Trump’s Homeland Security Storms Sanctuary Cities With High-Profile Arrest Request

The battle to end illegal immigration continues. Numerous regions in the country have opposed Trump’s goals. They have created ‘sanctuary cities,’ places in the United States that puts the rights of criminals ahead of citizens.

These cities and states have made it clear that law-abiding citizens do not deserve safe communities. Liberals will refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement, making it difficult for them to properly apprehend and deport violent criminals.

But things might be changing very quickly. It was announced that the President’s Homeland Security is about to get tough. Real tough.

From The Washington Times:

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen confirmed Tuesday that her department has asked federal prosecutors to see if they can lodge criminal charges against sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal deportation efforts.

“The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues may be available,” Ms. Nielsen told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Her confirmation came after California’s new sanctuary law went into effect Jan. 1, severely restricting cooperation the state or any of its localities could offer.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan says those policies put his officers and local communities at more risk because they have to arrest illegal immigrants out in the community.

Mr. Homan told The Washington Times last July that he wanted to see local officials charged as complicit in human smuggling if they shielded illegal immigrants through sanctuary policies.

Homan and others responsible for national security promised this. They said they would not be lying down in the wake of sanctuary cities, counties, and states. American citizens and law enforcement are in danger. Meanwhile liberals bend over backwards to protect drug dealers, murderers, and rapists. It has to stop.

This is the first step in major action. Homeland, DOJ, and ICE will not sit by as American lives are jeopardized. Jerry Brown and other clowns can obstruct all they want. But they will not win.

Expect to see major arrests coming down the line. Prosecutions and lawsuits will follow. States that defy the will of the people–and the President–will face the consequences.

Source: The Washington Times, patriotjournal.org

‘Super-Sanctuary State’ Created By Governor To Protect Illegals From Deportation

An illegal immigrant is an illegal immigrant is an illegal immigrant is an illegal immigrant.

Liberals argue that as long as “undocumented” immigrants do not steal or commit fraud, they should stay. However, they still entered the country without going through the proper government channels. For that, deportation is the punishment. It’s quite simple.

But once again, the Democrats are living in a fantasy world and are doing everything they can to keep illegal aliens in our country. The purpose? To quickly usher them in with a blanket amnesty clause and grant them the right to vote. That would give them the voting base they need to keep their state and federal representatives in the blue.

And one state in particular is forcing its citizens to live alongside these criminals. Incoming New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has declared that a state agency will be created in order to “help” illegals. The reality is, he’s using state resources to keep illegals in his state and protect them from deportation.

In short, he’s aiding and abetting illegal immigrants. And he’s breaking the law.

Image result for new jersey phil murphy

From The Daily Caller:

Newly inaugurated New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy plans to establish the Garden State as a bastion of far left policies, including a first-of-its-kind government agency devoted exclusively to protecting the rights of legal and illegal immigrants alike.

Murphy, a former Goldman Sachs financier who was swept into office on the back of former Gov. Chris Christie’s historically low approval ratings, told The Washington Post he plans to operationalize the sentiment behind the “sanctuary” movement by establishing an Office of Immigrant Defensive Protection.

While a number of Democratically controlled states have adopted an official policy of non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities, Murphy is seeking to outdo his progressive counterparts by devoting an entire agency to help immigrants navigate the federal immigration bureaucracy.

“It would be a place where everybody could call with questions about their status,” Murphy told WaPo. “Our guess is it’s going to be legal-services-oriented. One remarkable thing, and you probably have seen this, the rumors that swirl around communities are extraordinary, and it’s literally hard to get, particularly if you’re undocumented, the right answer to your question. That’s when people go back into the shadows.”

Murphy believes he can capitalize on the backlash to Christie’s fiscally conservative approach, establishing New Jersey as a testing ground for a progressive movement that’s gained traction with young voters nationally.

In addition to transforming New Jersey into a “welcoming” state — a term he prefers to “sanctuary” — Murphy plans to legalize the sale of recreational marijuana, mandate a $15 minimum wage, and institute a millionaire tax.

Image result for new jersey phil murphy

Based on all of the progressive plans that this new governor has, perhaps its time for some New Jersey residents to find new homes in other states. As you can see, soon New Jersey will be noted as the California of the East Coast: high illegal immigration traffic, high taxes, etc.

Good luck, New Jersey. You’re going to need it.

Source: The Daily Caller

WATCH: Trump Kicks CNN’s Jim Acosta Out Of Press Briefing

Jim Acosta, one of the top liberal faces of CNN — the fake news network according to at least half the country — was just humiliated by none other than President Trump himself after asking the President the most asinine, racist question one could possibly ask.

Watching Trump tell this dweeb to get out of the room is the best thing we’ve seen so far this year…

Hannity reports:

President Donald Trump didn’t have time for CNN senior White House correspondent Jim Acosta on Tuesday, telling the left-leaning reporter to “get out” during a press briefing with the President of Kazakhstan.

The President was fielding questions from journalists when Acosta pounced on his recent remarks regarding immigration; asking the Commander-in-Chief if he only prefers “Caucasian” and “white” immigrants from Norway other European nations.

“Mr. President, did you say that you wanted more people to come in from Norway? Is that true?” pressed the CNN reporter.

“I want them to come in from everywhere,” fired back the President.

“Just Caucasian or white countries, sir?” asked Acosta.

“Out,” replied the President, shutting down Acosta and pointing at the door.

The CNN reporter commented on the altercation on social media, saying he had “never encountered” that sort of behavior at the White House.

“As I attempted to ask questions in Roosevelt Room of Trump, WH press aides shouted in my face to drown out my questions. I have never encountered that before,” tweeted the correspondent.

Watch President Trump tell Acosta to “get out” above.

SHARE this all over Facebook and social media if you think it’s hilarious that Acosta got kicked out of a Trump presser!

Source: patrioticexpress.com

HUD Sec. Ben Carson Discovers $516.4 BILLION In Mismanaged Obama Funds

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson has gotten down to business.

The results of a new, independent audit of the last years of President Barack Obama’s term — 2015 and 2016 — show an incredible mismanagement of funds and a wealth of errors.

Here’s what Audit Report 2017-FO-0005, released Wednesday, notes:

“The total amounts of errors corrected in HUD’s notes and consolidated financial statements were $516.4 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively. There were several other unresolved audit matters, which restricted our ability to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to express an opinion.”

That is a lot of waste, fraud, and abuse.

The audit continues, noting exactly why they made a “check-up” of the department:

“Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of HUD’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to the Federal Government. This report presents our reissued independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements, including an update to our report on HUD’s internal controls.”

The official report describes why the audit took place:

In accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended, we are required to annually audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD reissued its fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements due to pervasive material errors that we identified. Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of HUD’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to the Federal Government. This report presents our reissued independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements, including an update to our report on HUD’s internal controls.

It also described a recommended course of action to correct the situation:

In accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended, we are required to annually audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD reissued its fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements due to pervasive material errors that we identified. Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of HUD’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to the Federal Government. This report presents our reissued independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements, including an update to our report on HUD’s internal controls.

Here is the “Background and Objective” from the official audit report:

We are required by the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, as amended by the Government Management Reform Act of 1994 and implemented by Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Bulletin 15-02, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, to audit the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) principal financial statements or select an independent auditor to do so. The objective of our audit was to express an opinion on the fair presentation of these principal financial statements. In planning our audit of HUD’s principal financial statements, we considered internal controls over financial reporting and tested compliance with selected provisions of applicable laws, regulations, and government policies that may materially affect the consolidated principal financial statements. Providing an opinion on internal controls or compliance with selected provisions of laws, regulations, and government policies was not an objective, and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

SHARE on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that waste and abuse has gotten out of control!

Source: patrioticexpress.com

American Convicted Of Trying To Join ISIS Is Released Back On US Soil As An ‘Experiment’

You’d think that the only government willing to release potential terrorists back into American society was Obama’s government. He, certainly, showed enough sympathy to terrorism to be able to release terrorists back among us.

But you’d be wrong. And you’d also be wrong about the reason why.

Let’s face facts – there are an awful lot more potential terrorists in the US than all of us would care to admit. They’re ready to join ISIS, ready to buy and sell weapons, ready to preach evil…and ready to die.

And they don’t have to be born in the Mideast to do it. Home-grown terrorism is ISIS’ new secret weapon.

So when a new and potential ISIS militant is released from prison? It should make you pay attention and wonder what in the world was the government thinking

Especially if the answer is, ‘he can be fixed, and healed.’

Ladies and gentlemen, meet Abdullah Yusuf, age 21, former ISIS soldier, and now released American. He’s part of a new government experiment called ‘reintegration of former terrorists’.

Fox News reports:

A man convicted of attempting to join ISIS was granted supervised release from a Minnesota halfway house — fewer than three years since he tried boarding a jet to meet up with the Islamic terror group in Syria.

Yusuf was among nine men who were arrested in a sweeping FBI probe of ISIS recruitment. He’s one of the few Americans to be allowed back into society after trying to join the terror group.

People are, obviously, worried about that re-integration. But there’s reason to believe that it may work in this case.

For one thing, they’re common sense – cooperate with the US Government, and we’ll cooperate with you.

Yusuf cooperated with federal authorities during the investigation, [and] was sentenced to time served after spending two years in detention.

[He] will remain under intense federal supervision for 20 years. Additionally, he’s barred from using social media.

That might seem like a small price to pay for someone who was at one point willing to kill American innocents.

But consider what happened to his friends, who did not repent:

Three others fought the federal charges, lost at trial, and could remain behind bars for 35 years.

Repent, or face nearly a life in prison – for young militants, the government’s choice is clear: repent, and gain freedom…surveilled, supervised freedom.

It’s still the best option for defecting from ISIS.

Source: Fox News,myrightamerica.com

Should Trump Eliminate Welfare For Illegal Immigrants? Here Is What 62% Of Americans Think

In spite of the liberals continually pushing their no-fringes plan, obviously, a large portion of the Americans are as yet mindful of the truth.
The predominant press always tries to indicate everybody that many individuals are agreeable to the movement arrangements. However, the truth and the information is way extraordinary.
The “country of foreigners” state is frequently dismissed as an expansive contention. All things considered, it is a senseless and superfluous remark being abused endlessly.
The surveys demonstrate that the US residents are more strong of Trump’s arrangements.
As indicated by Breitbart, the most recent Rasmussen survey uncovers that 62 percent of conceivable voters communicated their help towards halting more foreigners in the USA from getting welfare favorable circumstances amid the initial five years, a strategy proposed by President Trump.
Individuals who are probably going to help the denial, 72% of them all the more accurately, are subjects from the working class, winning from $30,000 to $50,000. Indeed, even the ones who say that they are “moderates” are in support at 61%.
As indicated by the survey, Americans need movement just if the general population are capable and need to work without sitting tight for gifts.
This is reality about the US individuals and their genuine feeling on the movement issue. Obviously, the liberal media will never give an account of it. They rather attempt to offer modest stories constantly, for the most part the “country of settlers’ one. That is their explanation behind things not to change until the end of time. On the off chance that a particular thing had been completed a particular path before, to begin with, it doesn’t imply that way was the greatest, second, it doesn’t suggest that thing ought to never be changed again.
Source: www.usadailyupdates.me

AMERICA IS NOT OWNED BY AMERICANS AND THEIR CHILDREN BUT IS INSTEAD HELD BY PEOPLE ALL OVER THE GLOBE, ACCORDING TO A STATEMENT FROM AMNESTY ADVOCATE SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM.

“I’ve always believed that America is an idea [which is] not defined by its people but by its ideals,” Graham said in a press statement January 12 which sought to criticise President Donald Trump for describing some foreign countries as less pleasant than America, or as “shitholes.”
Graham continued:
The American ideal is embraced by people all over the globe.  It was best said a long time ago, E Pluribus Unum – Out of Many, One. Diversity has always been our strength, not our weakness.  In reforming immigration we cannot lose these American Ideals.
Graham was a founding member of the 2013 “Gang of Eight” pro-amnesty group and has frequently urged the importation of more cheap labor for his home-state companies.
His view of Americans’ homeland as the shared property of the world is shared by many other pro-immigration advocates. For example, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who is working with Graham to push the amnesty bill, said in December:
America is a land of immigrants — it is who we are … that is why I have consistently supported humane and comprehensive immigration law reform, and it is why I am a proud co-sponsor of the DREAM Act.
In 2014, President Barack Obama voiced a similar claim, telling his audience that Americans do not have the right to exclude migrants:

Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently.
And that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration.  If you look at the history of immigration in this country, each successive wave, there have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, well, I don’t want those folks.  Even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans.
Business elites also use the ideal of immigration to shake off the civic demands from their fellow citizens — and also to cut payroll costs, increase sales, grow profits and spike the value of real-estate.
On January 12, for example, shortly after Democrats leaked Trump’s description of some foreign countries as “shitholes” — Goldman Sachs’s CEO used Twitter to declare that Americans’ prime directive is acceptance of foreign immigrants.
Source:www.donaldtrumpelite.me

ELIZABETH WARREN MAY LOSE HER SEAT TO A GOP NAVY SEAL!

Though she was once viewed as the next big star in the Democrat Party, things aren’t looking as good as they used to for Massachusetts Sen. Fauxcahontas, er, Lieawatha, sorry, Elizabeth Warren, as she prepares to defend her Senate seat from Republican challengers in 2018.
One such challenger who may have the outspoken progressive senator in a panic is a former Navy SEAL named Gabriel Gomez, who is reportedly considering a run for Warren’s seat next year, according to the Cohasset Mariner.
Gomez, a former Navy pilot turned SEAL, ran unsuccessfully in a special election in 2013 for the Senate seat vacated by then-Sen. John Kerry, who was moving on to lead the State Departmentin the Obama administration. That seat was ultimately filled by then-Democrat Rep. Ed Markey.
“It’s really making sure we’ve got a crystal clear strategy if we decide to go, because I do think whoever decides to take on this challenge there is a path to victory against Miss Warren,” stated Gomez.
“The nuts and bolts is that there’s a clear distinction on who is really prepared to serve the state in the capacity of the senatorship, and that’s as far as I’ll go on that,” he added, declining to provide further details.
The Washington Free Beacon noted that while Warren has been incredibly popular among Democrats, her approval rating among the broader base of Massachusetts voters has been sliding downward. In fact, her slipping numbers have encouraged a number of other Republicans beside Gomez to consider a run for her seat in 2018.

The Boston Globe reported this week on a recent Morning Consult poll of 2,500 Bay State voters that revealed that while the state’s Republican governor rates as the most popular in the nation, Warren’s approval rating has dropped significantly since last year.
Warren earned the approval of 56 percent of voters while 38 percent disapproved of the job she has been doing. That is a marked change from this time last year, when Warren had an approval rating of 61 percent and was only disapproved by 27 percent of voters.
That less-than-thrilling news for Warren came on the heels of a report in January by Politicothat nearly half of Massachusetts voters, 46 percent, wanted somebody else to represent them in the Senate.

“Low numbers don’t necessarily mean there’s an opening for just anyone to challenge her,” said Steve Koczela, president of the MassINC Polling Group, which compiled the numbers. “Republicans who want someone different face the same challenge they always face: Who will challenge her?”
That challenger could very well be Gomez, but obviously it remained a bit too early to make predictions regarding the ultimate path voters in the state will choose to travel down.

Source: blingnews,

Actress Ashley Judd Said: ‘Trump Supporters Are Hurting My Career, If This Continues I’m Gonna Move From This Awful Country.”

Actress Ashley Judd: ‘Trump Supporters Are Hurting My Career, If This Continues I’m Gonna Move From This Awful Country.The Reason behind this that she attacks Trump many time read below.

American actress Ashley Judd has launched a vicious attack on Donald Trump while addressing massed crowds protesting against the new US president.The Kiss The Girls star compared the Republican to Hitler and made sarcastic reference to his widely-mocked debate remarks saying: “I am a nasty woman.”

Judd then launched into a biting speech against Trump and his supporters adding: “I am not as nasty as a man who looks like he bathes in Cheetos dust.”

The 48-year-old Californian was speaking in front of thousands of protesters in Washington DC who turned out to stand up for gender equality, healthcare for women and other issues thought to be threatened under Trump’s presidency.

The Women’s March is thought to have seen about double the turnout of Friday’s inauguration ceremony with similar protests happening in cities around the world including London and even Antarctica.

Comparing Trump to Hitler, she referred to the president’s cabinet picks as “Nazis renamed” and continued: “I am not as nasty as a Confederate flag being tattooed across my city.

She added: “I am nasty like my bloodstains on my bed sheets.

Judd then addressed the contentious issue of the taxation of female hygiene products which has stirred debate across the world.

She said: “We do not actually choose if and when we had our periods. We do not like throwing away our favorite pairs of underpants.

“Why are pads and tampons still taxed when Viagra and Rogaine are not? Is your erection really more than protecting the parts of my womanhood?

“I am a nasty woman,” actress and activist Ashley Judd declared at the Women’s March on Washington Saturday, before delivering a biting poem about President Donald Trump, his Cabinet, and his supporters.

“I am not as nasty as a man who looks like he bathes in Cheetos dust,” she said, jabbing at Trump’s looks.
Judd, reciting a poem by 19-year-old Nina Donovan, spoke to a crowd estimated at a half a million people who have descended on the nation’s capital to protest Trump on his first full day as president. The Women’s March has seen about double the turnout of Trump’s inauguration ceremony, and similar protests have been organized in cities around the country and the world (even Antarctica).

“I am not as nasty as a Confederate flag being tattooed across my city. … I am not as nasty as a swastika painted on a pride flag,” Judd said, referencing the white nationalist groups that endorsed Trump’s presidency.Judd, a self-proclaimed “loud, vulgar, proud woman,” went to the extreme of comparing Trump to Hitler and referring to his Cabinet picks as “Nazis renamed,” before highlighting the wage inequality between men and women and the luxury taxes imposed on feminine hygiene products.

“I am nasty like my bloodstains on my bed sheets,” Judd said. “We do not actually choose if and when we had our periods. We do not like throwing away our favorite pairs of underpants. Why are pads and tampons still taxed when Viagra and Rogaine are not? Is your erection really more than protecting the parts of my womanhood? Is the bloodstain on my jeans more embarrassing than the thinning of your hair?”

“I am nasty like Susan, Elizabeth, Eleanor, Amelia, Rosa, Gloria, Condoleezza, Sonia, Malala, Michelle, Hillary!” she concluded. “And our pussies ain’t for grabbing.”

@AshleyJudd
Do You beleive that this nasty woman should be Depotted from our country. give your answer in comments below.

SOURCE: usaupdateddailynews,togetherwesupporttrump.info

Look What This Government Just Voted To Give Black People For Free Now America!

Today’s news made me think I was reading about a leftover campaign from Bernie Sanders.

The cry of ‘free tuition’ and ‘free education’ was pretty common, if you recall, in the Sanders presidential campaign.

Conservatives didn’t have the time to sit down with every Sanders supporter and explain to them, in painstaking detail, exactly how the Free Market actually works, and why the idea of free tuition would go exactly nowhere, except a giant recession for the good old US of A.

In short, nothing is free, and giving it away free usually hurts the people getting something free.

So it’s no surprise that today’s news – giving black Americans free tuition – is probably going to hurt America in the long run. It’s ironic, and too bad, that the reason for the free tuition is ‘reparations for slavery.’

Good going, liberals. You tried to make something better, but you actually made it worse.

Campus reform reports:

The Western Kentucky University student government voted Tuesday in favor of reparations for black students in the form of free tuition.

The resolution, which passed by a vote of 19-10-0, recommends that the university acknowledge slavery as a “debt that will never be paid” and offer free tuition to black students.

In addition, the resolution asks that a special task force be created to look into test-optional admissions and admissions weighting based on geographical location, which in theory would make it easier for black students to apply and be accepted to WKU.

Now, let’s be clear – Western Kentucky University student government is addressing the evils of slavery. That’s a good thing. So, score one for them.

But they’re trying to fix slavery’s aftereffects by – wait for it – stealing from other people. After all, if black Americans don’t pay tuition, someone else is going to have to take up the cost. Which means tuition for other students gets higher.

(Because – and to take it back to Sanders supporters – that’s just how economics works, people.)

There’s so many problems with this, in fact, that I don’t know where to start. I could mention that making something ‘free’ usually makes it worth less in the minds of people getting it.

Which makes sense – if I have to pay for something, I value it more. If I get it free, I take it for granted.

But the big problem here? Slavery is wrong because it’s theft – you’re taking the life and breath of another human being, against his will.

So fixing that problem by taking money and time from others isn’t so much fixing the problem as it is just making new problems.

Which, I suppose, is a good model for dealing with liberals – ‘we make old problems new again.’

Source: YesImRight,myrightamerica.com