Shiva Ayyaduai

A self-called “Real Indian” who is running against Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is suing the city of Cambridge who is demanding he takes his signs down. The sign calls Warren a “fake Indian.”

The independent upstart challenger, Shiva Ayyaduai, on Sunday filed a federal lawsuit claiming the city is violating his First Amendment rights. The sign which is on his campaign bus the city is requesting be taken down says “Only A REAL INDIAN Can Defeat the Fake Indian.”

Shiva Ayyaduai

The bus has been parking in a lot owned by Ayyadurai, who faces a daunting task to try and remove the incumbent. Fox News reports:

Earlier this month, the campaign received a notice from Cambridge building inspector Branden Vigneault that the signs lacked the appropriate “approvals and permits,” according to local reports and the Ayyadurai campaign.

Vigneault threatened fines of $300 per day plus additional legal penalties if the signs remain in place, according to Ayyadurai.

“We will not remove the slogan from our bus,” Ayyadurai told The Washington Times. “We will defend the First Amendment, and we will fight this egregious attack on the First Amendment, at any cost.”

Ayyadurai’s campaign reportedly thinks the building code doesn’t apply to the signs because they’re on a bus, not a structure.

Warren has long been accused of saying she is of Native American heritage to help in securing jobs, including one as a Harvard law professor.

Warren has been called on by left-wing groups and Cherokee genealogist to take a test and get the controversy behind her, but Warren refuses.

Warren has become an object of ridicule of President Trump who calls her “Pocahontas.”




The media seems to be once again showing their bias against President Trump. They pounced in Friday’s news cycle on the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia. But there was almost nothing in the news of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.


The latter lawsuit summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, discovered there was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”

Backer filed an 86-page complaint with the FEC against Clinton, her campaign and its treasurer, the DNC and its treasurer, and the participating state Democratic committees. The complaint detailed the misconduct and provided concrete evidence supporting the allegations.

In a nutshell, the evidence suggests that Clinton, the DNC, and participating state Democratic committees established the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) as a joint fundraising committee to accept contributions from large donors, some exceeding $400,000. 

FEC records show several large contributions reported as received by the HVF and the same amount on the same day (or occasionally the following day) recorded as received by the DNC from a state Democratic committee, but without the state Democratic committee ever reporting the contribution.

For more than a year, FEC records show some 30 separate occasions when the HVF transferred contributions totaling more than $10 million to the DNC without any corresponding record of the receipt or disbursement from the state parties. They illegally jumped right over the state Democratic parties. 

According to Politico, “[w]hile state party officials were made aware that Clinton’s campaign would control the movement of the funds between participating committees, one operative who has relationships with multiple state parties said that some of their officials have complained that they weren’t notified of the transfers into and out of their accounts until after the fact.”

It seems that the Clinton campaign was in total control of the transfer of funds and used the party as a “fundraising clearinghouse.”

Former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile acknowledged that “[a]s Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.”

If you wish to read more click here. 

The Supreme Court made evident in the 2014 case, McCutcheon v. FEC, that this exact scenario would violate the law. 

Even with this wave of evidence concerning campaign-finance criminality—more than $84 million—the media instead chose on Friday to chase the story of Trump’s $130,000 payment through Cohen to Stormy Daniels. 

Credit: The Federalist,redbluedivide.com

BREAKING: Obama Headed To Court Over Who Was Found DEAD!

Things are about to heat up for former President Barack Obama! The brother of a slain Border Patrol Agent has taken to Twitter to conjure the attention of President Donald Trump in an informal request to go after Obama for what happened while he was President. His name is Kent Terry, and he’s requesting that President Trump reopens the case that could put Obama in some serious trouble, enough to ruin his legacy for good if that’s what people consider it. Kent’s brother, Brian Terry, was killed back in 2010 when an illegal immigrant wrecked a part of the Fast and Furious Operation. This portion of the program included what was called “gun walking,” and it found Brian Terry on the receiving end of a weapon that ultimately took his life.

His brother Kent is not standing down. He requested that Trump opens the books on Obama and solves the scandal that people have long wanted an answer for. President Trump has been somewhat transparent lately, so there’s an excellent chance this could happen if Trump feels as though it’s worth the effort. When it comes to the opinion of the Americans, then, of course, it’s worth looking into because someone who protected the American border was lost.

Kent Terry is upset that he has no answers as to why his brother Brian, who spent 22 years protecting America’s border, was lost. Kent and many Americans want the answers they’ve been searching for, and they’re starting to demand them again. President Trump has not yet answered.

Fox News Insider reported more on the situation with Barack Obama and Operation Fast and Furious:

“Brian Terry was killed in 2010 by an illegal immigrant with a weapon used in the botched “gun-walking” program Operation Fast and Furious.

His brother, Kent Terry, tweeted at Trump on Saturday, asking him to “reopen the books” and get to the bottom of the scandal that cost his brother his life.

“We need to find out the truth, exactly what happened, how it happened, why it happened. We need Mr. Trump, President Trump, to unseal the documents, reverse executive privilege so that we know what happened, and that we can hold the people accountable that are responsible,” Terry said on “Fox & Friends” Tuesday.

He said people at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Justice Department need to be held accountable for the government-approved operation that allowed thousands of guns to pour into Mexico.

“Everybody’s still actively working, nobody’s been punished, maybe just a slap on the hand, and that’s about it,” Terry said. “There needs to be justice for my brother. He deserves it. He spent 22 years serving his country as a law enforcement officer, a Marine, and that’s what he deserves.”

He said he never believed President Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder when he said that those responsible for his brother’s death will be held accountable, but he’s hopeful that Trump will help his family get the answers they’ve been seeking.”

Kent Terry also mentioned that he met Donald Trump while he was campaigning for President in 2016. It appears as though they spoke briefly about the incident with Kent’s brother and Trump seemed very empathetic and apologetic for what happened to Brian Terry. It was mentioned that Trump suggested that Jeff Sessions reopens the case to investigate further for answers and hold people accountable for their actions that lead to the unfortunate passing of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

Jason Chaffetz speaks about Brian Terry in a video below:

Newsmax stated in 2014:
“Fast and Furious” started as a way to capture drug dealers in violent Mexican drug cartels. It ended as part of a scandal involving the Barack Obama presidency that had to be wrapped up following unnecessary deaths. Gun-buyers, many of whom the feds suspected were criminals, were permitted to take firearms purchased in the U.S. and walk into Mexico without interference from agents; the intention was that once the guns were sold to powerful drug cartels, the ATF would later trace the firearms. Whistleblowers and investigators, however, found no attempt to trace the guns.”

What possibly happened is that the guns which were supposed to be traced by the government had ended up being used in other crimes that were not part of the operation. This turned the operation into something that possibly spiraled out of control and became a much bigger problem than expected. It resulted in a shootout with criminals and Border Agent Brian Terry who was lost in the fight.

Americans still want and demand answers and accountability, but will they ever get it?


BREAKING: BIG Dem GUILTY On 47 COUNTS – Immediately Starts Sobbing In Court!

When reporting the news, we don’t always get to say that the good guys win, but today is an exception. We can report that the people have won at least one battle with the misconduct of power-hungry politicians, and we will be a little safer for it. The politician is Mayor Ed Pawlowski from Allentown, PA, and the details of his case will make you very happy that he’ll soon be behind bars.

It’s always sad on a human level when someone has to be imprisoned. However, there are times when it’s for the greater good, and this seems to be one of those times. Pawlowski was found guilty of almost 50 corruption charges and could face decades in prison for his less than legal activities.

Some people who are caught red-handed are taken aback or caught off guard while in office, but that wasn’t the case with Pawlowski. He knew that this inditement would be coming down before his last election, but he decided to run anyway. The money was favorable,  so he decided to gamble with it. Morning Call reports that this calls an end to his 12-year career in politics:

“A jury found Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski guilty Thursday on nearly all charges in his federal pay-to-play trial, meaning he will have to relinquish office after he is sentenced — a crushing end to a 12-year career at the helm of a long-distressed city in the midst of revival.

He was found guilty of conspiracy and multiple counts of bribery, attempted extortion, false statements to federal officials, honest services fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud.

All are felonies and some of the counts carry a penalty of up to 20 years in prison although his actual sentence is likely to be shorter. Pawlowski remains free on bond. No sentencing date has been set.

 Pawlowski’s co-defendant, Allentown lawyer Scott Allinson, also was convicted, on two counts of conspiracy and bribery.

Pawlowski’s head sank as the verdict was read one count at a time, and later cried as his mother-in-law consoled him. His wife, Lisa, closed her eyes as the guilty counts mounted, then left the courtroom crying shortly after 6 p.m. She collapsed just outside the doors and was treated in a conference room, but recovered and later left the courthouse with her husband.

Pawlowski’s attorney, Jack McMahon, briefly left the courtroom, then returned and shook hands with FBI Special Agent Scott Curtis.

‘Good job, good job,’ McMahon said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Wzorek said he and his co-prosecutor, Michelle Morgan, were thrilled with the outcome. They added that Pawlowski should ‘do the right thing.’ Asked if that meant the mayor should resign, Wzorek declined to elaborate.The verdict should send a message to every official in Pennsylvania, he said.

‘This type of behavior is not acceptable,’ Wzorek said. ‘If they don’t have it of their own mind to think this is unacceptable, we will be watching, and the FBI will be doing investigations and will root out corruption.’”

The disturbing part of this case is that when you read it, it’s almost like they consider the whole thing to be a game. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. In this case, Pawlowski overplayed his hand. That’s not how most of us see our politicians though. We consider it to be of the utmost importance for our elected officials to do for us what we should do if we were there.

The reason we elect based on a majority is in hopes that the people we communally decide on will do what’s best for the community. Maybe we won’t always agree with them, but as long as it’s someone’s best effort, we can overlook some of it. What we can’t ignore is the continued exploitation of one’s position for personal gain. Yes, we feel bad for a man who sobs, and for his wife while she collapses at the idea of living out the rest of her life without him. But we also feel bad for the people of his constituency who he stabbed in the back. We can’t let feelings run the show, and there has to be an adherence to the law. Otherwise, we have anarchy.

Here are more details from our source about Pawlowski’s case:

“Jurors in the case, who have not been publicly identified, left without comment afterward in a van provided by the government. They came from seven counties.

McMahon said he plans to pursue motions asking Sanchez to overturn the convictions on the basis of insufficient evidence, requests that both Pawlowski and Allinson made at the conclusion of the government’s case. Sanchez did not rule on the motions at the time but said the defendants are free to raise them again after the verdict.

‘I still think there’s some significant legal issues as to whether these are crimes or not, but that’s to be determined,’ McMahon said.

Weber said Pawlowski is likely to face 5-10 years in prison under federal sentencing guidelines. Under that system, additional points are added for aggravating circumstances and extend a defendant’s sentence. Several such circumstances are likely to apply to Pawlowski, Weber said, including his abuse of a position of trust and the fact that he took the witness stand and the jury did not believe him.

Multiple witnesses — developers, engineers, political operatives, City Hall staffers and former members of the mayor’s Cabinet — testified about Pawlowski’s unsuccessful campaigns for governor and U.S. Senate, his focus on raising money to prove himself a viable candidate and pressure placed on city officials to benefit people who helped fill his war chest.

Their testimony was brought to life by dozens of clandestine recordings of phone calls, meetings and conversations in cars, bars, elevators and even a restroom, made by his campaign manager, Mike Fleck, and Fleck’s employee, Sam Ruchlewicz, both of whom wore wires and consented to have their phone calls recorded. 


FBI In Hot Water For Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, and Contempt Of Court


Image result for FBI In Hot Water For Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, and Contempt Of Court

The FBI may have violated as many as five criminal statutes.

The federal government acted like criminals during the last administration.

Obama and his flunkies abused their power. Nothing was off the table for these con artists. They even went as far as spying on American citizens in order to protect their agenda.

In many ways, they acted like Communist dictators. If you got in their way, they’d crush you. Even if that meant breaking numerous laws.

Now it looks like some of them will have to face the music. Top officials from that era might be charged for their criminal actions.

From Washington Examiner:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., informed the Justice Department on Thursday that the FBI may have violated criminal statutes when it sought Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to spy on ex-Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page…

In a letter sent to Sessions, Nunes wrote that the apparent use of the controversial “Trump dossier” to make the case for spying on Page suggests a “clear violation” of FBI protocols because it contained unverified information.

And such a breach of protocol may have violated five criminal statutes, including conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and contempt of court…

Nunes is demanding a response by March 8, in exactly one week. His letter, first obtained by Fox News, shows that FBI Director Christopher Wray and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz were carbon copied.

The country was stunned by the Nunes memo. He exposed what the DOJ—under Obama—did to thwart the Trump campaign. They used a bogus dossier to get fraudulent surveillance warrants. To boot, they didn’t even disclose to the judges that they were using this dossier.

The charges leveled at them by Nunes are not unfounded. They overstepped their power—limited by law and the Constitution—to go after the Trump campaign.

The dossier was their only “evidence” of collusion with Russia. The dossier did not contain any verifiable facts and has been largely discredited by even liberal journalists.

Yet the FBI and DOJ covered up that inconvenient fact, just to persecute a political rival.

Conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and contempt of court might only be the beginning. If the current DOJ actually investigates this, we might find much more.

But will Sessions do anything?

Will we have to live through the indignity of Mueller’s bogus investigation, while real criminals go free?

I guess we’ll have to wait and see.


Just In: Federal Court Just Gave Trump The Biggest Win Of His Presidency

A promise was made to the American people by President Trump during his campaign that if elected, he would do something about the immigration issues in our country. Trump had the brilliant idea of building a border wall between the United States and Mexico. A wall would obviously help to slow down the influx of illegal aliens from Mexico into the United States.

Unfortunately, Congressional Democrats have zero interest in any of it, and they have been fighting Trump tooth and nail at every single turn when it comes to the border wall.

President Trump received a huge victory in terms of the border wall this past Tuesday.

Washington Times reported:

A federal court cleared the way Tuesday for President Trump to build his border wall, ruling the administration has the power to waive a series of environmental laws to speed up construction.

The state of California and environmental groups had been counting on the lawsuit to derail the border wall, and the judge’s ruling to the contrary is a major boost to Mr. Trump.

“It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices,” he wrote in a 101-page ruling.

There is something even more interesting about this ruling. The judge who made the ruling is the very same judge who President Trump made accusations against for being biased during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Fox News reported:

Had Curiel ruled against Trump, he could have undermined the construction of barriers on unfenced portions of the border.

The Trump administration was sued back in September as part of its effort to block any construction of the border wall.

Curiel is the federal judge who then-candidate Donald Trump once accused of being biased against him – due to Curiel’s Mexican ancestry – during the campaign.

Curiel, whose parents emigrated from Mexico, was attacked by Trump in 2016. Trump said the judge held “tremendous hostility” against him in a lawsuit involving Trump University because of Curiel’s Mexican descent.

It’s clear that this isn’t about the Trump University case. This judge could still be biased… most federal judges are. But, Curiel did make the right decision here and there was no bias.

The wall will be erected, that you can be sure of. President Trump will be going back to check up on the prototypes of the wall very soon.

Roll Call reported that President Trump will be making his way to California next month on a trip across the country. He will be making eight stops to visit different prototypes for his United States-Mexico border wall. The Trump administration has requested that Congress give $18 billion to fund the wall. President Trump’s immigration reform ideas include a proposed trust fund of $25 billion which includes construction of the wall.

Source: fbnewscycle.com

SC BEAT DOWN: Neil Gorsuch Just Did Something To Bader-Ginsburg That Has Rocked The Court

The Supreme Court of the United States has entered it’s Fall term and already there’s a not so unexpected rivalry brewing in the ranks.

As we all well know, Trump appointed the Honorable Neil Gorsuch as the newest SC Justice, after Obama failed to get his nominee pushed through on his way out of the White House door. And that pissed a LOT of Democrats right off.

Let’s just say, Ruth Bader Ginsburg (or RGB as she is known) leans so far left she is barely visible out there.

Justice Gorsuch is a strict Constitutionalist in the vein of the man he replaced, Justice Scalia. During a recent oral argument, he said to one attorney “[m]aybe we can just for a second talk about that arcane matter, the Constitution.”

RBG fired at Gorsuch, trying to shut him down, but it didn’t work.  He continued asking questions, one coming less than a minute after RBG tried unsuccessfully to shut him up.

They traded barbs again just a week later during oral argument in another case.  Gorsuch, again, wanting to follow the Constitution.  RBG, on the other hand, noting how the SCOTUS has otherwise interpreted it.

SNL knows:


(Courtesy of Saturday Night Live via Youtube.com)

It could just be a seniority thing; however RGB made it quite clear during the election what she though of Trump:  “I can’t imagine what the country would be with Donald Trump as our president.  For the country, it could be four years.  For the court, it could be –I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

And this:  “He is a faker.  He has no consistency about him.  He says whatever comes into his head at the moment.  He really has an ego.  How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns?”   

Me thinks RGB may be taking out her feelings on Gorsuch now.  What do you think?  Please comment and Share.

[H/T The Daily Caller and Fox News]


“I think people are going to like what they are going to see with Mr. Trump and they should be excited” -Jeanine always supported Trump.


Imagine getting a personal phone call from the president-elect only days after he pulled off possibly the biggest upset in the history of American politics. Judge Jeanine Pirro didn’t have to imagine that call — it came on Saturday morning, as Donald Trump was making decisions about the aides, advisors and cabinet members with whom he would surround himself.

And on her show, “Justice,” Pirro disclosed at least part of what Trump told her, right before she revealed why the election was a “revolution.”

Before she became a Fox News commentator and host of her own weekly program, Jeanine Pirro served as a county court judge, the district attorney of Westchester County, New York, and the first female judge on the Westchester County Court bench.

It was while serving in those capacities that she got to know the New York real estate developer who would stun the world by defeating rather handily the Democrat nominee who was thought by the entitled left to have the 2016 election all sewn up.

So it wasn’t some out-of-the-blue phone call from the man America is sending to the White House. It was a chat with someone Pirro had known for years — someone who thanked her and her viewers for the support that helped make him the future President of the United States.


Of course, there is another possible explanation for Trump calling his old friend, Judge Jeanine — a reason apart from his wishing to thank her and her audience for their support through the campaign.

Source: www.readfirstoday.com

President Trump Scores Mammoth Victory In Court – Illegal Voters Just Got Burned

Kirsters Baish| Our country has been having a serious problem with voter fraud. The left has been fighting with all they have in order to downplay the size of the problem, but they only do it because it’s furthering their own cause. They are the only ones benefitting from illegal voters.

Throughout the years it has been drilled into our heads that there is no real issue. The Left has tried to convince us that there is no real problem and that it is ridiculous to require photo IDs or any kind of strict oversight. The Left wants us all to think that the Republican Party is discriminatory against poor and minority voters which would apparently be affected by these policies.

Following President Trump’s victory, all of a sudden the Left claimed voter fraud was all over the place. However, the only way that President Trump won was because of American voters… not because of the Russians as Liberals decided to claim.

President Trump wasn’t just content with his victory, however. He decided to prove the Left wrong and opt to create a commission that would look into voter fraud in the U.S. during the 2016 presidential election.

Fox News reported that on Monday a federal judge allowed for President Donald Trump’s commission on election fraud to start up again and collect a detailed voter roll of information from our country.

In November, the commission solicited states to hand over publicly available data which included, but was not limited to, registered voters’ names, birth dates, as well as partial Social Security numbers.

A judge halted their plans, however. This forced the commission to stop until a lawsuit which was filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center which is located in Washington was settled once and for all.

United States District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly is now denying the request made by the advocacy group which would block the data collection in a ruling that commission vice chairman Kris Kobach called “a major victory for government accountability, transparency and the public’s right to know about the integrity of our elections processes.

Kobach, the Republican Secretary of State in Kansas, also stated, “The commission requested this publicly available data as part of its fact-gathering process, which is information that states regularly release to political candidates, political parties and the general publicWe look forward to continuing to work with state election leaders to gather information and identify opportunities to improve election integrity.”.

It was ruled by the judge that the collection commission is not an agency, so they are not subject to this kind of assessment. She also found that the group did not show that its members would be harmed by the collection of data.

Source: unabashedconservative.com

Muslim Imam Claims He Has A Right To Preach ‘Kill Infidels’, Doesn’t Count On Conservative Judge

When you’re taking up residence in a new country, it’s a fabulous idea to do your best to integrate yourself into your new surroundings.

By doing so, there’s a good chance you’ll be welcomed with open arms by the surrounding community.

If you insist on not integrating yourself and attempt to cause as much carnage as possible? Not so much.

That pickle of a situation pops up all the time when those with extremist views feel the need to spout off their nonsense and get the world around them to change to the way they see things.

These out of touch folks get quite frustrated when things don’t go their way, and there’s no telling what they’ll do when push comes to shove.

In a perfect world, a reality check will be provided before they inflict some serious damage.

That’s what happened with this Muslim Imam, and he’s going to have some extra time to place things in perspective as a result.

Swiss Info shares the details.

A district court in canton Zurich has given a Muslim preacher, accused of promoting violence, an 18-month suspended prison sentence. It also ordered the 25-year-old Ethiopian to be deported and banned from re-entering Switzerland for 15 years.

The preacher was on trial for calling for the burning of Muslims who are not devout enough in their worship.

As the preacher sees things, everyone must see things the way that he does. Those that do not need to be dealt with swiftly.

Thankfully, he slipped up before causing even more problems – and he’s now paying the price.

Police arrested the cleric in October of last year, after receiving reports of the controversial sermon delivered at the An’Nur mosque in Winterthur, in north-eastern Switzerland.

A policeman and police van in front of the mosque

The man is also charged with distributing pictures of executions online and of violating labour regulations by working without a permit.

“His religious views represent a danger to the public,” the prosecution told the court. But the defendent’s lawyer painted a different picture, saying: “He was merely an unsuspecting asylum seeker who had only been in Switzerland for three months. He is no fanatical Muslim.”

Open border advocates seem incapable of grasping the fact that welcoming dangerous people into our midst without having any idea about who they are is somehow a good thing.

The absurdity of that line of thinking has been exposed a countless number of times, but that’s not stopping them from beating the drum.

That leads to a simple question: Why?

It’s unclear how much more evidence they need that lax immigration policies lead to some serious problems.

We’ll hold out hope that they’ll wake up and smell the coffee before it’s too late, but we’re not all that optimistic about that actually happening.

Source: Swiss Info,myrightamerica.com