Arrogant Lib Judge Helps Illegal Escape Court, IMMEDIATELY Gets Bad News

An Oregon judge was in for a bit more than she bargained when she helped an illegal alien escape after hearing that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents were out front waiting for him. Too bad for the arrogant liberal, she immediately got slapped with bad news – and it is downright brutal.

It all started when Diddier Pacheco Salazar, 22, a Mexican citizen illegally in America, was pulled over in Multnomah County and arrested for driving while intoxicated. As one would imagine, it wasn’t long before he was in court, but his situation wouldn’t go like all the rest.

According to reports, he was rather lucky that he was scheduled to appear before Judge Monica Herranz, a flaming liberal who is willing to break the law for her leftist ideals. Of course, she’d later come to prove just that when she heard that ICE agents were waiting out front for Salazar to exit the building.

Arrogant Lib Judge Helps Illegal Escape Court, IMMEDIATELY Gets Bad News

As it turns out, the illegal alien never did come face to face with the agents outside since Herranz invited the man into her chambers with his lawyer – but only two would return. Just like that, Salazar had evaded the authorities, and it wasn’t long before everyone figured out why.

Mail Online reports that “every courtroom in the Multnomah County Circuit Court has three doors — one for the public, a private judge entrance, and one for inmates to be brought in from jail.” In short, the liberal judge, sympathetic to Salazar’s illegal behavior, let him escape outside the private door in her chambers.

As one would imagine, ICE officials and other various law enforcement agencies weren’t too happy after learning what Herranz had done – and that’s when things took a turn. In fact, the arrogant liberal immediately got some bad news as U.S. Attorney Billy Williams states that he has launched an internal investigation into the judge’s actions.

“I felt that it was inappropriate and delegitimizes the work of ICE agents who are out there doing their jobs,” Williams explained. “When you’re talking about the judicial system — whether it’s federal or by state — you have an expectation that people are going to abide by the law and not take steps based on their own motivations, their own politics.”

Unfortunately for Herranz, it would only be two weeks before ICE was able to permanently detain Salazar as he had arrived for another court appearance. At the end of the day, all she bought this illegal alien was a 2-week stay here in America and a few legal repercussions on herself.

Hopefully, this investigation ends the way it should; with Herranz in cuffs, officially charged with aiding and abetting a fugitive. Justice is supposed to be blind, and if this arrogant liberal proved anything with her actions, it’s that she is unfit to serve as a judge anywhere. This woman has to go – and maybe spending a few nights in jail as an example to others wouldn’t be such a bad thing either.

Source:madworldnews.com

Appeals Court Hands Trump A Travel Ban Win — DETAILS

A U.S. appeals court in California on Monday let part of President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban go into effect, ruling that the government can bar entry of people from six Muslim-majority countries if they have no connections to the United States.

A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals partially granted a Trump administration request to block at least temporarily a judge’s ruling that had put the new ban on hold. Trump’s ban was announced on Sept. 24 and replaced two previous versions that had been impeded by federal courts.

The action means the ban will apply to people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad who do not have connections to the United States.

Those connections are defined as family relationships and “formal, documented” relationships with U.S.-based entities such as universities and resettlement agencies. Those with family relationships that would allow entry include grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins of people in the United States.

The ruling does not affect people from the two other countries listed in Trump’s ban, North Korea and Venezuela.

The state of Hawaii, which sued to block the restrictions, argued that federal immigration law did not give Trump the authority to impose them on six of those countries. U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu ruled last month that Hawaii was likely to succeed with that argument.

Trump issued his first travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries in January, just a week after he took office, and then issued a revised one after the first was blocked by the courts. The second one expired in September after a long court fight and was replaced with another revised version.

Trump has said the travel ban is needed to protect the United States from terrorism by Muslim militants. As a candidate, Trump had promised “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.

Critics of the travel ban in its various iterations call it a “Muslim ban” that violates the U.S. Constitution by discriminating on the basis of religion.

The 9th Circuit is due to hear oral arguments in the case on Dec. 6. In a parallel case from Maryland, a judge also ruled against the Trump administration and partially blocked the ban from going into effect.

An appeal in the Maryland case is being heard on Dec. 8 by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. The Maryland case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents several advocacy groups, including the International Refugee Assistance Project.

In announcing the newest travel restrictions, the White House had portrayed them as necessary consequences for countries that did not meet new requirements for vetting of immigrants and issuing of visas. Those requirements were shared in July with foreign governments, which had 50 days to make improvements if needed, the White House said.

A number of countries made improvements by enhancing the security of travel documents or the reporting of passports that were lost or stolen, the administration has said. Others did not, sparking the restrictions.

The Justice Department and Hawaii state officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

Source:www.usapoliticstoday.org

Muslim Demands Sharia, Tells Court ‘Go To Hell’ — Judge Destroys Her In Just 3 Words

Muslim Hag Demands Sharia, Tells Court 'Go To Hell' — Judge Destroys Her In Just 3 Words

When a woman stepped into court, she immediately began cursing the justice system, demanding Sharia law, and telling the “infidels” that they can “go to hell.” However, as soon as the judge heard her disrespectful shrieking, he replied with 3 simple words that put the hateful woman in her place.

While millions of Muslims from tyrannical nations flock to the West, the left assures us that they are fleeing political oppression and war. However, as the same migrants who plead for asylum from their despotic governances begin to demand the same despotic governances in our countries, their underlying motives for immigrating are revealed.

Instead of enjoying the democracy that allows them freedom from their religious law’s stranglehold, refugees require not only that they have the liberty to practice Sharia but that we all respect it. However, non-Muslims soon discover that respecting Sharia actually means permitting its implementation and obeying its compulsions.

In August, 32-year-old ISIS recruit Rehab Dughmosh began her long list of ultimatums, including refusing to leave her prison cell to attend the trial, refusing to stand for the honorable judge, and incessantly demanding to be tried in a court of Sharia law, all in accordance with her religion, the Toronto Sun reports. However, she quickly found that the judge wasn’t a politically-correct Muslim-sympathizer like most of Canada’s officials.

On November 10, Dughmosh rebelliously stood with her back to the judge’s seat as she belted out, “Damn your legislation, damn your nationality!” and “Go to hell!” before insulting the rest of the Canadian officials by shouting, “Hey, you infidels, I do not worship what you worship!” according to CP 24.

Fed up with her ridiculous disruptions and religious supremacy, Judge Robert Goldstein angrily interrupted the screeching woman’s final demand for Sharia law in perhaps the most applause-worthy way a Western judge has ever responded to such a supremacist. In a brilliantly bold reply, Judge Goldstein audibly laughed as he berated Sharia law to Dughmosh’s face, adding that she should “consider herself lucky” that she’s isn’t being tried by an Islamic court because of how brutally they treat women.

“Your views about what system you would like to be tried under are completely irrelevant,” he told Dughmosh, who scoffed in response.

“You should consider yourself lucky that you are caught up in a justice system of this nature rather than one that in your flight of fancy you seem to think is better.”

Not only did Dughmosh feel the sting of her religious beliefs getting obliterated by an infidel judge, she also undeniably suffers the humiliation of being judged by a magistrate who’s Jewish, whom the Quran considers the ultimate filth and most despised of the infidels.

Although Dughmosh talks a big game, the reality is that she’s a failed and disgraced Muslim jihadist. The haggard woman had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State before launching a pathetic and easily-thwarted terror attack in the summer of 2017. On June 3, Dughmosh brandished a golf club and kitchen knife in Cedarbrae Mall and the Canadian Tire store in east Toronto before chasing after confused customers while screaming, “Allahu Akbar,” “I’m here for Syria,” and, “I’m going to kill everybody!”

Dughmosh was apprehended and charged with 21 counts of criminal activity, including attempted murder of at least 3 people for or in the name of a terrorist organization, assault with a deadly weapon, and issuing threats of physical violence. Officials later added a myriad of terrorism-related charges after discovering her affiliation with ISIS and intent to leave Canada for Syria with the purpose of committing crimes.

After undergoing a psychological evaluation that deemed her fit for trial, it was at the initiation of her trial that Dughmosh proved her supremacy, bucking the authority of the Canadian court at every turn, first refusing to answer Judge Alice Napier and disrupting court proceedings with her antics.

“ISIS — I pledge to the leader of the believers — Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi,” blurted the woman through an interpreter.

“I reject all counsel here. I only believe in Islamic Sharia law,” Global News quoted the Scarborough woman as saying during a court appearance this week. “I would like to revoke my Canadian citizenship that I received. I don’t want to have any allegiance to you.”

Although Dughmosh seems like a mentally ill fanatic, the Quran considers Muslims like her the utmost devout followers who shall receive the best of rewards. Quran 3:151 states that unbelievers have no authority over superior Muslims while verse 4:74 states that Allah promises a vast reward upon those who “slay and are slain.”

Dughmosh isn’t an extremist. She has emulated the prophet Muhammad, who modeled Allah’s commands by ambushing and slaughtering innocent non-Muslims purely because of their disbelief.

Source:madworldnews.com

Convicted Killer Laughs At Victim’s Family In Court, Judge Gives Him ‘Something’ To Really Laugh About

Most citizens cannot imagine the horror of losing a loved one. The pain that grips a family will last the rest of their lives.

What’s even worse is to see their loved one’s killer, completely unremorseful over his actions.

Yet that’s just what happened at a recent trial. The judge, however, set him straight.

From Conservative Tribune:

According to WXYZ News in Detroit, Danta Wright had confessed to killing another young man in Ann Arbor. While relatives of the victim read a heartfelt statement to the court, Wright acted amused by the upset family.

“I’ve lost my only child, my son, my baby, my friend. More than that, I lost laughter and love. I no longer have the hope of having grandchildren,” a family member read aloud from a statement prepared by the victim’s mother.

Wright apparently wasn’t moved by the emotional words, but the judge was outraged by his cavalier attitude.

“Watching you sit there, smile, laugh, shake your head like this was no big deal— I’m very tempted to just say, ‘I’m not going to accept this sentencing agreement and we’ll go to trial’ and if you’re convicted of felony murder, you’ll go to prison for the rest of your life,” Judge David Swartz scolded…

Despite the judge’s temptation to move the case to a full jury trial, Klee’s family stated that they didn’t want to go through a drawn-out legal process. For the sake of closure, they asked the court to keep a plea bargain in place.

Even without a full trial, that plea agreement means that Danta Wright will spend 23 to 50 years in prison.

It’s hard to imagine anyone laughing at the pain of a family. Yet this is the same person who had no problem killing their son.

Sometimes deaths are terrible accidents or crimes of passion. Other times, they are done by people who lack the basic morals needed to live in a civilized society.

This judge was absolutely right in condemning Wright for his shocking attitude in court. He took the life of another man. Yet he showed no sadness or remorse, even after being convicted.

By taking the plea deal, he gets a lesser sentence. But is that fair? That family will never see their son again. A brother and friend is gone forever, but his killer can get off slightly easier, despite his attitude.

My guess is jail will not go well for this one.

Source: Conservative Tribune, myrightamerica.com

Muslim Smiles At Murder Trial When Widow Cries, So Judge Gives Him ‘Something’ To Really Smile About

Oftentimes we are frustrated when the justice system fails victims.

Criminals get off on loopholes or technicalities. This deprives victims of crimes justice for the terrible things they’ve endured.

But once and a while, a criminal encounters a judge that does not play games. Such was the case in this recent story.

From Mad World News:

Carjackers Basim Henry, 32, Kevin Roberts, 33, Hanif Thompson, 29, and Karif Ford, 31, fatally shot 30-year-old Dustin Friedland as he valiantly tried to defend his 27-year-old wife, Jamie, at the Short Hills mall in December 2013, the New York Daily News reports…

Expectedly, Jamie’s final statement during Basim’s trial in Newark was just as heartbreaking as her ordeal. However, Basim, who had participated in the carjacking but was not believed to have killed Dustin, found her devastating grief amusing.

Seeing Basim smirking just after Jamie’s emotional address, Judge Ravin’s outrage over the crimes took a very personal turn, prompting him to shout that he can smile all he wants but he’ll be doing it in prison “for the rest of your life!”

Footage from within the courtroom shows Basim’s grin slowly subside as the reality of an eternity behind bars starts to set in.

Because his smile proved his remorselessness, Judge Ravin threw the book at him, sentencing him to serve a life sentence without parole eligibility until he has spent at least 68 years and 9 months behind bars. By this time, Basim will be 104 years old, according to NorthJersey.com.

Judges carry serious power while in court. They can make decisions based on their years of experience and know-how. Clearly this judge knew by Basim’s behavior that he was not remorseful over his crimes and should not receive mercy.

Our justice system is built around punishing violators of the law. The hope is that they learn the error of their ways and reform. Yet if a judge believes a man cannot or will not reform—because he doesn’t even show the slightest bit of remorse in court—then the judge will throw the book at him.

It was clear by Basim’s smirk that he was not sorry for what he did. In fact, he considered murdering an innocent man—and the pain it caused his wife—to be funny. That kind of moral bankruptcy cannot be cured.

It’s a lesson to all of us: do right, follow the law, and respect judges.

Source: Mad World News, myrightamerica.com

Muslim Refused to Respect “Secular” Court — Judge IMMEDIATELY Gave Him a NASTY Surprise…

Is there an epidemic of people not wanting to stand and honor national traditions? Maybe it’s something in the water.

A Muslim man was hilariously put out to pasture by a judge after refusing to stand in court. The reason the man gave for not standing was, unsuprisingly, religious in nature.

Ricardo McFarlane was appearing in court that morning for disobeying a court order. He had previously been banned from approaching citizens on the street and preaching sharia law. A recent convert to Islam, McFarlane was one of 21 other men who were court ordered to stop harassing people. The original case saw them outside a store and speaking aggressively as customers tried to enter and exit.

Judge Martin Beddoe noticed that McFarlane was the only seated person when he entered the courtroom. He said, “If Mr. McFarlane isn’t going to treat this court with respect then I might have to deal with him differently than to release him on bail.”

“Because of his religious belief he believes there is only one person who he should bow to,” defense attorney Roy Hedlam was quick to respond.

“That is as may be, but this isn’t a court of religion, this is a secular court and it expects to be treated with respect. That isn’t in breach of any religious principles I’m aware of,” Beddoe said plainly.

McFarlane changed his tune very quickly. Once the judge threatened withholding bail, the once militant and supposedly pious McFarlane relented. He in turn stood for Beddoe while the judge was speaking.

Mad World News, where the story was covered on Facebook, was on fire with commentary:

“I would rise in any court room I might find myself in. Been in several as an observer, never for me. When a Judge enters I rise. Not for the Judge as a person but for what he represents. I have known some Judges socially and to a person they are enjoyable to be around. But, if I knew a Judge that was the most miserable SOB I ever met I would rise in his court room for what he represented. The best legal system in the world,” one person said.

“No Sharia Law exists in this country! Period! We must keep our laws and only our laws. Proud of the judge holding his grounds. We all need to stand our grounds and put them in their place,” another commented.

What do you think of the Judge Beddoe and the way he handled the situation with McFarlane?

Let us know in the comments section and like us on Facebook!

Source:politicstec.com