Hillary Offered Deal By Justice Department

Elder Patriot – Hillary Clinton has gotten away with criminal acts so many times that she has come to believe no one can touch her.  That’s the only way to explain why she turned the generous plea bargain offered her by Trump’s Justice Department last July.  That, or she’s so delusional she still thinks she’s going to be president.

According to a report filed in August of 2017 by respected investigative journalist Ed Klein:

“The discussion of a plea bargain took place late last month and was offered by a high-ranking Justice Department official to the Clinton lawyer.

“During the exploratory talks with the prosecutor, the Clinton attorney was told that despite former FBI Director James Comey’s decision last July not to prosecute Hillary, the Justice Department has reexamined the email case and believes there are ample grounds for prosecuting Hillary on a number of counts.

“Under the Justice Department’s plea offer, Hillary would be required to sign a document admitting that she committed a prosecutable crime. In return, the DOJ would agree not to bring charges against Hillary in connection with the email probe.

“Also as part of the agreement, the Justice Department would not proceed with an investigation of Hillary’s pay to play deals with foreign governments and businessmen who contributed to the Clinton Foundation or who paid Bill Clinton exorbitant speaking fees.”

Whether the offer came from a Clinton sympathizer still hiding in the shadows at the DOJ wanting to give a free pass to Hillary, or under orders from President Trump himself looking to end this national nightmare and to avoid what is almost certain to become a constitutional crisis is not known.

What is known is that Hillary Clinton made the wrong decision as evidence of her role in funding and using the Russian dossier and in using the levers available to monetize the trust placed in her as Secretary of State continues mounting.

Hillary was a constitutional crisis waiting to happen.  Thank God that she never became president.  Her hubris is frightening.

More importantly, Hillary’s scorched earth strategy may well result in the end of the modern Democratic Party.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

‘Dreamers’ are Threatening to Leave the Country if No DACA Deal is Made

If you had to read that headline more than once, don’t worry, I am sure you are not the only one. This is just rich. The so-called ‘Dreamers’ who are illegally in our country, are actually threatening to leave the country if there is no deal made to keep them here. Let that sink in.

Geez, entitled much?!

Michelle Malkin had this to say back in September in a Fox Business interview and it seems all the more relevant now.  Malkin said,  “The fact is that if there were a single ‘deserving dreamer’ in this country, they would be deserving because they would acknowledge that they are owed nothing and that they deserve nothing from a country into which they were born because of their parents’ illegal activity.”

Malkin went on to say, “You can talk to anyone who’s come into the country the right and proper way, including my own parents. There are so many first- and second- generation Americans who understand that citizenship is a privilege and not a right. And when you have an entire class of 800,000 people who feel entitled to be here despite the law, you are creating the very trouble we are in now.”

H/T Daily Wire

A group of DREAMers, young illegal immigrants fighting to stay in the country following the Trump Administration’s refusal to extend the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) executive order, say they’ll leave the country if a deal isn’t reached . . . err . . . to keep them in the country.

Speaking to CNN, one of these DREAMers, Alex Velez, said, “I will leave. I will leave America as soon as possible,” claiming that she would prefer to depart the country on her own terms than wait for the United States to collect and deport her.

The theory appears to be that, if DREAMers suddenly disappear, Americans will notice their absence. Velez and her sister claim they own businesses, pay tuition, and hold jobs, and that America has a duty to keep them here in order to maintain their contributions.

The problem is, for the Velez sisters, striking against the United States for refusing to accommodate them isn’t a plan with a likely payoff. The pair are undocumented citizens brought over by their parents from Venezuela, and the situation in their home country is less than ideal.

The United States Congress may be taking its time renewing the DACA Act, but Venezuela is currently crumbling under a dictator — so the theory that they’d return to a more awesome place to show President Trump what he’s missing might not pan out.

If a comprehensive immigration reform plan is not approved by early March, DACA recipients will be allowed to finish out the term of their amnesty contract before being declared “illegal.” Congress says it is working on a solution and President Trump has been clear that DACA recipients who overstay will not be targeted for deportation.

I will say this for the Dreamers, they have got some guts. They have no problem flaunting their illegal status and protesting everywhere without regard for our laws. Though this declaration….threatening to leave our country… sure takes it to a new level of entitlement!

Look, I see their point. Their point is that we somehow need them in our country. I am also sure there are some “Dreamers” that contribute and under ordinary circumstances, we would be happy to have them in our country. But the fact is, “Dreamers” are not as important as a group as they think they are.

If “Dreamers” really wanted to stay and make a case for it, you would think they would show a little more gratefulness to our country. You would think if they want to become part of our country, they would also see the need for protecting our borders. But running around hating our president and acting like this country belongs to then, that will get them nowhere fast.

To me, it sounds like we have found the solution to the DACA problem. Do nothing and they can leave on their own. Problem solved! This is probably as likely as all of those celebrities who left the country after Trump won the presidency, but hey we can still hope!

Source:joeforamerica.com

 

HE DID IT! Trump Just Pulled The Plug On Obama’s “Bad Muslim Deal” Overnight DO YOU SUPPORT HIM ?

IN THE MOST RECENT DAYS OF BARACK OBAMA’S ORGANIZATION, HE DID WHATEVER HE COULD TO KEEP ON DESTROYING AMERICA. THE RUNDOWN OF NAUSEATING THINGS OBAMA DID BEFORE DONALD TRUMP WAS INITIATED GENUINELY TURNED MODERATE AMERICA’S STOMACH. NONETHELESS, THERE IS ONE ARRANGEMENT THAT OBAMA STRUCK THAT MAY NOT SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY, AND IT COULDN’T OCCUR AT A SUPERIOR TIME.

In the course of the most recent a while there has been an expansion in fear monger movement from displaced people the world over.

Nations, for example, Britain, Sweden, and Germany have been consistently assaulted by Islamic radicals, and there gives off an impression of being not a single end to be found. Rather than these nations finishing these crazy exile programs that are putting subjects in danger, they keep on allowing these fear mongers to surge through their outskirts.

America was confronting a similar problem under the Obama organization, as he did whatever he could to annihilate America with wiped out arrangements. In Obama’s last days of his administration, he went into hyperdrive pushing one awful arrangement after another. Obama not just for all intents and purposes exhausted fear based oppressors out of Guantanamo Narrows, however he likewise was busted giving $418 million dollars of weapons to Kenya.

Another of those terrible arrangements Obama made in his last days of office was the point at which he chose to quick track a great many rejected Muslim exiles into America. The undercover arrangement was worked out by then Secretary of State, John Kerry who did his best to attempt and convey these displaced people to America in front of calendar.

Would you be able to think about where every one of these exiles hailed from? You got it, fear based oppressor hotbeds, for example, Iran, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Sudan.

Evacuees in Australia dissenting.
Presently, President Trump is by all accounts drawing the brakes on this crazy arrangement, and you can make sure the left will lose their brains.

Here is more from Reuters:
U.S. authorities talking with exiles held in an Australian-run seaward confinement focus left the office unexpectedly, three prisoners told Reuters on Saturday, tossing further uncertainty over an arrangement to resettle a significant number of the prisoners in America.
U.S. authorities ended screening meetings and withdrew the Pacific island of Nauru on Friday, two weeks shy of their booked timetable and a day after Washington said the Unified States had achieved its yearly evacuee admission top.
“U.S. (authorities) were booked to be on Nauru until July 26 however they cleared out on Friday,” one exile told Reuters, asking for obscurity as he would not like to endanger his application for U.S. resettlement.
In the Unified States, a senior individual from the union that speaks to evacuee officers at U.S. Citizenship and Migration Administrations (USCIS), a Division of Country Security organization, revealed to Reuters his own particular excursion to Nauru was not going ahead as booked.

Jason Imprints, boss steward of the American Alliance of Government Representatives Nearby 1924, revealed to Reuters his trek has now been pushed back and it was hazy whether it will really happen.

The USCIS said on Saturday that the program would proceed yet offered no points of interest.
“We don’t talk about the correct dates of USCIS’ circuit rides to settle displaced people’s applications. Be that as it may, we are arranging return trips,” the organization said in an announcement.

“It isn’t remarkable for the dates of probably arranged displaced person circuit ride trips worldwide to change because of a wide assortment of elements.”
The Australian Movement Office declined to remark on the whereabouts of the U.S. authorities or the eventual fate of a displaced person swap understanding amongst Australia and the Unified States that President Donald Trump not long ago marked a “moronic arrangement”.

Australian Remote Clergyman Julie Diocesan said on Sunday the arrangement was advancing of course, repeating the legislature had confirmations from the Trump organization.

“The share will move over again on October 1 as I stated, and I expect that the Assembled States will hold fast to this understanding, as the president guaranteed,” she told the Australian Telecom Corp.

The majority of the displaced people in the camps are largely men from psychological oppressor hot bed zones, for example, Sudan and Afghanistan.

This arrangement ought not experience regardless and it shows up from this report it is starting to go to pieces. There is no reason that we should take in these outcasts at all under any conditions. These displaced people are known to be from psychological militant hotspots and the exact opposite thing we require is any more dread dangers.

This arrangement ought to be rejected and given Australia a chance to manage the emergency they have made themselves. Obama should not be making this kind of arrangement when he was en route out of office. President Trump has each privilege to deny this terrible arrangement since that is the thing that the American individuals chose him to do. The times of permitting each Muslim exile into America need to end, and immediately. The main way we will have the capacity to recover our nation on track is by ending all these crazy arrangements that liberals actualized throughout the years. In the event that they need to revolt in view of it at that point so be it, they at that point can be captured and sit in prison for their own particular fear monger exercises.

It is presently the time that we close our fringes until the point that further notice, and if the left doesn’t care for it, well, there is the entryway.
Source: www.usainfopolitic.com

Hillary Offered Deal By Justice Department

Elder Patriot – Hillary Clinton has gotten away with criminal acts so many times that she has come to believe no one can touch her.  That’s the only way to explain why she turned the generous plea bargain offered her by Trump’s Justice Department last July.  That, or she’s so delusional she still thinks she’s going to be president.

According to a report filed in August of 2017 by respected investigative journalist Ed Klein:

“The discussion of a plea bargain took place late last month and was offered by a high-ranking Justice Department official to the Clinton lawyer.

“During the exploratory talks with the prosecutor, the Clinton attorney was told that despite former FBI Director James Comey’s decision last July not to prosecute Hillary, the Justice Department has reexamined the email case and believes there are ample grounds for prosecuting Hillary on a number of counts.

“Under the Justice Department’s plea offer, Hillary would be required to sign a document admitting that she committed a prosecutable crime. In return, the DOJ would agree not to bring charges against Hillary in connection with the email probe.

“Also as part of the agreement, the Justice Department would not proceed with an investigation of Hillary’s pay to play deals with foreign governments and businessmen who contributed to the Clinton Foundation or who paid Bill Clinton exorbitant speaking fees.”

Whether the offer came from a Clinton sympathizer still hiding in the shadows at the DOJ wanting to give a free pass to Hillary, or under orders from President Trump himself looking to end this national nightmare and to avoid what is almost certain to become a constitutional crisis is not known.

What is known is that Hillary Clinton made the wrong decision as evidence of her role in funding and using the Russian dossier and in using the levers available to monetize the trust placed in her as Secretary of State continues mounting.

Hillary was a constitutional crisis waiting to happen.  Thank God that she never became president.  Her hubris is frightening.

More importantly, Hillary’s scorched earth strategy may well result in the end of the modern Democratic Party.

Source: unabashedconservative.com

Democrat ‘Holy Grail’ Defects, Tells Congress To Build The Wall—Trump Wins Again

There’s a crack appearing in the liberal opposition to President Trump. Now we’re not talking about a thaw in nasty relations, let alone a full-blown rapprochement. And some of the Democrats will have to grit their teeth to cooperate with the president.

But some on the left have appeared to have decided that working with the man on occasion might be a good idea. Or at least a better one than opposing everything, and coming up empty-handed and looking irrelevant like the Democrats did with the tax bill.

So get ready for this one. That bastion of liberal ideology, the Washington Post, has admonished Democrats to support building the border wall. At least in return for some accommodation for the “dreamers.”

President Trump had already expressed a willingness to do this, so it looks like the left might be the ones who will be learning to cooperate. Still, it’s a shock to read such words on the editorial page of the Washington Post.

The Washington Post Editorial Board published a piece Wednesday begging Democrats to accept President Trump’s border wall in return for the protection of “dreamers,” the illegal immigrants currently protected by DACA.

The article, entitled ‘Take a deal for the dreamers. Build the wall,’ argues that while the wall is a ‘dumb idea,’ it would ultimately be a worthwhile trade-off to protect ‘dreamers.’

‘If a few billion dollars annually is the trade-off that provides certainty — a pathway to citizenship or permanent legal status — for nearly 700,000 young immigrants brought to this country as children by their parents, it’s worth it.

Because the alternative — all those lives ruined, all those jobs lost, all that education and promise cut short — is much worse,’ the Editorial Board writes.

Note this is no full-scale endorsement of the border wall. The Post dutifully calls it a “dumb idea.” Yet they can see the writing on the wall: President Trump has made noises about doing something to help the “dreamers” find a way to citizenship.

The last thing the left needs is for President Trump to be able to take credit for accomplishing one of the Democrats’ goals.

To create the impression that this is no capitulation to President Trump, [t]he Editorial Board further notes that increased border security has historically been a bipartisan issue, such as in 2006 when both Senators Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama voted to support 700 miles of fencing on the Mexican border.

Image result for president trump

Maybe the Post as grown tired of losing and watching President Trump frequently win as he promised to do on the campaign trail.

While the Washington Post remains a staunchly liberal publication, its writers and editors are bright people. It’s bad enough for them to have to watch President Trump tear the Obama legacy to shreds and see the president’s tax bill become law.

Allowing him to claim credit for doing something for illegal immigrants is more than they can stand.

So, we see the Post’s strategy. Work with him on the border wall in return for being able to take some credit for providing a pathway to citizenship for the dreamers.

And claim that any compromise the left reaches with him on his border wall can be explained against a backdrop of previous support for fences on the border by Obama and Clinton.

The alternative is to watch him get his border wall anyway while co-opting a vital part of the Democrats’ agenda on immigration.

After all, the left can only lose so often before matters get intolerable. Or, to look at it another way, “If you’re getting run out of town, get to the front and act like you are leading a parade.”

Source: Daily Caller,americanconservativeherald.org

Major California Democrat Goes Rogue, Openly Supports Trump’s Top Priority Live On T.V.

It’s taken them a year to figure it out. But some Democrats have discovered that President Trump really does know how to get his agenda implemented.

In other words, all that talk about “winning” was not just bluster. He outlined what he wanted to get done, and has largely accomplished that agenda in his first term.

What remains to be finalized are immigration issues and the replacement for Obamacare. And even some of those goals have been accomplished via executive orders.

Obamacare has been largely gutted, and now exists mostly in name only. And the border wall is coming regardless of what Nancy Pelosi and her pals want.

Image result for democrat leaders

More and more cracks are appearing in the Democratic opposition to the border wall. Now, Democratic congresswoman from California Jackie Speier has announced that she is ready to work with the president.

And it’s safe to assume that if one Democratic member of Congress is ready to cooperate on the wall, there are many more of the same persuasion who have simply not made their positions public yet.

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., broke ranks with Democratic leaders on Thursday and said she is willing to work with President Trump and congressional Republicans on legalizing the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in return for border wall funding.

“I’m willing to go, you know, midway with the president and the Republicans to fund higher-tech walls along our border, more border security, enhanced measures, but I really feel very strongly that our DACA kids need to be protected,” Speier told MSNBC host Craig Melvin, who seemed stunned by the statement.

This is probably all the heresy a Democrat can utter without getting excommunicated from the party. And it mirrors the position recently published by the Washington Post.

So what we might have here is a coordinated effort to at least take part of the credit for accomplishing something. After all, they certainly don’t want to be seen as just sitting around irrelevant as the Democrats did during the president’s tax bill success.

“‘To be clear, I want to clarify. You are okay with giving the president his wall in exchange for DACA?’ Melvin asked.

“‘I would be willing to give the president a high-tech wall, willing to give him some amount of money to build his wall to a certain degree,’ Speier said.”

We have all the makings of successfully passing legislation addressing these issues. It’s just a matter of working out the details along with plenty of political theater to satisfy supporters in both parties.

Proving they are yesterday’s leaders, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have both previously insisted the Democratic Party would not compromise on that request.

Those two offer nothing of value to the American people and are actually a drag on their own party. However, in the finest of political traditions, they remain either unaware of, or indifferent to, their own uselessness.

At least Pelosi and Schumer do one thing well. They demonstrate the sort of leaders who should be forced into retirement.

Meanwhile, they can watch a true leader, President Trump, work with selected members of the Democratic Party to move forward his agenda. It’s something to behold.

Source: Washington Examiner, patriotjournal.org

BREAKING News From DC!! TRUMP Just Made BORDER WALL DEAL!

Various ideas have swirled about who will foot the approximately $21 billion to make President Donald Trump’s most important campaign promise come true, all of which have failed to work out – until now. We’ve previously reported that the $14 billion seized from notorious drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman would make a good dent in the building cost since he’s responsible for why we need the barrier anyway. However, that cash can’t be used for this project despite El Chapo having no need for the money in prison. Other ideas haven’t worked out as well either, but now we’re getting word of an unexpected hero to our illegal immigration issue coming forward with the finances to take care of the cost once and for all.

Although we wish that the ingenious idea of illegal El Chapo’s cash covering a large part of the expense, for the irony that it would be, Ted Cruz’s proposition for this wasn’t a possibility. As quickly as that idea was shot down, a surprise financier showed up overnight with the approximately $21 billion needed to foot the bill and you won’t believe where it came from.

Although the lengthy construction process is already underway, it could be finished much quicker than originally thought after having solved one of the biggest challenges it has faced to date. “Building ‘a big, beautiful wall’ on the Southern border was Trump’s signature promise during his campaign, winning him support from advocates for hard-line immigration reform,” Politifact reported. Ironically, someone on the wrong side of that issue could be paying for it.

Breitbart reports:

President Donald Trump restated his promise to make Mexico pay for his big wall on the Southern border, suggesting that they would do it by renegotiating NAFTA.

“They can pay for it indirectly through Nafta,” Trump said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday. “We make a good deal on Nafta, and, say, I’m going to take a small percentage of that money and it’s going toward the wall. Guess what? Mexico’s paying.”

He insisted that NAFTA was a bad deal for the United States and said that “nothing’s changed” about his campaign promise to renegotiate the deal.

“I can tell you I think the American market would go up if I terminated Nafta and renegotiated a new deal,” Trump said.

President Donald Trump restated his promise to make Mexico pay for his big wall on the Southern border, suggesting that they would do it by renegotiating NAFTA.

“They can pay for it indirectly through Nafta,” Trump said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on Thursday. “We make a good deal on Nafta, and, say, I’m going to take a small percentage of that money and it’s going toward the wall. Guess what? Mexico’s paying.”

He insisted that NAFTA was a bad deal for the United States and said that “nothing’s changed” about his campaign promise to renegotiate the deal.

“I can tell you I think the American market would go up if I terminated Nafta and renegotiated a new deal,” Trump said.

He threatened to terminate NAFTA unless they could reach a renegotiation of the trade deal,but said he was waiting until after the presidential elections in Mexico.

“I understand that a lot of things are hard to negotiate prior to an election,” he said. “They have an election coming up fairly shortly. I understand that makes it a little bit difficult for them.”

If NAFTA doesn’t work out for paying for it or liberals stand in the way of allowing that to happen, the financing problem could soon be solved if Alabama Senator Luther Strange gets his way

Strange went on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to discuss his idea of where this much-needed wad of cash could come from right now, and it’s as ironic as using drug money to pay for it. Those who want immigrants in this country don’t seem to have an issue with paying for them to be here, so they should be okay with footing the bill to keep them in their country.

Strange explained to Tucker that the funds should come directly from so-called Sanctuary Cities who don’t follow the law. In essence, this would be a fine for going against the President, not cooperating with local police, refusing to turn immigrants in, and worst of all, actually preventing people from fairly bidding on the border wall. Sanctuary cities like San Francisco, California punish their citizens for participating in bidding on the construction of the wall by banning them from doing any other work in the city. This is not a democracy, it’s a dictatorship decided by liberals and since they aren’t stopping, Strange wants them to pay for the wall that’s already written into law.

The Senator’s simple solution is that cities who refuse to comply with the nation’s law aren’t going to get the money that they expect from the government because it’s going to go to building the wall. It makes perfect sense to not reward bad behavior with cash that could be used to ensure the rule of law which our nation is built on. Sanctuary Cities don’t make their own rules and can’t expect other people to pay for it when it goes against what the president has already set. Rather than defunding these defiant cities, divert the funding and let their laws be the country’s gain.

Along this same line of logic that Strange presented, costs of this wall could also be met it America stopped or slowed the flow of funding to Mexico. It only makes sense to use the money being sent over the border for the barrier between us since we’re also trying to block Mexican citizens from entering America illegally.

This isn’t about keeping good people out and prevent people from wanting to seek a better life and the American dream, it’s only about preventing those from entering the wrong way and wreaking havoc, compromising citizen’s safety, and sapping off our resources. If it’s important to become a law-abiding American citizen and reap the rewards of living in this country, there’s an immigration to follow to prove those intentions.

Source:freedomdaily.com

Fusion GPS Partner Refuses the 5th, Strikes Deal to Testify

Less than a month after two Fusion GPS co-founders pleaded the fifth and refused to testify to the House Intelligence Committee regarding the Trump-Russian dossier, a third co-founder has agreed to answer questions from the committee next week.

The testimony of Glenn Simpson, a former journalist who helped commission the Russia dossier with allegations of collusion by President Donald Trump’s top aides, was offered as part of a deal between the committee and Fusion GPS, according to CNN.

The committee had issued a subpoena for Simpson’s testimony, but in exchange for his voluntary appearance, the committee agreed to withdraw the subpoena.

Joshua Levy, an attorney for Fusion GPS, explained that Simpson had agreed to testify after the committee agreed to the certain conditions.

“Mr. Simpson will be appearing voluntarily, he will tell the truth, the subpoena will be withdrawn, and he will be able to maintain Fusion GPS’ privileges and honor its legal obligations,” Levy said. “Through a voluntary interview, he has the ability to appear with counsel, to assert privileges and to answer questions that he chooses to answer.”

The committee had also subpoenaed bank records from Fusion GPS, which subsequently filed an injunction in court to try to stop the release of those documents.

The battle of those records was not impacted by Simpson’s agreement to testify.

Last month, other Fusion GPS co-founderes Peter Fritsch and Thomas Catán were subpoenaed to appear before the House panel, but invoked their constitutional right not to answer questions.

The committee has been searching for answers regarding who paid Fusion for the 35-page dossier, compiled by British spy Christopher Steele, that outlined Trump’s alleged interactions with Russians during his campaign.

We already know that the firm was hired by Hillary Clinton and the DNC to collect damaging information about Trump, although they have maintained that they did not direct Steele’s activities in regards to the dossier, according to The Washington Post.

Though, who really believes that?

We’re talking about the same people who colluded to ensure that Clinton won the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination and then lied about it.

Hopefully, the testimony of this Fusion co-founder will paint a clearer picture of what exactly went on behind the scenes of the dossier, and just how much collusion was taking place between Russia, Clinton and the DNC.

Source:www.usapoliticstoday.org