Crooked Sheriff Just Received A LOT Of CASH After His Connection To Shooter Revealed – Here’s Who Paid

The shooting in Parkland, Florida was a tragedy and ensuing conversation regarding gun control has waged on since the shooting. While many blame the NRA others have pointed to the non-action by the local law enforcement as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Officers at the school were armed and refused to engage the shooter. Law enforcement was called to the boy’s house over 30 times. There is accountability to go all around.

However, the County Sheriff refuses to accept responsibility and instead chooses to push the blame elsewhere. But after some extensive research, it was found that in reality, he has a much shadier past than anyone realized.

The Last Refuge reported,

A few points need to be emphasized for those unfamiliar with the Broward County system. First, with revelations of frequent LEO contact and calls from people warning about school shooter Nikolas Cruz, there’s a common narrative mistakenly being pushed by mainstream media.

The Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO) didn’t “miss warning signs” or make “mistakes” in not writing up reports. The Sheriff’s office did exactly what their internal policies, procedures and official training required them to do, they intentionally ignored the signs, and intentionally didn’t generate documents.

Example: Miami Herald […] In November, a tipster called BSO to say Cruz “could be a school shooter in the making” but deputies did not write up a report on that warning. It came just weeks after a relative called urging BSO to seize his weapons. Two years ago, according to a newly released timeline of interactions with Cruz’s family, a deputy investigated a report that Cruz “planned to shoot up the school” — intelligence that was forwarded to the school’s resource officer, with no apparent result. (read more)

It is important to understand the policy here. Broward County law enforcement (Sheriff Israel), in conjunction with Broward County School Officials (Superintendent Runcie and School Board), have a standing policy to ignore any criminal engagement with High School students. When the police are hiding current, actual and ongoing unlawful conduct as a matter of standard procedure on a regular basis, what do we expect the police would do with reports of potential unlawful conduct? Of course they would ignore them. This is horrific. “In November, a tipster called BSO to say Cruz ‘could be a school shooter in the making’ but deputies did not write up a report on that warning. It came just weeks after a relative called urging BSO to seize his weapons.”

This is not a “mistake” on their part, the ‘doing nothing’ is part of the standard practice. Secondly, the 27 minute tape-delay in the CCTV system is not an “accident”, “flaw” or “mistake”. It is entirely by design. As a standard Broward and Miami-Dade practice, when school law enforcement need to cover-up or hide behavior, they need time (when that behavior happens) to delete the evidence trail. As such the school policy -as carried out in practice- is more efficient with a 30 minute tape delay affording the school officer enough time to deal with the situation, then erase the possibility of a recording of the unlawful activity surfacing.

Building in a 30 minute delay on the CCTV system was one of those pesky add-on items that happened a few years ago when the School and Law Enforcement officials established the policy of intentionally not arresting students. With modern technology it’s tough to hide criminal behavior, especially the violent stuff, when it is being recorded. Duh. Ergo the tape-delay was the best-practice workaround. Lastly, when the county education policy is intentionally constructed to ignore criminal behavior in schools, the Sheriff and School superintendent cannot rely on “law-and-order-minded” school police officers to carry out the heavily nuanced policy.  The county officials need the people closest to the work, the officers, to be able to think quickly on their feet to safeguard their prized district-wide statistics.

2013 – Broward announced broad changes designed to mitigate the use of harsh punishments for minor misbehavior at the beginning of this school year. While other districts have amended their discipline codes, prohibited arrests in some circumstances, and developed alternatives to suspension, Broward was able to do all these things at once with the cooperation of a group  that included a member of the local NAACP, a school board member, a public defender, a local sheriff, a state prosecutor, and several others. In early November, The Miami Herald reported that suspensions were already down 40 percent and arrests were down 66 percent.

A Broward County SRO must carry a political hat and be able to intercept behavior, modify his/her action based on a specific policy need, falsify documents, hide evidence, manipulate records and engage inside the system with an understanding of the unwritten goals. Broward County school law enforcement are given political instructions, and carrying out political objectives.  They are not given law-enforcement instructions. The school officers are the primary foot soldiers carrying out county political policy. Physical security of school students is not their role, they don’t have time for that. The Broward County SRO is in place to protect the school system “policy” and ensure students are not arrested for criminal conduct.

If you begin reviewing the downstream consequences with a correct understanding of the originating policy objectives then everything begins to make sense. Again, from the Miami Herald: […] on Nov. 30, an unidentified caller from Massachusetts called to say Cruz was collecting guns and knives. The caller said “Cruz will kill himself one day and believes he could be a school shooter in the making.” BSO, however, never even wrote a report on the tip. Internal affairs detectives are now trying to figure out what happened. Deputies Edward Eason and Guntis Treijs are on restricted duty while detectives examine their handling of the two potential school shooter tips. After the shooting, the tipster was re-interviewed and said BSO told him to report Cruz to the Palm Beach Sheriff’s, as the teen was then living in the neighboring county.

Of course the Broward County Sheriff’s Office didn’t write a report.  Writing a report would not be in line with the goals of hiding student criminal behavior. Additionally, it seems odd to see the Miami Herald reporting on Nikolas Cruz in 2018; when the same editorial staff conspicuously avoided any aspects of Trayvon Martin’s student criminal behavior in 2012 and 2013. I wonder why there’s such a difference now?

[School Police Officer Scot] Peterson is mentioned as part of a 2016 social services agency investigation into Nikolas Cruz, the 19-year-old identified by police as the gunman. According to a Florida Department of Children and Families report detailing that investigation, Peterson was approached by investigators and “refused to share any information … regarding [an] incident that took place with” the teenager. That same year, the sheriff’s office revealed Thursday, it was told about “third hand information” from a “neighbor’s son” suggesting that Cruz “planned to shoot up the school,” although the specific school was not listed. The sheriff’s office said a deputy contacted the caller, determined that Cruz had knives and a BB gun and sent the information to the school resource officer — presumably Peterson. It is unclear whether he investigated.”

This shooting was a failure on the part of the local law enforcement. It was because of the Sheriff’s internal policies that Cruz was able to go free and rampage his oldThereol. Their are no if ands or buts about it. The Sheriff had changed internal policies years prior to crack down and decrease student arrests in an attempt to get more money from the federal government. Because the less kids that enter the juvenile criminal system the more money they received.

All this meant was that serious and illegal behavior went unreported and ignored for years and years. This is the result. Seventeen people are dead and their futures are gone because of the Sheriff’s need to bring in more money to his police department from the federal government.

The Sheriff’s actions were especially despicable given how awful he treated the spokeswoman at the National Rifle Association at the CNN town hall regarding the issue. He completely shifted the blame on firearms when he knew full well that his police station and his policies were completely inept.

Share if you agree

Source:freedom-daily.com

CONFIRMED: Cash from Obama’s $1.7 Billion Ransom Payment to Iran Traced to Terrorist Groups (VIDEO)

TGP| On January 17, 2016, a cargo plane with $400 million in foreign currencies was secretly sent to Iran in the dead of night.

This was the same day the Iranian regime released four American hostages held in Tehran.

L to R: Matt Trevithick (Photo Credit Robin Wright) Amir Hekmati, Jason Rezaian (Photo Credit AP), Saeed Abedini (News 4).

Barack Obama later told reporters this was not a ransom payment.

Obama lied.

Former US Iranian Hostage Saeed Abidini told FOX Business Network today the Iranian regime WOULD NOT let his plane leave Tehran until the ransom plane arrived.


US officials held the ransom cash until the hostages were released.

Two days after Obama sent Iran the ransom cash the US government wired 13 individual payments for $99,999,999.99 , each with an independent MICR, totaling $1,299,999,999.87.

Now this…

Cash from Obama’s ransom payment to Iran is being traced to terrorist groups in the region.

Via Reddit The Donald:

Source: fbnewscycle.com

Clinton Nightmare: Uranium One Informant Has Video of “Briefcases Full of Cash”

Kirsters Baish| It seems that the Clintons may be on their way out the door when it comes to American politics. Their most recent scandal may leave them behind bars. New evidence has been uncovered against the Clintons in the “Uranium One” corruption scandal.

We are now faced with one very important question. Did Bill and Hillary Clinton accept bribes and kickbacks from Russia so they could fast-track a uranium deal? I wouldn’t put it past them. Now, numerous respected investigative journalists are agreeing, and there may actually be video evidence of the corruption.

Investigator John Solomon made an appearance on Hannity on Thursday. He claimed that an informant witnessed “briefcases full of cash” that were meant to be transferred between Russia and the Clintons.

Solomon stated, “(H)e gathered so much information, there are videotapes where the Russians are opening up briefcases full of cash — these are the people that we then gave uranium to, that we then gave nuclear fuel contracts to.”

Reuters reported that the informant, William D. Campbell, has worked as a lobbyist for a Russian firm. If this evidence stands to be true, the Clintons have a lot to worry about. Campbell is due to testify before Congress next week.

Campbell opened up saying, “I have worked with the Justice Department undercover for several years, and documentation relating to Uranium One and political influence does exist and I have it.”

The briefcases full of money may have actually been a part of a huge money laundering and payoff scheme that was meant to line the pockets of the Clintons as well as other officials. In return, they would supply political favors to Russian firms.

Sara Carter, a Circa investigative reporter, explained, “The bribery schemes included delivering thousands of dollars in yellow envelopes, laundering tens of thousands of dollars in briefcases or wiring thousands of dollars through shell companies through the Seychelles Islands, Latvia, Cyprus, and Switzerland, to name a few.”

If what Solomon and Carter say is true, the informant (Campbell) previously tried to warn our government that these deals were occurring. However, the Obama administration did not try to put an end to the deals. They allowed them to continue happening and there may be evidence that they actually pushed the deals through and transferred the uranium.

A Russian firm called “Rosatom” had wanted to take over Uranium One. This would allow Russia to obtain 20 percent of the United States’ uranium. If this were to happen, a committee called CFIUS had to sign off on the deal… and you’ll never guess who were some big names in that group.

Circa reported, “At the time of the Uranium One deal the panel was chaired by then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and included then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and then-Attorney General Eric Holder.”

While there was more and more evidence coming out about bribery and secret deals, the Obama-run DOJ didn’t do anything until the deal was complete.

Sara Carter also stated, “The Justice Department didn’t move forward an indictment with prosecution of bribery by people tied to Rosatom, through subsidies and other entities, until 2014 after CFIUS approved the sale of Uranium One. (This left) the American public without knowledge of the Russian company’s allegedly illegal actives as it went to procure one-fifth of U.S. uranium supply.”

Take into account all of the sketchy details. There were briefcases full of Russian money that was meant for the Clintons. There was a secretive committee that was paid off in order to approve of the deal in question. There was a huge amount of nuclear fuel that was handed over to Russia in secret. How can anyone say that they still support the Clintons after this?

If these allegations are true and the video evidence holds up, there is no telling what will happen next. The Clintons are in for one wile ride.

Source: fbnewscycle.com