Senate Votes 25-9 To Restore Your Most Important Constitutional Right, Libs Are Furious

Image result for Senate Votes 25-9 To Restore Your Most Important Constitutional Right, Libs Are Furious

America was established on certain inalienable rights. We revolted from the oppression of European rule to protect those rights for each man, lady, and child. However today, Liberals crosswise over America look to obliterate our rights. The stage of the Democratic Party is to destroy our American values, supplanting them with Socialism. That implies the finish of all that we have confidence in.

For a long time, they’ve had their way. In any case, all that is evolving. We are seeing this all through the nation. Counting West Virginia. Its Senate as of late voted to protect our most principal right: the right to life.

Via Daily Caller:

The West Virginia Senate voted Friday in favor of a resolution that would allow the state government to restrict access to abortion by asserting the procedure is not and should not be a constitutional right.

The state Senate voted Friday to pass Senate Joint Resolution 12, which states “nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right of abortion or requires the funding of abortion,” according to the Charleston-Gazette Mail…

Others don’t think so highly of the resolution and see it as an attack on women’s rights. “This is not an issue about women’s health, it’s about a political play. They are playing politics with women’s health care,” said Planned Parenthood South Atlantic director of public affairs Alisa Clements in a statement.

Do we truly trust the expressions of a Planned Parenthood lobbyist? Their association makes a fortune from the ending of a human life. They will state anything they can to ensure this primitive and abhorrence practice.

Liberals claim abortion is tied in with protecting ladies’ rights. Shouldn’t something be said about the rights of the individual in the womb? Half of all aborted youngsters and females. Don’t their rights tally?

This vote is an unmistakable sign that at any rate, a few legislators are tuning in. For a considerable length of time, Americans have contradicted abortion. They are shocked that such a training is permitted in the United States. At long last, we are seeing leaders stand firm.

Don’t imagine it any other way, abortion lobbyists will battle like there’s no tomorrow to ensure this malicious practice. They profit from it. They will state or effectively keep it.

Liberals will dump a lot of trash onto West Virginia over this vote. We have to remain with them and support it.

What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Source: Daily Caller,

BOMBSHELL: McCain Handed Trump Dossier to FBI, Now His Team Is In BIG Trouble (Details)

Image result for BOMBSHELL: McCain Handed Trump Dossier to FBI, Now His Team Is In BIG Trouble (Details)

John McCain, the RINO Senator from Arizona, handed the ridiculous and faulty “Trump dossier” over to the FBI a little while ago.

McCain played dumb, not willing to admit whether or not he knew the dossier was funded by the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign.

Now, big things are going down…

From Breitbart:

PHILADELPHIA — Sen. John McCain may find himself facing serious questions following the disclosure that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research utilized in the infamous, largely discredited 35-page dossier on President Donald Trump.

In December, it was McCain who notoriously passed the controversial dossier documents produced by the Washington opposition research firm Fusion GPS to then FBI Director James Comey, whose agency reportedly utilized the dossier as some of the basis for its probe into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

A McCain associate, David Kramer, was subpoenaed in late 2017.

From Washington Examiner:

House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has issued a subpoena to David Kramer, a former State Department official who, in late November 2016, traveled to London to receive a briefing and a copy of the Trump dossier from its author, former British spy Christopher Steele. Kramer then returned to the U.S. to give the document to Sen. John McCain.

Kramer is a senior fellow at the McCain Institute for International Leadership at Arizona State University.

McCain later took a copy of the dossier to the FBI’s then-director, James Comey. But the FBI already had the document; Steele himself gave the dossier to the bureau in installments, reportedly beginning in early July 2016.


McCain, recovering in Arizona from treatments for cancer, has long refused to detail his actions regarding the dossier. For his part, Kramer was interviewed by the House Intelligence Committee on Dec. 19. The new subpoena stems from statements Kramer made in that interview.

In the session, Kramer told House investigators that he knew the identities of the Russian sources for the allegations in Steele’s dossier. But when investigators pressed Kramer to reveal those names, he declined to do so.

Now, Kramer has pleaded the fifth.

From Fox News:

A former State Department official and associate of Sen. John McCain has invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to testify in connection with questions from the House Intelligence Committee about the anti-Trump dossier’s Russian sources, according to a law enforcement source.

David J. Kramer, who is a central player in how the unverified Trump dossier made its way to the FBI in late 2016, testified before the committee in December in a closed-door session, indicating he had information about the dossier’s sources. A subpoena was issued for mid-January, as first reported by The Washington Examiner.

The law enforcement source confirmed, however, that Kramer did not appear and has exercised his Fifth Amendment rights.


Yet Kramer gave a videotaped deposition last December in separate civil litigation against BuzzFeed about the dossier and his contact with the former British spy who compiled it, Christopher Steele. Steele was hired by opposition research firm Fusion GPS to write and research the dossier, with funding from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign.

According to British court records obtained by Fox News as part of its ongoing investigation of the Trump dossier, Kramer was personally briefed in late November 2016 by Steele in Surrey, England. After that briefing, Steele told the British court that an arrangement was made so that Fusion GPS — co-founded by Glenn Simpson – would provide hard copies of the dossier to McCain via Kramer. Shortly afterward, the dossier was given to the FBI, which already had its own copy from Steele.

David Kramer isn’t willing to talk. WHY!??

Breaking: Another Democrat Lawmaker Found GUILTY of 11 Felonies, Could Serve YEARS In Prison

Image result for Breaking: Another Democrat Lawmaker Found GUILTY of 11 Felonies, Could Serve YEARS In Prison

Another Democrat caught breaking the law?

Go figure.

Check out the story of a liberal state senator from Texas.

It’s a doozy!

From Daily Wire:

On Thursday afternoon, a Democratic Texas state senator was found guilty on 11 felony charges, including “multiple counts of fraud and money laundering,” reports the Texas Tribune.

State Sen. Carlos Uresti was charged last year for his role in what authorities called a “Ponzi Scheme” involving a bankrupt oilfield services company called FourWinds Logistics. Uresti, the Texas Tribune says, “used his prestigious reputation to lend credibility to an unknown company; several investors testified that Uresti’s presence reassured them that their money would be safe with FourWinds.”

Texas Tribune has more:

“The Texas Senate Democratic Caucus is calling upon Sen. Uresti to resign his position,” said Sen. José Rodriguez, a Democrat from El Paso who chairs the caucus.

And Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the Republican who presides over the Senate, said he would strip Uresti of his committee assignments.

Uresti was charged last year in connection with FourWinds Logistics, a now-bankrupt oilfield services company that perpetrated a Ponzi scheme against its investors. Uresti served as general counsel for FourWinds and owned 1 percent of the company. He also earned commission for recruiting investors, according to court documents.

More from Texas Tribune:

State Sen. Carlos Uresti, accused of misleading a former client who invested in a company in which Uresti has a financial stake, was indicted Tuesday by a federal grand jury on 11 charges over his involvement in the alleged investment Ponzi scheme, and he also faces a separate indictment alleging bribery surrounding a government contract.

In the first indictment, the federal grand jury charged Uresti, a San Antonio Democrat, with eleven counts of wrongdoing over his complicated saga involving a now-bankrupt company. The company, FourWinds Logistics, purported to sell sand used in hydraulic fracturing, a process that extracts oil and gas from shale rock, but has been accused of misleading investors and grossly misspending funds. The grand jury indicted Uresti on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud; one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering; five substantive counts of wire fraud; two counts of securities fraud; one count of engaging in monetary transactions with property derived from specified unlawful activity; and one count of being an unregistered securities broker.


President Trump Delivered 30-Day Eviction Notice To Obama’s Most Loved Legacy, You’ll Cheer

Image result for President Trump Delivered 30-Day Eviction Notice To Obama’s Most Loved Legacy, You’ll Cheer

One of the greatest contrasts between President Obama and President Trump? How they use their Presidential authority. Obama abused his executive orders to push through his agenda. He would not like to work with Congress. It was an undeniable and blatant violation of as far as possible on control.

Trump, then again, isn’t keen on going past what the law permits. He comprehends that to roll out a lasting improvement, you have to do it through law. That is the reason he canceled DACA’s, Obama’s most noticeably awful abuse of executive authority.

Presently he’s influenced it to clear, he won’t sign any orders broadening the disputable program.

Via The Hill:

White House chief of staff John Kelly said Tuesday that President Trump is unlikely to extend the deadline for work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on March 5 if Congress has not reached a deal on immigration by that date.

Kelly told reporters on Capitol Hill that he was “not so sure” that Trump had the authority to extend the deadline because the program was not based on law, The Washington Post reported.

Work permits for DACA recipients will begin to expire on that date due to Trump’s decision to rescind DACA in September with a six-month delay.

Would you have ever listened to these expressions of Barack “the ends justify the means” Obama? Barack “never waste a good crisis” Obama? No, and this is what’s in question:

“There are 690,000 official DACA recipients and the president sent over what amounts to be two and a half times that number, to 1.8 million,” Kelly continued. “The difference between 690 and 1.8 million were the people that some would say were too afraid to sign up, others would say were too lazy to get off their asses, but they didn’t sign up.”

Obama terribly overstepped his limits when he issued DACA. He declined to work with Congress to give an enduring solution (legitimately and inside the limits Constitution). It’s the reason we are confronting the issues we have today. Obama’s fretfulness and short-sidedness left us with the present emergency.

Trump isn’t Obama. He’s not intrigued by driving issues to get his own particular way. He wants lasting fixes for our sickly nation. That implies inspiring Congress to draft an immigration solution that will work. Also, keep on working for a long time. Not at all like DACA, which was a poor, here and now Band-Aid.

Yet, will Congress be sufficiently capable to make that fix? President Trump laid out his goals in the SOTU address. It’s dependent upon Republicans in Congress to draft up a bill to fit his vision. In any case, Democrats might not be willing to compromise. Which will prompt more gridlock and conceivable government shutdowns.

The inquiry is: will Democrats be mature enough to swallow their pride and work with Trump?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below. 

Source: The Hill,

Stunning Photo Shows Real Reason Broward Sheriff Wants to Take Americans’ Guns

Image result for Stunning Photo Shows Real Reason Broward Sheriff Wants to Take Americans’ Guns

A picture is worth a thousand words — and it might be worth a thousand explanations, too.

Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel has found himself in the national spotlight after the tragic school shooting that occurred in his corner of Florida, and the chief law enforcement officer has been looking a bit like a politician while appearing on television to push liberal talking points about gun control.

Too much like a politician, a skeptic might say. After some pundits noticed that a sheriff who should be primarily concerned with enforcing the law has been sounding like he’s reading from the Democrat party phrase book, several photos emerged that may shed some light on Israel’s political leanings.

A photo posted on the sheriff’s official Facebook page from 2015 show Israel warmly interacting with then-candidate Hillary Clinton, a strong liberal and gun control proponent.

So nice to see you again, Sheriff,” says a quote on the photo attributed to Clinton, implying that Israel and the Democrat candidate were already friends.

Now, it isn’t that damning for a local sheriff to take a photo with a visiting candidate. However, a series of similar photos soon emerged that show Israel going out of his way to mingle with pro-gun control, Democrat figures — and there don’t appear to be any equivalent images of the sheriff with conservatives.

Have you noticed how the Broward Sheriff’s Office has been spewing Democrat gun control talking points?” conservative firebrand Laura Loomer posted on Twitter. “Well, turns out the Sheriff has some interesting friends.

The investigative journalist included four photos, which show Sheriff Israel proudly posing with Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, and former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

A general search for similar photos of Sheriff Israel with conservative or pro-gun candidates revealed no immediate results.

Similarly, a post on the “LEO Affairs” forum for law enforcement professionals suggested that Israel had actually endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in 2016.

At the Broward Democratic Executive Committee meeting today Sheriff Israel announced he is endorsing Hillary Clinton,” the poster claimed in January of that year.

Hillary’s own campaign confirmed that Sheriff Israel was on her team. In a press release obtained by Politico, the campaign named Israel as a member of the candidate’s volunteer group in Florida.

Hillary for America announced the launch of its ‘Florida Leadership Council’– a group of over 150 elected officials, community, coalition and grassroots leaders who will help build a grassroots-driven volunteer team that will help Hillary to win the Florida Primary,” the press released declared.

Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel” was on the pro-Hillary volunteer list.

Let’s be clear: There isn’t anything inherently wrong with a sheriff supporting one political party over the other, as long as he is able to objectively perform his job and not allow his political views to bias his duties.

With that said, the photos and other evidence suggests that Israel has probably had political ambitions within the Democrat party for years, and had an existing slant against citizen gun ownership long before the tragic incident in Parkland.

The media and leftist narrative is that this law enforcement officer was so shocked by the school shooting that he has seen the light, and now wants “common sense gun control.

In reality, Israel has been on the anti-gun liberal bandwagon for years, and is using the tragedy to further political talking points borrowed from the Democrats.

Never let a serious crisis go to waste,” as fellow leftist Rahm Emanuel once said. Sheriff Israel and the rest of the Second Amendment opponents are taking that to heart — and as a result, the rights of the American people are now at stake.

Barron Trump Gets His Own Portrait (Photo)

Barron, Melania, and Donald Trump on balcony

First son Barron Trump may become the first child of a president to have his painted portrait hung up in the White House.

In the unofficial portrait painted by artist Barry Wingard, President Donald Trump is seen hugging Barron Trump, now 11, at the Republican National Convention in July 2016, reports All That’s Fab.

News of Barron Trump’s portrait quickly sparked controversy online.

Many found it inappropriate.

“Until this child shows that is somehow worthy of such recognition (aside from being a trump kid) his picture should NOT be hung in the White House,” wrote one person in All That’s Fab’s comments section. “Unless in his parents quarters. He has done nothing notable.”

Others defended the Trump family.

“Don’t most parents have pictures of their children on display in their homes?” wrote one person in reply to Newsiosity’s Facebook post about the incident. “Why should it be any different for the Trumps?”

“They were a gift to the president and his family,” added another. “It’s no one else’s business. Hang it while they live there then take with. It’s their’s. Grow up please and give it a rest.”

Wingard also painted portraits of the president and first lady Melania Trump to pay tribute to a president he believes is disrespected.

“The lack of respect for the president has gone on a little too far,” Wingard said.

“I’m hoping to change the conversation,” he added, reports Tri-County Sunday. “It’s been so ugly lately,” said Wingard in July 2017, referring to the photo of comedian Kathy Griffin holding a model of Trump’s head.

“I’m not saying [Trump is] right on everything,” he continued. “We can talk policy without being ugly. At least, I hope we can.”

However, although Wingard voted for — and even painted — Trump, he insists he is not a particularly political person.

“For me to go into this realm is unfamiliar territory,” he said. “If I painted Mrs. [Hillary] Clinton or if I painted former President Barack Obama, I would never paint them in a way that was ugly. I don’t feel like that’s being American.”

Wingard painted President Trump sitting at his desk signing his first executive orders, while another portrait features the firs lady at the inauguration, wearing a powder blue suit.

After he finished the paintings, Wingard reached out to Republican Rep. Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania about gifting the portraits.

Kelly admitted it was unusual for unofficial paintings to be displayed on the White House walls. However, he was struck by the beauty of his constituents’ work and agreed to deliver them to the White House.

“This is a person taking their talent and their time to show their appreciation,” Kelly said.

California Democrats Demand Businesses Turn Over Half Of Their Tax Savings From Trump Tax Reform Bill To The State

California democrats propose a new bill that would force local businesses to fork over half their intended tax break through Trump’s new reform.

 California democrats

Liberals controlling California are as greedy and corrupt as it gets and the newest proposal regarding Trump’s tax reform is proof. In order to restore the American economy President Trump changed the country’s tax bill to better provide big business with incentives to stay and build Here in our country. Now California officials are reversing the plan by proposing to take have the incentives away. The result will be the removal of big business from California altogether and California is only hurting itself as usual.


SF Gate – California lawmakers are targeting the expected windfall that companies in the state would see under the federal tax overhaul with a bill that would require businesses to turn over half to the state.

A proposed Assembly Constitutional Amendment by Assemblymen Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, and Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, would create a tax surcharge on California companies making more than $1 million so that half of their federal tax cut would instead go to programs that benefit low-income and middle-class families.

“Trump’s tax reform plan was nothing more than a middle-class tax increase,” Ting said in a statement. “It is unconscionable to force working families to pay the price for tax breaks and loopholes benefiting corporations and wealthy individuals. This bill will help blunt the impact of the federal tax plan on everyday Californians by protecting funding for education, affordable health care, and other core priorities.”


Report: FBI Accidentally Deleted 5 Months of Texts Between Agents Who Made Anti-Trump Comments

The FBI “failed to preserve” text messages between employees who made private comments critical of Donald Trump, The Daily Caller reports.

This information was provided in a letter to Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (HSGAC), by the Justice Department.

“The Department wants to bring to your attention that the FBI’s technical system for retaining text messages sent and received on FBI mobile devices failed to preserve text messages for Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page,” wrote Stephen Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department.

Messages from Dec. 14, 2016, to May 17, 2017, could not be preserved, Boyd said, citing “misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

“The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected,” he said.

The FBI employees, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, had worked on special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. Strzok was removed from this role after it was revealed that he had criticized Trump, referring to him as an “idiot.”

In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Johnson wrote that the loss of records is “concerning.”


BREAKING: He Betrayed Trump, Now Is Donald Getting Ready To Fire Him?


The fact is, if someone is not doing their job and especially when it comes to matters of national security they need to be booted as soon as possible for the good of the country.

President Trump has enough to deal with when dealing with crazed liberals, but you would think that members of his own administration would back him. Well, evidently that was a wrong assumption as Trump has found out over the past year, as Attorney General Jeff Sessions has refused to do anything about the rampant corruption in the government.

During the presidential campaign, Trump promised that he would go after Hillary Clinton for her dirty deeds over the years.

However, despite the public support, Sessions has refused to go after “major” cases involving former President Barack Obama or 2016 Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. This refusal to crack down on these corrupt individuals has caused frustration on the conservative side as we watch these criminals walk free.

Not only has Sessions refused to investigate those crimes, but he has also recently balked over the need to appoint a special counsel to investigate the Justice Department after shocking revelations concerning the FBI had come to light.

In a recent statement, Sessions stated that while he’s concerned about recent allegations of bias within the FBI, “sometimes things that might appear to be bad in the press have more innocent explanations, so fairness and justice should also be provided to our personnel.”

Then before that ludicrous statement, Sessions again in November pushed back against the need to appoint a special counsel to investigate the disgusting anti-Trump dossier that was paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC that was used as the premise for the ridiculous Russian collusion narrative.

 With all of these instances of Sessions seemingly dropping the ball to investigate these crimes, the calls for the attorney general to step down are all growing. One of those people is Fox News contributor and former Republican House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz who has argued that Attorney General Jeff Sessions should step down on a recent appearance on Fox News.

Here is more from Newsmax: Former House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, Saturday called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to be removed from office, saying that may be a cure for the “deep systemic problems” in the Department of Justice.

“It pains me to say this a little bit [but] I don’t think the attorney general is up to the job he’s doing,” Chaffetz, now a contributor for Fox News told the “Fox and Friends Saturday” program.

Sessions “had to remove himself from everything” involving President Donald Trump and that led to the appointment of Robert Mueller as special investigator in the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, said, Chaffetz.
He also criticized the attorney general for not taking on a more active role in digging up information about several controversial figures at the DOJ, including Agent Peter Strzok, who was removed from the investigation after a series of anti-Trump text messages between him and a fellow agent were discovered.

Chaffetz said that Sessions also had told him that he would not prosecute Bryan Pagliano, Hillary Clinton’s former chief tech staffer, who had refused a Congressional subpoena to testify about the 2016 Democratic nominee’s use of a private email server.

Sessions had also refused to make documents on the Fast and Furious scandal public following the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, Chaffetz said.

So, why would Sessions be balking at investigating crimes in our country? The only logical explanation that one can come up with is that he is just another member of the swamp that is protecting his own, and the evidence to support that theory is massive.


Greg Jarret Just Made a Revelation About FBI at CPAC That Has Bob Mueller Hanging His Head in Shame

Kirsters Baish| Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett has been arguing over the last week about Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, top Department of Justice officials, and former FBI Director James Comey for the fact that they should be prosecuted and held responsible for their crimes and for fraud in during one former Donald Trump campaign official. Their ridiculous accusations are now the example of how Trump supporters are trying to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into President Trump’s alleged “Russian ties.”

The way they have done this is by claiming that the Department of Justice has been compromised by corruption and biased anti-Trump bans. The accusations were made by Jarrett while he was speaking to Sean Hannity during the Conservative Political Action Conference on Wednesday. A lot of pro-Trump Americans have stated that the Justice Department and FBI officials utilized the falsified Trump dossier in the wrong way and obtained permission from a court to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page back during the 2016 presidential election.

Subject Politics reported that all of the enemies of President Trump who are looking for special counsel Robert Mueller to take him down are going to be gravely disappointed. Sean Hannity went on stage during the CPAC on Wednesday and got right to the point when it came to the whole Russia situation. 

If you weren’t aware, CPAC is the yearly convention for conservatives that is called the Conservative Political Action Conference.

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarret has been openly against the investigation into President Trump since the start. He was ready to state his case to the audience at CPAC. He responded to a question about who on Robert Mueller’s special counsel team could be in legal trouble and told Sean Hannity, “Well, I think James Comey, who signed off on it, Rod Rosenstein, who signed off on it, [former FBI Deputy Director] Andrew McCabe signed off on it, [former acting Attorney General] Sally Yates as well.”

He continued, “Using a fake document as an officer of the court to convince a judge to spy on an American citizen is six different crimes: abuse of power, false and misleading statements, it’s perjury, it’s major fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, and obstruction of justice. Those are the crimes and people need to be prosecuted.”

The left was clearly unhappy when Jarret came forward with his opinion. They started to accuse him of anything they could think of. None of us know what is going to happen in this investigation, but we do know that it will be ending very soon. With all of the evidence that is going public everyone should be realizing that Trump isn’t the one who should be scared.

As Jarret explained, the investigators might be the one who see themselves at the center of a very serious investigation.