt the 2016 election in his favor.

On a night when he was also tweeting about perceived progress on the denuclearization of North Korea, the president had this to say about the Dems’ lawsuit:

“Just heard the Campaign was sued by the Obstructionist Democrats. This can be good news in that we will now counter for the DNC Server that they refused to give to the FBI, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Servers and Documents held by the Pakistani mystery man and Clinton Emails.”

The Democratic Party on Friday filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against Trump campaign officials, the Russian government and WikiLeaks, alleging an election conspiracy.

Calling it an “all-out assault on our democracy,” the Democratic National Committee filed the civil suit in federal district court in Manhattan. The suit amounts to another legal broadside related to the 2016 race, on top of the special counsel’s ongoing Russia probe and the FBI raid on Trump’s personal attorney this month.

“The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the Presidency,” the suit states.

The new suit claims that Trump campaign officials worked in tandem with the Russian government and its military spy agency to bring down Hillary Clinton by hacking into the computer networks of the Democratic National Committee and spreading stolen material.

The suit names several Trump campaign aides who met with Russian nationals during the campaign, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, former campaign chair Paul Manafort and former campaign deputy Rick Gates.

Gates and Manafort have both been charged in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The suit also claims WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange “shared the defendants’ common goal of damaging the Democratic Party in advance of the election.” The suit states that Russia, using WikiLeaks, would disseminate information stolen from the DNC “at times when it would best suit the Trump campaign.”

Law Enforcement, ACLU, Alan Dershowitz, Civil Liberties, FBI raid, Fifth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Michael Cohen, Sixth Amendment

FILE - In this Sept. 10, 2014, file photo, Missouri state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal speaks on the Senate floor in Jefferson City, Mo. Chappelle-Nadal says she posted and then deleted a comment on Facebook that said she hoped for President Donald Trump's assassination. The Democratic Senator says she didn't mean what she posted Thursday, Aug. 17, 2017, but was frustrated with the president's reaction to the violence last weekend in Charlottesville, Va.(AP Photo/Jeff Roberson, File)

A black Missouri state senator who said she hoped President Donald Trump would be assassinated is now calling for reparations for blacks because of slavery.

During the debate over a tax bill on April 17, Democrat Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal (University City) took to the Senate floor at the state capital in Jefferson City to demandthat the state pass a reparations policy. Chappelle-Nadal also criticized members of her own party for not joining in her effort, the Kansas City Star reported.

Chappelle-Nadal insisted that Democrats like Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) are “no different” than Republicans who generally oppose reparations for slavery.

“Neither one of them give a heck about the black community, only the votes,” Chappelle-Nadal said during her comments on the floor of the Senate.

Chappelle-Nadal was motivated by emails and phone calls from constituents on the issue, saying, “When I’m getting a single mother of three children calling me trying to find a place to live because they don’t have a place to live, that’s what’s on my mind today and every single day.”

The senator also insisted that black Missourians—including her own ancestors—don’t get enough for their past work, saying, “In Boone County, Missouri, in Callaway County, Missouri—what my family contributed to making the state what it is today is incredible, and my family deserves way more than what it is getting today.”

Chappelle-Nadal was in the news last August when she posted to social media her hopes that President Trump would be assassinated.

After a backlash ensued, Chappelle-Nadal backed off and apologized for the post, but said she had no intention of resigning over the incident.

“I am not resigning. … What I said was wrong, but I am not going to stop talking about what led to that, which is the frustration and anger that many people across America are feeling right now,” she said.

Chappelle-Nadal found few of her fellow legislators to come to her side during her attack on Trump. Even Democrats like McCaskill and Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO 1st District) said she should resign for her comments.


Democrats Reveal the Real Reason for “March for Our Lives”… and it’s Worse Than We Thought

Kirsters Baish| Masses of brainwashed Americans made their way to the “March for Our Lives” rally in Washington, D.C. this Saturday. Credit for putting on this event is being given to the kids from the Parkland, Florida school shooting. The thing is, we are a little more aware than the mainstream media wants us to believe, and the kids weren’t the ones putting on the march. The Democratic Party and it’s special interest groups are responsible. The march was organized by far left groups such as Planned Parenthood and the Women’s March. They kept claiming that the whole thing wasn’t meant to be political. They claimed that it was simply about stopping gun violence in our country and that it was a bipartisan event. The whole thing was simply a big DNC voter registration push.

Fox News attended a march in Parkland, Florida, where some of the survivors of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting were protesting. As the rallies progressed, it was clear that the majority of those marching had no idea what they were marching for. Many attendees didn’t have the slightest clue about guns or details of the Second Amendment.

One teen who was interviewed literally had zero idea what she was saying. She thought assault rifles were legal in the United States. They are not. She believed that AR-15s were weapons of war. They are not. No modern military would send their solders into combat with a semi-automatic rifle.  She also believed that all mass shooters use AR-15s… because that is what the mainstream media keeps insisting. Most mass shootings are committed with handguns. No one with a mental health issue should not be able to have access to guns, this is something we all seem to agree on and should work to do our best to achieve. Authorities need to enforce the laws that are already in effect.

What has David Hogg been doing since the Parkland shooting except attacking all conservatives in our country and the entire NRA. He has been hanging up on President Trump and showing a complete lack of respect for our country and the rights of all American citizens.

The real reason for the march was announced by Parkland survivor Emma Gonzalez who stated, “Get out there and vote. Get our there and get registered.” It’s all about pushing people to vote for Democrats.

The whole thing is a big DNC voter registration rally. That’s all the entire march was.

It was reported that almost every single block in Washington D.C. had a voter registration table.

Just in case you weren’t aware who they were targeting:

All the Democrats are trying to do is get more voters. They don’t care that they’re using these kids in the process. They are hoping to win the midterms and get ready for the 2020 presidential election where they hope to take back the White House. Insert eye roll here. Taking away people’s rights isn’t the way to get votes.


Democrat candidate for Sheriff suggests killing people to take their guns — Bloomberg moms laugh, applaud

Image result for Democrat candidate for Sheriff suggests killing people to take their guns — Bloomberg moms laugh, applaud

In a video posted to Twitter on Saturday, Buncombe County, North Carolina, DemocratSheriff candidate R. Daryl Fisher suggested to a group affiliated with Michaels Bloomberg’s Moms Demand Action that he would have no problem killing defiant law-abiding gun owners to take their firearms.

“What about people that already had weapons? Well, I’m gonna tell you now, don’t buy into the scare tactics, don’t believe the scare tactics, because you’ve heard people say ‘You’ll have to pry my guns from my cold dead hands,’” he said.

“OK, he shrugged to delighted laughter and applause.

Here’s the video:

His comments angered a number of people, prompting Fisher to respond on Facebook:

This post is for all of the people who have posted false information about my position on proposing sensible gun legislation as a candidate for Buncombe County Sheriff. As a citizen, human being, and Candidate for Sheriff, I would like to recommend the following legislation:
Ban the sale of high capacity magazines;
Ban the sale of any mechanism that will allow a weapon to fire in rapid succession;
Raise the age to purchase any weapon to age 21;
And ensure proper background checks are done for purchase permits.
These are sensible measures and are a big step at protecting our communities. Stop pointing fingers and bring solid and sensible solutions instead of spreading false information and propaganda.

Fisher also claimed his statement was a “joke” in another Facebook post:

The crowd laughed and I made a joke. I admit the joke was a mistake and I should not have joked. But I go on to relay that the government cannot take away any guns or any items that were legally sold before any new laws take effect. To do this would be unconstitutional because that would constitute what is called an ex post facto law. Responsible gun owners have nothing to worry about. We have to do something different because what has been done is not working.

A “joke?” Seriously?  Killing gun owners is now a joke?

Writing at Oathkeepers, David Codrea observed:

What he’s obscuring is that law enforcement officials can be extremely influential in persuading lawmakers to act, and as sheriff, he would enthusiastically enforce citizen disarmament edicts. That he would take an oath to the Constitution seems not to trouble Fisher, as there are evidently no citizen disarmament laws he would refuse to issue to his subordinates or to obey himself.

He would enthusiastically enforce forbidding citizens old enough to serve in the military or the “unorganized militia” of U.S. Code from purchasing guns. He would ban standard capacity magazines for everyone (except the “Only Ones”), along with any firearm that has “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia [or] is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.”

Fisher’s “joke” didn’t sit too well with many.

The only joke is you and the idea that you should have any kind of public leadership position. You’re a fascist. If you get elected people need to make it impossible for you to function,” one person said on Facebook.

 I saw the video where you laughed about taking guns from people by force. That can’t be explained away. So your oath as a police officer means nothing and your oath as a sheriff, if your county is unfortunate enough to vote you in, will mean nothing. Which means you are a hypocrite and a liar and not worthy to wear a badge,” another person said.

The actions in which you advocate in your comment to the moms demand action is the surest way to plunge this country in to the next civil war sir are a mental midget who should be precluded from holding the highest law enforcement job of your county …I hope the voters in your county defeat you in a stellar fashion or better yet why don’t you just withdrawal from the race and save them the trouble and you the humiliation,” a third person added.

Fisher’s Facebook page was hammered with a number of similar comments.

Codrea further said that Fisher is “one of three Democrat candidates out of a field of seven,” and Buncombe County “is the only Democratic bastion in western North Carolina” and it went big for both Obama and Hillary.

“They’ll be ‘OK’ with a badged gun-grabber,” he concluded.

Exit question: Does foul-mouthed teen demagogue David Hogg approve of this message?

H/T Gateway Pundit,

Retiring Democrat Representative CAUGHT Laundering $430K Budget Funds!

Image result for Retiring Democrat Representative CAUGHT Laundering $430K Budget Funds!

In the wake of Al Franken‘s resignation, another Liberal Representative turned out to be crooked till the neck which is a clear indicator showing that no matter who it is, it is a Democrat Representative you can freely suspect him for criminal or at least illegal activities.

As more and more Representatives are caught guilty of various crimes, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) has been funneling campaign money on his wife’s name lying that she is an office manager.

Via The Washington Free Beacon:

“Retiring Dem Rep. Gutierrez Paid Wife $430,000 From Campaign Funds Over Past Seven Years
Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Ill.), who announced last week that he will not seek reelection after spending 24 years in the U.S. House of Representatives, will no longer be able to pay his wife hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaign funds once he officially departs from Congress.

Soraida Gutierrez, his wife, has collected more than $430,000 from Gutierrez for Congress, Luis’s campaign committee, since 2010. Soraida is the top recipient of expenditures this year.

Soraida, who was a registered lobbyist in Illinois prior to appearing on the campaign’s payroll, has been listed as the campaign’s office manager, fundraiser, and treasurer for the past seven years.

Gutierrez’s campaign committee has reported $77,838.69 in operating expenditures from the beginning of January to the end of September. Soraida has received seven checks for $6,000 each—or $42,000 total—during this time, meaning that she has collected more than half of his campaign’s disbursements.”

This says everything about the corruption and illegal activities amongst Democrat Representatives that has spread like a virus during Obama’s Presidency.

Only now we see how crooked they really are and how deeply they were connected to one another. No wonder why they were backing each other so much, they are all in this together so they are going down together, in a pile.

Another Democrat “Rising Star” Indicted in $803,000 Fraud, Embezzlement Case

The Daily Caller Reports: A Democrat running for a Virginia seat in the U.S. House of Representatives was charged with fraud, embezzlement and theft in relation to payments made to a nonprofit in 2012.

Shaun Brown, 58, appeared in front of a judge Friday and claimed all charges that have been brought against her were false. Brown also said she is going to continue to fight the charges until they are all dropped, Fox News reportedMonday.

Brown reportedly received $803,000 from a nonprofit organization she created. The money was said to be for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Summer Food Service Program. Prosecutors have said they believe Brown received that money by filing false reimbursement claims with the Virginia Department of Health.

Brown and her mother filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Virginia Department of Health in December saying the departments delayed payments and falsified reimbursements due to their race, saying this happened because they are black Americans. The two, who started the nonprofit together are seeking $10 million in their lawsuit.

Even though Brown is suing the government, prosecutors have said Brown had her employees to raise the number of meals served to low-income children, in order for her nonprofit to keep the extra money. Brown has even admitted there are problems with her non-profit, according to The Daily Press.

“I want the irregularities corrected,” Brown said. “I want to see the program improve.”

Although Brown is facing these serious charges she still plans on running for Virginia’s 2nd Congressional District seat. Brown lost a race for the same seat to a Republican in 2016 by 23 points.

Brown is next scheduled to appear in court Jan. 12 and is said to plead not guilty.