Bay Area Income Inequality Among Highest in America

San Francisco Skyline Painted Ladies (Justin Sullivan / Getty)

Brookings Institution research confirms that the San Francisco Bay Area has the highest income inequality levels in the United States.

Brookings develops income inequality multiples for America’s 100 largest metropolitan areas by dividing the income earnings of the top 5 percent of households by the income earnings of the lowest 20 percent of households.

In 2014, the San Francisco metropolitan area was the only Northern California region to be in the nation’s top 10 for income inequality. With the top 5 percent of households making an average of $353,483, and the lowest 20 percent of households making $31,761, the income inequality ratio was 11.1, the third-highest income inequality in America.

Two years later, in 2016, San Francisco’s income inequality was still the third highest, at a ratio of 11. But the San Jose metropolitan area had jumped from the 17th highest rate of income inequality in 2014 to the 6th highest rate in 2016. With the top 5 percent of households making an average income of $428,363 and the lowest 20 percent of households making an average income of 40,807, the income inequality ratio was 10.5.

The San Jose metropolitan area’s top 5 percent of household incomes were second only to Bridgeport, Connecticut, with a household income average of $485,657. But San Jose’s lowest 20 percent was the highest average metropolitan household income for the nation’s lowest 20 percent of household incomes.

The Bay Area’s combined two metropolitan areas encompass the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, and Santa Clara. With a combined income inequality ratio of about 10.8, there are no two adjoining metropolitan areas that come anywhere close to the inequality of the Bay Area. The gap between the highest earning group and the lowest group of earners expanded by a stunning $54,000.

In 2015, PolitiFact found that of the Brooking’s study’s 10 most unequal cities, 9 had Democratic mayors, including “Atlanta, San Francisco, Boston, Washington, New York, Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Minneapolis. Only one, Miami, has a Republican mayor.”


BREAKING News From Atlanta!! TRUMP Was On The Field When It HAPPENED!

President Donald Trump was greeted by a booming chorus of cheers mixed with a few boos (according to liberals) as he took the field Monday for the singing of our nation’s national anthem ahead of the college football title game between Georgia and Alabama.

The president, who was surrounded by military personnel stood near the 40-yard line with his hand on his heart as the anthem played on. Another wave of cheers and some jeers followed him as he left the field.

It was reported that the President arrived in Atlanta around 6 p.m. local time to attend the all-Southeastern Conference matchup between the two NCAA powerhouses. His motorcade caused gridlock, some confusion, and long lines outside the sold-out stadium but most of the fans didn’t mind and were happy to see the President in attendance.

Before arriving in Atlanta, President Trump took the time to once again criticize the ungrateful ball tossers who refuse to stand during the presenting of our nation’s colors and the national anthem. He also told attendees at an agriculture meeting in Tennessee earlier today that “we love our flag and we love our anthem and we want to keep it that way.” He added to thunderous applause: “We want our national anthem respected, too.”

The remarks came at an appearance at the American Farm Bureau Federation’s annual meeting in Nashville, which he attended with U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue. The president attended the game with Perdue, a former Georgia governor who was a former Bulldogs football player, and Nick Ayers, a Georgia native and top aide to Vice President Mike Pence.

Via OZY:


Because controversies — and politics — are taking their toll on America’s most popular sport.

It remains a $14 billion business with a central space in American life, but temblors of controversy have shaken the National Football League in recent years. This season, serious cracks have appeared in its foundation as it became the focus of divisive racial politics. Players’ silent demonstrations during the national anthem to protest the mistreatment of Blacks by law enforcement surged after President Donald Trump described a protesting player as a “son of a bitch.” Meanwhile, no team has hired protest-instigating quarterback Colin Kaepernick. Amid a hot-take fest about patriotism, people on both sides of the aisle have called for a boycott of the NFL. An exclusive SurveyMonkey and OZY poll reveals that the movement has caught on:


Those who sat out had multiple motivations, but the most common one: “in support of Donald Trump,” a reason given by 32 percent of surveyed boycotters. Another 22 percent said they stopped watching or attending in solidarity with players kneeling during the anthem, 13 percent had no interest in the teams playing, 12 percent acted in solidarity with Kaepernick, 11 percent were troubled by the devastating long-term effects of traumatic brain injuries on players and 8 percent said the games were boring. Another 46 percent chose “other” as their reason for boycotting, with replies specifying the national anthem, the American flag and opposing players’ kneeling. (Respondents were allowed to give more than one reason for boycotting.)

This SurveyMonkey/OZY online survey was conducted Dec. 8–11 among a national sample of 1,726 adults ages 18 and older, including 1,223 people who said they are football fans or watch the Super Bowl. Respondents were selected from the nearly 3 million people who take surveys on the SurveyMonkey platform each day. Data has been weighted for age, race, sex, education and geography using census data to reflect the demographic composition of the United States. The modeled error estimate for this survey is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. The full results can be found here, and cross-tabs can be viewed here.

The protests had a sharp gender split. Men were more likely than women to boycott the NFL overall (39 percent to 26 percent) and more likely to do it to back Trump (35 percent to 25 percent), while women were more likely to opt out in solidarity with kneeling players (30 percent to 17 percent).

OZY and SurveyMonkey also probed views about taxpayer-funded stadiums, an issue that helped spark two recent franchise moves. When taxpayers would not help foot the bill for new football palaces in St. Louis and San Diego, both the Rams and the Chargers, respectively, departed for Los Angeles. People across the country side with St. Louis and San Diego: 70 percent of respondents oppose taxpayer subsidies for stadiums, including 46 percent who strongly oppose them. Only 6 percent strongly support subsidies. But support rises among superfans: 43 percent of those who identify as big football fans back publicly financed stadiums.

On television the NFL has slipped, but not dramatically. Jon Lewis, founder and editor of the website Sports Media Watch, says the ratings are generally mediocre, and the highs are not as high as in recent years. “These are not necessarily bad ratings,” Lewis says. “I haven’t seen any numbers that would say, ‘Oh, my goodness, the NFL is free-falling.’” While Lewis says the league’s top sports competitors, Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association, had a strong fall, nonsports ratings are plunging in the age of Netflix and cord cutting. NFL games still cram the roster of the most-watched TV programs each week — a critical metric for advertisers.

Paid attendance has been down slightly — the Sports Business Journal reported a 2.5 percent decline through Week 12 — but television cameras have captured abysmal in-game turnout in several stadiums, an indication that many presold season tickets are going unused.

The effect of the fan boycott might be more a softening than a cratering of support. Consider the case of Chip Lake, who lives outside Atlanta. He’s still an NFL fan and fantasy football obsessive. But for the first time in about 15 years, he didn’t attend a Falcons game. “I didn’t want to spend my money in a stadium and watch people disrespect the national anthem,” Lake says. “I don’t know consciously that I sat down before Week 1 and said, ‘I’m boycotting the Atlanta Falcons’ … I just didn’t make it a priority to go.”

Although some ball tossers and one rapper voiced their displeasure at President Trump at the game, for who knows what reason, not one of them had the guts to kneel during our national anthem. Which goes a long way in showing just how powerful the presence of President Trump really is.

Please share if you continue to boycott the ball tossers in the NFL…