Bernie Sanders has just proven once and for all how biased he truly is against Christians. He proved that once again recently when he violated a Constitutional mandate that you are not allowed to apply a religious test when running for office.
The Vermont senator criticized White House Deputy Budget Director nominee Russell Vought for his Christian beliefs in relation to Islam. Sanders declared he would oppose Vought on those grounds, basing his decision on an article Vought wrote in defense of Wheaton College.
“This is the fundamental problem,” Vought wrote. “Muslims do not simply have a deficient theology. They do not know God because they have rejected Jesus Christ his Son, and they stand condemned.”
“It is hateful,” Sanders said of the writing. “It is Islamophobic. And it is an insult to over a billion Muslims throughout the world.”
Sanders went on to grill Vought, asking him if he believed that the statement in his article was Islamophobic.
“Absolutely not. I’m a Christian and I believe in a Christian set of principles based on my faith,” Vought stated. “That post, as I stated in the questionnaire to this committee, was to defend my alma mater, Wheaton College, a Christian school that has a statement of faith that includes the centrality of Jesus Christ for Salvation.
“I understand you are a Christian. But this country is made up of people who are not just — I understand that Christianity is the majority religion, but there are other people who have different religions in this country and around the world,” Bernie fired back.
Vought responded by saying, “As a Christian, I believe that all individuals are made in the image of God and are worthy of dignity and respect regardless of their religious beliefs.”
“I would simply say, Mr. Chairman, that this nominee is really not someone who is really what this country is supposed to be about,” Sanders concluded. “I will vote no.”
Attorney General Jeff Sessions listens to a question on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 13, 2017, as he testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing about his role in the firing of James Comey, his Russian contacts during the campaign and his decision to recuse from an investigation into possible ties between Moscow and associates of President Donald Trump. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Let’s talk about the debacle that is the current Department of Justice.
In all fairness, the state of the DOJ is not the fault of the current administration. We do have ample reason to believe that it has been allowed to become politicized under prior administrations. However, the current state of the Department seems at times to be damn near rebellion against the President of the United States.
While no one should ever expect the nation’s top law enforcement agencies to swear an oath of unquestionable loyalty to any single president over their own duty, it should still be expected that members of those agencies continue to act in a professional manner and respect the office. We simply do not see that very much right now.
Leaks, text messages, and the like have called into question whether or not these agencies can effectively serve their duty under Donald Trump. You can argue against that opinion all you want, but you would have no problem making the same claim if Barack Obama were still in power or if Hillary Clinton had won the election instead.
When he took office, Trump offered the job of Attorney General – the leader of the DOJ – to Jeff Sessions, and Sessions has done very little to convince the public that he is even doing the job at all.
He has done nothing to reform the DOJ, letting these agencies do as they please. There has been no show of leadership, other than a recusal from the central investigation into Trump’s transition (a fair recusal, as he was a key adviser to Trump leading up to his election and transition).
He has remained singularly focused on marijuana laws, almost as though he believes that eliminating it would solve all of our problems. Nevermind the myriad other reforms that can and should be taken to change the way the DOJ is perceived and how they do their job. This focus remains at the expense of solving other, more real problems.
Most importantly, however, Sessions has remained quiet and on the sideline during this entire memo fiasco.
The Department of Justice, if nothing else, looks like it is a chicken without a head. Maybe it is. I’m not even sure sometimes that Sessions is really alive.
It is time for Donald Trump to fire Jeff Sessions, or at least ask for his resignation. It is time to find someone who can lead that Department out of the flames that seem to keep rising from it and essentially start over.
If the President reads this, I would hope he takes the following advice when looking for someone to replace Sessions with.
Find someone who is not a sycophant. Barack Obama had this nasty habit of keeping his inner circle filled with Yes Men. They were insulated from the rest of the world and had no real, practical skills to offer for many of their jobs. Trump should hire someone from the outside, because if he himself is the outsider he says he is, then he should understand the value of an outside perspective.
Get someone young, energetic, and eager to work.Sessions does not look, talk, or act like someone who is gung ho about his job. He looks like a bureaucrat who stopped actually working six years ago and is going through the motions. Get someone who has at least a youthful look to them, and someone who is eager to step in and do the job.
Pick someone who is reform-minded. The Department of Justice is in desperate need of reform. It needs to be reshaped into something more efficient and less politicized. It needs to be able to do its job without the strings being overly pulled by a chief executive – even Trump himself.
If Trump can find someone who would even want the job and fits this description, then we have a chance to finally help him move past all this pointless drama and focus instead on the investigations that matter – yes, including the Russia investigation.
It’s time for a change. I hope Trump has the courage to make it happen.
After eight years of Obama, the field of “journalism” has become a joke. Thankfully, there are still some honest journalists out there.Bill O’Reilly came out swinging against Obama and his connections. O’Reilly explained that Obama’s “emotional attachment to the Muslim world has hurt” the United States; and that, “The Obama administration’s greatest failure is allowing the Islamic terror group ISIS to run wild, murdering thousands of innocent people all over the world, including many Muslims.”
Thank you, Mr. O’Reilly. We can always count on you for the truth.
The Obama era made it too easy for radical Islam to spread. Obama needs to admit that he failed our country.
Radical Islam is not compatible with our values. We do not want Sharia law in our country.
We need to take a stand against the spread of radical Islam. Thank goodness Donald Trump is not afraid to say the words “radical Islam.”
We finally have a president that isn’t going to kneel before the “politically correct” altar. What a refreshing change!
Unfortunately, the liberals are conspiring against him. The Left won’t rest until they have ruined our great nation. The establishment is helping the Left, too. The swamp is working overtime to eject Trump from the presidency. Every day we hear stories about “impeachment.” Nonsense!
mainstream media loves to spin Trump’s actions into failure. Luckily, Mr. O’Reilly is still around to give a “No Spin Zone.” The liberals love to silence conservative voices.
Thankfully, they cannot silence Mr. O’Reilly. He will say what needs to be said. Bill O’Reilly is not going anywhere. He will not allow the liberals to take him down. We need more honest journalists like Mr.
A jubilant President Trump tweeted on Thursday to announce that five of the ‘Most Wanted leaders of ISIS‘ have been captured after they were lured from Syria to Iraq with fake Telegram messages.
Iraqi officials used the cell phone of already captured ISIS lieutenant Ismail al-Eithawi to send instructions via the app for the four other leaders to come to Iraq, where they were seized.
The encrypted app was officially named by ISIS as one of its favored mobile messaging services in 2015 and has been regularly used by the terror group for private communication and to spread propaganda.
Al-Eithawi, who also uses the alias Abu Zaid al-Iraqi, was captured in February by Turkish intelligence and handed
over to the Iraqis.
Eithawi was a direct aide to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, responsible for fund transfers to the group’s bank accounts in different countries.
Saddam al-Jamal, a Syrian who was accused of taking part of a massacre in the province of Deir Ezzor in 2014 which killed 700 members of a tribe that rose up against ISIS, was the second most senior member to be captured.
Trump tweeted about the capture, which included two of the highest-ranking ISIS commanders ever to be taken alive
Apart from al-Eithawi and al-Jamal, the operation captured three field commanders: Syrian Mohamed al-Qadeer
and two Iraqis, Omar al-Karbouli and Essam al-Zawbai, Hashimi said.
Iraqi intelligence released images of the five men on national television on Wednesday.
Al-Eithawi and al-Jamal are the two most senior Islamic State figures ever to be captured alive.
The former served as ISIS governor in Syria’s eastern Euphrates region and as a minister in charge of the group’s so-called education department.
Al-Jamal, meanwhile, had previously been a commander in the Free Syrian Army and then leader of a western-allied ‘moderate’ Islamist group called Ahfab al-Rasoul.
This was effectively destroyed by ISIS following a military campaign, and al-Jamal reappeared in an ISIS video to say he had defected from his former group which he branded ‘stooges’ of the West, according to The London Times.
As head of ISIS in Deir Ezzor, he is accused of overseeing the murders of 700 members of the Shaitat tribe after it rebelled against ISIS.
Al-Jamal is said to have ordered the execution of children, sometimes in front of their parents.
Washington Times reports: Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen confirmed Tuesday that her department has asked federal prosecutors to see if they can lodge criminal charges against sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal deportation efforts.
“The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues may be available,” Ms. Nielsen told the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Her confirmation came after California’s new sanctuary law went into effect Jan. 1, severely restricting cooperation the state or any of its localities could offer. This isn’t the first time calls for arresting leaders of sanctuary cities have been made.
Oh so what’s going on in US sanctuary cities during President Trump actually is supporting the Federal arrests of sanctuary city mayors like Bill De Blasio of NYC and Rahm Emanuel of Chicago.
If the DHS is fully prepared to make Federal arrests of US city leaders that are allowing Sanctuary for illegals, then this could mean in itself an end of Sanctuary for illegal immigrants across the board.
Also with this if the DHS does Federally prosecute leaders of Sanctuary Cities in America, then along with that we could see a massive drop in crime across these cities…
As violent crimes and other crimes are rising across multiple US Sanctuary Cities.
This move by DHS preparing to arrests Sanctuary City leadership really makes you curious if these Sanctuary City mayors are on the list of almost 10,000 sealed indictments?
Nikki Haley has been doing a remarkable job at the United Nations. She has been increasing the presence and role of the United States while holding others accountable for taking advantage of the United States generosity in the past. Draining the swamp is not the only thing happening in Washington, D.C. it is happening in New York City now too.
When recent reports came out that a United Nations member was talking trash about the ambassador as well as the United States she did not take too kindly to them. And she fought back as a result. The Every Day Conservative reported,
“And who better to bring the president’s message in support of our ally Israel then our own U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley, who took to the podium inside the emergency called assembly, and forcefully delivered America’s response to those member nations aligned against the United States, warning them; “This vote will make a difference on how Americans look at the U.N. And on how we look at countries who disrespect us in the U.N. And this vote will be remembered.”
The threat by the U.S. Ambassador was measured and without any drama, however unmistakably clear, that this president will hold each and every negative vote cast by a member nation against the United States accountable. However speaking on a condition of anonymity, a Muslim diplomat told a Reuters reporter, “States resort to such blatant bullying only when they know they do not have a moral or legal argument to convince others.”
Haley didn’t hesitate to fire back: Haley shared Trump’s attitude on the matter. Trump knows who is holding all the cards and America finally has a leader strong enough to stand up for our nation: Haley made it clear before Thursday’s vote that the United States was “singled out for attack” because President Trump followed through on his commitment to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, as prescribed by American law.
“The United States will remember this day in which it was singled out for attack in the General Assembly for the very act of exercising our right as a sovereign nation,” Haley told the 193-member General Assembly. She continued: “We will remember it when we are called upon to once again make the world’s largest contribution to the United Nations, and so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit.””
A senior diplomat from a Muslim country, speaking on condition of anonymity, said of @nikkihaley's letter: "States resort to such blatant bullying only when they know they do not have a moral or legal argument to convince others." https://t.co/x86IDjiDyL
I don’t think Nikki Haley is too worried what people are going to think of her as a result. As the leader for the United States with the United Nations, she gets to work on partisan but mostly bipartisan issues concerning human rights. Which shows in the support that she gets. A new Quinnipiac University poll found that she had a 63% approval rating with American voters whereas President Trump had a 39% approval rating.
The Jerusalem Post reported,
“Haley’s approval reached across the divide as 75% of Republicans, 55% of Democrats and 63% of Independents responded in support of the former South Carolina governor. By comparison, self-identified Democrats responded to the poll in similar support of the Democratic leadership, at 56% for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and 55% for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Overall, Schumer polled at 34% while Pelosi received a 30% approval rating. Schumer is one of 30 Jewish members of Congress.
Haley, seen as a steadying influence in an often tumultuous Trump administration, was an immediate shift in US involvement at the UN, opining that the body unfairly singles out Israel in its criticism. “The council must end its practice of wrongly singling out Israel for criticism,” Haley wrote in a June 2nd op-ed for The Washington Post. “When the council passes more than 70 resolutions against Israel, a country with a strong human rights record, and just seven resolutions against Iran, a country with an abysmal human rights record, you know something is seriously wrong.”
In a September op-ed for The Jerusalem Post, she said it is time for UNIFIL, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, to confront Hezbollah in Lebanon and outlined changes the US helped implement “which will help disrupt Hezbollah’s illegal activity.” She has also taken a hard-line stance against Russia for its attempts to sabotage US elections, and the Syrian regime for its brutalities in the Syrian Civil War.
“The United States is locked and loaded,” Haley told the UN Security Council chamber after Syrian President Bashar Assad allegedly used chemical weapons against Syrian rebels in April. “When our president draws a red line, our president enforces a red line.” Last June, she embarked on a three-day visit to Israel, where she toured Gaza border communities, Hamas terror tunnels and IDF field hospitals treating Syrian refugees as part of “Operation Good Neighbor.”
At the AIPAC Policy Conference in Washington in March, she received repeated standing ovations during her address. She spoke of the UN discouraging peace between Israelis and Palestinians by perpetuating an “illusion” that the existence of the Jewish state has caused the region’s conflicts and said she hoped to attend the opening of the US embassy in Jerusalem in May. “Like most Americans, I knew what the capital of Israel was,” she said. “To be more clear, I knew that Jerusalem was, is and will always be the capital of Israel.””
Haley has done a remarkable job at re-cementing the United States as a powerhouse in international politics. Moreover, in ensuring that the United States is not taken advantage of politically or economically in our generosity for others. Something that has been a key argument of the Trump administration.
Kentucky Fried Chicken is a highly successful chain restaurant. They have been around for decades. And they won’t be leaving. But the legal dispute they are caught up in is threatening that. More importantly, it is over some of the most absurd nonsense that will make your stomach turn.
A group of Muslim believers is campaigning for Kentucky Fried Chicken to shut down their businesses if they do not serve halal food. It is a movement that is gaining a lot of support in New Zealand all thanks to a Facebook and social media campaign. They have gained over 2,000 likes in a little over a month and their support continues to grow.
The US Herald reported,
“The movement is being led by Syeda Fouzia, who said the process of delivering halal food ‘is not that difficult.’ ‘We’ve had some criticism, but having halal certification will only mean more people will be able to eat at KFC. It won’t affect non-Muslims,’ UK-born Ms. Fouzia told reporters.
However what seems to be missing in all of this is KFC’s iconic branding within the fast food industry and whether it might actually affect its business model around the world, in that the entire concept of KFC is its branding persona of it’s carefully guarded “top-secret” original recipe which includes a blend of 11 herbs and spices.
However, Ms. Fouzia has gained a lot of support online asking why the simple transition can’t be made to include “halal KFC?” “Just like to point out KFC is a multi-national fast food corporation, it has about as much cultural bearing on New Zealander’s way of life as Tacobell,” one person said.
But not everyone was having it from the bully Muslims:
Fortunately, KFC has no intention of caving in to the demands of these pushy Muslims. ‘We appreciate their request, however, the issues relating to us being able to certify halal product for customers remain,’ said a KFC a spokesperson. ‘We have no plans to re-introduce halal in New Zealand.’ Well, there you have it. Nice job KFC!”
Halal meat is food that is permissible to eat under Islamic law. Much like kosher meals for Jewish people, halal is a dietary restriction that many Muslim believers abide by. While there is no problem for anyone to eat like this, the problem that is arising is where they are trying to force Kentucky Fried Chicken to abide by their religious dietary restrictions.
“However, David Wardly – one of the staunch online critics of her campaign – said halal certification was a way for Muslims to “ram their religion” into New Zealand culture. The 82-year-old said he did not know any Kiwi Muslims, but he feared the halal certificate was a way to introduce the Shariah law in to New Zealand. The Englishman said Islamic practices only had a place in Muslim countries.
“We’ll enjoy your culture, your music, your customs and your food in your country. Not here” Many online opponents also criticised the halal method for being cruel. But according to the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand (FIANZ), the country’s commercial halal practices were in line with the Animal Welfare Code.
That meant it was compulsory for all animals to be stunned unconscious before they could be slaughtered. President of FIANZ Hazim Arafeh said the Animal Welfare Code and the halal method worked together “perfectly”.
“In Islam an animal must not suffer or be sacrificed in front of other animals.” He said there was no hidden radical agenda. “Halal certification is not about bringing Sharia law in to New Zealand, it [halal certification] exists because New Zealand wants to export to Muslim countries.”
Restaurant Brands – the company that owned KFC in New Zealand – had earlier said a halal trial was carried out in 2001, but complexities in supply chain led to the idea being dropped. Marketing general manager Geraldine Oldham said the fast food chain’s position had not changed and at this stage they had no plans to re-introduce halal options in New Zealand.
There were 46,000 Muslims living in New Zealand in the 2013 census, a 28 percent increase since 2006. Halal is an Islamic term meaning permissible. In the dietary context it referred to meat from animals and poultry that has been slaughtered using a sharp knife and specially-trained slaughtermen who recite a special prayer.”
If someone wants to eat halal meat that is fine but they can’t force private businesses to offer food. They are a private business and as such, they have a right to serve whatever type of food they want according to the demand they have. Clearly, the demand for halal food is not that high otherwise they would have already served it.
Share if you agree
Share if you believe that private businesses should not be mandated to serve certain foods if they don’t want to
Media outlet headlines have been dominated over discussion regarding the current White House administration decided to pull out of the Iranian nuclear deal from the Obama administration. While Democrats are furious Republicans and the American public are elated. It is officially over despite former secretary of state John Kerry’s attempts to try and thwart its ending when he met with Iranian diplomats in Paris, France. But Iran is pissed now that Kerry’s efforts did not work and they are looking for blood.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman threatened:
H.J.Ansari Zarif’s senior advisor: “If Europeans stop trading with Iran and don’t put pressure on US then we will reveal which western politicians and how much money they had received during nuclear negotiations to make #IranDeal happen.” That would be interesting.#JCPOA
“OUR PREVIOUS REPORT ON JOHN KERRY’S CURIOUS VISIT WITH IRANIAN DIPLOMATS IN PARIS, FRANCE: The always arrogant John Kerry is at it again… So John Kerry just left a meeting @ L’Avenue in Paris w/3 Iranians. A friend was sitting next to their table and heard JK blasting @realDonaldTrump. The Iranians had a 5 person security detail and left in diplomatic vehicles. Is he FARA registered?
WHAT WAS JOHN KERRY DOING IN PARIS SATURDAY AT NOON WITH THREE IRANIAN DIPLOMATS, WHILE HIS PRESIDENT, DONALD TRUMP, HAD JUST CANCELED THE NUCLEAR AGREEMENTS?
Obviously, the former catastrophic diplomat who cannot even stand on a bike does not fear being prosecuted for treason against his country: he is a Democrat, and therefore he is protected.
Admittedly, the FBI has indicted Michael Flynn, the national security advisor to President-elect Trump, for identical but less serious reasons: he spoke with Russians during a cocktail party while he was still a simple citizen: Flynn is a Republican, all the force of the law apply.
And of course, the media won’t say a word about it: collusion with a foreign power, it only interests them if they can accuse President Trump.”
H.J.Ansari Zarif’s senior advisor: “If Europeans stop trading with Iran and don’t put pressure on US then we will reveal which western politicians and how much money they had received during nuclear negotiations to make #IranDeal happen.” That would be interesting.#JCPOA
Iran has not been taking kindly to the United States recent actions regarding the Iran Deal. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani told media outlets on Sunday that so long as Tehran’s interests remain protected that Iran is willing to remain within the 2015 nuclear deal. He and his foreign minister indicated they are interested in having it redesigned without the United States. Lambasting the United States withdrawal as a violation of morals, Rouhani said that if the remaining five countries in the agreement want to stay so will Iran.
The Huffington Post reported,
“Rouhani made similarly conciliatory comments on Tuesday, and on Saturday his foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, embarked on a tour of other signatory nations to the accord, state media reported, in a last-ditch effort to save it. After arriving in Beijing on Sunday, Zarif said: “We hope that with this visit to China and other countries we will be able to construct a clear future design for the comprehensive (nuclear) agreement.”
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi said he believed Zarif’s tour would “improve countries’… understanding of Iran’s position.” and help Tehran protect its “legitimate national interests”. Rouhani has said Iran would stay committed to the deal, which Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia also signed, provided those powers could ensure Iran was protected from sanctions against key sectors of its economy such as oil.
The three European states have also recommitted to the agreement, but senior cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami told worshippers at Tehran University on Friday that Europe was not to be trusted. The head of the elite Revolutionary Guards also warned against relying on foreign powers to guarantee Iran’s interests.
“America’s exit aims to break the Iranian people’s resistance, which is not new …but today’s problem is not U.S. sanctions, it’s that some officials look towards outside rather than looking at domestic potentials,” Guards commander General Mohammad Ali Jafari said, the state news agency IRNA reported. On Wednesday, Jafari had cast doubt on European nations’ ability to save the nuclear accord. With the deal on shaky ground in the face of fierce opposition from hardliners at home, some analysts say the pragmatic Rouhani faces the prospect of serving out his second term as a lame duck leader.”
Whatever this nuclear deal means for Iran is irrelevant. The current administration made the decision to come out in order to put America first. The Iran Deal did not benefit the United States, only Iran. And Iranian politicians should not be emboldened to fund their nuclear program. Under the deal sanctions were lifted, United Nations resolutions regarding Iran were annulled, and the European Union were forced to remove energy and banking sanctions.
Share if you agree the Trump administration did the right thing
Share if you agree the Iranian Deal only helped Iran
Share if you want to know the names of the politicians who are in the pockets of the Iranian government
The unhinged Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) suffered a screaming meltdown on the House floor after Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) said three words that she just couldn’t bear, and it was all caught on video for our viewing enjoyment. This is pure unadulterated fun.
The crazy Congresswoman from California is making headlines again with another unforgettable meltdown in front of other House members on Tuesday, May 8, 2018, according to Breitbart. Apparently, Kelly uttered the wrong three words in front of “Auntie” Maxine, and that was all she could bear in her little liberal mind.
Waters’ meltdown was bizarre, even for her, and seemed to be triggered when Kelly suggested that America should shift its focus from the things that divide us to the things which unite us. “We are trying to make sure we are making America great every day in every way and the best way to do that is to stop talking about discrimination and start talking about the nation,” Kelly said Tuesday, aiming his comments toward Waters. “We’re coming together as a people, in spite of what you say.”
Then, Committee chairman Tom McClintock interjected to remind the lawmakers to direct their comments to him, rather than each other, before yielding to “the gentlelady from California.” Waters ignored his request and instantly launched a nasty screaming attack on Kelly, pointing to her special victim status as a black woman.
“Mr. Kelly, please do not leave because I want you to know that I am more offended as an African American woman than you will ever be. And, this business about making America great again, it is your president that’s dividing this country,” Waters exclaimed. “And, don’t talk to me about the fact that we don’t understand … that’s the attitude that’s been given toward women time and time again,” she added.
Kelly made an attempt to chime back in with an explanation, but Waters was too far gone and refused to yield for a response from the Congressman. Again, McClintock reminded Waters to direct her remarks to him, and she ignored the request a second time. Leave it to a liberal to expect others to give consideration and then give none in return.
“I respect the chair, but don’t stop me in the middle when you didn’t stop him in the middle, and so I shall continue,” Waters said, turning back to attack Kelly. “Don’t you dare talk to me like that and think that somehow women don’t understand what goes on on the floor of automobile dealers,” she said. At this point, McClintock was fed-up with Waters’ outburst and again requested that she respect the rules, which sent the 79-year-old politician into a tirade about President Donald Trump.
“I don’t appreciate that you did not interrupt him when he was making those outrageous remarks about him knowing more about discrimination than I know about discrimination,” Waters screamed. “I resent that, and I resent the remark about making America great again,” she continued.
“He’s down here making a speech for this dishonorable president of the United States of America. Having said that, I reserve the balance of my time. And no, I do not yield, not one second to you,” she screamed at Kelly like a hysterical circus clown. “Not one second,” she shouted. “Not one second to you,” Waters repeated angrily.
The purpose of the hearing was to review Obama-era anti-discrimination regulations for auto lenders, which Republicans and some Democrats voted to reverse. The measure, which was previously approved by the Senate, is now awaiting President Trump’s signature, according to The Hill.
There was no need for Maxine Waters to explode like she did in such dramatic fashion, but in all seriousness, at the end of the day, that is what most liberals have to resort to when they encounter a logical 0pponent.
As a Congresswoman, Maxine Waters continues to be not just an embarrassment to the state of California but also to our country. How can other civilized nations look at this spectacle and not wonder why people like Waters are able to weasel their way into Congress? Here is another good example of why Congress needs to have term limits.
Illegal aliens roam the streets in Los Angeles County with the blessing and help of California’s Democratic politicians like Kamla Harris, Diane Feinstein, and Nany Pelosi. In a shocking move, African-American voters identifying themselves as supporters of President Donald Trump just delivered a nasty surprise to the illegal aliens and to every Democrat in California causing them to totally freak out. Don’t miss this.
The city of Santa Clarita in Los Angeles County was the spot of a major showdown over Governor Jerry Brown’s “sanctuary state” law. Leftists were shocked as they watched African-Americans file into the city council meeting wearing “Make America Great Again” hats, and to understand what happened next you must understand what’s happened to LA County.
Los Angeles County is the largest county in the United States with over 10 million residents. It’s also a Democratic stronghold, as LA County votes, so votes California. The issue of illegal aliens and a strong Southern border have now come to the attention of many African-Americans, who have watched cities like Compton, Lynwood, and South Central Los Angeles become invaded by illegals dumped there by the authorities.
Thirty years ago, those cities were primarily black communities. Now, the demographics have completely changed. Hispanic gangs have infiltrated those cities like MS-13. Nightly gunfire is heard as the African-American gangs and the Hispanic gangs vie for territory.
“Violent crime increased in Los Angeles for the third straight year as police tried to stem a rash of homicides and gang-related shootings while dealing with a growing homeless population,” reported the Los Angeles Times in 2016, and it has only gotten worse.
So it really shouldn’t be such a shock that the black community in LA County is waking up. The huge lie that President Trump is a racist isn’t working anymore, not when kids are getting killed by gang bangers, and the killer turns out to be an illegal alien who was deported several times and keeps coming back over the border with no problem.
That’s what happened to Jamiel Shaw, whose father, a resident of South Central Los Angeles, supported Donald Trump for president. So when Santa Clarita held it’s city council meeting to determine if they would uphold SB 54, the law that illegally makes California a sanctuary state, reporters were stunned as a line of #MAGA hats worn by African-Americans waited to give their testimony.
One woman wearing a #MAGA hat was the highlight. She was rightly pissed off at what is happening in the inner cities due to illegal aliens freely welcomed by the politicians with open arms. She started out by saying, “I’ve been fighting for this, and I’ve had to tell some people off.”
“I’m a black woman, I’m what you call an African-American and a daughter of immigrants and a granddaughter of immigrants, not from Mexico, but from the islands, from St. Croix. Where they just couldn’t walk across the border whistling Dixie, violating our Constitution, raping our Constitution, and in many cases raping our people,” she said with growing conviction.
She went on, “The black community is most adversely affected by the illegal alien activity. Because when these people, and I don’t care if they’re Swedish, Mexican, Nigerian or Nicaraguan, I don’t care…when they come here illegally they don’t get trucked into Brentwood. They don’t get trucked into Beverly Hills. Hell, they don’t even get trucked into the fairly upper-class suburbs where I live, they get trucked into Watts!”
On a roll, she continued, “Here in So Cal, they get trucked into the streets of Crenshaw, the Jungle [Compton], and East LA. A lot of black people don’t have the privilege that I have. A lot of black people are suffering academically and thus suffer economically, in immense abject poverty and crime. Their schools get pumped with illegal aliens and they’re more apt to drop out.”
She went on to point out that to get a job she must be bi-lingual. Not only is this true, you also get paid more to be bi-lingual, and were aren’t talking French. You must speak Spanish to get a teaching position with LA Unified School District.
Well, the great news is the Santa Clarita City Council voted 5-0 to pull out of Gov. Moonbeam’s illegal law SB 54. The Los Angeles Times reported, “With the 5-0 vote early Wednesday morning, Santa Clarita became what is believed to be the first city in Los Angeles County to officially oppose Senate Bill 54, joining a handful of municipalities elsewhere in Southern California that have challenged the law since Gov. Jerry Brown signed it in October.”
🔴 BREAKING: Another victory, Santa Clarita, the first city in Los Angeles county that voted unanimously 5 – 0, on a resolution and amicus brief against SB-54 sanctuary state bill. 🇺🇸#MAGA2018 👍 pic.twitter.com/9YcnAiUgl8
Los Angeles County is the gem for politicians like Senators Kamala Harris and Diane Feinstein. If LA County has an uprising in the black community and they start voting to protect their children, exactly what this African-American woman pointed out, it’s curtains for all Democrats.
It looks like the fire of taking back their communities has started, and as each city rallies to reject SB 54, the Democrats are freaking out as they see their strongholds turn from blue to red as the “make America great again” agenda takes over California.