Congress Just BLINDSIDED Democrats: Clinton, Comey, And 4 Others Face Criminal Charges

Image result for Congress Just BLINDSIDED Democrats: Clinton, Comey, And 4 Others Face Criminal Charges

Over the past few weeks Washington, D.C. has been in a whirlwind because Republican congressional lawmakers sent out criminal referrals to Jeff Sessions, the Attorney General. They are looking to punish those involved in the Hillary Clinton email scandal that rocked the 2016 presidential election. Now some of the biggest names in the Washington, D.C. game are getting hit and it does not look pretty.

Former presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey were a few of the people who got criminal referrals. Others include Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, for “separate violations.”

The Patriot Journal reported,

“Republican lawmakers have finally had it with those shady Democrats. In a move that shook Washington to its very core, GOP lawmakers sent out a bunch of hard-hitting criminal referrals to Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Those facing charges include some of the biggest names in the political game, several of whom are from Barack Obama’s camp.

Former high-ranking FBI members also got hit hard, as Capitol Hill seeks to punish those involved in the Hillary Clinton email scandal and outrageous Trump-Russia investigations. The criminal referrals in question do include Hillary herself (has her time finally come?), as well as former FBI Director James Comey, who has been on the hotseat for weeks.

Others facing charges are former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, for “separate violations.” The bottom line is that Republican lawmakers believe these people, regardless of status, should be treated as equals.

472EBC7D8F55C0F9E830D37CF96376A2.Final Criminal Referral by Kristina Wong on Scribd

Via Breitbart:

“Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately.” They claim Comey potentially broke the law when he protected Hillary, and for leaking classified info of his conversations with President Donald Trump to give to the press.

As for Clinton, they’re saying she’s guilty of disguising payments to Fusion GPS, the firm that produced the infamous Trump dossier. Strzok and Page, apparent Obama lackeys, interfered in the investigation of Clinton’s private email server, as they apparently tried to erase the necessary evidence. “The report provides the following alarming specifics, among others: ‘Mr. Strzok texts Ms. Page to tell her that, in fact, senior officials had decided to water down the reference to President Obama to ‘another senior government official,” the criminal referral said.

This is a very big deal, my fellow citizens. At long last, some of these deceitful, two-faced higher-ups are going to face official charges. Now, if only they can get those charges to stick… Here’s hoping!”

CNN reported,

“The Justice Department’s inspector general referred its findings on former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to the US attorney’s office in Washington for possible criminal charges associated with lying to internal investigators, according to a source familiar with the matter.

When exactly the referral was made to the US attorney’s office was not immediately clear, and prosecutors there may decline to prosecute.

Last week, the IG issued a report finding that McCabe “lacked candor” on four occasions with internal investigators when discussing a Wall Street Journal article about the FBI’s Clinton Foundation investigation, according to a copy of the report obtained by CNN.

In addition, the inspector general determined that McCabe was not authorized to disclose the existence of the investigation because it was not within the department’s “public interest” exception for disclosing ongoing investigations. The disclosure to the Journal was made “in a manner designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of department leadership,” the report said. While leaking non-classified information is generally not a crime in itself and the IG’s investigation was not a criminal probe, lying to federal investigators is a crime. Referrals are not unusual but the move is significant give McCabe’s role as the former No. 2 at the FBI. McCabe’s attorney, Michael Bromwich, said he believes there will be no charges filed.

“We were advised of the referral within the past few weeks. Although we believe the referral is unjustified, the standard for an IG referral is very low,” Bromwich said in a statement. “We have already met with staff members from the US Attorney’s Office,” he added. “We are confident that, unless there is inappropriate pressure from high levels of the Administration, the US Attorney’s Office will conclude that it should decline to prosecute.” The Justice Department, the inspector general’s office and the US attorney’s office all declined to comment. The findings formed the basis of McCabe’s firing last month by Attorney General Jeff Sessions.”

The criminal referrals are a perfect example of the corrupt nature of the Obama administration. They were willing to go to any lengths to do what they thought was right as well as undermine the Trump presidential campaign. Even if it meant breaking the law. But since Democrats are no longer in power nobody wants to put up with their illegal antics anymore. They should be referred, charged, and sentenced for the crimes they committed.

Share if you agree.

Source:rwnofficial.com

WATCH: Trey Gowdy Blows Lid Off Comey’s Fox News Interview, Mentions ‘Felony’

Image result for WATCH: Trey Gowdy Blows Lid Off Comey’s Fox News Interview, Mentions ‘Felony’

In an extensive interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson last night, the South Carolina Congressman Trey Gowdy executively and meticulously took apart some of the former FBI director’s talking points which led up to President Donald Trump’s firing of the former FBI director. In the video below, they stopped short of calling Comey a liar.

This all came about when Comey had an earlier appearance on Fox New’s Special Report with Bret Baier where he made a series of odd claims from his time as FBI director while he was investigating the now disproven “collusion” between the Donald Trump presidential campaign and the Kremlin.

Comey told Baier that he isn’t sure exactly how much of the debunked ” Trump Dossier” created by former British spy Christopher Steele was paid for by the Democrat National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Trending: Middle Eastern Woman In NYC Decapitated 7-Yr-Old With ‘Kitchen Knife’ – Media REFUSES To Report It (VIDEO)

He followed the claim by downplaying the importance this dossier had in obtaining the wiretap warrant to spy on Carter Page who is a Trump associate. Comey denied that he engaged in leaking when he secretly gave his confidential memos about his meeting with Trump to a friend to have them published in The New York Times.

The Conservative Tribune provided more information on the exchange between Trey Gowdy and Tucker Carlson: “Carlson zeroed in on those issues with Gowdy.

“He doesn’t remember a lot,” Carlson said. “He doesn’t remember when he first heard about the Steele dossier. He doesn’t remember who told him about the Steele dossier. Is that plausible?”

Gowdy, whose reputation for exactness in language and tenacity in grilling witnesses have earned him the nickname “Bulldog,” was having none of Comey’s latest line. It wasn’t plausible at all, he said.

“If he learned about it in the fall of 2016, and it was already known that the Democrats had picked up on that work, so, whoever briefed him… Why would you just say the Republicans started it but not also include the Democrats finished it? So that, that …”

Gowdy didn’t have to say, “that’s a lie.” Anyone listening understood it.

He then turned to how Comey minimalized the role the dossier played in the FBI’s application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when it was seeking a warrant to investigate Trump associate Carter Page as an alleged “agent of a foreign power.”

“I’ve actually read the application, and it is just wrong,” Gowdy said. “It was an indispensable part of the application. Period.”

But it was Comey’s denial in the Baier interview that he’d “leaked” information that Gowdy hit the hardest. In Comey’s world, apparently, a “leak” only occurs when the information that’s surreptitiously released involves information that’s officially considered “classified” by the government.

Gowdy blasted that for the nonsense it is.

“The other thing that I will tell you, Tucker, that I learned tonight is Jim Comey has a definition of the word ‘leak’ that no one else has,” Gowdy said.

“What he says is a leak is what the rest of us call a felony,” Gowdy said. “Leaking is disclosing a confidential conversation which is exactly what he did.”

They were only three of the points Gowdy covered, but they blew the lid off key parts of the story Comey’s shilling as he travels the publicity circuit to peddle the memoirs he titled “A Higher Loyalty.”

He’s been getting a respectful greeting from liberals like ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, and he’s been getting grilled by interviewers like Baier.

But whatever their politics, few know the inside story about Comey the way Gowdy does, a member of the House Intelligence Committee whose years as a federal prosecutor have given him an insight into law enforcement most American civilians can’t match.”

Critics claim that the former FBI Director is more in tune with one political party over the other and appears as though he wanted to help sway Hillary towards victory in the 2016 election.

The alleged corruption appears difficult to investigate because there seem to be various levels of corruption amid drama and side stories within the realm of politics.  Some Americans worry about the internal corruption that might affect the outcome of the presidency and interrupt with the action plan set in place by Donald Trump and his administration.

Please share your thoughts below and tell us what you think about the situation with former FBI Director James Comey. Was Trey Gowdy accurate in what he said?

Source:rwnofficial.com

Mad Maxine Waters Make A Statement About Comey That’s So INSANE That Even MSNBC Calls Her Out

Image result for Mad Maxine Waters Make A Statement About Comey That’s So INSANE That Even MSNBC Calls Her Out

It seems that California Congresswoman Maxine Waters has made herself look like a total fool… once again. You may be wondering what she could have said this time that tops her having called for Trump’s impeachment. Well, wonder no more. This time, Waters had something to say about disgraced former FBI Director James Comey.

The former FBI Director’s anti-Trump rhetoric lately has been taking over mainstream media headlines, but what Waters just said has taken it a step too far for even the most liberal news networks.

During an interview on Monday evening on MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes,” the California Congresswoman was shown a clip of her during the presidential transition period, in which she claimed that Comey was unreliable.

She can be heard saying in the clip, “All I can tell you is the FBI director has no credibility.”

Hayes stated on the air during Monday’s interview, “You and Donald Trump do agree on that. That sentence you said that, ‘the FBI director has no credibility.’ You and Donald Trump are in agreement on that.”

Waters was clearly confused, as she isn’t used to being questioned by a fellow liberal. She seemed to stutter a bit before going into one of her normal babbling responses.

“I’ve tried to clarify that and to say, yes, coming out of that classified briefing, I said that, and I certainly meant it. However, I think it is quite different when you take a look at Comey and his relationship to the president, what he said, what he’s done. I believe him,”Waters stated.

“Then is then, and now is now.”

Conservative Tribune reports:

At The Washington Post, “The Fix” writer Aaron Blake practically spluttered on his keyboard. (His piece is headlined “Maxine Waters’s cringe-worthy explanation for her 180 on James Comey.”)

“Part of being a politician is showing that you have some consistent moral compass — that you don’t just promote things and people because they say things you like and denounce them when it’s inconvenient. Saying Comey has ‘no credibility’ means he lacks character and can’t be trusted to tell the truth. That doesn’t really change with circumstances and with the passage of 15 months,” he wrote.

“Politicians aren’t viewed as the most consistent and trustworthy people; in fact, Gallup polling shows that members of Congress are basically tied with lobbyists as the least-trusted of 21 professions tested. And sometimes they show us why.”

Twitter users really let Waters have it for her comments:

The Washington Post tore Waters apart for her comments.

The Post reports, “Part of being a politician is showing that you have some consistent moral compass — that you don’t just promote things and people because they say things you like and denounce them when it’s inconvenient. Saying Comey has “no credibility” means he lacks character and can’t be trusted to tell the truth. That doesn’t really change with circumstances and with the passage of 15 months.”

The Post also claimed that Waters either acknowledged that she is a bad judge of credibility or she basically admitted that her political opinions have changed rather conveniently.

Maxine Waters’ comment proved that the Democrats are so ready and willing to bend the truth in order to push their agenda that even their own beliefs are subject to change by the day. Waters flip-flopping on what she said isn’t much of a surprise, but it isn’t every day that an MSNBC host calls out a fellow liberal on the air and the Washington Post throws a Democrat under the bus.

I guess Waters has become even too much of a looney toon for the left to deal with at this point.

Source: fbnewsupdate.com

Fmr Attorney General Issues Stunning Comey Announcement… Prison Now On The Table

Image result for Fmr Attorney General Issues Stunning Comey Announcement… Prison Now On The Table

‘O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.’   It seems like the top brass of the Obama DOJ, Justice Department and intel communities, have found themselves on the verge of ruin.  What I would not give to be be privy to the conversations of Lynch, Comey, Obama, Holder, Clapper, Brennan and the other former Obama Admin higher ups who have seemingly been caught with their hands in the cookie jar.  According to one former AG some of these players are facing serious consequences, including the loss of their freedom …

Conservative Tribune Reports: Former FBI Director James Comey may have just been hoisted by his own petard.

It looks increasingly likely that the now-fired director tried to use internal memos of meetings and conversations with Donald Trump to undermine the president, but those very memos are now making Comey look like the guilty one.

That’s certainly the view of former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey. He served in that respected position during the final years of the George W. Bush era, and knows a thing or two about the legality of classified information.

During a Friday appearance on Laura Ingraham’s program, the former attorney general pointed out that by leaking memos during his time in office, Comey may have done something highly illegal: Break the rules regarding classified documents.

“I think we ought to put to rest something one of your guests said in the last segment about how well the memos weren’t marked classified at the time,” Mukasey told Ingraham.

“They were classified as soon as he wrote them,” the legal expert explained. In simple terms, it didn’t matter whether or not Comey’s memos were marked as secret; they were classified as such automatically.

Mukasey used an example of his own time as attorney general to illustrate the point.

“I had an experience when I started as AG of taking notes at a meeting at a top secret procedure. And when I got up to leave the meeting my then chief of staff leaned over and wrote in big block letters at the top TS/SCI meaning ‘top secret, secured compartmentalized information,’” he recalled.

“In other words, those weren’t my notes, those were the government’s notes,” he clarified. “And those weren’t Mr. Comey’s memos, those were the government’s memos.”

And now it appears to be confirmed that James Comey leaked classified memos… memos that belonged to the U.S. government. After weeks of defending Comey, the media was forced to admit on Friday that, yes, the disgraced former director did leak classified material.

That Post article goes into detail of the sentences, ranging from probation and fines to lengthy prison time, given to past government officials who have leaked classified documents.Read More @ Conservative Tribune 

Source:fbnewsupdate.com

BOMBSHELL: Trump WILL FIRE Mueller After Evidence Found In Comey Memos – Get Ready For Riots!

Image result for Trump ,Mueller and Comey

Former FBI Director James Comey has some serious questions to answer after a report yesterday revealed he might have leaked two memos which documented his conversations with President Donald Trump which were classified.

According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, the fired FBI director leaked at least two memos which on top of confirming there was no collusion between Russia and the President, also contained classified information. The leak was to a friend who is a former federal prosecutor and a professor at Columbia. The memos documented the private conversations he had with President Trump during his early days in office.

His leaking of the classified memos is currently under investigation by the Justice Department.

According to the report, Comey himself redacted elements from one of the memos that he allegedly knew to be classified before handing them over to his friend Daniel C. Richman. Although Comey reportedly determined that the other memo contained “no classified information,” FBI officials later upgraded it to “confidential.” Comey implied to senators during his June 8 hearing that the memos he gave to Richman on May 15 were not classified on the date he shared them.

This revelation of Comey’s leaking of classified notes comes after the Justice Department handed his memos to House lawmakers on Thursday. Of the seven notes that were handed over, four actually contained classified information. Comey apparently gave his friend at least two of those classified memos.

The inspector general has the ability to refer Comey to the Justice Department for criminal charges, as he did with former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe earlier this week and President Trump has indicated that he would not let Comey’s leaking go lightly.

Here is more on these memos via The Federalist:

“Newly released memos written by former FBI director James Comey indicate that an early 2017 briefing for then-President-elect Donald Trump about the contents of an infamous dossier was held so it could be leaked to media outlets eager to report on the dossier’s allegations. In multiple memos, Comey specifically mentioned that CNN had the dossier and wanted a “news hook” that would enable the network to report on its most salacious allegations even though they had not been verified.

“I said the Russians allegedly had tapes involving him and prostitutes at the Presidential Suite at the Ritz Carlton in Moscow from about 2013,” Comey wrote of his conversation with Trump in a classified memo that was released in redacted form late Thursday. “I said I wasn’t saying this was true, only that I wanted him to know both that it had been reported and that the reports were in many hands.”

No media organizations had reported the allegations at the time Comey briefed Trump.

“I said media like CNN had them and were looking for a news hook,” Comey added in his memo about the briefing with Trump on January 6, 2017.

In another classified memo written on January 28, 2017, Comey wrote that in a separate meeting Trump mentioned the allegation about the alleged tape of prostitutes at a hotel and called it “fake news.”

“I explained again why I had thought it important that he know about it,” Comey wrote. “I also explained that one of the reasons we told him was that the media, CNN in particular, was telling us they were about to run with it.”

Of the many thousands of articles promoting a still-unproven theory of treasonous collusion between President Donald Trump and Russia, few were as significant as CNN’s January 10 story “Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him.” Extremely well-placed sources told CNN that the Obama administration’s top intelligence appointees had briefed Obama, Biden, and Trump all about a dossier they took incredibly seriously and considered credible. And it sounded really bad, as the headline indicated.

“Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump,” CNN declared. BuzzFeed published the actual dossier within minutes of CNN’s story going live, showing the world that the dossier was riddled with salacious gossip that lacked even a possibility of corroboration.

Keep in mind that nothing we now know about the dossier had been reported at the time. It wasn’t yet reported that it was used by the FBI to provide a substantial basis to wiretap at least one Trump affiliate despite the fact it was unverified. It wasn’t yet reported that the product was bought and paid for as a Hillary Clinton campaign operation, or that it was secretly funded by the DNC using a law firm as a pass-through to hide its provenance in federal campaign filings. It wasn’t yet reported that its author’s working relationship with the FBI was terminated because he had lied to the agency about how he wouldn’t talk to the media.

After nearly a year of wrangling, the seven memos written by Comey were finally handed over on Thursday to Congress, which oversees the operation and funding of the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ). The memos purport to show Comey’s version of his interactions with the president before Comey was fired last May. According to Daniel Richman, the original recipient of Comey’s leaks who now claims to be his personal attorney, Comey gave him four memos. Four of the seven memos are classified, meaning that at least one of the memos he leaked was classified. By his own account, Comey orchestrated these leaks to the media in order to launch an aggressive special counsel to avenge his firing by Trump in May 2017. The memos given to Congress on Thursday were quickly leaked to the media.

The first memo was sent on January 7, 2017, to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, General Counsel James Baker, and James Rybicki, Comey’s chief of staff. McCabe has since been fired from the FBI and referred to DOJ for criminal prosecution for repeatedly lying under oath about leaking. Baker was reassigned. And Rybicki was replaced in January of 2018.

There are two things in the memo that are worth highlighting as relate to that blockbuster CNN story from January 10, 2017.

First, Comey claims that briefing the president-elect was the brainchild of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

“I said there was something that Clapper wanted me to speak to the [president-elect] about alone or in a very small group,” Comey wrote. More on that in a bit.

“I then executed the session exactly as I had planned,” Comey noted before going into details of what he claimed he told the president-elect. He wrote that he told him about the now-infamous prostitute pee-pee videotape claims contained in the dossier. Then he wrote:

“I said I wasn’t saying this was true, only that I wanted him to know both that it had been reported and that the reports were in many hands. I said media like CNN had them and were looking for a news hook. I said it was important that we not give them the excuses to write that the FBI has the material or [REDACTED] and that we were keeping it very close-hold. He said he couldn’t believe they hadn’t gone with it. I said it was inflammatory stuff that they would get killed for reporting straight up from the source reports.

Such a close-hold that someone at a very high level in the Obama administration gave the information to CNN almost immediately. CNN broke the news of the dossier and Comey’s briefing of the president just four days later.

With Comey claiming that Clapper wanted him to brief POTUS, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence final report on Russia has something of interest. The report, which was downplayed and panned by CNN, included a finding of interest related to discussions of the dossier with the media:

Finding #44: Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN national security analyst, provided inconsistent testimony to the Committee about his contacts with the media, including CNN.”

So Comey, at Clapper’s expressed behest, told Trump that CNN was “looking for a news hook” to publish dossier allegations. He said this in the briefing of Trump that almost immediately leaked to CNN, which provided them the very news hook they sought and needed.

This briefing, and the leaking of it, legitimized the dossier, which touched off the Russia hysteria. That hysteria led to a full-fledged media freakout. During the freakout, Comey deliberately refused to say in public what he acknowledged repeatedly in private — that the President of the United States was not under investigation. He even noted in his memos that he told the president at least three times that he was not under investigation. Comey’s refusal to admit publicly what he kept telling people privately led to his firing.

That led to Comey leaking multiple memos in order to get a special counsel appointed out of revenge. That special counsel has utterly distracted multiple agencies and embroiled all three branches of government at the highest levels. All over a document that was secretly funded by Hillary Clinton and the DNC, contracted by a Democrat research firm with ties to the Kremlin, and authored by a shady foreign spy whose relationship with the FBI was terminated because he lied to them.”

This is what the swamp does. They stick together in a fight to take out a sitting president who is not one of them!

H/T The Daily Mail,rwnofficial.com

WATCH: Savannah Guthrie Catches Comey Off Guard, Leaves Him Squirming With Two Questions

NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie caught former FBI Director James Comey off guard on Wednesday, leaving him squirming over two tough questions.

During the interview, Comey was stunned when Guthrie grilled him about his integrity and why he sounds so petty toward President Donald Trump in his new book.

As noted by The Hill, Guthrie immediately exposed that Comey attacked Trump’s personal appearance several times in his book, asking the former director if he enjoyed “taking those shots at the president?”

“Some of the most widely cited parts have to do with your description and words about President Trump. Including calling his skin orange and saying he looked like he had tanning goggles. Some people said that was, for lack of a better word, that was a little catty,” she asked.

“No. I didn’t think of them as shots,” Comey replied.

“Really?” Guthrie followed.

“And I still don’t,” Comey said.

“Really?” Guthrie asked again.

Comey tried to deflect by saying he also described his high school boss from a grocery story, but Guthrie wasn’t having it.

“But you’re talking about his hair? Some people are saying, ‘Wait a minute. James Comey, you just got in the gutter with President Trump, who is known for his name-calling.’ He’s called you a slime ball and a nut job and any numbers of things. Did you stoop?” she said.

“I really don’t think so. Again, maybe I’m missing it, but I think I’m describing what his hair looked like.’” he said.

Watch below:

After grilling Comey on why he sounded so petty and catty toward Trump, Guthrie questioned Comey’s integrity.

“You don’t think you’ve diminished yourself?” Guthrie asked.

“I hope not,” Comey replied.

Guthrie was referring to reports that he leaked classified information to harm Trump after being fired last year.

During his testimony in June 2017 before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey admitted he created several memos detailing private conversations he had with President Donald Trump before he was fired.

Comey testified under oath that he leaked the memos to a friend and instructed him to give them to The New York Times. The paper then published a report detailing Comey’s memos and used them as the basis for portraying Trump as erratic and possibly obstructing justice.

While Comey told Guthrie that he didn’t believe he has diminished his own integrity, the American people disagree.

A new Rasmussen poll states that 46 percent of Americans believe Comey should be prosecuted for leaking information to the media while he was leading the FBI.

So nearly half the country wants him prosecuted and, as Guthrie pointed out, his book hasn’t taken off as expected.

He describes almost crying in the Oval Office with former President Barack Obama; admitting he didn’t tell Trump that Hillary Clinton and Democrats funded the dossier; and even attacked Trump’s personal appearance.

Outside of that, many haven’t been impressed at all, and Guthrie exposed that during the interview.

What do you think about Guthrie stunning Comey with two explosive questions? Comment below.

 Source:ilovemyfreedom.org

Bookstore That Sold Out of “Fire and Fury” Reveals How Many Copies Of Comey’s Book They Sold … ROFL

Image result for comey and trump photo

After the news broke that ABC host George Stephanopoulos’ interview with former FBI Director James Comey had  only attracted less than half of the TV audience that porn star Stormy Daniels’ television appearance drew in the week before, Comey’s new book made its debut in stores in Tuesday. The book is doing just about as well as the interview did, in case you were wondering. The former FBI Director’s book, “A Higher Loyalty,” has been surrounded by bad publicity from the start. What did Comey really expect?

After excerpts were released from the book, President Donald Trump condemned Comey, but that wasn’t even the worst of it for Comey. We all expected Trump to have something negative to say, however, it came as a shock when the book was criticized by current FBI employees. They had concerns that the book may damage the entire bureau’s reputation even more than it already has been thus far.

It seems that book sales weren’t quite what Comey was looking for, either. A staff writer for The Weekly Standard, Alice Lloyd, decided to go to Kramerbooks, which is located in Washington D.C.’s DuPont Circle and found that buyers for the book were in short supply.

When keyhole-sniffing author Michael Wolff’’s “Inside the Trump White House” book went on sale in January, for instance, the store sold out of its 75 copies of the book in 15 minutes, Lloyd reported.

The line for Comey’s book at midnight? A total of four customers — each one probably feeling more foolish than the next one for being out at that hour for something that clearly no one else was interested in.

The tweet below pretty much says it all:

Western Journal explained that “A Kramer employee told Lloyd the store had sold 12 to 15 by 12:30 a.m. — a half hour after the sales started and a half hour before the store’s normal closing time. And most of those were likely sold to the reporters and cameramen who outnumbered patrons.”

There are a variety of reasons as to why the book is so widely unpopular among Americans. People are sick and tired of the lies that continue to come from people like James Comey, and are becoming more and more untrusting. Think back to the anger that so many Americans felt when the then FBI Director exonerated Hillary Clinton back in July of 2016 after conducted a pathetic excuse of an “investigation.” Comey did do a very good job of boosting his popularity before releasing his novel.

Alice Lloyd had her own opinions on the book saying, “Whereas Wolff’s book was steamy, Comey’s book is preachy. It’s a self-righteous breakfast of oat bran, compared to a sugary cupcake you’ll regret later. Comey makes clear his disapproval of precisely what made Wolff’s book seem worth standing in line for, writing on Page One: ‘We are experiencing a dangerous time in our country, with a political environment where basic facts are disputed, fundamental truth is questioned, lying is normalized, and unethical behavior is ignored, excused or rewarded.’”

Source: fbnewsupdate.com

Comey & Lynch Colluded with Clinton Campaign to Entrap, Wiretap Trump; Illegal Scheme Involved Entire U.S. Intel Community

True Pundit published a bombshell of an article today detailing the scope & depth of the Obama administration’s illegal plot to entrap and ruin members of the Trump family and campaign.  If everything this article alleges is true, this country is about to see some unprecidented court proceedings … you be the judge.

True Pundit Reports: Loretta Lynch’s Justice Department and James Comey’s FBI worked together with the Hillary Clinton campaign to entrap Donald Trump and associates — including his eldest son — prior to the 2016 presidential election, according to records and testimony of federal law enforcement insiders.

One high ranking official in the Justice Department called it a sweeping “highly illegal” scheme to ensure Hillary Clinton’s election to the White House.

“This was clearly a scheme using Justice (Department) resources and State (Department) resources to get the Russian lawyer into the United States,” one Justice Department insider said. “Who has the power to do this? Only the people at the very top.”

Lynch. Comey. Andrew McCabe. Preet Bhahara. Sally Yates.

And according to high ranking FBI sources, the Bureau played a definitive role in plotting this sweeping privacy breach. But the FBI had much help from the NSA, CIA, the Office of of the Director of National Intelligence, Treasury financial crimes division under DHS, and the Justice Department, federal law enforcement sources confirmed.

John Brennan. James Clapper. Jeh Johnson.

That places the Barack Obama administration directly into this illegal soup, led by Lynch, Yates, Comey and the FBI’s McCabe and associates.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with the DNC bankrolled Fusion GPS to set up Donald Trump Jr. in the large scheme to undercut his father’s path to the presidency, sources said.

The Russian lawyer who set up Donald Trump Jr. — Natalia Veselnitskaya — was paid by Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS was paid by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.

Veselnitskaya and Fusion GPS worked together on another caper in 2014, two years before the Trump Jr. operation. In Russia.

Veselnitskaya was barred from entering the United States. Federal law enforcement sources said Lynch and Comey — using Preet Bhahara’s clout in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the southern district of New York — ensured she was granted a special visa for entry, just to set up the Trump inner circle.

A Justice Department official said Clinton likely never expected her campaign’s role and finances to be uncovered and broke a host of federal laws while trying to get elected in 2016, including bringing Veselnitskaya — who was previously barred from entering the United Stated — into Manhattan for the Trump sit down.

Using research firm Fusion GPS as a buffer, Clinton and associates are now linked to financing a scheme to set up the controversial Trump Jr. meeting at Trump Tower before the 2016 presidential election.

Fusion GPS is already on the legal hot seat for commissioning the Dodgy Dossier on Trump, hiring former British spy Christopher Steele to compile the bogus manifesto with the financial backing of the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, as well as the FBI.

But these new revelations — that Fusion GPS played a key role in setting up President Trump’s elder son to make it look like he was colluding with the Russians to beat Hillary — pushes this scandal into a new and more troubling orbit.

Soon after the meeting, Clinton and her campaign flunkies began slamming Trump for his links to Russia and Vladimir Putin, a chorus that continues to this day.

But it appears now this loud chorus was a manufactured arrangement of lies from a paid choir.

Especially since this scheme was backed by Hillary-Clinton dollars which implicates Clinton and her campaign in helping orchestrate the Russian sit down to entrap members of the Trump family.

Perhaps even more alarming, it is now alleged Barack Obama’s Justice Department and FBI helped sneak the Russian lawyer into the United States for the Trump Tower meeting, the insider said. She was previously banned from entering the country (more on that below).

If you are paying attention, this scandal is shaping up into a serious and disturbing criminal plot.

The Democrats and Clinton herself lambasted Trump Jr. for meeting with Russian lawyer   The Democrats alleged Trump Jr. was working a backroom and illegal deal at the behest of his father. The meeting has been part of U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s criminal investigation and Trump Jr. has testified at the Senate level to explain the meeting. Trump Jr., corroborated by evidence since the investigation began, met with the Russian delegation for anything but illegal reasons.

No collusion, as the Democrats have cried out for, has been proven on Trump Jr.’s part or that of his father. Nor does it appear it ever will be.

Fusion GPS has been fighting Congress in federal court to keep its banking records private, battling a federal subpoena to turn over the details of money coming in and flowing out of the Virginia-based research firm.

Following the Trump Tower sit down with Russian lawyer  Natalia Veselnitskaya, investigators began digitally wiretapping Paul Manafort, Trump Jr., and Jared Kushner who were also at the meeting. Read More @ True Pundit

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Trump’s pee-tape defense to Comey: “Do I look like a guy who needs hookers?”

Image result for Trump’s pee-tape defense to Comey: “Do I look like a guy who needs hookers?”

James Comey couldn’t believe he was briefing the incoming president about an interaction he may have had with a bunch of prostitutes, and it was equally preposterous for the president — for a different reason.

“Do I look like a guy who needs hookers?” Trump shot back as Comey walked him through allegations from the famed Steele dossier in his first interaction with then-president-elect Donald Trump, in January 2017.

During a no-holds-barred interview with ABC’s George StephanopoulosFriday morning about his new book, Comey walks through his first meeting with Trump at Trump Tower last January. Comey walked Trump through the allegations contained in the so-called Steele dossier, which describe an interaction between Trump and prostitutes at a hotel in Moscow in 2013. The dossier alleges that they were, in Comey’s words, “peeing on each other,” that the Russians had taped it and would use the tape as leverage to control Trump.

“And I assumed he was asking that rhetorically; I didn’t answer that, and I just moved on and explained, ‘Sir, I’m not saying that we credit this, I’m not saying we believe it, I just think it’s very important that you know,’” Comey told Stephanopoulos.

How weird was that first interaction? “Really weird,” Comey said. He described it as an out-of-body experience, one in which he was floating above himself and looking down, realizing that he was briefing the incoming president about an interaction he may have had with a bunch of prostitutes.

Trump apparently also insisted that Comey try to disprove the pee tape, for Melania.

“He may want me to investigate it to prove that it didn’t happen. And then he says something that distracted me because he said, you know, ‘If there’s even a 1 percent chance my wife thinks that’s true, that’s terrible,’” Comey said.

“‘And I remember thinking, ‘How could your wife think there’s a 1 percent chance you were with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow?’ I’m a flawed human being, but there is literally zero chance that my wife would think that was true. So, what kind of marriage to what kind of man does your wife think [that] there’s only a 99 percent chance you didn’t do that?”

So is it real?

“I honestly never thought these words would come out of my mouth, but I don’t know whether the current president of the United States was with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow in 2013,” Comey said. “It’s possible, but I don’t know.”

Source:news.vice.com

Breaking Report: Indictments Pending for McCabe and Comey – Entire House of Cards Coming Down Soon

Alex Jones can no longer be accused of being a conspiracy theorist.  Bombastic? Absolutely.  Does he exaggerate? Yes. But after almost two decades on the air he has been proven to deliver information from inside the Deep State years before anyone else.

Jones has essentially served as the canary in the information mine for regular Americans and has been heavily criticized and attacked for providing the public with the information that the handmaidens of the globalist movement – the mainstream media – refuse to give us, or worse, hide form us.

He took to the airwaves 30 minutes prior to his normal Sunday broadcast time to preview the indictments facing McCabe and Comey and why that has the entire Deep State melting down:

Source: fbnewscycle.com