BREAKING: 11-Count Indictment Handed Down in Russian Bribery Case Involving Uranium One. Clinton, Obama, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Holder, Lynch Facing Criminal Prosecution

The Justice Department released the first in what promises to be a series of nightmare statements for Hillary Clinton and members of the Obama administration on Friday.

Yesterday’s statement comes under the banner:

The charges are explained in the third paragraph the DOJ’s statement:

“Mark Lambert, 54, of Mount Airy, Maryland, was charged in an 11-count indictment with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to commit wire fraud, seven counts of violating the FCPA, two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion money laundering.  The charges stem from an alleged scheme to bribe Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official at JSC Techsnabexport (TENEX), a subsidiary of Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation and the sole supplier and exporter of Russian Federation uranium and uranium enrichment services to nuclear power companies worldwide, in order to secure contracts with TENEX. “

We’ve been waiting for the indictments to start being handed down since a confidential informant came forward last October.

John Solomon first reported the CI’s existence whose evidence showed that:

“Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.”

Back in October we reported that The F.B.I. knew about this but never disclosed that agents working for then-FBI Director Robert Mueller had obtained extensive financial records, secret recordings and had intercepted emails that dated as far back as 2009, Obama’s first year in office.

FBI and court documents showed that Mueller was well aware that this violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act yet he remained silent under orders from Obama’s Department of Justice. 

It was also known that the F.B.I. had an eyewitness — backed by significant documentation — that was in possession of evidence Russian nuclear officials had routed multiple payoffs of millions of dollars each to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that approved questionable decisions to Moscow.

The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.

Then, in 2011, the Obama administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp.

The following day we went into further detail on the FBI’s strange handling of the case.  The principle players in the case read like a who’s who of the current prosecutorial team trying to take down President Trump:

Now the Deputy Director of the DOJ, Rod Rosenstein was the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland where the investigation took place.  After Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel without evidence of an underlying crime.  Mueller was charged with finding one, just not the one that was staring him in the face.

Current F.B.I. Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was in charge of the investigation into Mikerin and Rosatom-Tenex back in 2009.

Sitting immediately above Mueller was Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder.  It’s hard to imagine that Mueller or McCabe never told Holder what their investigation had revealed.  And, it’s just as unimaginable that Holder and Obama never discussed it.

More likely, Obama and Clinton conspired to sell the uranium to Russia, each for their own reasons, with Obama giving a stand down order to Mueller and McCabe to squash the investigation.  Such an arrangement would closely mirror the stand down order Loretta Lynch, who succeeded Holder as Attorney General, gave to Jim Comey, who succeeded Mueller as F.B.I. director, regarding the Clinton email investigation.

The significance of the indictment against Lambert comes from its potential to be the tip of the iceberg.

For those of you who wanted to prove Russian collusion at the highest levels of government you are about to see your dreams realized… or not.

Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Holder, Lynch, Clinton, and Obama all had a hand in it and then they compounded their assault on our American democracy by attempting a coup against President Trump to keep their corrupt dealings hidden from the public.

The mainstream media has been complicit in all of this.  There have remained silent on reporting this indictment, as they remained silent back in October.  Instead they want us fixated on whether it’s appropriate to call a sh*thole a sh*thole.

Criminal Conspiracy to Topple U.S. Government Has Been Uncovered – Grand Jury Must Convene Immediately

Definition of Treason:

1 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign’s family

2 : the betrayal of a trust

ELDER PATRIOT – As the duly elected President of the United States, the people chose Donald Trump to run the executive branch of their government and any unlawful action or actions taken to overthrow his presidency is treason.

Democrats and Republicans have been working together to subvert the will of the American people for decades on everything from foreign wars to taxes to controlling immigration to the growing government leviathan.

Every Trump voter will tell you that they voted for him to put an end to this.

In a working democracy this is the lawful procedure for changing their government that is afforded law-abiding citizens.

Trump’s supporters followed the legal procedure afforded them and any attempt to remove the president, absent unlawful behavior on the president’s part, would be nothing more than unlawfully subverting the will of the people and their duly elected government.

President Trump’s opponents simply will not accept this. As is their right, they began resisting every initiative to keep his campaign promises as he advanced them, and even before.

This too is the way a democracy works. The peoples’ right to protect is unquestioned. The president is not a dictator and the other elected officials serve as a political counter-balance, as well as to provide the people with legal protections against the president if he usurps powers that aren’t his under the Constitution.

But, when the political opponents of the president within or outside the government conspire to bring the president down by breaking the law they have crossed the line into treasonous behavior.

While plausible deniability has been a justification for politicians’ illegal behavior since Watergate, the evidence has become so overwhelming that we can no longer deny that a conspiracy between members of the political establishment, the deep state and the mainstream media exists.

The question then becomes whether that conspiracy broke any laws with the intention of creating a political groundswell that would bring President Trump down. If they did break any laws 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS, commonly referred to as RICO law, would come into play. It has been a critical tool in dismantling organized crime.

So, let’s examine what we know.

The outrage coming from both the mainstream media and Trump’s political opponents over allegations that President Trump violated national security during his recent meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak is an attempt to discredit the president and plant in the minds of voters that he is unfit to hold high office. Fair enough, but once they began calling for impeachment Trump’s opponents may have crossed the line into a conspiracy to commit treason. Here’s why.

While discrediting the president is accepted political gamesmanship, calling for the impeachment of a duly elected president based on false charges is as much an attempt to overthrow the government as any physical attack may be.

Whether the president disclosed any previously classified information to his Russian guests may show bad judgment but it violates no law. The president is the final arbiter of the classification status of sensitive information and can declassify or reclassify sensitive information at will. As such, this would become an issue for the voters to decide.

Additionally the president, any president as well as any negotiator, must be able to give something in order to get something. As an example, Hillary got $135 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Russians got 20% of our Uranium. Nothing to see here just ask the current crop of traitorous co-conspirators in government and the MSM.

Or, is there? If the “leaker” of the story was in that meeting, and then divulged the nature of the classified information to the mainstream media which then shouted it from the rooftops with the intention of bringing down the president then that would be treason.

If the MSM simply made up the story, that’s a serious possibility considering the lack of evidence so far produced, the conspiracy between the MSM and establishment pols would still exist.

A look at the MSM’s immediate reaction shows widespread condemnation of President Trump and calls for his impeachment. This provides necessary elements to establishing the conspiracy.

Whether politically motivated or not, establishment politicians who joined that chorus became part of the conspiracy to take out President Trump, or to at least seriously damage his ability to govern in the manner he was elected to.

But was a crime against the United States committed in order to buttress the opposition’s political play? The answer is unequivocally yes.

When President Trump alerted the Russians to the threat of laptops planted with explosives being permitted on airliners he was well within his rights. In fact, the MSM had reported that laptops had been banned for precisely this reason at least as early as April 25th, well before the meeting with the Russians took place.

The president was merely sharing that information in a confidential setting with an ally in our war against ISIS. The Russians had every reason to protect both the information and the source of that information. It may even be that the Russian intelligence had already turned up that information.

If President Trump did nothing illegal who did?

When the MSM began openly speculating that the information had been provided by Israeli intelligence they put our relationship with Israel in peril whether the story was true or not. Worse, the very presence of this story in the MSM unnecessarily and intentionally endangered every intelligence asset embedded within ISIS by putting the terrorist organization on alert. Leaking of classified of information is, in itself, a violation of the Espionage Act.

The RICO law was written to allow prosecutors to tie otherwise lawful activities (plausible deniability,) committed by multiple parties together to show that a criminal conspiracy existed when a crime has been committed.

There is no question that leaker violated federal law by disseminating classified information. Whether the MSM acted lawfully in blasting the information far and wide is an argument for the courts to decide, but once they began calling for impeachment, without offering any counter arguments, it crossed the line and became a criminal conspiracy to defraud the American people.

Then, when politicians began joining in it became a criminal conspiracy to depose of a duly elected president who hadn’t committed a crime. This cannot be dismissed as a political ploy. This rises to the level of conspiracy to commit treason.

BREAKING: Reporter Who Exposed Judge Roy Moore Has A Criminal History Of “Faking”

Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore is denying that he romantically pursued teenagers as young as 14 while he was in his 30s after a bombshell report.

Leigh Corfman, told the Post that when she was 14 years old in 1979, a 32-year-old Moore “took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes.”

Corfman told the Post that Moore “touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear.”

BREAKING: Reporter Who Exposed Judge Roy said in a statement the four women quoted by the Washington Post are lying.

“This garbage is the very definition of fake news and intentional defamation,” Moore said.

Washington Examiner reports:

Stephanie McCrummen, the reporters who co-wrote the Washington Post hit piece on Judge Roy Moore, apparently has a history of “faking” news.

According to the anti-Trump publication, Red State, McCrummen, who works for the Washington Post, has a criminal record that involves writing a FAKE check.

The Red State reports:

Ms. McCrummen has a rather interesting criminal history herself, as public criminal records in multiple states stretching across 4 time zones have shown.

Ms. McCrummen’s criminal history began with North Carolina Case # 1992 CR 00654, a violation of the Article 19 – False Pretenses and Cheats section of the North Carolina Criminal Code. Ms. McCrummen was convicted of a crime punishable by up to six months of imprisonment for writing a hot check that was deemed worthless.

In 2005, the apparently unrepentant Ms. McCrummen was again found guilty in the 2005 Virginia Case #059GT0504714900 for failing to obey a highway sign.
The following year, McCrummen was found guilty in yet another Virginia criminal case, #153GT0604021200, speeding 46 miles an hour in a 25 mile speed zone.

Sean Hannity reports:

Trump Authorizes Congress To Pursue Criminal Charges Against Hillary – SHOULD THEY PROCEED?


Jason Chaffetz, the Chairman of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, shared the information with the committee that he had a discussion with President Trump where the President gave Chaffetz the permission to investigate whatever he wants.

Chaffetz also suggested that charges against Hillary could be arriving soon.

This is what Chaffetz stated:





You can watch the video here:

The information that President Trump also encourages the investigation comes just days after the Oversight Committee ordered James Comey, (now former) FBI Director, to publish the contents of Hillary Clinton’s email server.

This basically indicates that criminal and reckless Hillary Clinton didn’t get away from a full-blown investigation, regardless of what she had hoped for.

Most of all, without Obama and Comey to cover her tracks now, Hillary Clinton may finally be indicted.

It’s about time she starts being held responsible for her innumerable crimes and for betraying our country.

Finally, she has to answer for what she did, since the fact that President Trump is in control, she won’t make it out uninvestigated this time.

We hope that you found this article informative and helpful. Share your thoughts and opinions with us!