Mueller Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open Look What Crime He buried For Obama

Robert Mueller, who is the special counsel in charge of the Russia investigation.

Oversaw the FBI when the agency allegedly hid evidence it had collected that showed that Russian officials were engaged in a bribery scheme aimed at growing their atomic energy business inside the United States.

The details were outlined in a report on Tuesday which showed that the evidence was withheld even from lawmakers as they questioned the Obama administration’s approval of the sale of Uranium One to Russia’s Rosatom, which led to Russia controlling 20% of U.S. uranium.

Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill that he was never made aware of anything regarding “Russian nuclear corruption,” though many of his fellow lawmakers were concerned about the deal, which was also approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them,” Rogers said. “The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking.”

According to The Hill, there are strong ties between the high-level officials who were involved in the allegedly undisclosed investigation on the Russian bribery scheme and the current investigation into whether Trump campaign officials “colluded” with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign:

The investigation was ultimately supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, an Obama appointee who now serves as President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, now the deputy FBI director under Trump, Justice Department documents show.

Both men now play a key role in the current investigation into possible, but still unproven, collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election cycle. McCabe is under congressional and Justice Department inspector general investigation in connection with money his wife’s Virginia state Senate campaign accepted in 2015 from now-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe at a time when McAuliffe was reportedly under investigation by the FBI.

The connections to the current Russia case are many. The Mikerin probe began in 2009 when Robert Mueller, now the special counsel in charge of the Trump case, was still FBI director. And it ended in late 2015 under the direction of then-FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired earlier this year.

Mueller has come under fire after it was revealed that the attorneys on his staff made previous political donations to the Democratic Party, including to presidential candidate Hillary Clinton while making none to then-candidate Donald Trump.

According to Conservative Forever

The liberals told fake lies about Donald Trump being connected to this corruption.

But guess who’s behind it? The one and only Barack Obama.

Apparently, Obama’s administration was approving a deal to give Russian companies stack in U.S. uranium, and the same Russian individuals were engaged in all sorts of nefarious behavior.

According to our source, Patriot Journal, the FBI was covering it up all the time to hide the truth from the world. And the responsible for the cover up is the guy leading the Russian investigate today. This looks pretty bad for everyone involved in it, Obama, Clinton, Mueller. They are in a big pot of corruption stew.

“Robert Mueller, who is the special counsel in charge of the Russia investigation, oversaw the FBI when the agency allegedly hid evidence it had collected that showed that Russian officials were engaged in a bribery scheme aimed at growing their atomic energy business inside the United States.

The details were outlined in a report on Tuesday which showed that the evidence was withheld even from lawmakers as they questioned the Obama administration’s approval of the sale of Uranium One to Russia’s Rosatom, which led to Russia controlling 20% of U.S. uranium.

Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill that he was never made aware of anything regarding “Russian nuclear corruption,” though many of his fellow lawmakers were concerned about the deal, which was also approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department…

“The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking,” the Daily Wire reported.

Source:ectionviral.net

Texas Sheriff Shares His Perfect Nationwide Plan For How To Deal With Liberals And Their Sanctuary Cities

The debate over sanctuary cities is one of the many discussions in today’s day and age that quickly devolves into a shouting match filled with name-calling and baseless accusations.

Unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority of the name-calling emanates from the Left.

When presented with simple questions by someone that doesn’t feel that sanctuary policies are a good idea at all, the knee jerk liberal reaction is to portray the questioner as if he or she is some sort of abominable human being.

Absent in the barrage of insults is an answer to the actual question that has been posed.

If one feels so strongly about something, why is it so hard to craft an eloquent response that clearly outlines their position?

That remains unclear, and the conversation will never advance until those that can’t have discussions like grown-ups come to terms with that.

Here’s some food for thought for the safe space crowd to mull over while they are memorizing the daily liberal talking points.

Texas sanctuary city crackdown should go nationwide

Mad World News passes along a well-thought argument against sanctuary policies from someone that deals with them on a firsthand basis.

A Texas sheriff has grown tired of open borders advocates who lobby for sanctuary cities where criminal illegals are welcomed with open arms, and he is speaking out.

Jackson County Sheriff Andy Louderback — who is a four-term sheriff, former Sheriffs Association of Texas president, and current legislative director living in Jackson County — has six words for illegal alien-loving liberals and their sanctuary cities.

In a new op-ed for The Hill, Texas Sheriff Andy Louderback outlines the many reasons which sanctuary cities are a terrible idea, for both American citizens, legal immigrants, and those who invade our borders illegally. According to Fox News, the sheriff wants Texas’ “sanctuary city crackdown to go nationwide.”

Rather than following the lead of the Left by dropping a fistful of insults, Louderback rifles through a number of different points that bolster his argument.

“Sanctuary policies create a neon welcome sign for illegal aliens,” he writes.

“But laws like Texas’ anti-sanctuary city law S.B. 4 turn that light off. This law should be a model for other jurisdictions across the country when it comes to cracking down on sanctuary policies and boosting the relationships between state, local and federal law enforcement officials,” he adds.

“As an elected Texas sheriff who works along one of the biggest human trafficking corridors in the country — U.S. 59 — having a working relationship with immigration officials is essential to tackle this massive problem,” continues Louderback.

“If more municipalities were held accountable for the actions of criminal aliens after they’re released from police custody with an active ICE detainer request, you would see far fewer jurisdictions with sanctuary policies,” write Louderback.

“As a law enforcement official, I feel personally responsible for the lives of everyone in my county, and Texas’ new sanctuary cities law gives me the tools I need to do my job,” the sheriff boldly declares.

Louderback is clearly not a fan of sanctuary cities, and it certainly doesn’t sound like there’s anything that would change his mind. He thinks they need to go, and he hopes to see a nationwide crackdown.

However, there’s a rather big difference between how he’s digging his feet into the ground and the way that many sanctuary city advocates tend to carry themselves.

He states his case, backs it up with facts, and provides some serious food for thought for those that may not agree with him along the way.

It’s really not all that hard to do, especially when the thing you are arguing for actually makes sense.

If you can’t make that happen with the things you’re so passionate about, then there’s a good chance that those things don’t make a ton of sense.

Source: Mad World News,myrightamerica.com