John McCain Panics, Refuses to Tell Authorities Where He Got the Money

John McCain turned over nearly $9 million in unspent funds from his failed 2008 presidential campaign to a new foundation bearing his name, the McCain Institute for International Leadership.

The question we all want to know, is where did it come from? John McCain keeps hiding and refuses to answer that question!

What we do know, thanks to an investigation by The Daily Caller, is that the McCain Institute for International Leadership received a VERY GENEROUS donation from none other than George Soros.

The institute is intended to serve as a “legacy” for McCain. It “is dedicated to advancing human rights, dignity, democracy and freedom”. It is also a tax-exempt non-profit foundation with assets valued at $8.1 million and associated with Arizona State University.

His legacy should be that of a traitor, after derogatory remarks about a sitting president said while over seas. #justSayin.

But McCain has very deliberately refused to release a list of donors and the dollar amounts they provided.

So, we know that Soros gave a lot of money. And we know that the McCain Institute got even more from other parties, but that he’s not going to tell us who.

The DC gives us more:

Critics worry that the institute’s donors and McCain’s personal leadership in the organization’s exclusive “Sedona Forum” bear an uncanny resemblance to the glitzy Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) that annually co-mingled special interests and powerful political players in alleged pay-to-play schemes.

The institute has accepted contributions of as much as $100,000 from billionaire liberal activist-funder George Soros and from Teneo, a for-profit company co-founded by Doug Band, former President Bill Clinton’s “bag man.”

Teneo has long helped enrich Clinton through lucrative speaking and business deals.

And Bloomberg reported in 2016 on a $1 million Saudi Arabian donation to the institute, a contribution the McCain group has refused to explain publicly.

In addition, the institute has taken at least $100,000 from a Moroccan state-run company tied to repeated charges of worker abuse and exploitation. The McCain group has also accepted at least $100,000 from the Pivotal Foundation. It was created by Francis Najafi who owns the Pivotal Group, a private equity and real estate firm.

What exactly is John McCain doing behind closed doors? What is he doing for Soros to get all that financial love?

Charles Ortel, a retired Wall Street investment banker and philanthropy law expert, told The DC that “high government officials such as John McCain, [former Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama should not get involved with vehicles like these where substantial sums can be funneled over time in ways that at best, reeks of impropriety and at worse are public corruption.”

The institute’s donations suggest special pleading before the senator. They also in some instances appear to contradict McCain’s vision of human rights and national security.

John McCain is no better than Obama and Hillary. He lost all conservative credentials years ago. It is high time that he is retired.

I used to have respect for his service. He has almost destroyed that. Cant the Hanoi Hilton take him back? Did I say that?

John McCain is indicative of the real problem in DC. Power held too long, always leads to corruption.

I believe McCain used to be a good man. He is no longer.



Devin Nunes Drop Nuke – It Was Obama That…

Image result for [LIVE VIDEO] Devin Nunes Drop Nuke – It Was Obama That…

Rep. Devin Nunes sounded off at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) Saturday on how former President Barack Obama allowed to Russia to gain prominence during his administration.

We went through a whole European infrastructure consolidation process of military installations across Europe, abandoned a lot of abilities in the North Atlantic to track Russian subs,” Nunes said.

We actually had the president of the United States, who said on a hot mic to the prime minister of Russia at the time, ‘Just tell Vladimir to wait after the election.’ That was President Obama who said that.

So who created this Russian threat? Who? It was the last administration that put us in this position,” Nunes said.

The much-awaited Democratic memo on the Steele dossier was also released Saturday.

The conference, which unfolded over 3 ½ days at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center just outside Washington, overlapped with breaking news about the long-running Russia investigation. On Friday, Trump campaign official Rick Gates pleaded guilty to two charges related money laundering, and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III filed fresh charges against former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.

But at CPAC, the news was received in two ways — as a distraction or as a hoax. According to the conference’s annual straw poll, 60 percent of attendees said the Mueller investigation was unfair. In a Saturday-afternoon speech, Tom Fitton, the president of the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch said the probe and the media’s focus on it was designed to distract from scandals around defeated 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“Stolen and destroyed records. Violations of national security laws. You name it — Judicial Watch has compiled enough evidence to compel the lawful arrest of Hillary Clinton,” Fitton said. “It’s no wonder that the D.C. establishment would rather talk about their made-up garbage about Donald Trump and Russia.”

A Saturday panel about the investigation, bringing together skeptical conservative reporters, was less dismissive. While they criticized some national news media as hyping each turn in the Russia story, they acknowledged that the investigations raise some questions about Trump’s campaign.

Disgraced Gay Olympian Just Issued Desperate Demand To Pence After Major Olympics Failure

The 2018 Winter Olympics will sadly not be remembered for its top athletic performances, but it will be remembered for its virtue signaling and social justice warrior antics. From the beginning of the anticipated winter games, numerous Olympic athletes decided to use their platform to protest President Trump and his policies, but not all athletes were focused on Trump. For instance, openly gay figure skater Adam Rippon focused his attention on Vice President Mike Pence doing his best to disrespect him and his Christian values.

Mike Pence being the class act that he is didn’t take the bait from the combative skater, but only offered support and wishes for Rippon to bring home the gold. Evidently, those warm wishes rubbed Rippon the wrong way since he continued to snub Pence every chance he got publically. Now, that the games are over and Rippon is beginning to slip into obscurity, he has decided to make a desperate demand to Mike Pence that has everyone wondering how the vice president will respond.

Since the Olympics began just a couple weeks ago, they were overshadowed by the disrespectful antics of numerous athletes competing in the games. Instead of these top athletes focusing on winning the Olympics for themselves and the American people they used their platform to mock President Trump and create more division in the country. One of those “delightful” division makers was figure skater Adam Rippon who attacked VP Mike Pence incessantly alongside openly gay American freestyle skier Gus Kenworthy on social media.

Of course, many people in America were baffled over why Rippon could be so angry at Pence, and it all boiled down to the LGBT agenda. According to Rippon, he was attacking Pence for a statement he allegedly made in 2000 on his congressional campaign website concerning gay conversion therapy. While Pence has denied this in the past that didn’t stop Rippon from taking jabs at Pence every chance he had. Then, just as quickly as the attacks began, Rippon made a sudden about-face stating that he wanted to focus on his time spent at the Olympics and not the one-sided feud he was in with Pence.

Well, now the Olympics are wrapping up, and the gay figure skater is making headlines again announcing that he would like Mike Pence to call him on the phone, which has everyone scratching their heads in confusion.

Here is more from Patriot Beat:

Disgraced Olympian who turned the entire Olympic event into a political stunt show that was all about him, is baaacccck.

This time though, the anti-Tump/Pence-bashing Olympic failure is declaring, if Mike Pence called, NOW, he’d accept the call.

From Washington Examiner:

U.S. figure skater Adam Rippon — the first openly gay U.S. athlete to compete in the Winter Olympics — said he would now accept a call from Vice President Mike Pence.

“I was offered a phone call with the vice president that I decided not to take before the games,” Rippon told the “Today” show. “I didn’t take the phone call because I needed to focus on the competition.”

 But Rippon says now he would “totally” take the phone call.

Rippon has been critical of Pence during the Olympics, claiming that the vice president backs “gay conversion therapy.” Pence’s office has refuted that claim.

When staffers for Pence reached out to Rippon to set up a meeting with the athlete, he declined the offer. Rippon said earlier this month that he didn’t want his Olympic experience to be about Pence and that he would not attend a White House celebration for the Olympic athletes.

“Mike Pence doesn’t stand for anything that I was taught when I grew up, and I think that it’s important if you’re given the platform to speak up for those who don’t have a voice,” Rippon told the “Today” show.

It has become abundantly clear, that Rippon realizes that his fifteen minutes of fame is up and is now grasping at straws to somehow stay relevant in the media. Rippon is beginning to see that no one cared about his mock outrage toward Pence and that his nasty attacks against him did not win him any points.

So, in a desperate attempt to appear favorable in the public’s eyes he is trying to look like the “bigger” person, but we all know who Rippon is. It will be interesting to see how Pence will respond to Rippon’s request, but I hope he ignores it and lets this mediocre figure skater fade into obscurity quickly.

The Boycotts Against The NRA Are Backfiring

Image result for The Boycotts Against The NRA Are Backfiring

The boycotts against the NRA and pressure to stop companies from offering discounts to their members has galvanized conservatives in support of the movement.

From The Daily Caller:

The liberal campaign against the NRA has successfully pressured some companies to sever their partnerships with the gun rights group but it’s having another, unintended effect: galvanizing conservatives who feel the NRA has been unfairly attacked.

Liberal activist groups turned the NRA into a scapegoat for the Florida school shooting that left 17 people dead and immediately launched a pressure campaign meant to weaken the NRA, which touts itself as the nation’s longest-standing civil rights organization.

Liberals have threatened boycott campaigns against companies like FedEx, for having discount partnerships with NRA members. On that front, the activists have had some success, as several companies including United Airlines and Delta Airlines caved to the pressure and severed their ties with the NRA. Left-wing website ThinkProgress, a project of the George Soros-funded Center for American Progress, has since taken credit for launching that boycott campaign.

Two left-wing gun control groups, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense and Everytown for Gun Safety, are pressuring Amazon, Apple and Google to ban the NRA’s channel from their streaming platforms. So far, their censorship campaign has been unsuccessful.

As liberals and prominent media figures have stepped up their attacks on the NRA, many on the Right are rushing to the NRA’s defense. Social media was flooded over the weekend with conservatives announcing they had joined the NRA as an act of defiance.

A long list of companies have refused to cave to liberal pressure and are maintaining their ties with the NRA.

Read more: (Link:

Judge Reveals Scalia Wiretap Bombshell … Media Dead Silent

Image result for Judge Reveals Scalia Wiretap Bombshell … Media Dead Silent

The nation is automatically in complete amazement whenever Judge Andrew Napolitano decides to present himself with a public announcement.

Much consideration and many questions have come into account after his live interview with FOX news. Judge Scalia is no longer with us, however, Judge Napolitano and Judge Scalia were very close friends.

Recently, Napolitano felt he has the responsibility to reveal important information about his friend on live television. Judge Napolitano stated clearly,

“Judge Scalia told him that he was under surveillance of the Obama’s administration. Scalia didn’t like that and probably other members from the Supreme Court had been under surveillance by the intelligence agencies under Obama.”

According to conservativetribune,

Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano just made a stunning claim about the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and President Barack Obama.

In a segment this week on the Fox News Business Network’s “Mornings With Maria,” Napolitano said he was told by Scalia that Scalia thought the Supreme Court was under surveillance by the administration of former President Barack Obama.

Justice Scalia told me he often thought the court was being surveilled, and he told me that probably four or five years ago,” Napolitano said in the clip shown below.


That’s huge for a couple of reasons.

First of all, if that claim is true, it’s a gross overreach of the executive branch into the judicial branch, to say the least. But much, much more than that, think of the massive rulings that were made over the course of the Obama presidency:

Two crucial Obamacare rulings. Gay marriage legalized nationwide — one of the most controversial rulings in recent memory. And if Obama’s White House really did have the Supreme Court under surveillance, Obama could have been inappropriately informed about all of it.

And, as the judge pointed out in the segment, “the use of intelligence data for political purposes is a felony.”

Let’s not forget that President Donald Trump had also made similar accusations against the Obama administration not long ago.

It’s a strange coincidence for several prominent politicians — including Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who has recently made formal requests for information on his own possible surveillance by the Obama administration — to be claiming the same injury against a man not really known for his uprightness and honesty.

Could there be some truth to this?

At the Conservative Tribune, we’ve discussed Obama’s fascination, shall we way, with surveillance before — this is just further confirmation.

But by all means, mainstream media, go nuts about whatever conversation was had between Trump and the Russians last week.


Under the Obama Administration, we were living in a country that treated Illegal Aliens and Syrian refugees better than our veterans. That was the America that Obama had created.

Under Obama, the Veterans Affairs (VA) was one of the most mismanaged government entities since 2008. In fact, it had gotten so bad that Obama should have been brought before Congress to account for how poorly and disgustingly he treated our men and women in uniform.

And just when you thought Obama could not treat our vets any worse, he proves us all wrong.

American heroes cannot make doctor’s appointments, the cost of treatment is insanely high, and over 307,000 veterans died while waiting for care. As bad as the problems have gotten, no one has been held accountable.

The most egregious dereliction of his duties came when the VA appeared before Congress and argued that they were short $2,600,000,000 in their budget because that money was taken by Obama and placed in his Syrian refugee program.

The Secretary of Veteran Affairs, Robert McDonald, told Congress that if they are not provided an additional $2.6 billion, they will be forced to deny veterans the care they deserve.

Since 2008, the VA has been so underfunded, they are forced to deny vets everything ranging from doctor appointments to suicidal help, and now Obama is cutting their funding by $2.6 billion so that he can resettle Syrian refugees inside the United States.

Congress was forced to vote on and pass an emergency spending bill worth $3.5 billion.

Immediately following that, Obama’s administration sent an additional $4.5 billion to help rebuild Syrian mosques and homes. Additionally, Obama sent an astonishing $419 million more to Syria for “humanitarian aid.”  READ MORE


Neil Gorsuch Steps Up To Fire Shot That May Crush The Liberal Dream Forever & Restore Faith In Our American Republic

Kirsters Baish| We all saw the brutal fight over Neil Gorsuch, and we all remember how relieved we were when the Democrats lost that fight. They haven’t seemed to get over how Mitch McConnell gambled on Trump. No Democrat in the United States seriously thought that Trump would win. They were banking on waiting it out and getting their Democratic majority on the Supreme Court, but clearly things did not go as planned for the Democrats.

That liberal dream was crushed when President Donald Trump won and the things were not the same for the left after that. It seems as though this might be the end of the liberal dream, and Neil Gorsuch is the one putting an end to it.

Business Insider reported:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider for the second time in two years whether to choke off a critical funding stream for public-employee unions, potentially reducing organized labor’s influence in the workplace and at the ballot box.Depriving unions of agency fees could hamstring their ability to spend in political races. They typically back Democratic candidates over Republicans.

In 2016, the case came before the Supreme Court and it was deadlocked at 4-4. This was before Neil Gorsuch was hand picked by Donald Trump and the Senate confirmed him. He is supposed to cast the deciding vote very soon.

This will make history, and according to history, Gorsuch is going to ruin things for the left if he decides against them… which he will.

When Gorsuch does decide against the left, he will be getting rid of a big source of the Democrats’ funding.

This will make it even harder for them to get their campaign funds. The Dems will be looking to Wall Street to find funding, if Wall Street even supports them after all of this.

Think back to when Gorsuch gave his Opening Statement last year. Below is the full video:

My, how far we have come.


Trump Moves to Erase Obama’s Legacy – Takes Hatchet to High Prescription Drug Prices

Elder Patriot – On the campaign trail Donald Trump promised to do something about the high cost of medial care but he ran into a roadblock from John McCain who was the deciding vote to end the hope for Obamacare reform.

So President Trump took a different approach to helping seniors meet their pharmaceutical needs.

Earlier today the Trump administration released a 28-page proposal aimed at curtailing the runaway prescription drug prices that Barack Obama left behind as his legacy.

Among the most significant of President Trump’s proposals:

  • A cap on out-of-pocket spending for enrollees in Medicare’s prescription drug program. 
  • A provision that would allow up to five states to join together to negotiate drug prices for Medicaid.
  • Cutting Medicare payments to remove a financial incentive that doctors receive for prescribing higher-priced drugs.  You read that correctly – Obama rewarded doctors for prescribing the most expensive drugs effectively turning Medicare into a treasury for Big Parma.
  • Extend the pharmaceutical companies’ rebate program to insurers and pharmacy benefit managers – intended to help their medications gain a bigger slice of the market – directly to Medicare recipients.

The theory under the existing program is that the rebate payments to insurers would be applied to keep premiums more manageable.  Unfortunately, the only 2 results were higher costs and higher profits.

Under Trump’s proposal, seniors covered by Medicare’s “Part D” prescription benefit would be able to share directly in the rebates for individual drugs that they purchase at the pharmacy.

  • Still another proposal would require insurers to share the discounts they get from drug makers with their patients in the form of reduced premiums.
  • The plan also expands Medicare’s “catastrophic” drug benefit so many seniors with very high costs would not face copayments.

The Trump administration’s proposals are consistent with the president’s commitment to instituting free-market principles to make competition and the market work better.

The president’s proposals emphasize his desire to protect innovation from drug companies, but also his demand for lower prices. 

The accompanying statement made it clear that those were the two drivers of the president’s proposal:

“The U.S. biopharmaceutical industry is the engine of worldwide biopharmaceutical innovation and an important part of our economy.  Preserving this industry and encouraging it to innovate while making drugs more available and affordable for all Americans is an attainable goal.”


HUD Sec. Ben Carson Discovers $516.4 BILLION In Mismanaged Obama Funds

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson has gotten down to business.

The results of a new, independent audit of the last years of President Barack Obama’s term — 2015 and 2016 — show an incredible mismanagement of funds and a wealth of errors.

Here’s what Audit Report 2017-FO-0005, released Wednesday, notes:

“The total amounts of errors corrected in HUD’s notes and consolidated financial statements were $516.4 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively. There were several other unresolved audit matters, which restricted our ability to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to express an opinion.”

That is a lot of waste, fraud, and abuse.

The audit continues, noting exactly why they made a “check-up” of the department:

“Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of HUD’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to the Federal Government. This report presents our reissued independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements, including an update to our report on HUD’s internal controls.”

The official report describes why the audit took place:

In accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended, we are required to annually audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD reissued its fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements due to pervasive material errors that we identified. Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of HUD’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to the Federal Government. This report presents our reissued independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements, including an update to our report on HUD’s internal controls.

It also described a recommended course of action to correct the situation:

In accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended, we are required to annually audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD reissued its fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements due to pervasive material errors that we identified. Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of HUD’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to the Federal Government. This report presents our reissued independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements, including an update to our report on HUD’s internal controls.

Here is the “Background and Objective” from the official audit report:

We are required by the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended by the Government Management Reform Act of 1994 and implemented by Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Bulletin 15-02, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, to audit the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) principal financial statements or select an independent auditor to do so. The objective of our audit was to express an opinion on the fair presentation of these principal financial statements. In planning our audit of HUD’s principal financial statements, we considered internal controls over financial reporting and tested compliance with selected provisions of applicable laws, regulations, and government policies that may materially affect the consolidated principal financial statements. Providing an opinion on internal controls or compliance with selected provisions of laws, regulations, and government policies was not an objective, and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

SHARE on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that waste and abuse has gotten out of control!


Juan Williams Thinks ANY Of These 3 Women Could Beat Trump In 2020

Juan Williams isn’t the most annoying liberal in the world, as we see him on Fox News nearly every day getting intellectually owned by most of the other hosts, but every once in a while he says something so ridiculous we have to do a story on it.

According to Juan, any one of these 3 African-American women could destroy Trump in the 2020 race for the Presidency…

The Hill reports:

The three strongest Democratic challengers to President Trump’s reelection are now all black women.

They are talk show queen Oprah Winfrey, former first lady Michelle Obama and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).

Former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon has said Oprah and the “Me Too” movement pose an “existential threat” to the Trump presidency.

Obama left the White House with a 68 percent approval rating. She got a new wave of positive attention this month when record crowds showed up to see her newly unveiled official portrait at the National Gallery of Art.

Conservative columnist and Trump booster Ann Coulter confidently predicted last fall that if Harris ran, she would be the Democratic nominee.

A black female candidate would attract a lot of attention with a challenge to Trump. Ninety-four percent of black women voted against Trump in 2016 as did 69 percent of Latina women and 43 percent of white women. Women of all races have led the biggest anti-Trump marches.

April Reign, an activist who founded the #OscarsSoWhite campaign, worried during a recent NBC interview that the clamor for a black female presidential candidate could be a trap.

“Stop begging strong black women to be president: Michelle, Oprah, whatever,” Reign said. “It’s weird. And Lord knows when black women try to lead, y’all attempt to silence and erase us. So how would that work, exactly?”

Well, black women are already thriving at the top of the political ladder in lots of places.

Black women are in charge as mayor of at least seven big cities: Atlanta; Baltimore; Charlotte, N.C.; Flint, Mich.; New Orleans; Toledo, Ohio; and Washington.

In addition, a record 21 black women are serving in Congress, including Harris. All but one — Rep. Mia Love (R-Utah) — are Democrats.

Winfrey and Obama stand out among all these black women because their political strength is only a subset of their power as cultural icons.

They have fans among Republicans and Democrats. They attract people of all races. Their broad appeal, including among suburban white women, crosses the nation’s deep political divide

Trump is attuned to a potential challenge from Winfrey.

After Winfrey conducted a focus group on Trump for CBS’s “60 Minutes,” the president quickly lashed out at her.

“Just watched a very insecure Oprah Winfrey, who at one point I knew very well, interview a panel of people on 60 Minutes,” he tweeted. “The questions were biased and slanted, the facts incorrect. Hope Oprah runs so she can be exposed and defeated just like all of the others!”

Oprah responded last week by telling Ellen DeGeneres: “I woke up, and I just thought — I don’t like giving negativity power — so I just thought, what?”

Oprah said that she asked CBS to add a response from a pro-Trump member of the focus group to give the piece more balance. “So I was working very hard to do the opposite of what I was hate-tweeted about,” she told Ellen.

Meanwhile, if Obama runs, she would inherit her husband’s formidable political machine.

Perhaps only an Obama can successfully use the Obama political machine to hold together the Obama coalition and win back the White House?

Even longtime Trump political adviser Roger Stone recently told the Oxford Union that Obama would be the strongest Democratic candidate.

The then-first lady’s “When they go low, we go high” speech was one of the most memorable of the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

The big question with Obama is whether she is willing to go low and put her family through another brutal presidential campaign.

Harris lacks the name identification of Winfrey or Obama. But California’s junior senator comes from the most influential state in Democratic politics.

Harris would have a strong claim to the deep-pocketed donors in Hollywood and Silicon Valley who helped fund her Senate election in 2016. The former state attorney general’s unflinching television interviews and TV grilling of Trump administration witnesses at congressional hearings have made her a national favorite.