Exclusive: Woman Who Worked for Moore in Her Teens Shakes Left’s Narrative

By now, most of our readers have heard the allegations put forward by The Washington Post against Alabama’s former chief justice and Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore.

The report cited four different women who claimed to have been approached by a 30-something-year-old Moore when they were teenagers in the late 1970s.

The media, Democrats and even a number of establishment Republicans are now demanding that Moore step aside from his Senate run, which would essentially hand the open seat over to his Democrat opponent.

But in an exclusive interview with an executive at Conservative Tribune, a woman in Alabama identified only as “Beth” has shared her account of working with Roy Moore as a teenager, and her story differs quite a bit from the narrative put forward by the liberal media. Beth gave permission for her remarks to be shared and the only changes made were to grammar and punctuation.

“Yes, I absolutely believe (the) Judge is innocent!” Beth declared. “I’ve known him and his family for years. I was a teenager when I first started working in his campaign. And he always honored and respected me and all the others. I always felt safe around him, I never once felt uncomfortable.”

“And even if I didn’t know him personally, I would find it suspicious that these women are just now coming out with this,” she continued. “He’s been running for office for the past 17 years and been a judge for even longer. So why, if this did happen … why didn’t they come out about this before now? They’ve had plenty of chances.”

“I just find it odd with as many times as he has run for office over the past several years none of this has come out,” she added. “I don’t think it is a coincidence that all this is being said one month before the election. Polls were showing Moore way ahead of Jones, then next thing you know all this s*** is coming out.”

Beth explained how she worked closely with Moore during his first campaign to become chief justice, as it was only her and the campaign manager in the Birmingham, Alabama office, with a few others working on the campaign from Gadsden.

“So I worked real close with him,” she said. “He invited all the staff over for cookouts and dinners and stuff at his house. So if he was like that he had plenty of opportunities.”

Beth stated that she also worked on some of his other campaigns for office, though to a lesser extent than before, and noted that she stayed in touch with him and his family for years afterward, even volunteering her time at Moore’s Foundation of Moral Law.

“He even tried to hook me up with one of his lawyers that worked for him,” Beth revealed. “It did not work out, but I was close with them.”

“I went to a play with that guy and the Moore’s and others around Christmas time,” she added. “All this was years ago, but still … I know him enough to know he is not like that.”

As to why it appeared as though Moore had been targeted by a “hit piece” from the liberal media and establishment Republicans, Beth replied, “It’s because he stands up for God and biblical truths and the Constitution. They don’t want him in office because he won’t be in anybody’s pocket or their lap dog.”

This young woman worked for years with Judge Roy Moore — at times with few, if any, other people around. If Moore really was some sort of predatory older man looking to take advantage of innocent and naive teenage girls, he had all of the opportunity to do so with Beth … yet he didn’t.

Beth’s recollection of her time with Moore significantly undercuts the liberal media narrative against the judge, a narrative that was on shaky ground to begin with.

The bulk of the allegations against Moore put forth by The Post were from a woman named Leigh Corfman, who even The Post had to admit had credibility issues stemming from her turbulent background.

But on top of that, an exclusive interview from Breitbart with Corfman’s mother, Nancy Wells, casts even more doubt on her unverifiable story.

Corfman had claimed that she gave Moore her phone number and that he had called her to arrange a date on the phone in her bedroom. But Wells revealed that Corfman didn’t have a phone in her bedroom during that period of time.

Perhaps more troubling is Wells’ statement that Corfman never had any intentions of going public with this story, but was convinced to do so by reporters from the Post, who in their piece acknowledge interviewing Corfman at least six different times, potentially even pressuring her to speak out.

Wells made it abundantly clear that it was only because she had been contacted by reporters that she decided to publicly share her tale, and when asked about a possible motivation for doing so, Wells replied, “It wasn’t done for politics, you know. It was done for personal reasons. And it wouldn’t have been done if the reporters hadn’t contacted my daughter.”

As for the claim that “politics” played no role in her decision to speak out against Moore, some enlightening information uncovered by GotNews about Corfman’s son, Garner Polston, may undermine that claim somewhat.

A quick perusal of Polston’s social media postings revealed that he was proudly anti-Trump, made disparaging remarks about former Alabama Sen. and current Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and made a habit of sharing anti-law enforcement, anti-religion and pro-atheism posts from others.

Obviously, the actions of the son can’t necessarily be pinned on the mother, but she was also said to have made anti-law enforcement comments in the past, such as when police shut down a prom party her son had attended.

As for Judge Roy Moore himself, he has consistently denied the allegations put forward against him, and said they “are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign.”

Moore added, “This garbage is the very definition of fake news and intentional defamation.”

As a final note, more than a few skeptical people have taken note of the timing of this story being dropped, roughly one month ahead of a critical special election and mere days after ballots had been finalized and there was no way Moore could be replaced as the Republican nominee.

Those on the right who are demanding Moore step aside from his candidacy — even as none of the allegations against him can be proven or verified — are essentially demanding that he concede defeat and hand the seat formerly occupied by Sessions to a Democrat that doesn’t represent a majority of Alabama voters.

We have seen this sort of hit job from the liberal media before — who can forget the numerous accusers against then-candidate Donald Trump a month before the election who strangely fell silent weeks later — but the people have grown wise to these kinds of shenanigans and smear pieces, and they don’t work as well as they used to anymore.

On Dec. 12, voters in Alabama will decide whether they believe Moore or his accuser from nearly 40 years ago.

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter so everyone can see what this former young volunteer for Roy Moore’s political campaigns had to say about the allegations of sexual impropriety put forward against him.

What do you think of what Beth had to say about her time working with Moore? Scroll down to comment below!

Source:conservativetribune.com

Donna Brazile: Clinton Campaign ‘Was a Cult

Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” former Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile called Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign “a cult.”

Partial transcript as follows:

SCARBOROUGH: Bottom line it for us. Why did they lose? Was it, at the end of the day, arrogance?

BRAZILE: Yes, Joe. It was a cult, I felt like it was a cult. You could not penetrate them. I mean, I — look, you can — I’m a grassroot organizer. I know street politics better than I know suite politics. I know how to touch people where they live, work, pray, and play. But I cannot help a candidate, Joe, if I don’t have the resources, if I cannot spend the resources that the party is raising because there’s a blind agreement between —

BRZEZINSKI: Exactly—

BRAZILE: A campaign—

BRZEZINSKI: Unspoken even—

BRAZILE: And, again, I want my party to come back from this stronger. I like what Tom Perez is doing. I know he said this is not about my book. Baby, I know it’s not about my book. But it’s about making much-needed changes and reform inside the party. I’ve sat at the table. I want to make room for others to sit at the table, but you have to come into the room knowing you have to change the recipe. Yesterday was a wake-up call for the Democrats, too. Because you know what? It’s coming from the bottom up. It’s not top-down anymore. It’s bottom-up politics now.

 

Source: Grabien,www.breitbart.com

Donna Brazile Uses One Word to Describe Clinton Campaign — Hillary’s Biggest Fans Will Be Furious

First, Donna Brazile called out the Democratic National Committee for helping Hillary Clinton get ahead in the Democratic primary. Then, she admitted Debbie Wasserman Schultz knew about the hack a month before it went public. Now, she is digging her heels in even more.

During MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Wednesday, Brazile laid into Clinton like never before. And she took a swing at the former secretary of state’s presidential campaign that’s sure to leave a mark.

Joe Scarborough asked Brazile what made Clinton lose: “Was it, at the end of the day, arrogance?” She held nothing back in her response.

Brazile said:

“It was a cult. I felt like it was a cult. You could not penetrate them. I’m a grassroots organizer. I know street politics better than I know sweet politics.

I know how to touch people where they live, work, play, and pray. But I can not help a candidate Joe if I don’t have the resources. If I can not spend the resources that the party is raising because there is a blind agreement between a campaign…”

At which point, Mika Brzezinski interrupted by agreeing with Brazile. “Exactly,” Mika said, “unspoken even.”

Brazile’s comments mark the first time a former DNC leader has said such things about the Clintons.

Watch her remarks in the video below.

Source:ijr.com

New Dirty Clinton Campaign Secret Revealed – U.S Postal Office under Investigation

Every day new frauds are revealed and probably every American asks himself what is going on in this country. When we are speaking for frauds we have a new one. United States Postal Service is facing with huge problem and probably is in big trouble now. Imagine they illegally campaigning for Hillary Clinton.

Now, Republican lawmakers, including Senator Trey Gowdy and Ron Johnson, are spearheading an investigation into the USPS to see what wrongdoing went on during their campaigning. At least 10 other federal agencies are suspected of having taken part in the same shady campaigning. If anyone can work just perfect, don’t quit until find evidence and solution and dig deeper it is Trey Gowdy and you can be sure that the responsible parties will regret their unlawful behavior!

From Fox News

Republican lawmakers are casting a wider net in their search for wrongdoing at federal agencies in past election cycles, after learning the Postal Service violated the law by allowing employees to do union-funded work for Hillary Clinton’s campaign while on leave.

The lawmakers blasted out letters on Monday to 10 other federal government agencies questioning their unpaid leave policy for union-related political work.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., led the charge on the review of agencies’ practices after spurring an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) beginning in October 2016. That inquiry revealed that the USPS violated federal law by letting employees perform union-funded work for Clinton’s campaign and other Democratic candidates while on leave from the agency.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., joined Johnson’s efforts this week by penning joint letters to the departments of Commerce, Homeland Security, Defense, Justice, Labor, Transportation, Treasury, Agriculture, Veterans Affairs, and the Social Security Administration Monday. The letters concerned what’s known as “union official Leave Without Pay (LWOP)” for political campaign activity.

The letters cited the OSC’s findings regarding the USPS that “only [employees] who wanted to campaign for the [union’s] endorsed candidates were given the opportunity to take several weeks of leave on short notice, over the objections of local supervisors who raised concerns about potential operational impact.” The OSC’s findings revealed that the USPS violated the Hatch Act, a federal law that limits certain political activities of federal employees. While employees are allowed to do some political work on leave, the report said the USPS showed a “bias” favoring the union’s 2016 campaign operation.

“The procedures by which federal employees request LWOP, and by which managers and supervisors consider these requests, are the product of negotiation between the agency and the employees’ collective bargaining representative,” Johnson and Gowdy wrote, requesting specific information to “ensure federal agencies are granting LWOP in a politically neutral manner.”

Johnson and Gowdy asked for information regarding “use of LWOP in the three months prior to a federal election” dating back to 2008, agreements between the agency and employees regarding their leave, written policies and all documents and communications related to the use of LWOP.

Johnson and Gowdy requested “state-by-state” data for the requested information, giving a deadline of 5 p.m. on Sept. 11.

Source:www.conservativehere.com

Witch Hunt Update: FBI Lists 200+ Manafort Transactions from 2006 to 2014 in Indictment – ONE YEAR Before Trump Launched Campaign

Former Trump Campaign manager of three months Paul Manafort was charged today in the Robert Mueller witch hunt of the Donald Trump campaign.

Rick Gates, his longtime business associate, was also charged according to news reports.

Manafort was Donald Trump’s campaign manager for three months in 2016.

Manafort turned himself in today.

PHOTOS OF MANAFORT LEAVING HOME—

Manafort was charged with TAX FRAUD from transactions made before 2015!

 

The news of Manafort’s arrest was once again leaked to the liberal media this morning.

Here’s video of Manafort arriving at FBI office to surrender to deep state operatives.

As Josh reported moments ago there were 12 charges filed against Paul Manafort and his associate Rick Gates.

Here is a copy of the indictment against Paul Manafort and Rick Gates:

Via John Cardillo:

Paul Manafort and Rick Gates Charges Filed in DC Court by Jim Hoft on Scribd

The 200+ transactions listed in the indictment on pages 7 through 14 – with the exception of 4 transactions from 2014.

All of the transactions listed are from the years 2006 to 2013.

This was years before President Donald Trump announced his intentions to run for President.
This is ALL a witch hunt.

Source:www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: FEC Complaint Filed Against Clinton Campaign, DNC For Hiding Russian Dossier Payment

As Kristinn Taylor reported earlier on The Gateway Pundit the WaPo article claims the 2016 presidential campaign of Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee paid for the Fusion GPS dossier alleging Russian ties with the presidential campaign of Republican Donald Trump and sordid phony personal smears of Trump.The Post reported that Clinton campaign and DNC lawyer Marc Elias and his law firm Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS to continue researching Trump after a Republican donor who originally funded the research pulled out in April 2016.

An FEC complaint was filed Wednesday against the Clinton campaign and the DNC for violating campaign finance law because they failed to disclose payments for the Russian Dossier.

Via The Campaign Legal Center:

Today, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign committee violated campaign finance law. They failed to accurately disclose the purpose and recipient of payments for the dossier of research alleging connections between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia, effectively hiding these payments from public scrutiny, contrary to the requirements of federal law.

Adav Noti, senior director, trial litigation and strategy at CLC, who previously served as the FEC’s Associate General Counsel for Policy said:

“By filing misleading reports, the DNC and Clinton campaign undermined the vital public information role of campaign disclosures. Voters need campaign disclosure laws to be enforced so they can hold candidates accountable for how they raise and spend money. The FEC must investigate this apparent violation and take appropriate action.”

Brendan Fischer, director, federal and FEC reform at CLC said:

“Questions about who paid for this dossier are the subject of intense public interest, and this is precisely the information that FEC reports are supposed to provide. Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are accurately disclosed. But describing payments for opposition research as ‘legal services’ is entirely misleading and subverts the reporting requirements.”