Should Congress Remove Federal Judge That Blocked Trump’s Ban On Transgenders In Military?

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly has decided to take military matters into her own hands, instead of leaving the military under the decisions and protections of our Commander-In-Chief, President Trump.

She in fact has gone so far as to effectively stop President Trump’s order that bans transgenders from entering into military service.

Doing so will protect taxpayers from the expenses of hormonal therapies and surgeries that current transgender military troops are demanding.
However, this liberal judge would rather see more taxpayer expense go toward this and further push the progressive agenda than allow President Trump to do his job.

So what do you think? Should Congress remove this legislate-from-the-bench judge and have President Trump replace her with someone more constitutionally minded?

Make your voice heard, America!





Mind-Altering Drug Scandal Rocks Washington, Members Of Congress Could Soon Be Forced To Resign Because Of This

The continuous level-headed discussion of whether high-ranking government officials should be forced to undergo drug testing has quite recently been exposed. A few individuals from Congress were quite recently uncovered for being on a reiteration of mind-altering medications which a pharmacist in Washington, D.C’s. top legislators quite recently uncovered subsequent to feeling guilty about a portion of the medicines he had been giving these authorities for months. He feels that genuine conditions these endorsed meds are to treat can and do have some especially condemning impacts on the sorts of choices these Congress individuals are depended to make.

Many lower-level government workers are legitimately compelled to undergo random drug testing for the undeniable reason for being in a data touchy position. Since these individuals should be clear personality and judgment just to deal with paperwork and procedures, shouldn’t the individuals who settle on the huge choices must be more solid judgment than those underneath them? Obviously, control has superseded this security check and enabled numerous individuals from Congress to medicate themselves to perilous levels which have now caused some really significant issues that the pharmacist to the legislators is feeling terrible about.

Mike Kim is the owner and pharmacist of the pharmacy utilized by a significant number of D.C’s. most renowned government officials and addressed STAT News’ Erin Mershon around a disturbing pattern he’s seen of late. Not just has he been endorsing individuals from Congress with Alzheimer’s medication, but at the same time, he’s been giving medications to different calamities also, none of which individuals in this monstrous position of power ought to most likely be experiencing.


Mike Kim, the reserved pharmacist-turned-owner of the pharmacy, said he has gotten used to knowing the most sensitive details about some of the most famous people in Washington.

“At first it’s cool, and then you realize, I’m filling some drugs that are for some pretty serious health problems as well. And these are the people that are running the country,” Kim said, listing treatments for conditions like diabetes and Alzheimer’s.

“It makes you kind of sit back and say, ‘Wow, they’re making the highest laws of the land and they might not even remember what happened yesterday.’”

Kim’s tiny pharmacy — which, at its busiest, sends as many as 100 prescriptions to members in a day — is nestled among Capitol Hill’s stateliest row houses, less than four blocks from the Capitol building itself. Founded in 1867 and named for a previous owner, the pharmacy predates penicillin, the American health insurance system, and even the Lincoln Memorial.

This is no judgment on individuals who take medications, as the openness to treatment to enhance life is a gift of living during a time of current medicine. This involves perceiving your constraints and recognizing a condition and not keeping up an effective position only for control or any reason that could trade off execution and basic leadership capacities. These are normal desires of individuals in lesser limits of any industry, even outside of governmental issues that influence the heading of our nation. All the more critically, this medication/medical condition circumstance brings the requirement for term breaking points to the cutting edge.

The same number of our Senators and Congressman are slipping into seniority, some of their medications ought to be raised doubt about. In the event that a man gets to an age where they are never again ready to securely work a vehicle, family, and companions go alongside and say that’s the last straw.

When we choose our leaders we expect they are of sound personality and in great physical condition. Nobody is anticipating that a chose authority should run a mile in 5:00 minutes level, however when a person’s doctor is prescribing prescription to ensure that you can work at a typical level rationally, at that point it’s likely time to make a move.

There are numerous Senators and Congressmen who have been in office for more than 30 years, huge numbers of these individuals are in there 70’s and 80’s and are requiring a portion of the meds portrayed before. Age and wellbeing ought to be an argument for term limits, as unmistakably spoke to by Senator John McCain as of late. While experiencing surgery and post-operative treatment for brain cancer, he made some dubious votes concerning Obamacare repeal and replace. He keeps on torment from brain cancer he has portrayed as “very serious,” yet stays in office.

It has become visible that some high-level leaders in Washington D.C. are being recommended pharmaceuticals to help with Alzheimer’s, dementia, and other concerning health and mental health issues speaking to a diminished level of mental capacity, memory and different variables that specifically influence one’s capacity to perform to limit on a political position. These are consistent medical problems that influence loads of Americans, yet shouldn’t we investigate government leaders who experience the ill effects of these illnesses?

It appears that it is the ideal opportunity for open legit talk about these major issues. We all depend on our leaders to settle on steady decisions in sound health.

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

The President Authorizes Congress To Pursue Criminal Charges Against Hillary – SHOULD They PROCEED?

President Donald Trump has finally given Congress the authority to press charges against Hillary Clinton. Jason Chaffetz shared the information with the committee that he had a discussion with President Trump where the President gave the permission to investigate whatever he wants.

According to National Insider Politics, the Chairman of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Jason Chaffetz also suggested that charges against Hillary could be arriving soon.

This is what Chaffetz stated:





The information that President Trump also encourages the investigation comes just days after the Oversight Committee ordered James Comey, (now former) FBI Director, to publish the contents of Hillary Clinton’s email server.

This basically indicates that criminal and reckless Hillary Clinton didn’t get away from a full-blown investigation, regardless of what she had hoped for.
Most of all, without Obama and Comey to cover her tracks now, Hillary Clinton may finally be indicted.
It’s about time she starts being held responsible for her innumerable crimes and for betraying our country.

Finally, she has to answer for what she did, since the fact that President Trump is in control, she won’t make it out uninvestigated this time.

Congress Wants to Take Away Obama’s Pension

Congress has put Barack Obama on notice that his generous government pension could be taken away if he keeps living like a celebrity.

Obama’s behavior since leaving office has only cemented the fact that he’s an elitist.

From partying on yachts with Hollywood stars to raking in MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in book deals and speaking fees, Obama’s doing anything but retire with class and grace.

He certainly wasn’t the “people’s president,” and there’s no reason the PEOPLE should be subsidizing his lavish lifestyle.

USA Today reported that Congress is taking another look at a bill that would cancel pension payments to past presidents if they earn $400,000 or more in a fiscal year.

Unsurprisingly, Obama himself vetoed that bill when it was first introduced.

Obama had already put the wheels of his post-presidency cash machine in place, and wasn’t about to let Congress derail his plans.

But now that he’s out, Congress is going after Obama.

In response to the USA Today report that Obama’s earnings could trigger congressional action, House Oversight and Government Reform Chair Jason Chaffetz responded:

Let Congress know we are behind them – SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!

Obama is using OUR tax dollars to fund a level of luxury he does NOT DESERVE.

Historic Victory! Congress Just Voted 231-198, Gun Owners Are Cheering

The House of Representatives had been given a shot within the arm as of late through the instance of Speaker Paul Ryan as he attempts to outpace the maximum enthusiastic Congress ever conceived. This special experience of urgency has even inflamed the Senate in which Mitch McConnell has eventually decided to get his act collectively and do anything apart from whinge about how difficult it is within the Swamp!

This recent exuberance became supplied by President Trump who knew what the spirit of the American humans was seeking out when they elected him into the workplace. That excitement at spurring on actual exchange in the united states has long gone a long way closer to getting matters executedno matter no assist from the RINOs or the Democrats!

One of the most useful victories best befell every week ago when the Tax Code Overhaul invoice become exceededbut even better these days is the subsequent legislative victory that Ryan and the house have registered and this is the passage of the conceal carry Reciprocity Act! this is a big victory for gun-proprietors throughout Americahowever of direction, this additional manner that the house without delay voted against gun control. Cue screaming liberals.

Via Right Wing News:

The House passed a bill on Wednesday, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, that would allow those with concealed carry permits to conceal carry across state lines.

The legislation passed with a vote of 231-198 and it would tighten background checks that federal agencies report.“An overwhelming majority of Americans support concealed carry reciprocity.

Momentum, common sense, and the facts are on our side,” said Richard Hudson (R-NC) of the bill before the vote.

This legislation is popular with gun owners and the majority of Americans. Cue the outrage from foaming at the mouth leftists.

Jerry Nadler (D-NY) is the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. He released a statement about the bill. “The obvious solution to the varying state laws is to continue to do what is currently done by many states, which is to choose which other state permits they will recognize. Some states, including my state of New York, have chosen not to recognize permits issued by any other state. Most states, however, have chosen to recognize permits from at least some other states — basing the choice on the strength of the standards employed by the other states. We should not disregard these determinations, which is what this bill would do.”

Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) said the bill would undermine states’ rights, that it would “hamstring law enforcement and allow dangerous criminals to walk around with hidden guns anywhere and at any time. It’s unspeakable that this is Congress’ response to the worst gun tragedies in American history.”

Getting the bill through the Senate is another matter and it will be tough with a fractured caucus on the Republican side.

With the Alabama Senate race now seemingly within the hands of the Democrats, this may be a totally tough promote within the Senate. Mitch McConnell may have his hands full just attempting to convince the RINOs to vote this throughnot to mention all the rest. Getting the 8 Democrats to vote for it’ll be a miracle.

Crossing our fingers possibly won’t be sufficient. At this pointit is able to take a variety of phone calls from materialslet’s hope that clearer heads will be triumphant in this argument. The Left is going to be on a tear with this bill as soon as it goes on up to the Senate. There won be an afternoon that goes by way of that gun manage headlines aren’t glaringly apparent. If McConnell can get this finished, he will have earned his very massive paycheck.

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

House Republicans And Democrats Agree To Shut Down Obama’s Pension — Barack Is Livid

Why in the world would a former President of the United States need a pension, or any other financial benefits, for that matter? All they have to do is give one or two speeches per year and they will make more money than only the wealthiest of Americans. If they cannot make it on speaking and consulting fees or lucrative book deals, that’s just too bad.

We have an example being set by President Trump. He has refused to accept his presidential salary. No doubt that practice will carry over after he leaves office, taking the form of his refusing the presidential pension. While this won’t fix the deficit, it does point in the direction of the original idea that those in elected office should be citizen-leaders, rather than those looking for a lifetime income from their government “service.”

It turns out that Mr. Trump might not even have to make that decision to decline the presidential pension. The House just voted to cut the size of pensions for millionaire past presidents. It’s about time. If Mr. Obama is unhappy, he can get to work, although any “work” he might do is a far cry from what the vast majority of Americans do on a daily basis.

Image result for obama pension

The House easily passed legislation on Monday to reduce the pensions and federal benefits provided to former presidents.

“Before approving the bill by voice vote, lawmakers expressed agreement that modern-day former presidents don’t need financial assistance from the government if they already earn salaries in the millions.”

Image result for obama pension

It’s interesting to note where this practice of paying past presidents pensions got its start.

“Under a law established in 1958, former presidents are eligible for an annual six-figure pension, plus funds for staff salaries, office space and other expenses.”

And here is where it is likely to get cut.

“Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.), the author of the bill, questioned the necessity of providing funds for former presidents who can make millions of dollars from book deals and speaking engagements.

“‘Because of these opportunities, it’s no longer necessary to provide taxpayer-funded support to former presidents in the same way as envisioned in 1958,’ Hice said during House floor debate.”

Image result for obama pension

Mr. Obama vetoed a similar bill, claiming concerns over the fate of presidential staffers and the security for past presidents. Whatever. This time around it will be President Trump who will have the opportunity to sign the legislation.

And there should be no doubt as to what this president will do.

Source: The Hill,

BREAKING: Congress Just ENDED It For Anti-American NFL With Just One Swipe Of The Pen

Over the past couple of weeks, NFL protests have metastasized into something racist and vile. No longer are some of these athletes happy to quietly protest by sitting or kneeling through our National Anthem, as we’re now seeing an increasing number of athletes flashing black power salutes after they sack white players on the field.

President Trump has had enough, and several days ago spoke out about the NFL allowing this to go on, telling Americans to turn off the game, while advising NFL owners to “get that son of a b***h off the field right now … he’s fired!”

Over the weekend, these players held massive protests across the NFL to defy President Trump, where over 200 athletes took a knee or sat, with entire teams choosing to stay in the locker room as the National Anthem played. These players have grown increasingly cocky over the past week, believing they’re unstoppable, while ignoring the will of their patriotic fans, who are now causing their viewership to plummet into the double digits. As angry Americans continue to prove they have better things to do other than being bombarded with the anti-American sentiments of “oppressed” millionaires, Congress is now stepping in with an action that could ruin everything overnight for the NFL, with one simple swipe of a pen.

One thing people don’t realize is the NFL currently gets over a billion dollars in taxpayer-funded federal subsidies. The fancy stadiums that these entitled players continue to kneel and disrespect our country in were bought and funded by the American tax payer, where we’ve foot the bill for 20 NFL stadiums since 1997.

Over the past 20 years, the American people have spent spent a whopping $7 billion to renovate or build NFL stadiums, providing 46% of the total costs of these fancy stadiums. But all that could soon change after what Congress just announced. In the U.S. Senate, there is a bill currently being reviewed that would BAN the use of federal money for the construction and financing of professional sports arenas. Conservative Fighters reports:

“In the U.S. House and Senate, there is bill currently reviewed which will ban the use of federal money for financing the construction of professional sports arenas.

“Well, how about that; it turns out that there’s even more that the government and taxpayers do for those players than just show up at their games and buy their overpriced jerseys. Apparently, our hard earned tax dollars are going to help out with those stadiums that we only get to enter when we pay an additional fee,” Kat from Freedom Daily reported. 

Unfortunately for the anti-American NFL, empty stadiums and plummeting viewership could soon be the least of their concerns. If these subsidies suddenly end, all the NFL would have to fork out their own money to build and maintain these fancy stadiums, meaning they’d have no choice but to listen to their angry fans and put an end to these protests.

As these cocky players continue to disrespect our country, our police, and every American Oklahoma Republican Rep. Steve Russell first presented the bill a few months ago, and now has become an interest to others as well as the NFL players continue to express their dishonor of America. The bill already has bipartisan support.

‘The federal government is responsible for a lot of important functions, but financing sports stadiums for multi-million – sometimes billion – dollar franchises is definitely not one of them,’ Rep. Russell said.

The financing is a form of community bonds that channel taxpayers’ money into the projects for construction of sports arenas.

For the past 17 years, 36 professional athletic stadiums have been built or renovated by federal tax-exempted municipal bonds. This cost taxpayers $3.2 billion dollars,” the Caller explained, quoting information from the Brookings Institute.

Advocates for the federal funding of professional sports arenas often justify the costs by pointing to economic development, but new research shows that isn’t true.

‘There is no statistically significant positive correlation between sports facility construction and economic development,’ the Journal of Economic Perspectives said.”

soldier who has fought, bled, and died to protect America, the one thing they didn’t consider was the will of the American people. After refusing to listen to their vast patriotic fanbase, now they’ll be incurring the full wrath of GOP lawmakers who overnight could ruin everything for them with this wonderful new piece of legislation.


Guess Who Just Got An IRS Investigation Dropped On Him By Congress? It Is Time For Him To Resign?

The IRS is a colecting organization of the Federal Reserve Bank and does not play a role in the national government in spite of having “federal” in it’s name,now and again, it can be utilized for some evil purposes.

Back before the 2012 presidential decision, Barack Obama weaponized the IRS to target traditionalist gatherings who restricted him, for example, the TEA party, by keeping them from having the capacity to get their non-benefit status.

And in addition keeping them tied up with reviews of their association’s finances.

At the point when Barack Obama’s IRS Commissioner, John Koskinen, declined to leave a week ago in the repercussions of his bad treatment to those conservative non-benefit associations, Congressional Republicans declared their plans to ask Attorney General Jeff Sessions to dispatch thorough examination concerning the IRS scandal.

Breitbart reported:

[t]he IRS started targeting conservative non-profit groups in 2010 and withheld their tax exempt status before the 2012 presidential election.

In 2013, Lois Lerner, who was responsible for the IRS department granting tax-exempt status to non-profits, admitted during an American Bar Association meeting that conservative groups were targeted for their political ideologies. 

Lerner blamed lower level workers, and later that same month, she declined to affirm about the embarrassment before the Oversight and Reform Government House Committee.

It is past time for individuals of Obama’s settled in “deep state” government be conveyed to equity for utilizing their positions to change the political procedure.

What Barack Obama did is the stuff that tyrants are made of and we can’t stand to have another president do what he did on the off chance that we want to cling to anything American!

Ideally, Trump will wipe out this corruption, before they can do any more harm!

Source: MadWorldNews,

President Trump To Unleash Explosive Executive Order On Congress — Paul Ryan Is Scrambling

There’s an executive order from Trump’s administration that could reveal Obamacare’s mandate,

The Trump administration has prepared an executive order that would unravel Obamacare’s individual mandate, but has put it on hold to see whether repealing the penalties for going uninsured might be included in the Republican tax bill instead, a GOP senator told the Washington Examiner.

President Trump decided to delay the executive order after Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., pushed for the inclusion of the individual mandate repeal in the tax bill, and has been supportive of its inclusion in statements he has made on Twitter.

The White House announced Thursday night that it would scrap the subsidies, known as cost-sharing reduction payments, which help low-income people pay for certain out-of-pocket medical costs.

The administration had continued to make the monthly payments to insurers, which are worth an estimated $7 billion this year, but Trump has repeatedly threatened to end them.

In its decision to cut off the subsidies, the Trump administration said that the payments were unconstitutional because Congress has not appropriated money for them.

The bill would repeal the individual and employer mandates as well as shift Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion funding and insurance subsidy structure into a block grant program for states.

States would be given a lump sum of money from the federal government, and it would be up to them how to spend it.

This is obviously Congress’ job. Republicans were elected on a platform that included the repeal and replacement of Obamacare.

That Republican leadership has failed to get this done is a testimony to either their incompetence or their disloyalty to those who elected them. In either case, failure is unacceptable, and if that happens, they are without excuse.

In other words, if Ryan and McConnell cannot get this provision eliminating the Obamacare individual mandate into a tax bill that passes both houses of Congress, they should both resign and let others take over.

Share your thoughts down in the Comments!

Featured Image Source H/T: TheLutchmanReport,

Congress Releases Final Bombshell Report. OBAMA ROBBED $2.6B FROM VETERANS Gives $4.5 BILLION To ISLAMIC REFUGEES

We are living in a country that treats Syrian refugees better than our veterans. That is the America that Obama has created.

Under Obama, the Veterans Affairs (VA) has been one of the most mismanaged government entities since 2008. In fact, it has gotten so bad that Obama should be charged with treason for how poorly and disgustingly he has treated our men and women in uniform.
Just when you think Obama cannot treat our vets any worse, he proves us all wrong.

American heroes cannot make doctor appointments, the cost of treatment is insanely high, and over 307,000 veterans have died while waiting for care. As bad as the problems have gotten, no one has been held accountable.

The most recent act of treason came when the VA appeared before Congress and argued that they were short $2,600,000,000 in their budget because that money was taken by Obama and placed in his Syrian refugee program.

The Secretary of Veteran Affairs, Robert McDonald, told Congress that if they are not provided an additional $2.6 billion, they will be forced to deny veterans the care they deserve.

Since 2008, the VA has been so underfunded, they are forced to deny vets everything ranging from doctor appointments to suicidal help, and now Obama is cutting their funding by $2.6 billion so that he can resettle Syrian refugees inside the United States.

Congress was forced to vote on and pass an emergency spending bill worth $3.5 billion.

Immediately following that, Obama’s administration sent an additional $4.5 billion to help rebuild Syrian mosques and homes. On top of that, Obama has sent an additional $419 million to Syria for “humanitarian aid.”  READ MORE