10 Reasons Why the Vegas Shooting Has Disappeared from Headlines

Thefreethoughtproject.com reports: Las Vegas, NV – With the 24/7 news cycle constantly in full swing, important stories at times get lost in the constant onslaught of non-stop information. The mainstream media gatekeepers essentially dictate what social and cultural memes are injected into the public consciousness, what topics are discussed, and which cases are given publicity and thoroughly investigated with journalistic rigor.

With such oligarchical control of the mass media – the media gatekeepers of information decide what stories stay in the glare of the public spotlight, and which ones are allowed to fade from the headlines.

Without question, one would reasonably expect the most deadly mass shooting in recent American history, which took place in Las Vegas on October 1, 2017, to maintain a strong presence in the headlines — especially given the lack of answers surrounding the case.

The scant information released by investigators indicates that Stephen Paddock, 64, who by all accounts was independently wealthy and a Vegas high-roller, opened fire on a music festival from a 32nd-floor hotel room at the Mandalay Bay Casino.

The massacre left 58 dead and 546 injured, yet one and a half months later and there are still few answers – even to the most basic of questions.

Now, a month and a half later, there are few answers to the most deadly mass shooting in recent U.S. history – and perhaps even more strange – the case has been jettisoned from the 24/7 mainstream media cycle, despite the fact that the most basic of questions have yet to be answered.

One would assume that such a high-profile case would garner widespread interest from investigative teams across the spectrum of major broadcast mass media and cable news, and yet, there are no penetrating journalistic investigations delving into the many unanswered questions.

In fact, coverage and investigation into the highly dubious shooting are virtually non-existent outside of online alternative news media.

Here are the few facts that we know thus far, and they seem to raise more questions than answers:

1. The official timeline of the mass shooting has been changed at least three different times.

2. Paddock wired $100,000 to an account located in the Philippines a week prior to the massacre.

3. Investigators claim Paddock’s laptop was missing its hard drive when they found it in his hotel room.

4. Paddock reportedly took cruises that made port stops in the Middle East.

5. Authorities now claim an officer discharged his weapon in Paddock’s hotel room – after denying it for the first month after the attack. (This raises the question of why police discharged a weapon if Paddock had already committed suicide prior to law enforcement breaching the room? And why they lied about it after the fact.)

6. Security guard Jesus Campos, who reportedly came across Paddock as he began his attack was allegedly shot in the leg, but a spokesperson for UMC Quick Care, the walk-in health clinic facility Campos supposedly went to after being shot, said they had “heard nothing” about Campos visiting them.

7. During an interview on Fox News with Tucker Carlson, an attorney for the victims revealed that not only did police officers respond to Campos after he was shot, they were right outside of Paddock’s door before he began shooting out of his hotel room window.

“As of yesterday it was that two—we knew about Campos—but there were two other police officers from MGM that were on the floor prior to the shooting,”Craig Eiland said.

8. Eiland also noted that MGM Grand claims to have a “corporate watch center”that trains its employees to report any suspicious activity. So if a guest arrived at Mandalay Bay Hotel with 27 rifles and 5,000 rounds of ammunition stored in 10 bags, why didn’t the employees who helped him, or the cleaning service who visited his room regularly, report suspicious activity? And if they did, why wasn’t it addressed? 

9. On Halloween, a suspect, identified as Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov, rented a pickup truck, drove it onto a busy bicycle path and mowed down innocent people. Almost immediately after the horrific attack that left 8 dead and a dozen more injured, video of Saipov, an Uzbekistan native, was released. There has yet to be a single image of Stephen Paddock released from the thousands of

10. Campos disappeared days after the shooting, reportedly leaving the country, thus, being a no-show to numerous scheduled television news interviews. Upon his return to the U.S., he did a softball, scripted, interview on the Ellen DeGeneres Show where no penetrating journalism, nor tough questions were asked. The interview was almost comical in the sense that DeGeneres did more narrating of the actual events than Campos, which allowed for him to not divulge any information.

So why did Jesus Campos leave the country in the middle of an investigation into the most-deadly mass shooting in recent American history? Why did he refuse to do the news interviews, and instead opt for a scripted daytime talk show?

The Mandalay Bay, and all of the Vegas Strip for that matter, are some of the most heavily survielled areas on the planet — yet we have seen no video footage, or even stills — of Paddock.

Additionally, as we previously reported, 4 survivors of the attack have died under somewhat questionable circumstances.

As a report from Zero Hedge notes:

Notably, both Kymberley Suchomel and Danny Contreras both publicly claimed there were multiple gunmen the night of the mass shooting. Dennis and Lorraine Carver died after their Mercedes smashed into a metal gate and exploded into flames.

Per CNN:

The couple’s youngest daughter, 16-year-old Madison Carver, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that she heard the crash from her bedroom. When she ran outside and down the street to find out what had happened, she recognized her family’s vehicle in flames.

By the time their daughter heard the crash (which only happened about a half mile from the Carver’s home) and ran down the road to see what had happened, the car was engulfed in flames… Much like everything else pertaining to the Vegas shooting, the story just doesn’t make sense.

There still has been no motive released for the massacre.

The complete silence from law enforcement in such a high-profile case raises serious questions about the potential for some type of cover-up taking place.

Why is there no investigative coverage of Vegas shooting by major media organizations? Why did the story simply vanish from the news cycle with so much public interest and so many unanswered questions?

The fact that there have been virtually no answers to any of the questions that have arisen from the official story not adding up, while simultaneously being blacked out by the mainstream mass media, seems to indicate an intentional soft-censoring of the Vegas mass shooting… the only question is why?

Over a month and a half later – and we know exactly as much as we did in the immediate aftermath of the attack… virtually nothing.

Contrast that to the recent attack in New York where a detailed picture of the suspect and his activities in the hours and days before the attack was public within hours.…

…yet in the case of Stephen Paddock, we still know nothing a month and a half later.

The official narrative does not add up in the Las Vegas attack, and the public needs to be sure to hold the lamestream media and those investigating the massacre accountable.

It’s clear that this story is being censored by legacy media in an effort to keep the American public in the dark about the exact details surrounding the most-deadly mass shooting in recent U.S. history.

Out of respect for the memory 58 dead and 546 injured — we need to ask why this investigation is being blacked-out and hidden from the public.

Do we really believe that after the most-deadly mass-shooting in America, and with few answers, everyone just decided they didn’t care about the who, what, where, why, and how of the attack?

Please share this important story to help increase public awareness regarding the numerous oddities surrounding the Vegas mass-shooting — and the ongoing media blackout!


Hillary Clinton Investigation Under ‘SPECIAL TREATMENT’ That Keeps Details Away From Agents!

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe wrote that the FBI has a special investigation for Clinton. The special investigation is run by a closed circle and is about the e-mail affair surrounding Hillary.

Andrew says that in 2016 the State Department investigator gave the case to the FBI to investigate if Clinton really had a personal classified email server.

He commented: “Some time thereafter, HQ opens a case. I had no role in that decision,”

I was not consulted … because (as we now know) the decision was made to investigate it at HQ with a small team,” – He added.

He said that he was kept in the dark while other agents were working on the case

Then he stated: “(The Washington Field Office) provided some personnel for the effort but it was referred to as a ‘special’ and I was not given any details about it,”

In February 2016 McCabe became Deputy Director and began overseeing the Clinton investigation.

Tom Fitton who at that time was Judicial Watch President stated that McCabe was not allowed to be involved in the Clinton investigation.

He said:

The FBI is compromised. Mr. McCabe should have been nowhere near the Hillary Clinton investigations,”

That he saw fit to recuse himself only days before the election further demonstrates the FBI’s Clinton email investigation was a sham. No wonder it took a year and a federal lawsuit to get these records. It is well past time for the Justice Department to reopen the Clinton email investigation.”

Recently a lot of revelations has come forward. We now know that the FBI was investigating Clinton scandal some time before the public was aware of that. We just hope that this investigation will end soon and Clinton will be put in jail for putting in jeopardy the security of the US.


Dirty Liberal Jerry Brown Slams President Trump In Front Of Chinese Officials!

This Tuesday, at a climate change conference in Bonn, Germany,  Liberal California Governor Jerry Brown talked bad about President Donald Trump in front of Chinese officials, during the time when Trump was on his first official trip in Asia as the President of the United States.

The Sacramento Bee reported that:

Brown told the Chinese officials that Americans were embarrassed by Trump’s statement that climate change was a Chinese hoax. He called it ”probably the most absurd thing that has ever been said on the topic.

When he bashed Trump, Jerry Brown was thinking about Trump’s opinion in his tweet from five years ago in which he said:

The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese people in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.

Two days ago, President Trump talked about his more than successful meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping in a national address from the White House.

From Breitbart News:

While there is no evidence that the theory of climate change was invented by China – and plenty of evidence to the contrary – the idea that climate change regulations are embraced by some foreign competitors to gain an advantage over American manufacturing is arguably true. In Germany, Brown was speaking after Xie Zhenhua, China’s negotiator at the Paris Climate Accords. Brown urged China to take the lead in implementing climate change regulations – such as California – designed carbon trading marked – since the Trump administration was not.

We are witnesses of a series of constant political attacks by President Trump’s political enemies both on the domestic and foreign level while Trump is criticizing the previous administrations while on his tour. Every President does that, but the thing with Jerry Brown is that he goes directly against the best interest of our people as he shows to China that we are divided and by that he’s giving them the opportunity to leap several steps over us.


194 Liberals Arrested – Facing A Decade In Prison!!!

It’s been just over a year now since Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in the presidential election. Liberal snowflakes were so “triggered” by his win that they launched violent protests all over the U.S. Unfortunately for them, however, this quickly came back to bite them in a big way.

On Inauguration Day, violent protests erupted in Washington D.C. leading to numerous police officers being hospitalized and over $100,000 in damages. Police said that protesters armed with things like hammers and trashcans smashed Starbucks and Bank of America windows, torched a parked limo, set (purchased) “Make America Great Again” souvenirs aflame, and sprayed “Revolution or Death” on walls of local buildings.

The Independent UK reported that the organizers of the protest said that the point of it was to “give expression to the massive opposition to Trump’s right-wing, racist, and misogynist agenda”.

Organizers intend to demonstrate that people of conscience are the majority, and take steps towards organizing that sentiment into a force that can have an impact on Trump’s ability to claim a mandate, setting a tone of resistance for the coming years,” they wrote.

In total, 194 crazed liberals were arrested and hit with serious charges for this carnage.

The US Attorney for the District of Columbia hit nearly all of the protesters with felony charges of incitement to riot and destruction of property, among other charges. We’re glad to see that he is throwing the book at these liberal idiots.

The first seven defendants just started their trial this week, and they have been identified as Jennifer Armento, Oliver Harris, Britt Lawson, Michelle “Miel” Macchio, Christina Simmons, Jayram Toraty, and Alexei Wood.

Lawson is a nurse who said the process has been “stressful,” but that she found it “pretty inspiring to see the amount of solidarity and the ways in which defendants have come together and stayed fairly strong throughout this.” Wood is a journalist who claims he was only at the protest to “cover it.”

I think these charges are just f***ing absurd … I feel like I have an utterly strong case just like everybody else,” Mr Wood told the San Antonio Current in July. “It was indiscriminate arrest. I’m ready to fight.

In the end, their little protests meant nothing, because Trump is still our president one year later! We think it’s important that we send a message to crazed liberals that violent protests will not be tolerated in this country.

SHARE this story if you think these liberal protesters deserve to be in PRISON!


Hillary Clinton: DOJ investigating me would be ‘abuse of power.’ [VIDEO]

Hillary Clinton warned that if President Trump directs his Justice Department to investigate her role in a 2010 sale of a uranium company, it would be “a disastrous step into politicizing the Justice Department.”

“This is such an abuse of power,” Clinton said in an interview with Mother Jones, following reports that the Justice Department is considering appointing a special counsel to investigate.

“I regret if they do it because it will be such a disastrous step to politicizing the justice system,” she said.

“If they send a signal that we’re going to be like some dictatorship, like some authoritarian regime, where political opponents are going to be unfairly, fraudulently investigated, that rips at the fabric of the contract we have, that we can trust our justice system.”

Several Republicans have called for a special counsel to be named to investigate the Obama-era deal, which happened while Clinton was secretary of State. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said this week that the State Department would only consider such a step if it fits “a factual basis that meets the standard of a special counsel.”

But Trump has expressed frustration with his Justice Department and Sessions, pointing to a “lack of investigation” into Clinton and citing the Uranium One deal.


SHARE if you want a special counsel to investigate Clinton!

H/T: MSN,conservativepost.com

Let’s Drain The Swamp! 13 Republicans who didn’t vote for the Tax Bill [Names]

House Republicans passed a monumental bill to cut taxes on businesses and individuals.

The tax reform plan passed the chamber with 227 votes in favor and 205 against.

To pass the bill, the House GOP had to overcome opposition from several of its members who live in high-tax blue states. Those lawmakers objected to the proposal’s curb on popular state and local tax deductions.

The House plan would permanently chop the corporate tax rate to 20 percent from 35 percent and make other tweaks aiming to make businesses more competitive. It would reduce individual tax brackets to four from seven and make changes to several tax breaks.


Source: CNBC,conservativepost.com

Senate Says Trump Is Too Crazy To Handle Nukes. You Won’t Believe Who Leaps To Our President’s Defense…

Liberals never seem to have a clue what’s in the Constitution.

I guess reading our founding documents isn’t the Left’s strong suit. Never has been, really.

Liberal ignorance here, though, isn’t just about the Electoral College.

It’s about our national defense…and the fact that the President, according to law, custom, and the Constitution, is the Commander in Chief of America’s armed forces.

Libs have forgotten that, and it’s why they’re doing their best to put shackles on Trump’s ability to do one thing:

Use our nuclear weapons.

The Daily Caller reports:

“The Senate Armed Services Committee openly questioned the president’s authority to use nuclear weapons for the first time in over four decades Tuesday.

During the hearing, several senators expressed serious concerns about President Donald Trump’s absolute authority over the country’s nuclear arsenal.

The president of the United States is so unstable, so volatile, has a decision-making process that is so quixotic that he might order a nuclear weapons strike that is wildly out of step with U.S. national security interests,” Democratic Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy said.

I’ve heard it before. ‘He can’t even stop tweeting! How is he going to control himself with nukes?’ Blah, blah, blah, and so forth.

Look, it’s high time the Left recognized something – just because the president looks like he’s acting recklessly doesn’t mean he is acting recklessly.

Consider North Korea – any other president would have backed down from Kim Jong-un’s nuclear threats. Trump sent those threats right back to him. Everyone was scared a war was imminent.

And yet…nothing. Kim backed down. Trump did the “crazy thing,” and it worked.

And it’s because he knows what he’s doing. Have a little faith. His actions have proven to be correct.

There’s also the little problem of the constitutionality of taking the military away from the Commander in Chief.

And guess who says it’s a problem? A former Obama pal!

Taking away the president’s authority as commander in chief or diluting it in some respect,” said Brian P. McKeon, [Obama’s] former deputy undersecretary of defense.

I’m not sure that’s a wise course.”

Libs, when one of Obama’s former go-to guys is siding with Trump…you don’t have a case.

And you don’t have a case. Congress doesn’t make the decision to give the president the authority to use nukes. The American people do.

It might be time to start listening to them, wouldn’t you agree?

Source: Daily Caller,myrightamerica.com

Muslim Thinks He’s Cornered Unarmed Infidel — Meets Brutal ‘Secret Weapon’

A jihadist pulled out a knife when he spotted a defenseless man who was out for a walk, thinking the unarmed man would be an easy kill. However, as soon as the jihadist got close enough to stab his victim, the attacker was introduced to the man’s “secret weapon” that ensured he wouldn’t remain religiously clean.

As the only democracy in the Middle East, it’s no wonder that Muslims are flocking to Israel to trade their oppressive Sharia governments for the Jewish state’s prosperous freedom and equality. Of course, some Muslim Arabs are infiltrating the Western ally for much more sinister purposes — to slaughter the Jews, whom the Quran refers to as “apes” and “pigs.”

Breaking Israel News reports that Shabtai Kushelevski, a Jewish Israeli, was out and about on Mor Farm in the Mount Hebron region on Wednesday afternoon when he was brutally attacked by Muslim jihadist Sayad Machmud Ali Kaysiya. After Kaysiya brandished a knife, Kushelevski hastily turned and fled into his nearby home. When Kaysiya pursued Kushelevski, bursting into his house, he was introduced to the family’s first line of defense — a protective and very aggravated dog.

As soon as Kaysiya rushed through the door, the family’s pet and guard dog, Sofie, launched a vicious attack, allowing her master to grab his firearm in the other room. The golden retriever mix’s devastating bite stopped the Muslim terrorist just as he was about to plunge the knife into Kushelevski’s back. While Sofie was busy tearing at Kaysiya’s flesh, Kushelevski managed to grab the gun and shoot the invader dead, leaving him defiled by the same animal that Muslims consider “unclean.”

“This dog was not trained, but [her] natural instincts kicked in when he saw the Arab terrorist trying to stab Shabtai,” Ben Yakov told Breaking Israel News. “This extra few seconds saved the lives of everyone in the family. This is not uncommon, but there have been other attacks that ended tragically while Jews waited for the life-saving gift of guard dogs.”

Thanks to Sofie’s loyal defense, not only was Kusheveski spared horrific injuries or even death, his wife and baby, who were nursing in the next room, were saved as well, according to Arutz Sheva. Sofie has become the face of home defense in Israel, which urges residents to arm themselves with both firearms and canines.

Police discovered two knives on Kaysiya, which would’ve been more than enough to butcher the whole family. Knife attacks by Arab Muslims are far too common in Israel, although most result in victims’ injuries and casualties, unlike this one. Unfortunately, the anti-Semitism found within the Quran has caused many Jews to fear for their lives.

“He told me that he was worried because the Arabs would watch him work but he could see hatred in their eyes,” Yakov said. “He started taking classes on how to handle a dog. He wanted to take it with him to work.”

This is a particularly humiliating way for a Muslim jihadist to die, as dogs are seen as impure and even demonic in Islam. However, Kaysiya’s death wasn’t as laughable as another Muslim’s encounter with a canine in the UK.

Mad World News reported that after Osama Ansi, 29, led police on a drunken high-speed chase through a Midlands neighborhood, he crashed his Ford Fiesta and fled on foot. Realizing they couldn’t catch the swift criminal, police released a German shepherd canine officer to track down and restrain the assailant. Unfortunately for Ansi, the dog did a bit more than that.

“Unbeknown to the defendant there was a dog van following the car,” prosecutor Mark Phillips said coyly. “How can I say it? The defendant and the dog became closely acquainted, somewhat closely attached for some time.”

The canine officer reportedly became aroused after nabbing Ansi and sexually took advantage of the perpetrator while he was pinned to the ground. Apparently, it took police quite a while to catch up to the pair and remove the excited dog from Ansi’s back.

Sadly, Muslims have a hatred for dogs because their prophet Muhammad claimed that the beasts were messengers of Satan and would prevent angels from blessing them. These teachings have led Muslims to abuse, torture, and execute thousands of dogs, sparking international outrage.

Although it’s humorous to see a Muslim jihadist overtaken by one of the animals that they most despise, it’s even more fulfilling to watch as man’s best friend once again lives up to its name in the face of danger.


Boom! After Shooting Her Mouth Off, Doctor Gorka Puts Hillary Clinton In Her Place

News is heating up of an impending investigation into Hillary Clinton’s role in the Uranium One scandal. Crooked Hillary has emerged from her lair to try to dismiss the rumors, making pathetic accusations toward our leaders. However, President Donald Trump’s ally Dr. Sebastian Gorka shut her down with a single sentence.

As Mueller’s investigation into possible Russian interference in the 2016 Election goes nowhere, eyes are turning to the real sources of Russia collusion: the Democrats. In recent weeks, word has come out that while Congress was deciding on a deal that would provide 20% of U.S. uranium production to Russia, the FBI was investigating Russian agents who were bribing U.S. officials. Meanwhile, then-President Barack Obama hushed up the FBI, so Congress would approve the deal.

All roads have led to Hillary Clinton, who was the Secretary of State at the time. Was Russia bribing Hillary in order to seal the deal? That’s what many people believe, which is why an investigation should be conducted.

Clinton, desperately losing ground among her own, spoke to Mother Jones, hoping to deflect.

Hillary said, “I regret deeply that this appears to be the politicization of the Justice Department and our justice system. This Uranium One story has been debunked countless times by members of the press, by independent experts…” She continued that it is “personally offensive that they would do this. But taking myself out of it, this is such an abuse of power, and it goes right at the rule of law.” [Source: Breitbart]

Wow, the woman never learns. She dares call legitimate investigations a “politicization of the Justice Department”! What do you think was going on, during the entire Obama administration? The DOJ did nothing but pursue political schemes for Obama. They even interfered with an FBI investigation into Hillary’s email server, to protect her during the election. That’s the definition of politicization. Yet, Hillary has the audacity to call this — a real potential criminal investigation — politicizing.

She also tried to call an investigation into her past with Russia “an abuse of power.” Dr. Sebastian Gorka, former deputy assistant to President Trump, had something to say about Hillary’s little sound bite. While discussing the interview on Fox News, he set the record straight.

“It’s only an ‘abuse of power’ if she thinks that having the last name Clinton means she’s above the law,” Gorka declared, according to Fox News.

Boom! I couldn’t have said it better myself. Gorka, like many of us, knows exactly what Hillary Clinton was up to while Secretary of State. There is ample evidence that she took money from Russia and helped secure for them the Uranium One deal. On top of that, she was hiding the evidence on a private email server. She then deleted 33,000 emails — many of which would have incriminated her.

For years Hillary thought she could dodge the repercussions of her actions — because she was a Clinton. But, those days are over. In recent weeks, her own allies have turned on her, including former DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile. We’ve seen how Clinton violated her own party’s rules and procedures to steal the nomination.

Dr. Gorka went on to explain how there is clear evidence of pay-for-play between Clinton’s State Department and Russian agents. That is enough to at least warrant an investigation. All of Hillary’s boasts are simply posturing. She’s afraid of what might come out, should Jeff Sessions or anyone else begin to start digging.

People are backing away from the woman because they know what’s coming. She no longer can abuse her role in the U.S. government to protect her shady dealings.

Don’t be surprised when a special investigator is appointed to crack down on Hillary Clinton and her cohorts. Don’t be surprised when major announcements of indictments are made. The liberal world might be shocked, but we’ve been waiting for this for a long time.


Hitler Survivor Has Just 7 Words For Liberals Equating Trump To Nazi Leader

A German woman, who survived Nazi leader Adolf Hitler’s tyrannical reign, lived in a refugee camp, and fled to America, has noticed that liberals love to compare President Donald Trump to Hitler. However, when asked about the similarities between the two, she had just 7 words that completely shocked leftists.

Before Inga Andrews escaped Hitler’s “final solution,” the Holocaust, she and her mother were forced to survive the catastrophic events brought about by the Nazi party’s socialism and racial hatred. For decades, her harrowing experience has been locked away in her mind’s eye, however, it was recently awakened when angry liberals began combatting Trump’s travel ban and other executive orders with easily repeatable slogans that equate Trump to Hitler.

Now, Andrews feels a duty not only to dismiss the dramatic propaganda that compares the two leaders but also to point out who the really represents everything that encompasses Hitler and his Nazi militants.

When the Independent Journal Review asked Andrews about her thoughts on leftists saying that Trump is a dictator much like Hitler, she not only refuted this mistruth with personal experience, she explained that “it’s the destruction of freedom of speech” from the liberal protesters that resembles Hitler and Nazi-Germany.

“What is going on in this country is giving me chills. Trump is not like Hitler. Just because a leader wants order doesn’t mean they’re like a dictator,” Andrews told IJR. “What reminds me more of Hitler than anything else isn’t Trump, it’s the destruction of freedom of speech on the college campuses — the agendas fueled by the professors. That’s how Hitler started, he pulled in the youth to miseducate them, to brainwash them, it’s happening today.”

Andrews added that she recognizes the liberal bias in the school system, especially on college campuses, and says that it’s breeding the same intolerance and fascism that gave rise to Hitler in the 1930s. In addition, Andrews has actually lived through a travel ban even stricter than Trump’s when her mother married an American. Still, she believes that liberals should have a respect for these measures as our national security depends on them.

“It took six years to clear her to be able to be married,” she said. “Then when you married an American, because we were the enemy, you had to wait. We had to go from Heidelberg to another city where a camp was. They vetted us in both places. There were all these German brides with their children and families who had to be vetted again for three of four days before they could get on the ship. So we had a vetting process like what we are going through now because you have to have this to make the country safe.”

As for the liberal protesters, Andrews says that because of their emotionally-driven activism, they have abandon logic and reason. She remembers the desperation Democratic Socialism caused, including times when she only had “maple leaves and grass to survive,” something she says these leftist millennials have never had to endure. In short, equating Trump to Hitler is more of an insult to her and the millions who suffered and died during Hitler’s reign.

“Professors shouldn’t be telling their students to go after freedom of speech,” she said. “They should be telling them that this is the greatest country in the world…I see what is happening here reflecting some of the things we saw in Germany, and it’s terrifying. It’s sad. But it’s not because of Trump. It’s because of poor education. Trump is not like Hitler. The theory that he is is propaganda. Yes, I lived through some of Nazi Germany, but all you have to do is read some books about that period to see how wrong that theory is.”

Andrews added a harsh but much-needed message to the liberals who are protesting against Trump and believing that bullying and violence will get them what they want.

“America needs to grow up. The young people who are rioting and destroying property, who have no respect for elders and freedom of speech, I was so proud to become a citizen of this country,” she said.

Andrews knows from personal experience that America is an exceptional country because of the constitutional rights liberals often protest against. She easily identifies the parallels between the liberal movement in America and that of Nazi-Germany.

We have fascists labeling themselves “anti-fascists,” the intolerant blaming those with opposing views for intolerance, and modern-day Nazis calling Trump and his voters Nazis. You can take the Democrats out of Socialist Germany but you can’t take the socialism out of the Democratic Party.