Sanctuary State To Lose ALL Federal Funding – They Said This Would NEVER Happen

Image result for Sanctuary State To Lose ALL Federal Funding – They Said This Would NEVER Happen

One wonders just how far the state of California is willing to continue to push the envelope for illegal immigration? Just how much is pandering to illegal aliens worth?

The Department of Justice just issued a second and final warning to the state California sternly letting its Democrat Governor, Jerry Brown, state leadership, and the citizenry were given an ultimatum – you can be a sanctuary state that flouts federal immigration law or you can keep the federal tax dollars flowing … but you cannot have both.

Fox News reports

“Earlier this month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a so-called “sanctuary state” bill which basically erects a wall between California law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement officers. The bill forbids California cops from providing release and other information that isn’t publicly available in response to a request for notification from federal law enforcement.

The government has been pushing for notification from local authorities about when they have an undocumented immigrant in custody who has committed a crime, saying to withhold that information, and then release that person onto the streets is putting local communities in danger.

Supporters argue that sanctuary policies allow local and state law enforcement officers to build crucial relationships with immigrant communities. Critics say not turning over people living in the country illegally puts the public in danger. Wednesday’s letter urges California to comply federal statute (8 USC 1373) which bars local jurisdictions from limiting communication with federal law enforcement about a person’s immigration status or whereabouts. The letter states that California’s new law (SB54) “May violate,” 1373.

Department of Justice Officials tell Fox News this situation could result with future federal grants being withheld from California, that threat has been a common thread in this ongoing story. However DOJ officials also tell Fox they could “clawback” funds already awarded to the Golden State.

For instance California received more than $18 million in federal grants from the Department of Justice in 2016, funds DOJ officials say could be subject to a “clawback.”

‘In early October, the State of California codified into law a requirement that local police release criminal aliens back onto our streets. This law undermines public safety and national security, was opposed by law enforcement, and potentially violates federal law,’ said DOJ spokesman Devin O’Malley. ‘The abandonment of the rule of law evades all common sense, especially given the multiple high-profile incidents that have occurred in California as a result of similar policies. The Justice Department urges California to reconsider these so-called ‘sanctuary policies.’”

The so-called “sanctuary state” law, California “Sanctuary State” Bill (SB 54) – 

  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from holding illegal aliens on the basis of federal
  • immigration detainers, or transferring them into federal custody, unless they’ve been convicted in
  • the last 15 years for one of a list of 31 crimes, or are a registered s*x offender: if not, they may only
  • be held with a warrant from a federal judge
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from asking anyone about their immigration status
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from sharing any information with federal immigration
  • authorities that is not available to the general public
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from using any of their money or personnel to
  • “investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes”
  • Prohibits state and local law enforcement from allowing federal immigration authorities to use
  • space in their facilities
  • Limits how and when state and local law enforcement can contract with federal immigration
  • authorities
  • Grants discretion to state and local law enforcement to cooperate even less with federal
  • immigration authorities than the bill authorize them to, but not more
  • Is near-universally recognized and described by both its supporters and opponents as a sanctuary
  • state bill: protects illegal aliens at the expense of citizens, will increase illegal immigration to
  • California, and sends the message that illegal aliens are welcome everywhere in the state

The Federalist Papers took a look at all 261 sanctuary jurisdictions in the United States at risk for defunding back in August. All told, over $30 million in Byrne Justice Assistance Grant money, which account for the lion’s share of federal aid to states and localities for criminal justice, is at stake.

The Federalist Papers has previously covered how this indefensible policy will continue to affect Americans with the increase in crime, continued and increased government insolvency, less assimilation amongst illegal aliens to American culture, and fewer jobs for American citizens.

To many Americans, it is patently absurd that this is still even a topic for discussion, let alone a continued debate.

How is the proposition that higher levels of government have a right to require that lower levels of government actually enforce the law possibly controversial, especially in light of the fact that the law is clearly constitutional and immigration clearly falls under the scope of that office’s enumerated powers?

The answer, while obvious, is not simple, in that in a sane political climate, it wouldn’t be.

In response to simple common sense, the progressive left likes to claim that sanctuary cities are somehow good for law enforcement because illegals feel freer to report crimes if they know talking to police will not get them deported.

Yet in July that talking point took a hit thanks to the release of statistics showing that crime actually decreased in Phoenix, Arizona after the city dropped its sanctuary status –

According to Levi Bolton, the executive director to the Arizona Police Association, when Phoenix suspended its sanctuary city policies, instead of endangering the citizens, the opposite happened.

“We saw a decrease in crime,” said Bolton. “It had a deterrent effect on folks because the risk of discovery went up exponentially when we actually enforced the law.”

Under the new policies, law enforcement could ask suspects if they are in the U.S. legally, and they could inform immigration agencies about violations of federal laws.

Fox News reported that the m****r rate in Phoenix fell by 27 percent, robberies fell by 23 percent, and assault fell by 13 percent. Even more minor crimes fell, with burglaries by 14 percent and theft by 19 percent.

Dairy Queen Just Enraged Every Democrat With New Warning Sign To Liberals That Went Up Overnight

Image result for Dairy Queen Just Enraged Every Democrat With New Warning Sign To Liberals That Went Up Overnight

There was a time when social media was used to post funny pictures of our kids, adorable pet videos, and of course, the obligatory dinner plate, however, now it has been taken over by social justice warriors. We have all seen these keyboard warriors online with their unchecked virtue signaling and shrill screams that everyone is a racist or bigot that voted for Donald Trump. These entitled leftists scour the county looking for ways to be offended in order to post it online for all to see. So, when one Wisconsin Dairy Queen posted a politically incorrect sign in their window it was inevitable that liberals would soon be triggered, and of course, we were not disappointed.

Wisconsin Dairy Queen owner Kevin Scheunemann has created quite the stir on social media and it was not for his delicious frozen treats. Scheunemann posted on his door a sign that the left would deem as politically incorrect, and in all reality, it isn’t. The simple sign consists of a list of sayings and core values that the majority of Americans in our country hold dear, but leave it a liberal to find that offensive.

The sign reads, “This restaurant is politically incorrect we have been known to say “Merry Christmas, Happy Easter, God Bless America and give away free ice cream sundaes to veterans on Veterans Day. The bottom of the sign says in large letters “In God We Trust.”

The sign was posted four years ago after a customer came into the establishment and complained that there was Christian music being played. Then another customer complained that Scheunemann was giving away free ice cream to veterans and found that to be unfair. So, Scheunemann thought the best way to curtail these snowflakes delicate feelings was to post this sign so that customers knew where he stood.

“I felt the sign was appropriate to hang in terms of being transparent about the views of the owner and staff supporting God and country,” Scheunemann explained to CBS 58.

“It just seems that those kinds of values and principles are becoming controversial in society,” he added.

The sign has hung there for the last four years without a problem, but that streak ended about a week ago when one snowflake saw the sign and took to social media to complain. Ashley Coleman saw the sign hanging outside the door and was triggered by the sentiment and needed to take a snapshot of the sign.

“I find this extremely offensive,” whined an Oregon woman who goes by the name Ashley Coleman on Facebook. “Please speak with the franchise owner,” she added.

The post quickly picked up steam on Facebook as over a thousand people shared it and over two people commented, but if Coleman thought the town would get behind her she would be sorely mistaken. In fact, the community in this small town has rallied around the Dairy Queen seemingly in agreement with sign’s views.

Daily Wire reported:

“Business is good,” noted local CBS reporter Julie Parise, “thanks in part to a sign that’s hanging on the front door.”

Business owners in the area also came to Scheunemann’s defense.

“He posted it on the door so you see it before you walk in,” said local store owner April Serwe. “You don’t have to walk in if you don’t agree with it.”

Some Kewaskum residents even said the sign is unnecessary since most all of them “share the same values,” notes CBS 58.

“In this small community, I don’t think it’s a problem,” said local Liz Torrison. “We’re all just liking each other and having fun.”

Dairy Queen has not dictated the owner take down the sign, but they did distance themselves from the poster in a statement:

American Dairy Queen Corporation does not encourage our independently owned and operated franchisees to post non-business related messages in their locations or on their external reader boards. This sign expresses the views of this independent owner only and does not speak for ADQ Corporation or any of our other independent franchise owners. We expect our franchisees and employees to treat every person who walks through our doors with the utmost dignity and respect. Nothing less is acceptable.

Scheunemann said he’d be willing to make accommodations for anyone uncomfortable with the declarations made by the poster.

There is nothing wrong with anything that was said on this sign but leave it to a liberal to be triggered by it. America is a melting pot but that does not mean we need to abandon our customs for others people’s feelings. If they do not like that this place says Merry Christmas then are free to go to a place that says Happy Holidays and so forth. Being offended by something does not mean they get to force other people to see it their way it just simply means that is their views. To many people that seem simple enough but thanks to the liberal indoctrination, these entitled leftists believe everyone must bend to them. It will take time to fix this mess, but until then we cannot bend to these liberal idiots and we must continue forging on.

America is a melting pot but that does not mean we need to abandon our customs for others people’s feelings. If they do not like that this place says Merry Christmas then are free to go to a place that says Happy Holidays and so forth. Being offended by something does not mean they get to force other people to see it their way it just simply means that is their views. To many people, that seems simple enough, but thanks to the liberal indoctrination, these entitled leftists believe everyone must bend to them.

It will take time to fix this mess, but until then we cannot bend to these liberal idiots and we must continue forging on.


Source:Daily Wire,

Clint Eastwood Had Enough, Blows Up On Hillary And Obama… Liberals Are Furious

Image result for Clint Eastwood Had Enough, Blows Up On Hillary And Obama… Liberals Are Furious

One of Hollywood’s most beloved actors couldn’t take it and blew up the spot on Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama. Eastwood is an old-school actor, proud of his country, and living the great American dream and speaking his mind, embracing his wonderful first amendment. It didn’t take long for Eastwood, 87, to open up about his distaste for Clinton and Obama, and thus showing his support for President Trump.

Eastwood firstly didn’t announce his support for Trump, but when asked if he would support Trump or Clinton for President, then he sided with Donald. The reason is that he believed Clinton would follow in the footsteps of Obama and Eastwood wasn’t particularly a fan of Barack’s presidency. America turned soft under Obama and Clint Eastwood seems to despise the weakness that is found in the millennial generation who are offended by everything and trying to live in safe spaces which have proved to be embarrassing to America in general.

Clint comes from the tough generation where people weren’t so soft. His generation believed in the discipline at home and treating people with respect. His generation believed there were only two genders and people could not switch at any given moment in the day. Clint Eastwood is often criticized for his beliefs, but he speaks his mind and that’s something he believes that everyone should be able to do.

The Variety website wrote this bit about him: “Clint Eastwood says that he hasn’t endorsed any candidate for president, but given a choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, he’d choose the latter.

“That’s a tough one, isn’t it? I’d have to go for Trump…you know, ’cause she’s declared that she’s gonna follow in Obama’s footsteps,” Eastwood says in Esquire’s September issue. “There’s been just too much funny business on both sides of the aisle. She’s made a lot of dough out of being a politician. I gave up dough to be a politician. I’m sure that Ronald Reagan gave up dough to be a politician.”

Eastwood was clear that he hasn’t endorsed anyone — “I haven’t talked to Trump. I haven’t talked to anybody.” — but he was full of praises for the Republican nominee for being “onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up.”

In fact, Eastwood said, “We’re really in a p—y generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist.”

He added, “You know, he’s a racist now because he’s talked about this judge. And yeah, it’s a dumb thing to say. I mean, to predicate your opinion on the fact that the guy was born to Mexican parents or something. He’s said a lot of dumb things. So have all of them. Both sides. But everybody — the press and everybody’s going, ‘Oh, well, that’s racist,’ and they’re making a big hoodoo out of it. Just f—king get over it. It’s a sad time in history.”

One thing Eastwood pointed out about Trump is that people called him racist because Trump didn’t approve of a judge. Simply not approving or liking someone does not make one racist. Trump and the judge he criticized are not required to like each other. People are allowed to dislike each other without being labeled as a racist. However, there are many critics who called Trump “racist” for doing something such as disliking the judge or doing a travel restriction (it’s not a ban), and for doing things that help the laws of immigration be followed.

Clint Eastwood references the latest generation as the “p–sy generation” on account of how weak and soft people are in regards to their ability to be easily offended by everything. Combine the softness with the ever-growing emasculation of men and the gender identity politics and we have what could be considered a very sad generation where people have lost their true identity of being male or female.

The other problem is that people are constantly being labeled as racist, sexist, or anything else simply because they disagree with the ideologies of another.

Clint Eastwood isn’t the only celebrity to speak out about Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the generation of people who are easily offended. James Woods and numerous other celebrities have supported Donald Trump as President. Many have supported him as a person well before he ever ran for President.

How do you feel about Clint Eastwood’s opinion of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama? What is your opinion of the generation who is always offended and need to live in a safe space?

Share this story with your friends who like Clint Eastwood or would be interested in reading about his opinion of Hillary and Barack. Don’t forget to add your comments below!

Sarah Sanders Receives Life-Changing News After She Suffers Vile Ambush

Image result for Sarah Sanders Receives Life-Changing News After She Suffers Vile Ambush

Sarah Sanders has made national headlines all week for the things she didn’t do. That’s because Sanders, the White House Press Secretary, has been on the receiving end of some very vile micro-aggressions from people like Michelle Wolf and any fans she might have. Wolf, a comedian, tried ripping Sander’s heart out in a wicked ambush that tried tearing her soul apart by stating offensive sayings about Sanders’ appearance. This was during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and Sanders sat there taking the barrage like a champ. She was patient, calm, and showed barely any reaction to the jokes Wolf threw her way, each joke a proverbial strike-out as she could barely garnish a laugh from the crowd.

Nevertheless, she persisted. Wolf carried on with the laughless jokes while Sanders silently absorbed the vocal punishment. Wolf was later criticized by people on all ends of politics for her classless performance that joked about serious issues such as abortion while knocking people about their physical appearance, even touching on femininity at times. Critics tore Wolf’s performance apart across the nation, stating things that reminded Wolf of her own appearance and how someone like her might want to rethink criticizing someone else for their “looks” – which is nothing more than lowbrow humor at best.

It wasn’t long after that Sanders received the good news. It seemed like people favored her response, which was not more than a few lines, and praised her calm demeanor while Wolf stood upon the stage and tore into Sanders like a hungry wild animal in the woods.

Faith Family America reported a bit more on the Sanders and Wolf feud: “Throughout the performance, Wolf “joked” that Sanders “burned facts.” She also likened the press secretary to a macho softball coach and mocked her confrontations with reporters. It was clear that the performance was attacking the press secretary’s personal appearance and femininity.

According to the Washington Times, #StandwithSarah and #StandwithSarahSanders have become popular hashtags on Twitter following the White House Correspondents Dinner on Saturday evening.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders responded on “Fox and Friends” on Thursday to the offensive comments hurled against her by “comedian” Michelle Wolf.

Rather than stooping to the indecently low level of Wolf, Sanders wished the comedian a happy life.

“Look, I think that evening says a whole lot more about her than it does about me,” Sanders said of the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner on Saturday, according to the Daily Caller.

“The people that were my friends before that evening are my friends today and I’m going to continue doing the job that I came here to do every single day,” she said. “I’m very proud of the fact that I work in this administration for this president and we’re going to keep pushing forward and doing everything we can to make America better.”

“I think we’ve had a great first year and a half at doing that. A huge success story that we’re proud of,” Sanders continued. “I hope that she can find some of the same happiness that we all have, because I think she may need a little bit more of that in her life, because the rest of us here are doing great.”

Sanders also received encouraging words from Harris Faulkner, and some critics were unhappy that a woman of color would compliment Sanders for being a hardworking mother of three who faces adversary well by taking the “high road” during the ongoing fued:

Twitter users posted the following replies:
Maureen Karas: “Harris – You look as amazing as your magnificent brain! Love your commentary and demeanor! Thank you for praising our wonderful @PressSec.”

Barbara Cherewaty: “She’s such a role model for young girls love her!!”

Demi Wu: “Yes, I completely agree with your comments. Trump supporters love & stand with Sarah Sanders…”

Sanders’ supporters came out and posted nice messages for her. Some other people did not. She had some very bitter critics who accused her of various things, proving that it’s nearly impossible to make everyone happy.

People in politics will always have enemies no matter how much they’re doing a good job. There will always be controversy and ongoing battlers and the existence of social media has opened up a world of spiteful messages being sent to so many different people. In this case, it was Sanders’ being harshly criticized and being the better person.

Hillary Announces She’s MOVING Out Of U.S. Because Of Trump – Isn’t Going To Like Place She Picked!

Image result for Hillary Announces She’s MOVING Out Of U.S. Because Of Trump – Isn’t Going To Like Place She Picked!

Hillary Clinton was recently talking about moving out of the United States after she lost the 2016 election. She was likely devastated by the loss as Donald Trump won the election, stopping Hillary from becoming the first female American president. Her stunning loss came at the hands of a man with no political experience, but that of reality television and business and people were left in tears when she lost. People still complain today, over a year after the election and with disregard to Trump making wonderful progress on some issues important to Americans.

Hillary’s talk of moving out of the country saw herself moving to New Zealand, all the way on the other side of the planet from her comfy home here in America where she’s persistently criticized and possibly faces legal trouble after being caught up in a money laundering scandal with the Democratic National Committee. Hillary might claim it was only a joke that she’s moving out of America, but sometimes jokes are later revealed as truth. Even though her comments were jokes, for now, many wonder if they’ll turn out to be true if there are any pending legal actions. It makes sense for her to pull a Roman Polansky and run from the country if she faces legal actions.

Breitbart reported more on Clinton’s joke about moving out of America: “Hillary Clinton joked on Monday that she thought about permanently relocating to New Zealand after her crushing 2016 presidential election loss to Donald Trump.

“I received a number of invitations from Kiwis to permanently relocate here,” Clinton said in Auckland. “I must say I really appreciated the offers and gave them some thought, but I’m going to stay put because we have work to do in my country as well.”

Clinton said she wanted to help Democrats “crack the code” to beat Trump the “reality TV” candidate” in 2020.

“Part of our problem was this unprecedented reality TV campaign and him being the first reality TV candidate in our history,” she reportedly said.

Clinton said reporters were acting like they “were watching a car wreck or train wreck all the time” in 2016 and “they couldn’t take their eyes away.”

“They didn’t know what to make of it,” Clinton said, referring to Trump’s “insults and his scapegoating and his horrible comments about people with disabilities and Latin Americans and immigrants and everybody.” She added, “It was just so hard to understand.”

Clinton then said it took a “perfect storm” of events for Trump to defeat her: “Deep currents of anger and resentment flowing through our culture. Our political press that told voters my emails were the most important story. The unprecedented intervention in our election by the FBI director. The information warfare waged from within the Kremlin.”

She added that the “forces at work in the 2016 election in the United States are still with us” not only in the United States but around the world.

“We’re having a very important struggle in the United States right now,” Clinton said. “It’s difficult to fully grasp because there are 20 stories and people are getting overwhelmed by the strange goings on we are living through.”

What’s very funny is that Hillary and her fans still complain about Trump winning the election and they continue to “resist” the election results. The resistance to accepting the presidential election results shows a great weakness and an ignorant amount of arrogance on one side of politics.

Donald Trump needs support from the politicians who work for him and even those who challenge him. Constructive criticism is good, but blatant ignorance and delusional sideshows show where true failure is and those people who participate in the shenanigans are the same people halting further progress for Americans.

Will Hillary ever move out of the United States? No one truly knows but her. She might be more likely to move if there’s any chance of her facing legal charges for any of her alleged crimes. If she’s about to be prosecuted and finds out about it earlier than expected, then she might get in a plane and really leave for New Zealand.

Will she like it there? No one knows that either. These are all unknown bits of information until Hillary Clinton reveals them herself. Of course, that’s if citizens find out on the mainstream media when something happens legally. Although many people find Hillary Clinton to be untouchable, so the people she worked with might be the first to suffer any legal penalties for various incidents, in particular, the alleged $84 million that was laundered and recently reported on.

Please share this on social media to let your friends know about Hillary’s joke! They might get excited. To be serious with them, use this as a way to start a friendly conversation about what will happen to Hillary Clinton regarding the alleged crimes that she’s being looked at for.

Share and comment this funny story!

Melania Just Fired Them ALL! ‘That Is Not Acceptable Here – I Won’t Allow It!’

Image result for Melania Just Fired Them ALL! ‘That Is Not Acceptable Here – I Won’t Allow It!’

First lady Melania Trump just sent them packing! She released multiple people from their positions as she would not allow taxpayers to be ripped off for jobs that were simply not needed – quite contrary to the former first lady, Michelle Obama. While Melania Trump takes on bigger roles and a more active schedule, she has proven herself to spend a lot less than what Obama did. This news comes about as Melania Trump runs one of the lightest East Wings in recent history.

Michelle Obama was reported to have 16 people working under her, being paid a combined $1.24 million. Melania Trump’s staff is only four people who earn a combined $486,700, much less in comparison to Obama. Knowing that Melania Trump refuses to hire 12 extra people to do jobs that can be handled by herself and four others is a wonderful bit of information as it reduces wasteful spending of the taxpayer money.

Not carrying the extra staff for jobs that can be handled by fewer people is a step in the right direction towards reducing the amount of money spent by the administration and shows that Melania cares to be mindful in her position as the first lady. That’s an enjoyable quality for a first lady to have as it spreads a message about being responsible and not overspending.

Fox News reported more on Melania’s smaller staff: “The details are contained in an annual report the White House sends to Congress showing the names, positions and salaries of all its personnel. Both the Obama and Trump administrations acknowledged several additional staffers beyond those listed in the report with the term “first lady” in their titles. But even counting all those employees — 24 for Michelle Obama and nine for the current first lady — Melania Trump’s office is relatively small.

It’s an approach her spokeswoman says is intentional.

“As with all things that she does, she is being very deliberate in her hiring, focusing on quality over quantity,” communications director Stephanie Grisham said in an email. “It is important to her that the team is a good fit for what she wants to accomplish as first lady, and that everyone works well together. She also wants to be mindful and responsible when it comes to taxpayer money.”

While the 2009 annual report listed 16 staffers for Michelle Obama, her press secretary said at the time the staff actually included 24 people. A 2009 story said Obama’s 24 aides might have broken records.

“That may indeed be the largest of any first lady, but Hillary Clinton, with 19 staffers, and Laura Bush with at least 18 and perhaps more, weren’t far behind,” said.

Grisham told Fox News this week there are nine people working in the East Wing under Melania Trump, a few more than listed in the annual report.

According to those personnel reports, Melania Trump’s staffers include a chief of staff, a communications director, a deputy chief of staff and a deputy director of advance.

Michelle Obama’s staff included those same positions and a slew of others: additional press aides, a director of policy and projects, a personal aide, a traveling aide and a director of correspondence.

Michelle Obama’s office did not return a request for comment.”

Melania and Donald Trump will surely be criticized for this one way or another. The critics will say that Melania fired people instead of being resourceful and saving money for the White House and their Presidency. While every President and first lady face critics, there has surely been an insufferable and increased amount of criticism has been levied towards the Trump family, with even Barron facing his own fierce barrage of harsh commentary from spiteful people who dislike the Trump family living in the White House.

Donald and Melania work through the criticism, doing things to make many Americans in hopes that they’re constantly doing right by the citizens. They will always face criticism from those who oppose their leadership, even though Trump won the Presidency in a fair election well over one year ago.

What do you think of Melania having a smaller staff? Is she saving money for taxpayers? Is it a smart move for her to be more resourceful in her spending?

Will Michelle Obama respond to Fox News to talk about why she had so many people working under her?

Please share this on Facebook to spread the good news about Melania Trump and her resourceful behavior.

Martin Luther King Jr’s Nephew Says Trump Is A ‘Genius’, CNN Anchor Has Priceless Response

Image result for Martin Luther King Jr’s Nephew Says Trump Is A ‘Genius’, CNN Anchor Has Priceless Response

Martin Luther King Jr’s nephew genius talked to a major CNN host about President Donald Trump and it didn’t turn out the way that CNN may have hoped. The host, Don Lemon, a highly criticized anti-Trumper, was talking with Isaac Newton Farris, Jr and the interview went the way of a Conservative rather than going in the direction of a liberal. It could’ve been a well-balanced interview, but once Don Lemon appeared to begin talking about President Donald Trump as a racist, that’s when it went wrong for Lemon. In fact, it became nearly comical and flooded with denial and self-pity after Lemon had to fold and feed into what Farris was happily saying, especially the part where he touted Trump as a genius.

Watching Lemon face defeat under the wrath of Farris, a relative of a great civil rights icon, was a splendid touch of reality for those watching CNN that day. If people missed it, then no worries because it was posted on social media and YouTube.

Watch the video of CNN’s Don Lemon and Martin Luther King Jr’s nephew, Isaac Newton Farris Jr, which includes commentary by Mark Dice:

This website provided the following information on the fiasco between Farris and Lemon: “Now that the “Russian collusion” accusation seems to have failed to bring down President Trump, the media seems to be pivoting right back to their accusation that Trump is a “racist,” especially after a recent meeting where he was accused of referring to some third world countries as “sh**holes.”

After Trump was accused — so far without any corroborating proof — of using the “sh**hole” comment in a closed-door meeting, Lemon had MLK nephew, Isaac Newton Farris, Jr., on the air to talk about MLK’s legacy. Naturally, as an overtly left-wing operative, Lemon also pressed Mr. Ferris on Trump. And when Farris refused to call Trump a racist, Lemon badgered him for the entire segment.

After Lemon brought the president into the conversation, Ferris told the CNNer that he doesn’t think Trump is a racist. “The President, I do not think, is a racist,” Ferris said to Lemon’s astonishment.

The MLK relative added that if Trump did use the word, it was more out of ignorance as opposed to racism.

Almost immediately, the liberal CNN host began to lose his cookies. Lemon quickly jumped to a list of Democrat talking points meant to paint Trump as a “racist.” Lemon’s list included Trump’s campaign claim that some illegals are criminals. Lemon also slammed Trump as a “racist” for calling fake Native American Indian Senator Elizabeth Warren by the name “Pocahontas.”

… Now, before we go on with CNN’s meltdown, it should be noted that Trump was right about the criminals coming here. A new report found that the so-called DREAMERs have crime rates at double that of American-born youngsters. So, yeah, these foreign nations are sending their rapists and criminals here.

Anyway, Lemon went on, according to Mediaite:

“Just because the president is not aware of his racism doesn’t make him not a racist. It makes him ignorant of the fact that he is racist. To be honest, it is tough to sit here and call President of the United States a liar. It is tough to sit here and call the President of the United States a racist, but you have to do that as a journalist. And guess what? You do it because you realize the person who is in that position has less respect for the office than you do, because if he respected the office and if he respected all of America and all of American people then he would listen to the majority of black people and brown people in this country who are trying to educate him and tell him he is exhibiting racist behavior. he’s not listening. he keeps doubling down on it.”

The constant badgering by CNN contributes to the division that splits people apart on major issues. The mainstream media that insists on going after the President for incidents that have no merit, nor are fact-based, provide the viewers with lackadaisical information. CNN could focus on the positive news, accomplishments, and the aspects of Trump’s presidency that have provided the nation with positivity

There have been numerous accomplishments by Trump’s time in the White House and Americans should focus on that while providing constructive criticism to help him do an even greater job. Everything from tax cuts, peace between Korea’s, stock market surges, and more. Trump is doing the best he can with the support that he has – despite all the people going after him and trying to halt his progress.

Will you share this to show your support for Trump? Was Don Lemon out of hand with what he said?

Write your comments below and send this to a friend. Let them know what Don Lemon just said about our president!